Preview

Transparency Is Key Aspect of Corporate Governance

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1320 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Transparency Is Key Aspect of Corporate Governance
The boards of directors are responsible for the governance of their companies so there has to be transparency in company reporting. Transparency is key aspect of corporate governance because of implementing corporate governance this will allow stakeholders and shareholders to review and evaluate performance of management and the company this ensures that the board of directors and the executive directors of corporations act in the best interest of shareholders and the corporations. It is implemented like a form of company law it is put in place so shareholders are protected and also so that the company is run up to standards is making profits and it is a way shareholders and potential investors know they can trust the management. This is also how to overcome conflict of interest between them and how they make sure everyone is doing what they are supposed to because they have to show in their company reports what they have been doing.
Agency theory explains the conflict of interests between the shareholders and managers (Jensen & Meckling, 1976).Agency theory can be traced back to Adam Smith (1937) who identified an agency problem (managerial carelessness and wealth). The separation of ownership and control has also been one of the most discussed issues in corporate governance as it is restricted to the relationship between shareholders and the company in addition it is seen as the traditional view of corporate governance, and this is the main aspect of agency theory, as summarised in the Cadbury report (1992). The main issue of aligning mangers interests with those of their shareholders. The shareholders are the owners of the company, and the firm has a binding fiduciary duty to put their needs first, to increase value for them and maximise shareholder wealth the aim of the firm is to maximise shareholder return.
The managers and shareholders have to align their interest so that the manager s can make the best decision and in the best interests of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Fin 331 Study Guide

    • 5260 Words
    • 22 Pages

    * Managers are naturally inclined to act in their own best interests (which are not always the same as the interest of stockholders).…

    • 5260 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    CORRECT A way of aligning management goals to shareholder’s interest is to tie managerial compensation to the market value of the firm’s stock.…

    • 892 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Fin370 R8 Definitions

    • 265 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A firm’s common stockholders, the owners of the firm, are the principals in the relationship, and the managers act as “agents” to these owners. If the managers have little or no ownership in the firm, they have less incentive to work energetically for the company’s shareholders and may instead choose to enrich themselves with perks and other financial benefits.…

    • 265 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    BUS650 Week 1

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages

    According to Gitman, the goal of the firm, and therefore of all managers and employees, is to maximize the wealth of the owners for whom it is being operated (2009). The financial manager is responsible for acquiring sources of financing and allocate amongst competitive investment alternatives. The ultimate goal is to invest in projects yielding higher returns than amount of financing used to invest, so profits can be used satisfy claims and increase shareholder wealth. The issues facing financial managers are therefore to 1) increase sources of financing from investors and 2) increase shareholder wealth while maintaining a balance of short term and long term profit.…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    505 Quiz 1

    • 852 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Management’s primary goal is to the shareholder’s wealth maximization, which translates into maximizing the value of the company as measured by the price of the company’s common stock. This goal can be achieved by giving the shareholders a “fair” payment on their investments.…

    • 852 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    fin 370 wk 1

    • 820 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Refers to the problem companies face in motivating their managers who act as agents in pursuing the interests of the owners (shareholders).…

    • 820 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The primary goal of a publicly-owned firm interested in serving its stockholders should be to…

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Critical Essay

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Corporate managers work for the owners of the corporation. Consequently, they should make decisions that are in the interests of the owners, rather than their own. What strategies are available to shareholders to help ensure that managers are motivated to act this way?…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    keeping control of the company, so they should not give away too many of their shares in order…

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Chapter 10

    • 6051 Words
    • 25 Pages

    * Overriding this is the goal of the firm’s owners (shareholders) and their elected representatives (board of directors) to ensure that the firm’s executives (management team) strive to fulfill their fiduciary duty and maximize the firm’s long- term value. .…

    • 6051 Words
    • 25 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Intro to Business

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Historically, the goal for them has been to maximize the value of the firm to its owners. But today’s businesses have adopted a broader perspective, believing that they have responsibilities not just to stockholders but also to customers, employees, and other stakeholders. Treating these other stakeholders well often builds value, which benefits stockholders, but other stakeholder groups also sometimes have goals that conflict with those of stockholders.…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    he stakeholder theorists smell blood. Scandals at Enron, Global Crossing, ImClone, Tyco International and WorldCom, concerns about the independence of accountants who are charged with auditing financial statements, and questions about the incentive schema and investor recommendations at Credit Suisse First Boston and iMerrill Lynch have all provided rich fodder for those who question the premise of shareholder supremacy. Many observers have claimed that these scandals serve as evidence of the failure of the shareholder theory— that managers primarily have a duty to maximize shareholder returns — and the victory of stakeholder theory, which says that a manager 's duty is to balance the shareholders ' financial interests against the interests of other stakeholders such as employees, customers and the local community, even if it reduces shareholder returns. Before attempting to declare a victor, however, it is helpful to consider what the two theories actually say and what they do not say. Both the shareholder ' and stakeholder theories are normative theories of corporate social responsibility, dictating what a corporation 's role ought to be. By extension, they can also be seen as normative theories of business ethics, since executives and managers of a corporation should make decisions according to the "right" theory. Unfortunately, the two theories are very much at odds regarding what is "right." Shareholder theory asserts that shareholders advance capital to a company 's managers, who are supposed to spend corporate limds only in ways that have been authorized by the shareholders. As Milton Friedman wrote, "There is one and only one social responsibility of business — to use its resources and engage in activities designed to increase its profits so long as it ... engages in open and free competition, without deception or fraud."On the other hand, stakeholder theory^ asserts that managers have a duty to both the…

    • 4849 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Global Employment Laws

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A basic assumption of classic microeconomic theory is that the overriding goal of any business is to be profitable. As trustees (fiduciaries) of the shareholders, managers have a primary responsibility to try to improve the value of shareholder investment. In fact, under the law of corporations, managers are answerable to the owners of a company-its stockholders-if they fail to take reasonable care in running it.…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stockholder vs. Stakeholder

    • 2260 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The stockholder theory, which is also known as “Friedman Doctrine” and is a model most often associated with the Noble Prize winning economic theorist Milton Friedman, defines a manager as an agent for the stockholders (Bowie and Werhane, 2005, p 21). A “stockholder” is a person, who has a monetary investment in a business or company. Many business schools follow the orthodox view that according to the stockholder theory, the unique purpose of the manager is to increase the profits of the company. Consequently, a manager should try to maximize the wealth of the shareholders. Milton Friedman summarizes the theory by saying that…

    • 2260 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    stakeholder chart

    • 384 Words
    • 2 Pages

    To make sure that the company invests the funds correctly to give profits to the shareholders and for expansion.…

    • 384 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays