tourism
ARTICLE IN PRESS
Tourism Management 27 (2006) 1373–1385 www.elsevier.com/locate/tourman The role of community involvement and number/type of visitors on tourism impacts: A controlled comparison of Annapurna, Nepal and Northwest Yunnan, China$
Gyan P. Nyaupanea,Ã, Duarte B. Moraisb, Lorraine Dowlerc a Tourism Development and Management, School of Community Resources and Development, Arizona State University,
P.O. Box 874703, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA b Recreation, Park, and Tourism Management, The Pennsylvania State University, 228 Mateer, University Park, PA 16802-1307, USA c Department of Geography, The Pennsylvania State University, 302 Walker, University Park, PA 16802-1307, USA
Received 9 March 2005; accepted 30 November 2005
Abstract
Tourism development in mountain regions is reported to bring economic growth to host communities. However, the literature reveals that the economic, environmental and cultural impacts of tourism development in these regions vary greatly and that a number of critical factors may explain that variability. Therefore, the purpose of this paper was to explore the role of community involvement and number/ type of visitors on tourism impacts in mountain destinations. The study followed a controlled comparison method [Eggan, F. (1954).
Social anthropology and the method of controlled comparison. American Anthropologist, 56(5), 743–763] including field observations and individual and group interviews in two popular mountain destinations in Asia: Annapurna, Nepal, and Northwest Yunnan, China.
The findings suggested that level of host involvement in management and number/type of tourists helped explain these destinations’ varying degrees of economic leakage, local control, and socio-economic inequity. Moreover, both destinations appeared to cope with their challenges through cooperative community efforts supported by non-governmental agencies. r 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Community
Tourism Management 27 (2006) 1373–1385 www.elsevier.com/locate/tourman The role of community involvement and number/type of visitors on tourism impacts: A controlled comparison of Annapurna, Nepal and Northwest Yunnan, China$
Gyan P. Nyaupanea,Ã, Duarte B. Moraisb, Lorraine Dowlerc a Tourism Development and Management, School of Community Resources and Development, Arizona State University,
P.O. Box 874703, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA b Recreation, Park, and Tourism Management, The Pennsylvania State University, 228 Mateer, University Park, PA 16802-1307, USA c Department of Geography, The Pennsylvania State University, 302 Walker, University Park, PA 16802-1307, USA
Received 9 March 2005; accepted 30 November 2005
Abstract
Tourism development in mountain regions is reported to bring economic growth to host communities. However, the literature reveals that the economic, environmental and cultural impacts of tourism development in these regions vary greatly and that a number of critical factors may explain that variability. Therefore, the purpose of this paper was to explore the role of community involvement and number/ type of visitors on tourism impacts in mountain destinations. The study followed a controlled comparison method [Eggan, F. (1954).
Social anthropology and the method of controlled comparison. American Anthropologist, 56(5), 743–763] including field observations and individual and group interviews in two popular mountain destinations in Asia: Annapurna, Nepal, and Northwest Yunnan, China.
The findings suggested that level of host involvement in management and number/type of tourists helped explain these destinations’ varying degrees of economic leakage, local control, and socio-economic inequity. Moreover, both destinations appeared to cope with their challenges through cooperative community efforts supported by non-governmental agencies. r 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Community
References: Annapurna Conservation Area Project. (2001). Progress report of the Annapurna Conservation Area Project 2000–2001 Archer, B., & Cooper, C. (1994). The positive and negative impacts of tourism Babbie, H. (2004). The practice of social research (10th ed.). New York: Wadsworth Publishing Company. Bailey, M. (2000). Country reports China. Travel and Tourism Intelligence, 3, 25–47. Baum, T. (1999). Themes and issues in comparative destination research: The use of lesson-drawing in comparative tourism research in the Bernard, H. R., & Ryan, G. W. (1998). Text analysis: Qualitative and quantitative methods Briassoulis, H., & Van der Straaten, J. (Eds.). (1992). Tourism and the environment: Regional, economic and policy issues Briedenhann, J., & Wickens, E. (2004). Tourism routes as a tool for the economic development of rural areas—vibrant hope or impossible Butler, R. W. (1989). Alternative tourism: Pious hope or Trojan horse? World Leisure and Recreation, 31(4), 9–17. Butler, R. W. (1991). Tourism, environment, and sustainable development. Environmental Conservation, 18(3), 201–209. Caffyn, A., & Lutz, J. (1999). Developing the heritage tourism product in multi-ethnic cities Campbell, L. M. (1999). Ecotourism in rural developing communities. Chee-Beng, T. (2001). Tourism and the anthropology in China. In T Cochrane, J. (2000). The role of the community in relation to the tourism industry: A case study from Mount Bromo, East Java, Indonesia Cohen, E. (1972). Towards a sociology of international tourism. Social Research, 39, 164–182. Cohen, E. (2001). Ethnic tourism in Southeast Asia. In T. Beng-Chee, S. Davis, J. S., & Morais, D. B. (2004). Factions and enclaves: Small towns and socially unsustainable tourism development Dewalt, K. M., Dewalt, B. R., & Wayland, C. B. (1998). Participant observation Foucat, V. S. (2002). Community-based ecotourism management moving towards sustainability, in Ventailla, Oxaca, Mexico Garrod, B. (2003). Local participation in the planning and management of ecotourism: A revised model approach Gartner, W. C. (1996). Tourism development: Principles, processes, and policies Gee, C. Y., & Fayos-Sola, E. (1997). International tourism: A global perspective Godde, P. M., Price, M. F., & Zimmermann, F. M. (2000). Tourism and development in mountain regions: Moving forward into the new Graburn, N. H. H. (1983). Tourism and prostitution. Annals of Tourism research, 10(3), 437–442. Gunn, C. A. (1988). Tourism planning (2nd ed.). New York: Taylor & Francis. Gurung, C. P., & De Coursey, M. D. (1994). The Annapurna conservation area project: A pioneering example of sustainable tourism? In E Hooks, G. (1990). The rise of the Pentagon and US state building: The defense program as industrial policy Ives, B., & Messerli, B. (1989). The Himalayan dilemma: Reconciling development and conservation Kang, Y. (1999). Lu gu hu sheng tai lv you yan jiu [Study on Lugu Lake’s Ecotourism] Kemper, R. V. (1979). Tourism in Taos and Patzucuaro: A comparison of two approaches to regional development Khan, M. M. (1997). Tourism development and dependency theory: Mass tourism vs King Mahendra Trust for Nature Conservation (KMTNC). (1995). King Mahendra Trust for Nature Conservation (KMTNC). (1996). Lama, W. B. (2000). Community-based tourism for conservation and women’s development