Preview

Tort Reform: The Destruction of the Civil Court System

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1457 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Tort Reform: The Destruction of the Civil Court System
Tort Reform: The Destruction of the Civil Court System “If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it”. This informal maxim can be applied to countless situations, from car maintenance to business practices. It can also be applied to the idea of tort reform and its effect on the civil court system in the United States. ‘Tort reform’ commonly refers to “proposed changes to common law civil justice systems that would place limits or caps on tort litigation or damages to be awarded to a plaintiff” (“Tort Reform Law”). It is thought by many that tort reform prevents “frivolous lawsuits” and lowers medical care costs for the general public. However, the evidence proves these ideas false. As tort reform has been shown to do very little, if anything, to help the American people, other methods such as repealing tort reform laws in their entirety should be attempted. Tort reform began in the 1980s as a political and corporate undertaking against large settlements reached in personal injury lawsuits. According to John T. Nockelby, director of the civil law program at Loyola Law School, the movement sought “to transform the cultural understanding of litigation by attempting to persuade the public through advertising that the civil justice system is constricting the economy and contributing to astronomical insurance premiums.” The idea of tort reform originated from large corporations “seeking to minimize losses against them” (Nockelby). The problem of tort reform lies inherently in its origination: if companies successfully curtail their abilities to be sued for large amounts of money, even if a large award to a plaintiff is warranted, the civil court system loses its power to bring justice to the average citizen. One of the central ideas of the pro-tort reform argument is that “frivolous lawsuits” are draining the United States legal system of precious time and money. This, however, is simply not the case. “The frivolous lawsuit is a myth,” states Susan Saladoff, a former

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Texas is the forefront of the tort reform movement in the United States. Supporters of tort reform believe that huge jury awards are not only excessive to the injury sustained by the plaintiff but also a void on the state's economy and is damaging to certain professions. Opponents argue that tort reform is not only legislative tampering with the judicial system but favors these powerful professions and business interest groups who seek to be protected from punishment for practices and products that cause harm to citizens. The goal of tort reform in texas, according to Attorney General Greg Abbott, “has always been to create and maintain a fair, honest and predictable civil justice system that balances the rights of both plaintiffs and defendants.” Tort reform is said to be good for Texas, and over the past years lawsuit improvements have changed our state in becoming the nation's representation for civil justice…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Many tort cases are frivolous, with some entering the realm of being totally ridiculous. The lawyers are not the only ones thinking of lawsuits as another way to get rich. The common American citizen brings lawsuits as a way of playing against the odds and will have a real chance to win.…

    • 1609 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Advanced Directives

    • 3334 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Miller, Robert D., Hutton, Rebecca C. Problems in Health Care Law (8th Ed.). (2000). Gaithersburg: An Aspen Publication.…

    • 3334 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Health Care Event

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Through the many events that have taken place in the health care industry one that comes to mind is how excessive litigation affecting health care today. Litigation has become so broad that it has become a specialized department in the law industry. When one watches television, listens to the radio, browses the Internet, or looks at other media outlets he or she is bound to come across some advertisements for litigations against health care facilities and professionals at frequent intervals. It is not unexpected to see or hear several of them throughout the day. Law firms have even become specialized in health care related cases and focus on specific conditions caused by some sort of illness, medication, or even procedure. The result of this is that health care facilities close due to the financial burden of payments resulting from litigations, in the long run the amount paid for malpractice insurance rises, insurance premiums rise, and costs of health care increases because of the additional procedures ordered to try to prevent litigation (Satiani, 2004). The practice of defensive medicine is estimated to cost two and a half times average coverage cost and the estimated savings in tort reform is passed in 50 billion dollars…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Doctors and insurance companies believe that MICRA’s cap should not be changed because it would make healthcare more expensive. They argue that for thirty-eight years MICRA has increased the availability of healthcare while providing enough compensation to injured patients. They believe increasing the cap on economic damages will impact physician medical liability rates, lead to higher costs of healthcare, and reduce access for patients. Overall, MICRA benefits the patients because healthcare costs are kept lower.…

    • 1433 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Essay On Tort Reform

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages

    It is all about personal viewpoints. All it takes is one misunderstood detail to blow a case out of proportion. Reporters use facts from cases that can be interpreted in many different ways. These humorous and minute details are used to get publicity and are tarnishing the reputation of civil lawsuits. Lawsuits are very beneficial for the relationship between consumers and companies. It lets the companies know what consumers do and do not want from their company. There is a definite need for the tort reform, but no need to get rid of civil lawsuits all together. Putting caps on rewards should be enough. Getting rid of civil lawsuits would only anger the public. Every citizen has the right to speak his or her mind, even if it may seem petty. Being able to speak their mind is important to most people in society these days. If people received less in punitive damages, but were at least able to continue to file lawsuits, then there should not be that big of an issue. With having the tort reform, a large amount of money could be saved. There are a ton of other strategies to help the justice system save money. Taking out civil lawsuit could save money, but would hurt the economy in many other ways. Limiting lawsuits is not the answer to saving the economy…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Legal fame may arise from great accomplishments, while other names become known for the issues for which they stand upon, like Rosa Parks, Roe and Miranda. For my first paper, the event that I felt influenced and changed the foundation and helped structure the American Legal History was the famous 1928 civil case Palsgraf V. Long Island Railroad Co. (248 N.Y. 339; 162 N.E. 99; Courts of Appeals New York (1928) The unique facts of the case created a need for a new application of the generally accepted theory that “negligence is the absence of care, according to the circumstances of the case”. (Benjamin Cardozo, 1928 N.Y. Lexis 1269; 59 A.L.R 1253). The famous accident occurred at the Queen’s Jamaica Station on the morning of Aug. 24, 1924. According to New York Times, 1924 Helen Palsgraf was standing on the platform waiting for a train just like the other passengers were, another passenger was running to catch a train that was departing. As the man jumped to catch the train, employees’ from the LIRR were trying to help him, when the package he was carrying fell to the rails. As a result of helping the man, the package exploded causing scales to fall on and injure passengers waiting for their train. The package which contained fireworks caused an explosion in which Mrs. Palsgraf and many others were injured, she later then sued the Long Island Railroad and won. The key point of the case that I felt changed the American Legal history was the opinions and different out looks each judge had toward the case. Later on these out looks would change history and the history of Tort Law. Judge Cardozo set a theory of duty and proximate causation that became the law of the state of New York, then eventually the law of the country. He wrote that the railroad was not liable, because the injury was unforeseeable.…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In my opinion, Tort reform will benefit both the patients and the medical practitioners, but it is more favorable for clinicians and health providers. It will benefit the patients because of its promised to reduced health care cost and better health care access. Tort reform has the potential to attract more physicians to continue their practice. According to the report, through tort reform, patients have greater access to specialists in high-risk fields of medicine, and more emergency room doctors are willing to be on call because their fears of lawsuits have been reduced (Roser, 2012). In the article title “Tort Reform Is Associated with Significant Increases in Texas Physicians Relative to the Texas Population”, states that after Texas Implemented…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Project for IS3350

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Applicability of American Legal System in the litigation process involving corporate, public, and private institutions…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Crime and Process Model

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “In Barker v. Wingo, the Court stressed the legitimate reasons for the 16 trial continuances. But is there a danger that prosecutors might illegitimately seek continuances?”…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Tort Reform

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Though many tort reform advocate groups exist, the most prevalent and well publicized advocate group that has arisen is the American Tort Reform Association (ATRA). These advocates have presented numerous reasons and facts as to why tort reform needs to take place in our legal system. Their first argument stems from the costs of tort law. They explain that the legal system has been burdened with too many frivolous law suits and that the system has therefore become expensive. They presented that the U.S. tort system in 2003 incurred $246 billion dollars in costs, which results to $3,380 per a family of four. They take this argument one step further by stating that the growth in these tort costs has consistently exceeded the gross domestic product in the last 50 years by 2-3 percent (ATRA).…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A common misconception by the supporters of the 2003 Medical Malpractice Tort Reform Act was that medical malpractice litigation was responsible for increasing healthcare costs and limited access to care. In retrospect, tort reform did have a number of demonstrable effects. The effect on health care administrators, patients and lawyers, and the current and future economic impact greatly outweigh the benefits of tort reform.…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Frivolous Lawsuits

    • 2390 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Cited: "Defending and expanding Tort Laws: The Civil Justice System." Foundation for Taxpayers & Consumer Rights. March, 2003.…

    • 2390 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tort Reform in the Us

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Tort reform in the United States has been a long standing debate to change the tort law system. The debate has arisen due to what is seen as overvalued remuneration for damages. The tort reform movement seeks to limit the amount one may recover for damages done towards them. The goal of this tort reform is to avoid the frequent meaningless lawsuits that the United States courts have to hear each year. According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS), in 1985 there were 166,430 tort cases filled across 15 states. By 1996 this figure had risen 32% to an all time high of 243,574 cases filled. In the following years after 1996 the number…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pro Tort Reform

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Tort reform refers to the proposed changes in the common law civil justice systems that would reduce tort litigation and/or damages. Tort liability imposes significant cost on society. In 1991, US has spent a total of $131.6 billion on tort litigation, which is approximately 2.3% of the gross domestic product (GDP)1 Studies have shown that the citizens pay a tort tax of $1200 per individual or nearly $5000 for a family of four. 2 Today, tort reform is a contentious political issue and its advocates propose procedural limits on the ability to file claims and capping awards of damages.…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics