Tocqueville Anarchy And Despotism
According to Tocqueville, the primary danger and potential consequence of individualism is that citizens become apathetic. When individualism deteriorates into “general apathy,” Tocqueville claims that “anarchy and despotism” will follow (Tocqueville 704). In these two possible dystopian democracies, either tyranny of the majority or tyranny of the executive power reigns. Both the executive and the majority are “in a position to oppress” when apathy conquers the populace (Tocqueville 704). Furthermore, anarchy and despotism seem to combine in this dystopian democracy, also as a consequence of general apathy. When citizens lose interest in social or political causes and confine themselves to their own little societies, despotic executives and
…show more content…
In aristocracies, an individual represented more than just himself. As shown with Richard’s deposition, a change in a man’s reputation and status also affected the reputation and status of his children, grandchildren, and even great-grandchildren. Therefore, each individual had a purpose that existed outside of his life’s length, and his actions held consequences for people other than just him. As the aristocratic family disappeared in democratic centuries, a man began to represent only himself, and the equality of conditions left his life with little obvious or practical purpose outside of his lifetime. His family name imposed no duties upon him, separating him from his great-grandchildren. Therefore, an individual may lose a sense of purpose upon failure that is difficult to fight back against, because he does not imagine or care for his descendants or feel responsible for his family’s reputation. However, through voluntary association in groups like Narcotics Anonymous, many individuals become sponsors for other, newer members. Through such a program, a person becomes responsible for someone other than himself and his impact can extend beyond his own lifetime to affect other
In aristocracies, an individual represented more than just himself. As shown with Richard’s deposition, a change in a man’s reputation and status also affected the reputation and status of his children, grandchildren, and even great-grandchildren. Therefore, each individual had a purpose that existed outside of his life’s length, and his actions held consequences for people other than just him. As the aristocratic family disappeared in democratic centuries, a man began to represent only himself, and the equality of conditions left his life with little obvious or practical purpose outside of his lifetime. His family name imposed no duties upon him, separating him from his great-grandchildren. Therefore, an individual may lose a sense of purpose upon failure that is difficult to fight back against, because he does not imagine or care for his descendants or feel responsible for his family’s reputation. However, through voluntary association in groups like Narcotics Anonymous, many individuals become sponsors for other, newer members. Through such a program, a person becomes responsible for someone other than himself and his impact can extend beyond his own lifetime to affect other