Preview

To What Extent Should Governments Have The Right To Check Citizens Communications Without Their Consent

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
524 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
To What Extent Should Governments Have The Right To Check Citizens Communications Without Their Consent
Should governments have the right to check their citizens’ communications without their consent?

Have you ever wondered if the government could see everything that you do online? Unfortunately, this is the case. The government can access your online Facebook profile, your messages and your web history; all without your consent. However, the government may do this for good reasons.

One reason why the government does this is to monitor suspicious activity. This may benefit us. As terrorism exists in this world, it is important for our safety to monitor their activities online in order for the government to prevent future attacks. It’s not just terrorism; most crimes are done on the web. Hacker groups, such as Anonymous, live to cause distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks on computers and gaming consoles.
…show more content…
Citizens could fall into the trap of phishing: the fraudulent practice of sending emails directing them to legitimate-looking websites which can steal credit card numbers or personal information. This can greatly affect their lives, so it is important that the government monitors this in order to take action. There is also the issue of spyware: another security risk which can monitor citizens’ keystrokes. This is another method of getting information such as passwords, but without the user knowing that this is happening.

Although this may be for our safety, our privacy is sacrificed. The government gathers phone call logs and internet data from your phones, tablets and computers. Most people feel like they have a right to privacy; which is true. Everyone has things which they would like to keep only for themselves. However, everyone has said at least one bad thing on the internet; something which could be used against them. On the other hand, governments will not be interested in the swear words on your Facebook wall – they care more about what affects your

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    citizens, and the government would have too much capability to go behind our backs, unnecessarily, and spy on us. The Federal Bureau of Investigation has freely admitted that it has not launched or found any extensive cases through the Patriot Act’s privileges. (Ybarra, n.d.) The question is, though, if they can not find any cases of terrorism, smuggling, or organized crimes what are they doing? The Government is spying on us through every piece of technology that we own. They can find us within the blink of an eye through our cell phones, computers, and bluetooth devices. They can hack into any of our Facebook accounts, emails, internet search browsers. They can view a person through their phone or computer's camera without them even knowing. The government can also turn on your microphones through the same devices and listen to you and what you are doing at any moment. The National Security Agency has put its codes into Android's operating systems, hacking into three quarters of the world's smartphones. (Tyler Durden, July 9th,…

    • 3008 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    If someone told you “You are being watched every time you use digital communications, “how would you feel? The majority of people would probably feel discomfort. Sadly, you are being watched by the National Security Agency or NSA. While they allegedly keep us safe, the NSA shouldn't continue to monitor everyone’s digital communications. It gets every tax paying citizens money involved. They violate an amendment of the constitution. Likewise, there is a major loss of privacy. They simply have access to too much information. (Pathos)…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As well as cameras watching us, the government can access our phone as well on social media. Anything that targets the Government gets a Red Flag whether it is about killing someone, bomb threat, ect. This is the same as the telescreens watching Winston’s every…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Our phone calls, computer's browsing histories, social security, and zip code numbers are accessible by the government. Cameras record us on the daily, spying on our routines. Always being monitored…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety”. A famous quote by none other than Benjamin Franklin, and although he did not live to see it, his words would be part of almost every argument considering internet surveillance. This ongoing debate is immense because many different people from all aspects of society use the internet, so everyone is affected by the outcome of the debate. There is no easy solution when it comes to the balance between security and freedom, but in the end the right thing to do is to allow people to not be monitored when surfing the internet as it is a violation of the constitution, very impractical, and morally wrong.…

    • 2088 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The government should worry citizens, by hiring people to hack into their lives. The National Security Agency, NSA, is “inside” everything from phones to major websites like Google and Yahoo. The NSA is responsible for code breaking and getting information from phones and the internet. The NSA has headquarters in the United Kingdom as well. They try to focus overseas instead of domestically to prevent any serious crime and to defend the UK’s economic interest. Because the NSA doesn’t trust its own U.S. citizens, violates the fourth amendment, and made programs to “hack” us, the NSA invades the privacy of citizens and should be stopped.…

    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    For example, if a person gets on goggle and searches how to make a bomb, the government can react to that and see what they need a bomb for. Also, wiretapping monitors questionable people. Anybody that searches anything bad or that can harm someone else,, that person will be asked about whatever they searched. This will not affect your everyday life by any means. For example, if you search something that couldn’t harm someone elso you wouldn’t get a red…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Fourth Amendment does not allow searches of personal items unless a warrant is used, but by tracking information on people it could help detect terrorism threats sooner. For example, President Obama claims that the data-collection programs “help prevent terrorism (Transcript: Obamas Remarks 4.3).” Even though people do not need a warrant to use these programs, people examine the phone numbers and length of calls, and by doing this it could ultimately protect the country from terrorism threats. Also, the U.S. Patriotism Act enables law enforcement agencies to search through “email and telephone communications, medical, financial, and library records (Legal Information Institute 1.1).” Furthermore, whenever the intelligence gathering community…

    • 188 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The concept of living in a surveillance society with no fear as long as individuals have nothing to hide sounds ideal; but even if people are not guilty of committing a crime, there are a number of reasons why loss of privacy should concern them. A significant concern is that the…

    • 1755 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The author of this article is Daniel J. Solove. He discusses the different perspectives and opinions of various people of the government’s control of viewing personal information. The article demonstrates this through examples of what people say, book references, and the opinion of the article himself. In the article, “The Nothing to Hide Argument”, Daniel J. Solove argues that the information- gathering programs the government uses to track and record information from people are problematic.(739) This still remains the case even if the information gathered from these programs was information people did not mind being uncovered. (739).…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The information that the government and the companies have taken away could be fallen into the hands of the criminals. For example, the criminals could hack into the governmental computer systems and obtain those information. Not only that the criminals could check the surveillance cameras as well, if they falsify their identity as some kind of authority. Also, the criminals can hack into the companies computers to get the information of where about of others through checking the tracking device that the companies use on their products. These tracking system that are attached to the products in the market are helpful to keep track of how much products are in stocks and help monitor to fill the stocks. But if these information is leaked then people’s locations can be known by certain criminals and might be used for some type of crime. We, as a citizen, can not trust that the government and companies are secure enough to store our information. When these criminals take such private information, they use people’s information as if it is theirs. For example, these criminals could use the card information that they might have gained from the governmental sites, that they hack into, or through looking at the surveillance cameras near ATM. Some might use such information to stock others. For instance, the stokers might gain some information through surveillance cameras and the tracking…

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Technology is a magnificent thing. A majority of people use some form of technology on a daily basis such as their telephones, computers, tablets, and even many devices on their cars. Many of these things are a necessity for a person to have daily, especially if they have to use these devices for work and/or school. Technology also helps people communicate with other people all over the world. Although, technology is a wonderful thing, how private is our information? And, when is it okay for the government to gather this information on specific citizens without their consent, even…

    • 1433 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Our technology is driving society to a world in which Big Brother is watching. There has been many technological advances made over time that can be used by the government to have power over the population. Many people are unaware of this situation they have been placed in the instant that they make a phone call, log into a computer or send an email.…

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    All the countries establish in its political constitution and in its legislation, the duty of the government to look over the life of its citizens, protecting them from the risk: the internal threats (inside the proper country) and external (outside the country) That is why, it is admitted, and it is even required, that the government possess a structure of intelligence that resists the action of dangerous forces, however lately, it has been found that in order to get information that may be useful to protect citizens , the government itself reach private information from all its citizens as well. That is why this essay aims to point out the risks this action (spying) implies for all and aims to answer thereupon,” Why government should not spy on us.”…

    • 806 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Government Spying

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Think about back in elementary school when you had pen pals from other countries. How would you feel if the government was able to intrude on your personal life just because you made contact abroad? For us in America, a government spying on its citizens sounds pretty crazy right? In 2006 president Bush did just that by enabling a “Government Phone Tap”. President Bush thought in order to preserve citizen’s freedoms that is was justified to tap into people’s phones and emails. The only people that were supposed to be the recipients of phone tapings where those who were making calls abroad, particularly to suspected al-Qaida connections. Not only is this a complete violation of peoples constitutional rights and privacy, but Bush also neglected the need for a warrant in this instance. To this day many immigrants from other countries come to America seeking asylum from oppressive governments. America is supposed to be a safe haven where people’s rights and privacy are protected under the constitution. Acts of government espionage upon its own citizens like this are completely unacceptable. I believe that the only way from a government…

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays