Preview

To What Extent Is Britain a Democracy?

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3473 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
To What Extent Is Britain a Democracy?
It can be argued that Britain is both democratic and undemocratic; this can be shown via a range of issues relating to British politics and the society in which we live.
Democracy is a form of government in which supreme power is held completely by the people under a free electoral system. It states that all citizens have equal access to power and that all people enjoy the right to universally recognised freedoms. It is also the freedom of expression, speech and other civil liberties.

The selection of Prime Minister remains undemocratic in the UK. Although society has the power to vote for a political party to govern the country in a general election, citizens cannot choose their Prime Minister.
The leader of each party is elected by MPs, and if only one candidate stands for leadership they are elected by acclamation (a simple vote without ballot – usually by voice, those for or against).
In general elections, electors vote on the party they wish to govern the country, a voter’s decision should be made on the announced policies and beliefs of the party. Many people feel that electors vote for the qualities and personality of the party leader instead of the party itself. This can change opinion polls greatly and therefore affect the final outcomes of elections.
In 2007 Labour leader and Prime Minister Tony Blair stood down as PM. Tony Blair was elected in 1997 with a landslide majority over the Conservatives. No election was called when Blair stood down, so Labour continued to govern the country and the party members elected a new leader to immediately take over. Gordon Brown was successful in the leadership contest and became Prime Minister in 2007.
In 1997 the British people chose Labour and Blair as PM to govern the country, but last year Brown was brought in by the party with no vote taken by the public. This is argued to be undemocratic as it defeats the use of the electoral system and electors did not chose Brown to be Prime Minister.

The global economy

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the UK, there is hot debate as to whether the Prime Minister is actually a President. Tony Blair’s decision to go to war in Iraq is one of biggest examples in recent history of this theory as he did it because he thought it was right. However, some still say that the Cabinet is where the true power lies.…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    (c) Is pressure group politics in the UK better described as pluralist or as elitist?…

    • 4329 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Assignment 2 2014 2015

    • 480 Words
    • 3 Pages

    M2 – Compare the electoral processes used at different levels of government in the UK.…

    • 480 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    To what extent does democracy in the UK suffer from a participation crisis? (25 marks)…

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1850 Britain was extremely far from being known as a democracy. This was due to the fact that the great reform act only extended the power of the vote from wealthy landowning men in 1832 to the wealthy middle class men. This meant that the majority of the population still were unable to vote. For a country to be democratic it entails to have certain circumstances which would include the majority of the population, every adult, having the right to vote for their country. There should also be an equal amount of seats distributed. All elections that take place should be run fairly and be restricted from intimidation and influence. Every adult should also only be entitled to one vote whereas at this time some individuals who went to university could vote in their university constituency as well as when they owned a property. It should be allowed that a person from any background is able to become an MP. By 1918 many of these circumstances had been met although not all. Although improvements had been met in Britain some aspects that would make the country fully become a democracy where not in place, therefore it can be argued that Britain was not fully a democracy by 1918.…

    • 1328 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although it’s good to have a large amount of the public excited to input their views into political matters, there is the issue that the people of the public lack specialized knowledge, and can be easily swayed by the government. This is not very democratic and therefore would not improve democracy in the UK. The 1975 EEC referendum asked a question phrased in a way that would make the people give the answer that the government wanted, and this is not a true representation of the views of the public.…

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Contrastingly, prime ministers powers are very dependable, and in many cases, the extent to a prime ministers powers depends on the size of their party's majority in government. This was portrayed by the weak prime ministerial control of Harold Wilson in 1974, when his minority Labour Party took government for all of seven months and achieved nothing. Thus, a prime ministers power is little if their party is not in a powerful…

    • 1315 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another short term factor that would have its part to play is who a political party’s leader was. In 1997 when Tony Blair was young and fresh onto the premier political scene, he seemed a much more modern candidate in comparison to John Major. This idea of voters voting because a liking of the party leader rather than voting for the representative of their constituency is another factor into the debate on whether or not British politics is becoming more presidential.…

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    |Following the election of the New Labour government into power in the UK in 1997, referendum on the devolution of power in both|…

    • 1934 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Firstly, Prime Minister is the leader of his party in the House of Commons and the head of the government. However, in fact, the Prime Minister has come to be, not legally the Head of State, the leader of the nation, irrespective of party allegiance. It means that in time of difficulty, emergency or crisis such as war or terrorist threats, the country can unite behind its head of government. Although the Head of State is held by the monarch, but it is just ceremonial. The true power lies on the Prime Minister. It can be argued that there has been a long term seeing the prime minister of the day rather than the monarch as national leader. Moreover, the undoubted growth in the important of foreign and military affairs has contributed to a presidential ‘feel’ for the office of the Prime Minister. When the Head of Government has to negotiate with foreign powers, attend international conferences, negotiate treaties, conduct wars and meet visiting dignitaries, he is bound to appear presidential. In large conference he will be seen rubbing shoulders with the president of France or USA who represent their countries on these occasions. For example: Margaret Thatcher with Ronald Reagan, Tony Blair with Bill Clinton and George Bush. All forged close links with the US president.…

    • 1285 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Despite its flaws the ‘First past the post’ electoral systems for general elections suits Great Britain”…

    • 1268 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Each political party in each state controls the first part of the process. Each state has their own process. Most parties will nominate slates of potential Electors. This is usually done at the party convention in each state. They can also be chosen by the party's central committee by vote. This process happens in each state for each party. When this first phase is completed each Presidential candidate will have his unique slate of potential Electors.…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Referendums are devices for obtaining extra legitimacy for policy proposals or for reducing internal party disputes over party alternatives. They tend to replace the normal role of parliament and are a form of direct democracy, although initiation comes from the government and not the governed. There is an indication of the growing frequency of the use of referendums as a way of legitimising policies or appealing to the public beyond divided party structures. What was seen as non-British, inconsistent with parliamentary sovereignty, has quickly established itself as a central part of the British political process. Referendums have been called as a result of political expediency when the survival of the government depends upon it calling a referendum…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Democracy Dbq

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Electoral College is a group of Electors appointed by each state considering the sum of the amount of Senators and Representatives of each state, and their main job is to vote for the President representing the votes of all the qualified voters in the state (US Const. art. II, sec 1). Notwithstanding that they were supposed to represent the people of the votes in the state, the representatives of the Electoral College from each state gave all their votes to the candidate that gets the majority of votes from a person in the state (US Const. amend. XII). There are two cases in the history of a candidate for President getting a popular vote through the states, but losing the election because of the way the Electoral College works, in 1888 and 2000 (Lapsansky-Werner et al 182). This makes the Electoral College not quite fitting the democratic ideals, but the people’s vote still matter in some way.…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Now, people who think differently might say that having opinion polls will get who the people want as PM, if they have a set date or don’t have opinion polls then they don’t know if they are liked enough to win so then its fair as a coin toss, but until then it’s as fair as a double headed coin toss.…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays