Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

To What Extent Had the World War Started Before 1939?

Good Essays
593 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
To What Extent Had the World War Started Before 1939?
Consider to what extent was the world already at war in 1939?

Before the war in 1939, there were clearly bitter and tense international relations. We also find that many powerful countries were reluctant and unable to prevent Hitler in his policies of Lebensraum and expanding Germany’s territory in Europe. Hence, we can extrapolate that the world was already at war to a large extent in 1939, whereby the invasion of Poland was merely a catalyst and consummation of the tense international relations and Hitler’s aggressive policies.

We can even argue that the Second World War was a conflict that had merely continued from the unsettled disputes of the First World War. For example, Germany was clearly bitter from their defeat from the First World War and the ruthless settlements of the Treaty of Versailles. Because of the war, Germany was also crippled financially. In short, Germany was facing a social and political instability after the war. Although the conditions had improved under Gustav Stresemann’s leadership, the conditions further exacerbated from the Great Depression in 1929. As a result, Hitler was able to rise to power, particularly from his promises to curb unemployment and anti-Communist policies. During that point of time, the anti-Communists policies were highly appealing by capitalists alike, particularly because of Stalin’s purges and the harsh living conditions created by the Communist policies. Unsurprisingly, due to the increasing support for the Nazi party, the Weimar Republic collapsed and Hitler soon became the Fuhrer. With his given dictatorial powers in 1933, Hitler was then able to begin rearming Germany. Although France, Britain and many other countries opposed this, they were reluctant to prevent Germany from rearming itself. This is largely because they are sympathetic towards Germany’s plight and they appealed to Hitler’s anti-communist policies. Such reluctance can be seen in Britain’s policy of appeasement, the Anglo-German Naval Agreement, the failure of the Kellogg-Briand Pact and World Disarmament Conference etc. Hitler also broke many conditions of the Treaty of Versailles, such as its re-occupation of the Rhineland. International relations grew tenser, as can be extrapolated from the collapse of the Stressa Front and the eventual League of Nations.

We can also extrapolate that such international relations further deteriorate from Hitler’s many policies such as Lebensraum, and the Night of Broken Glass, whereby thousands of many Jewish shops and synagogues were destroyed and many Jews were killed. Relations further deteriorate when Italy and Japan joined an Anti-Comintern Pact whereby none of the countries would make any political treaties with the USSR and any Communist states. This pact had also led to the formation of the ‘Axis Powers’ whereby any foreign countries that opposes them will be automatically dealt with by all three powers. The Spanish Civil War in 1936 is a prime example of this. The international relations further deteriorate when Hitler enters a neutral pact (the Nazi-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact) with Stalin, which encourages Hitler in conquering more countries such as Poland.

On the whole, international relations grew tense through Hitler’s appealing and controversial policies. Germany had also increasingly posed more of a threat through Hitler’s string of successes in obtaining more land such as the Munich Crisis (1938) and Anchluss (1938) etc. From this, we can see that the world was truly at war as when Hitler invades Poland in 1939 this unsurprisingly catalyzes the event of the war, Poland’s western allies having finally acknowledge the need of a Second World War.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Finding the Middle Ground

    • 1550 Words
    • 7 Pages

    1914 is arguably one of the most influential years in human history. Not only did it introduce the world to the practice of total warfare, but it also demonstrated the devastating outcome of rising political and economic tensions in Europe, as well as the inevitable conflict that is rooted in our global anarchic system. Almost a century later, historians continue to study the catastrophic events that occurred in 1914 and one of the most controversial and sensitive topics is the debate on who is to blame for the outbreak of WWI. Many would be quick to point their finger at Germany, including historian Fritz Fischer, who validly argues that Germany was responsible for WWI based upon their nation’s political and militaristic aims to establish Germany as a world power. On the other hand, historian Paul Ritter questions Fischer’s argument, believing that Germany did not intentionally plan for WWI to occur. Both points are valid, yet the truth may not lie on either extreme sides of the spectrum. Rather, the long-term and short-term responsibility of WWI is shared between Germany, the conflictive nature of the world’s political system, and those nation states that exist within such a system during 1914. Therefore, the combination of a precarious political environment and an ambitious militaristic intention and course of action holds Germany highly, yet not completely, responsible for WWI.…

    • 1550 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Weimar republic was introduced on the back of Germany’s defeat at WWI, the resignation of Kaiser Wilhelm II and the widely despised signature of the Treaty of Versailles. These conditions led to its collapse in 1933, and also the great rise in popularity for the Nazi party during this period. There is no doubt that a number of economic factors played a crucial role in the collapse of the Weimar republic and the rise of the Nazis, however, numerous other factors also played a part. Some historians consider a lack of effective opposition a major contributing in the expansion of the Nazis. It has also been argued that the appeal of the Nazi party won them many votes. Finally, the impact of other political factors cannot be ignored when considering this issue.…

    • 1662 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    At the end of World War I, there were numerous fearful and terrible damages that happened in the world. The Allies shifted responsibilities to the Central Powers, especially to Germany. As a result, countries, such as the Ottoman Empire and the Austrian-Hungarian Empire were divided into a couple of small countries. Meanwhile, Germany needed a leader who would tide them over the crisis; and there was a leader, whose name was Hitler. As a military man, Adolf Hitler was fatigued by the debt that had to be paid for all the compensation from World War I. One of the reasons why Hitler planned to start another war was that he could not pay all of the debt back and make proper compensation for World War I. However, Europeans and Americans ignored the threats of Germany as none of their business, and then World War II became the world’s business. There was a plethora of “war guilt” during World War II, for example, persecution of the Jews caused the war to be more painful. World War II is the most important event in history because it brought many results into the world; for example, World War II proved to be the most costly war in history, the number of deaths and amount of money lost during the war transformed the political, social, and economic situations in Europe, the world divided into two “super powers”, and one of the visible results of World War II was the creation of the United Nations.…

    • 1419 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The question of whether no single alliance or nation could be held responsible for the outbreak of war is a hotly debated topic. Source 2 strongly agrees with the statement giving the view that no one nation could be held responsible. However, source 1 gives the opposite view that German aggression was primarily responsible, which is supported, to a large extent by source 3, which highlights German imperialistic aims as being a key aggravator. However, it does also suggest that other great powers were also aggressive to some extent. This essay will focus on the idea that, primarily, German aggression was to blame.…

    • 1314 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    After World War I created instability with in Europe the stage was being set for another world war that would follow a mere two decades later. Germany was both unstable politically and economically and with the help of Hitler they were determined to get back on their feet. Hitler began rearming the country and signed strategic treaties with Italy and Japan in order to gain more ground on his goal of world domination. Hitler invaded Poland in September of 1939 and as a result Great Britain and France were inclined to declared war on Germany. World War II…

    • 2536 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    From 1933 to 1934, during the consolidation of Nazi party and the process of Gleichschaltung, the Nazi party presented themselves as a less aggressive force than they would later prove to be. The Nazi party had considerable popular support in Germany from 1933 due to their strong opposition to the Treaty of Versailles. When Germany withdrew from the League of Nations and the World Disarmament Conference in October 1933, this was eagerly accepted in Germany due to its association with the Treaty. A Non-Agression Pact was signed with Poland in 1934 and this significantly bolstered the Nazi party’s image in the international scene. Hitler reinforced this new image of a peaceful Germany in a speech in May 1933 stating “The French, the Poles etc. are our neighbours, and we know that through no possible development of history can this reality be altered.” In June of 1935, Germany signed the Anglo-German Naval Treaty with Britain in which Germany agreed to have only 35% of the size of the British Army. For the Germans, this signified the end of the military terms of the Treaty of Versailles and was used as propaganda to promote the Nazi party in Britain. With the rest of Europe lulled into a false sense of security about Hitler’s foreign policy aims, a policy of ‘brinkmanship’ was employed.…

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Why Did Wwii Begin?

    • 265 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I believe that World War II began because Germany pushed their limits. Hitler used the abrupt limits of the Versailles Treaty to take over land where there were German speakers. By September of 1938, Germany had already successfully acquired Czechoslovakia and Austria. These two countries weren't enough for them. I think they were absolutely crazy for trying to push their luck any further. They had achieved something that was already so difficult. Doubling your money is always the risky choice.…

    • 265 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    World War II was arguably the largest and most destructive war in history. It shaped the world we live in today and its shadows can still be found. Battles were fought on multiple continents, the air, and the sea. The many facets of the war have been explored by scholars and students for over 65 years. The many causes, the results and the importance of the battles won or lost lies in the eyes of the author. It can easily be assumed that this war flared from the cinders of World War I, but complexity of it expands from there. Similar to WWI, there were many conflicting situations leading up to the war, (Treaty of Versailles, Hitler and Mussolini’s actions, and failure of appeasement and the League of Nations) but Germany’s invasion of Poland set the wheels in motion (parallel to the assassination of Franz Ferdinand in WWI). This resulted in Britain and France declaring war on Germany in September 1939 (historyonthenet).…

    • 660 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As Hitler’s power began to rise during the 30s, many Americans still believed that they could avoid the issue through a policy of appeasement (Document G), though it failed and both Britain and France…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Germans was rebound in 1925-1926. Fairly 30’s in turmoil economically. Therefore , the nazi power took the power in 1933. The nazis had a ideologic socialist In 1923 throw in jail and 1 ½ let out for good behavior. They hatred of the jews . Then , the economy collapse, but their power again grow by 1933. In the treaty of versailles they resentment and in the great depression they rebuild the nation. They made a promises, which are: shied the treaty, restore germany economic/military greatness and affirm german (Aquan) race’s supremacy. The Germany’s chancellor, the position most powerful in the government, was elected in 1933. Hitler was who occupied this position . In 1934 he was all a dictator, and made communist parties. In road to the war, germany wanted took the power of Europe and dominate it. Hitler wanted destroy the soviet Union. Germany follows with a serie of events during 1935-1941. In 1945 germany started to openly re-arms, in consequence in 1936 militarized the rhineland. In 1938, the anschluss happened in Austria where was a kind of unification of all europe. Also, in 1938 happened the munich agreement where had peaceful sudetenland. More later, in 1939 was the seizure of czechoslovakia and his next objective was poland, but he gave time to negotiate a treaty. So it gave way to the non-aggression pact. Joseph Stalin did not trust in hitler and vice versa and one of…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wendell Willkie, the Republican Presidential candidate in 1940, once said, “It is from weakness that people reach for dictators and concentrated government power.” In Germany, Italy, and Japan, the awful economic, political, and racial conditions leading up to World War II gave rise to three of the modern world’s fiercest dictators. Adolf Hitler, Benito Mussolini, and Hideki Tojo have gone down in history for all the wrong reasons, and they will forever be remembered for the dark stain they have left on history. Adolf Hitler, possibly the most infamous of dictators, is one of the most known figures in history. Before Hitler came to power, Germany was in the midst of an economic depression, still trying to find money to pay its war reparations after losing World War I (Hitler, 1).…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is evident that throughout history many wars have occurred. One of the major ones would be the First and Second World Wars because it was damaging to all countries in the world. The Second World War in particular was caused by ultra-nationalistic views, where one believes that their country is superior to all other countries. Adolf Hitler a German leader was able to become the head of a political party where he renamed it to “Nazional Sozialismus Deutsche Arbeiters Partei” which is also known as the Nazi Party. With this party he was able to stir up many people into following him and following his ideals. Adolf Hitler was also able to convince the English and the French into giving him back Austria and Czechoslovakia which are two countries that they have lost because of the First World War. With these two countries Hitler began to believe that he was superior because he was able to gain these two countries easily. This led him into the invasion of Poland which triggered the beginning of the Second World War. Due to Adolf Hitler’s…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    By the 1900s it was second nature for Germany to revert to combat and strong leadership - i.e. during the 1st World War and Hitler’s totalitarianism during the 2nd World War. The victory over France in 1870 sowed the seeds for what can only be described as a ‘tragic harvest that was ultimately reaped’; when France actively opposed Germany in the 1st World War. The result of two wars in quick succession (that had badly affected France), and the loss of Alsace Lorraine, led Georges Clemenceau to press for a harsh treaty in the 1919 Versailles Conference. Germany then developed a desire for vengeance and some of the roots that subsequently led to the 2nd World War were created.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pearl Harbor

    • 2529 Words
    • 11 Pages

    World War II spanned a six year period between September 1, 1939 (the date of Germany’s invasion of Poland) and September 2, 1945 (the date of the Japanese surrender) (“Pearl Harbor Raid, 7 December 1941—Overview and Special Image Selection.” 2). After the invasion of Poland, Germany quickly struck again crushing Denmark, Luxemburg, the Netherlands, Belgium, Norway, and France. In June 1940 Great Britain stood alone against Germany and then that same month Italy joined Germany’s side in the war. It was realized even at the time of the U.S. decision to enter the war that it would be a war which would probably result in more long-term and far-reaching political and cultural consequences than any other war in…

    • 2529 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rise of Hitler

    • 2142 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The historical debate surrounding the causal factors of the rise of the Nazi state in Germany by 1933 is fierce. Marxist historians, emphasising the idea that Nazism was no more than capitalism's most extreme form, tend to view Hitler as a puppet of big business. Others, including renowned scholars such as AJP Taylor stress the idea that Hitler and the Nazi's were a product of unique German history and a 'German struggle for mastery over Europe'. Amongst all of this debate, one thing is agreed upon and that is the fact that without the great depression stemming from the Wall Street Crash of 1929 and the dire consequences that the withdrawal of American loans had on the German economy, Hitler would have remained on the sidelines of German politics. It was the circumstances of early 1930's Germany, as emphasised by historian Karl Bracher, that ultimately brought Hitler to power. Thus it is impossible to understand or assess the significance of the Nazi's ideological appeal, the fatal underestimation of the Nazi's by both the conservatives and the left and their use of propaganda whilst coming to power without understanding this context and it is thus the express intention of this essay to contextualise these factors in order to demonstrate the limitations of their significance. Further, this essay will also attempt to highlight the inextricable links between these above stated factors and select other factors which are given as having helped the Nazi's come to power, namely the brutality of the SA; Hitlers personality and the unique position of Germany in European history, with a view to unearthing the most significant amongst them.…

    • 2142 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays