Preview

To What Extent Had the Ussr Recovered from the Impact of the Great Patriotic War (1941-1945) by the Time of Stalin’s Death in 1953

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1813 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
To What Extent Had the Ussr Recovered from the Impact of the Great Patriotic War (1941-1945) by the Time of Stalin’s Death in 1953
To what extent had the USSR recovered from the impact of the Great Patriotic War (1941-1945) by the time of Stalin’s death in 1953?
Although VE celebrations started on 24th June 1945, peace was declared on the 9th May in Moscow. There are differing opinions on the amount of deaths that were caused by the Great Patriotic War (for example, Kenez estimates 26-27 million, many of whom were prisoners of war, whereas Hoskings estimated 20-25 million, many of whom were killed indirectly by the war, by means such as famines). It could be suggested that the USSR simply returned to where it had been previously in the 1930s after the war, for example primary focus for industry was put on "heavy" goods such as oil and coal. But to what extent did life for the Russian improve once the war was over? Social conditions after the war were anything but favourable. 1,170 towns, 70,000 villages and 7 million homes had been destroyed leaving 25 million Russians homeless. This issue was not addressed or rectified and no housing schemes of building projects were started, instead the money was redirected to other areas. So Soviets were left restless as they had nowhere to go.

The peasants were essentially bound to their land as they had no access to funds or passports to travel. The two types of farms faced disadvantages, for example the Kolkhozy farms (collective state farms) had to meet state obligations which were 60-70% of their output and only received trivial rewards in return (such as sacks of potatoes). Even though the war had caused so many deaths, the Politburo remained to see the peasants as disposable after the war. Also Stalin did not trust the peasants as he said they were “too individualistic to make good socialists” and therefore increased the taxes on them. So this is not recovery as the lifestyle, especially for peasants, got worse. The agricultural output in 1945 was only 60% of what it had been before the war, and as a result food shortages that had occurred

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The patriotic war caused great destruction in the USSR in terms of social and economic. Many people were killed and many more left in a poor state, much of the industry was destroyed and the USSR would take years to recover fully. But in despite all the negatives the USSRS heavy industry was the highest it has ever been…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stalin Dbq Research Paper

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There were several reasons. Stalin sought to reorganize the Soviet Union via his Five Year Plans, which called for a radical industrialization as well as collectivisation to increase agricultural production and efficiency. This increased agricultural output was necessary to support the rapid industrialization he espoused; how else could the workers be fed? Many peasants who had been awarded or taken their land...to liquidating the kulaks as a class" (Document 5.3 Collectivisation 181). Millions were sent to labor camps, deported and died. The impossible demands made on the peasant farmers of increased production, only to turn everything over to the state, resulted in peasants that remained on the land at first hiding, then burning their crops/killing their animals rather than give them up "Stock was slaughtered every night..." (History in Quotations #5). An infuriated Stalin sent industrial workers into the country to show the peasants 'Bolshevik firmness' "without any rotten liberalism...[or] bourgeois humanitarianism...[and with]extreme measures" to get the grain. (Document 5.4 Horror in the Village…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yalta Conference Dbq

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Soviet’s were able to acquire more land and establish the government they wanted in Europe, despite Stalin’s promise made to America and Great Britain. In addition, the USSR “won” the war because they sacrificed more than the United States and Great Britain. Furthermore, their main enemy, Germany, surrendered in in the USSR, and the USSR agreed to declare war on Japan even though they were not involved in the Pacific…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Some small change came under war communism in 1918. The town houses of the rich were taken over and the living space divided amongst poor families, which meant that the select few benefited from the Bolshevik rule. This aspect can be seen as an improvement when looking at the living conditions endured under the Tsarist period. Because there had been little workers before Witte’s industrialisation, the population of cities dramatically expanded. This expansion had not been organised or supervised, meaning that the facilities accommodating the influx of workers were inadequate. Between 1881 and 1914, workers were overcrowded in insanitary wooden tenements with poor health services and this continued in World War One. Disruption of supplies meant little fuel and a shortage of food. These living conditions can be seen as a change compared to Tsarist Russia as the urban proletariat had barely developed in this era, so they would have not endured overcrowding. In 1917, this series of bad working conditions were set to continue. Sanitary conditions were appalling and fuel for heating was again short. Less than a third of diet came from state provided rations and food prices rocketed in 1919, this resulted in a large scale desertion of towns in favour of the country side. Under Stalin, there was a large degree of continuity for working conditions. Stalin, however, would disagree: ‘Life has become…

    • 2033 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    During World War II produce was needed in mass quantities from American farmers. This was because the war was focused around Europe and the Allies’ land was destroyed. With the high demand of…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bolshevik Revolution Dbq

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There were many consequences from the Bolshevik revolution. Farmland was distributed among farmers, and factories are given to workers. The banks were nationalized and a national council was assembled to run the economy. Russia pulled out of World War I, signing the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk, conceding lots of land to Germany. Civil war, between Bolshevik (“red”) and anti-Bolshevik (“white”) forces, sweeps Russia from 1918 to 1920. Around 15 million die in conflict and the famine. The Russian economy is in shambles. Industrial production drops, trade all but ceases, and skilled workers flee the country. Despite the…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The war had an adverse effect on the Russian economy. The rising cost of food caused food shortages. Industrial workers went on strike to increase wages and by the end of the war and a new government emerged following Nicholas II abdication. The already delicate domestic political situation in Russia would be imperiled by Nicholas II’s personal affiliation with the military wealth of his country. Any other military commander could be blamed for a disaster and then dismissed, but by taking personal command the Emperor would now take personal as well as political responsibility for all military failures. The crumbling of the Russian position in the field after he assumed command made such an outcome inevitable regardless of innumerable…

    • 1728 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Farmers had been supported during WWI to keep them producing for the war effort, but after the war, their production never went back to normal. Farmers continued to produce more and more, but could no longer find markets. Many farmers lost profits and even their property. Many tried to move to urban…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The peasants were probably the worst off in Russia in the early twentieth century. Although the peasants had been emancipated by Alexander II back in 1861, they still had little freedom while Nicholas was leading. Peasants had to pay redemption payments for land the government had given or lent them but they found it difficult to keep up and often got into debt. The village communities owned and paid for the land together, not as a single person. Peasants had to pay much higher taxes than the landlords and the officials would flog the peasants who didn’t pay their taxes. There were so many pressures in day to day life that many peasants could not support themselves and had to move to cities for work. Peasants had to be granted permission by their fellow commune members to leave the farm. Even once they had left, they were still expected to assist with the redemption payments (Proctor, 1995). The living standards the peasants and their families had to endure were terrible. Russian peasants were still forced into using traditional farming techniques which involved manual labour instead of machine labour. Entire families occupied one room huts and sometimes the living quarters were shared with their livestock. This meant epidemic diseases were prevalent. Peasant’s diets were insufficient and unvaried, mostly…

    • 1124 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many farmers had been growing food and crops for the government during the war. However, when the war was over the farmers continued growing enormous amounts of food. They even applied and received substantial loans from the banks to then purchase larger and more efficient farming tools, supplies, and machines. They used these to massify their farms and reach larger production quotas than ever. The output during the duration of the next year was quantifingly greater than any previous year.…

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Russia’s economy suffered worse during the war than most of the other participants due to its underdeveloped Industrial sector. Eventually, the toll on the Russian economy and quality of life caused the Russian people to rebel against Czar Nicholas II and a revolution took place in 1917. When Vladimir Lenin of the Bolsheviks came to power, he withdrew Russia from the war in order to begin ameliorating working conditions and quality of life, but before he could begin stabilizing the economic and political climate in Russia, a Civil War broke out. Ultimately, the Bolshevik regime won the war and Russia emerged as the Soviet Union: the first communist country in…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ww2 and the Soviet Economy

    • 1411 Words
    • 6 Pages

    It can be impossible to gauge how a population will respond to war. “There was a sharp contrast between the degree of wartime national unity and popular support upon which the two regimes, tsarist and Soviet, could draw. During World War I, the initial enthusiasm of the educated elite for war against Germans rapidly turned to despair and anger...By contrast, the Soviet regime encountered little overt popular dissatisfaction with the war effort.”1 The trust between the government and the governed was being restored, and the people were willing to trust Stalin to victory, in a way that they could not trust the leadership during World War I.…

    • 1411 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The main problem for peasants was land. There was just not enough to go round. The loans from the government took years to pay off, and the amount of land allocated to each peasant family was barely enough to live on. Many peasants fell into a crushing debt.…

    • 2426 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Finally, in 1917 Russia was in chaos. The First World War had been raging for two and a half years. Over 1,700,000 military personnel had been butchered because they were badly prepared by the old feudalist government. Russia was continuously losing territory, and the war had sparked food shortages through out the country. Economically Russia was devastated; 8,000,000,000 roubles in war debts were outstanding, strangling the national economy of its breath. Inflation…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Living in Russia while all this was happening would be very terrifying as it would also tear Russia apart and make them go against each other for at least 3 years. Food that was grown from local farms for families among Russia was cut short to supply the both armies as much as 30-40% and in fact it has been said that the food that was ordered from farms was first supplied to the Bolsheviks and what was left over was given to the people living in the cities. As time went on people were leaving Russia due to all this violence which sometimes happened in the cities and within 4 years it has been estimated that around 1.2 million people would leave the country to go live somewhere else better and violent-free. It was mainly common sense as the average person in Russia could choose to live somewhere else with more food, less violence, and a lot more less nonsense compared to being in Russia with their house being risked of being invaded or destroyed, being shot, everyday in fear, and somewhere they can guarantee more food to be able to…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays