Preview

To What Extent Did Stalin’s Rule Mar the Key Turning Point in Russia’s Political Development 1856-1953?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1037 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
To What Extent Did Stalin’s Rule Mar the Key Turning Point in Russia’s Political Development 1856-1953?
To what extent did Stalin’s rule mar the key turning point in Russia’s political development 1856-1953?

In an historical context, a ‘turning point’ can be categorized as an event o impact caused by an individual that, had it not occurred, would have altered the final outcome of a period of history. In the period of Russian history 1856-1953 there is no doubt there was a huge amount on political change, at the bringing of the period Russia was a state ruled by an autocratic Tsar and by the end it had seen provisional governments, local and national assemblies and a whole variety of rulers, some more autocratic and reactionary than others. Stalin’s period of rule in Russia could be seen as the most brutal rule Russia saw in this period, but a lot of changes were made whilst he was in power. Historians’ opinions on Stalin are, as ever, wide ranging, Marxist historians tend to be of the opinion that the brutality was a means to an end which was a necessity. Martin McCauley believes that Stalin’s personal impact was not that great and that he was simply at the head of a machine that ran by itself with him as the public figurehead. There are many other events that may be turning points in this period including the reigns Tsars Alexander II, Alexander II and Nicholas II, the October Manifesto, Lenin’s actions in abolishing the Constituent Assembly and the overthrow of the Provisional Government. However one of the most key of these is the period 1916-1917 during which Russia lost its Tsar, gained a Provisional Government which was subsequently overthrown and replaced with Bolshevik rule under Lenin. A period of extreme political change which provided an overwhelming different style of government.

Following the abdication of Tsar Nicholas II and the rejection of the title by his brother Grand Duke Michael, Russian politics was thrown into turmoil with a system of Dual power, shared between the Provisional Government and the Soviets. This was essentially a struggle



Bibliography: • http://europeanhistory.about.com/od/famouspeople/p/prstalin.htm 31st November 2012 • www.Spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/FWWinRussia.htm 31st November 2012 • https://sites.google.com/site/ibhistoryrussia/syllabus-overview---imperial-russia/alexander-ii • ‘Years of Russia, the USST and the Collapse of Soviet Communism’ David Evans, Jane Jenkins • W.C Mosse ‘Alexander II (1855-81)’ • www.alexanderplace.org/palace/alexanderIIbio.html

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Throughout the period 1855 to 1954, opposition to Russian governments was a common occurrence due to dissatisfaction of many civilians’ lives and the lack of development seen throughout Russia. However, as much as there were some successful movements throughout 1905 such as the Bolsheviks gaining support and eventually gaining power, there were also several failed attempts due to intense use of violence, terror and censorship by the state. It is arguable that whether opposition was successful, merely came down to the strength of the opposition group or the weakness of the government in power.…

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lenin’s death in 1924 not only created a power vacuum but also a bitter struggle for supremacy between Stalin, Trotsky, Zinoviev, Kamenev and Bukharin as each tried to become the new leader of the communist party. Whilst I do think that the personalities of the combatants were noteworthy I believe that the other elements involved such as Stalin’s tactical skill, the debate over permanent Revolution and socialism in one country, and powerbases held by the aforementioned contenders all contributed equally to Stalin’s ultimate triumph .…

    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Soviet Union DBQ

    • 840 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In 1924, the Soviet Union faced a power struggle when it’s leader and creator Vladimir Lenin died. His successor however, came into power and immediately began to make changes. This man knew exactly what he wanted to keep and more importantly what he wanted to change. His birth name was Iosif Vissarionovich Dzhugashvili, but who could possibly rule and leave a legacy with that name? He then adopted the name Joseph Stalin, (which means man of steel.) and began to rule the Soviet Union. At this time, the Soviet Union was well behind all the other countries; Stalin made many changes to the soviet society, employing many methods to achieve his aims.…

    • 840 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The first of these was headed by a moderate liberal, Georgi Lvov and the second was ran by Alexander Krensky. The Provisional Government knew that the Bolsheviks were going to strike. The reports of the Bolshevik's conspiracy in where always in Krensky's mind, but there was overwhelming dissent about the revolution. The government was so unstable that Krensky had little to no control over the congress or military, and because Krensky did not have "the majesty of government, the laws, the protection of friends and of the state," he had no power, no control over his fortune. Krensky's failure as a prince had to do with the unstable government and the political factions all brewing their revolutions and civil unrest. He did not prepare for fortune. He met his end by not being able to deal with…

    • 1377 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dziewanowski, M. K. (2003). Russia in the twentieth century (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.…

    • 1696 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The beginning of the 20th century brought radical changes to the social and political structure of autocratic Russia. It was a period of regression, reform, revolution and eradication. Eradication of a blood line that had remained in rule for over 300 years; the Romanov Dynasty. The central figure of this eradication was Tsar Nicholas II, often described as an incompetent leader, absent of the “commanding personality nor the strong character and prompt decision which are so essential to an autocratic ruler...” (Sir G. Buchman, British ambassador to Russia from 1910 in H. Seton-Watson, The Decline of Imperial Russia, 1964, p.108) What caused or defined the decline and eventual fall of the Romanov dynasty cannot concluded by one influencing factor but an amalgamation of Tsar’s leadership, certain events that impacted on Russia and Revolutionary groups that aided this process. From these it is evident though that Tsar Nicholas’ role, to a major extent, was the key factor in the end of the 300-year reigning Romanov rule and subsequent execution. In exploring Russia in the early 20th Century, the revolutionary groups, mainly including the Bolsheviks, can be seen as having a minor role in that actual reason for the decline of the Romanov dynasty but rather a larger role in the events after the fall, in regards to the execution itself and shaping Russia’s future afterwards.…

    • 2102 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Czar Nicholas turned to the army to restore order. When it could not, he decided to return to the capital to deal with the crisis. However, the Duma knew what had to be done. Duma members met the czar’s train as it neared the city. They told Nicholas that the only way to restore order was for him to step down as czar. He tried to abdicate, or formally give up power, in favor of his brother, Mikhail.When Mikhail refused to take the throne, Russia’s monarchy came to an end.…

    • 4038 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Aglaya's Response To Stalin

    • 2546 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Or how the reaction to Stalin by three social groups illustrates the development of Socialism in the Soviet Union from 1945 to the 1990s.…

    • 2546 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In global history, many civilizations have undergone changes that historians consider turning points. A turning point is a point in time at which a significant change occurs that affects a whole society's way of life. There are many examples of turning points in the past.…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Turning points are points where an important change occurs. It is very important that it will never be forgotten since these turning points make such great impact on history. Some of these impacts include food, people, plants, animals, technology, and diseases passed from one continent to the other. The voyages of Columbus and the Collapse of Communism in the Soviet Union are one of the most significant turning points that made political, social, and cultural impact.…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A historical turning point is a significant event in history that has led to a lasting change. One example of a well-known turning point is the Scientific Revolution. The Scientific Revolution was a time period of rapid advances in European scientific, mathematical, and political thought. This period led people to begin to question what they knew about the world around them.…

    • 202 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A historical turning point is a significant event in history that has led to lasting change. Many historical turning points have taken place in history; some minor, and others life changing. Some examples of turning points in history include the Emancipation Proclamation, and the Trail of Tears. Both of these events resulted in major outcomes that can be considered both positive and negative.…

    • 206 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    War was an important cause of change in Russia during the period 1855-1924 and arguably was the most important cause but it was certainly not the only one. Other factors such as the influence of key individuals played a great part in determining change in Russia and should be considered to be very important as well.…

    • 1389 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Though such victory strengthened Russia's international political role, at home the people faced an inefficient government and economic turmoil. When Nicholas I (1825-1855) succeeded his older brother Alexander I in 1825, he faced a public grieved by the peasants' hardship and influenced by the neighboring French Revolution. The result came as an uprising, with a group of liberal western-minded nobles and army officers engaging in the Decembrist Revolt of 1825. Tsar Nicholas I crushed the rebellion, and in the aftermath he became increasingly authoritarian--sending police to detect revolutionaries, abandoning Peter the Great's established Westernization Program and rigorously censoring written materials.…

    • 2263 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Although the Romanov Regime had always been very unpopular with the Russian people over many years, the regime had always managed to survive until 1917. In order to discover why the regime fell so quickly, it is necessary to look at the number of different factors which led the Tsarist regime to fall in March 1917. Tsar Nicholas II 's regime was autocratic, which means that the rule of the country is placed on the ruling of one person in this case, Nicholas II. There were a broad number of factors that led to the downfall of the Tsarist regime, and these can be placed in long and short term factors.…

    • 1756 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays