To What Extent Can Online Learning Replace Traditional Classroom-Based Learning?
Education has undergone significant changes because of the development of information and communication technology over the 21st century (Lin & Jou, 2012:2). As a convenient and inexpensive way to gain knowledge while pursuing higher education, online learning, a form of training or teaching that takes place over the Internet, has been considered as an alternative to traditional classroom learning (Zhang et al, 2004). This essay will argue that even though online learning has benefit such as flexibility which could outweigh traditional learning, traditional classroom learning might still not be entirely replaced. This essay will discuss positive and negative aspects of online and traditional learning in terms of four criteria: flexibility and time management, freedom of speech and deeper learning, interaction and students’ perspectives. In conclusion, the author suggests a blended learning with both advantages of online learning and traditional learning are combined (Paechter & Maier, 2010:296).
The “anytime, anywhere” aspect of online learning is the most significant advantage over traditional classroom (Arbaugh, 2004:171, cited by Brandon & Hollingshead, 1999; Dede, 1991; Harasim, 1990). Learners can process material at any time from any place (Paechter & Maier, 2010:296, citied by Artino & Stephens, 2009; Narciss et al, 2007). For students who cannot afford to take away from their time-dependent jobs, online programs provide flexibility in time and pace of study so that they are able to work meanwhile maintaining the universities’ academic commitment (Sharpe & Benfield, 2005; Conrad & Donaldson, 2004; Kruger-Ross & Waters, 2013). Moreover, by accessing a learning management system such as Moodle, Blackboard, course website, students can achieve clarity about their course information like assignments, test dates to the full extent (Kruger-Ross & Waters, 2013:181). On the other hand, online learning could be time-consuming
The “anytime, anywhere” aspect of online learning is the most significant advantage over traditional classroom (Arbaugh, 2004:171, cited by Brandon & Hollingshead, 1999; Dede, 1991; Harasim, 1990). Learners can process material at any time from any place (Paechter & Maier, 2010:296, citied by Artino & Stephens, 2009; Narciss et al, 2007). For students who cannot afford to take away from their time-dependent jobs, online programs provide flexibility in time and pace of study so that they are able to work meanwhile maintaining the universities’ academic commitment (Sharpe & Benfield, 2005; Conrad & Donaldson, 2004; Kruger-Ross & Waters, 2013). Moreover, by accessing a learning management system such as Moodle, Blackboard, course website, students can achieve clarity about their course information like assignments, test dates to the full extent (Kruger-Ross & Waters, 2013:181). On the other hand, online learning could be time-consuming
References: Arbaugh, J. B. (2004). Learning to learn online: A study of perceptual changes between multiple online course experiences. The internet and higher education, 7(3), pp169-182. Artino, A. R., & Stephens, J. M. (2009). Academic motivation and self-regulation: A comparative analysis of undergraduate and graduate students learning online Baturay, M. H. & Bay, O.F. (2010). The effects of problem-based learning on the classroom community perceptions and achievement of web-based education students. Computers & Education, 55 (1) ,pp43–52. Benfield, Greg. & Sharpe, Rhona. (2005). The Student Experience of E-learning in Higher Education: A Review of the Literature Brandon, D. P., & Hollingshead, A. B. (1999). Collaborative learning and computer-supported groups. Communication Education, 48(2), pp109-126. Bettencourt, L. A. & Houston, M. B. (1999) But that’s not fair! An exploratory study of student perceptions of instructor fairness, Journal of Marketing Education, 21(2), pp84–96. Conrad, R.-M., & Donaldson, J. A. (2004). Engaging the online learner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Dede, C. J. (1991). Emerging technologies: Impacts on distance learning. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (pp146–158). Beverly Hills, CA:Sage. Fraser, B. J. (1998) Science learning environments: assessment, effects and determinants, in: B.J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds) International handbook of science education (Chapter 5). Boston, Kluwer Academic. Harasim, L Jou, Min. & Lin, Yen-Ting. (2012). A Web Application Supported Learning Environment for Enhancing Classroom Teaching and Learning Experiences. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences , 64, pp1–11. Kruger-Ross, M. J. & Waters , R. D. (2013). Predicting online learning success: Applying the situational theory of publics to the virtual classroom. Computers & Education, 61, pp176-184. Maier, Brigitte. & Paechter, Manuela. (2010). Online or face-to-face? Students ' experiences and preferences in e-learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), pp292–297. Meyer, Katrina A., 2003, “The Web’s impact on student learning: a review of recent research reveals three areas that can enlighten current online learning practices.” T H E Journal, 30(10), p14. Macdonald, J. (2003), ‘Assessing Online Collaborative Learning: Process and Product’, Computers & Education, 40(4), pp377-391. Narciss, S., Proske, A., & Körndle, H. (2007). Promoting self-regulated learning in webbased learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, pp1126−1144. O 'donoghue, Tom., Sweeney, Jill. & Whitehead, Clive. (2007). Traditional face‐to‐face and web‐based tutorials: a study of university students ' perspectives on the roles of tutorial participants. Teaching in Higher Education, 9(3), pp 311-323. Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (2001). Lessons from the cyberspace classroom. San Fransisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Allen, E. I., & Seaman, J. (2007). Online nation: Five years of growth in online learning. Needham, MA: Sloan-C, Available from: http://www.sloanconsortium.org/publications/survey/pdf/online_nation.pdf.