This Sculpture Titled: Head of an Akkadian Ruler
This sculpture titled “Head of an Akkadian Ruler” was found at Nineveh somewhere between 2250 and 2200 BCB. Although, there is no evidence or proof that says the head was a particular king, most believe the head was indeed a powerful ruler. This twelve inch copper head is currently at the Iraq Museum, Baghdad. This piece has significant damage which is assumed to be caused during the Medes’ invasion on Nineveh in 612 BCE. There is no absolute proof this was a purposeful act. This sculpture is life-sized of an unknown Akkadian ruler. Some research says it is Sargon, but there is no proof. The head is bronze and appears to be one of the most powerful sculptors in Ancient Eastern art. There is much detail in the face with sharp clarity and an unrealistic beard. By seeing how specific the facial features are it seems like it would have been a ruler from that time. The eyes appear to be knocked out on purpose as said in the textbook as an act of ritualized destruction. This work of art is a commentary about the rulers and power in Nineveh. Through the deep, sharp, and large beard, the artist focused on important details of who once could have been Sargon, The True King. Because Akkadian art seems to be mainly about showing how dominate and influential the rulers were, their enemies devoured a lot of Akkadian art after the kings lost battles. Despite the fact the beard is not an average looking hairy beard, it doesn't take away from the image. Hair doesn't lay the way is shows in the sculpture, but more of a stylized texture.
Although there are many missing parts of the sculpture, the head remains a powerful piece of art history. I feel the damage of the ears and eyes does not take the strength away in this particular piece. In the book it was mentioned the hole on one of the eyes was purposeful. That it was an attempt to belittle the power of the king, or perhaps when the king lost their power. I would of hoped there was more information on if this was proven
Although there are many missing parts of the sculpture, the head remains a powerful piece of art history. I feel the damage of the ears and eyes does not take the strength away in this particular piece. In the book it was mentioned the hole on one of the eyes was purposeful. That it was an attempt to belittle the power of the king, or perhaps when the king lost their power. I would of hoped there was more information on if this was proven