Preview

They Say, I Say

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
228 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
They Say, I Say
In the book They Say, I Say by Birkenstein and Graff, the first chapter discusses the process of making a more engaging essay and also how to discuss what you think about the subject or how you feel about what author has said in the essay. One of the processes that chapter one focuses on is the "They say, I say" process which basically is a way of discussing opposing views and debating with an argument that can be applied from the writing, it is having an engaging discussion in which one person is talking about what the other might say in order to counter the argument by using that point to make their point on why they are correct (Birkenstein, Graff 8). Throughout the first chapter we are introduced to many authors such as George Orwell,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the preface and introduction of the book: “They Say, I Say”, Graff and Birkenstein contend that well written argumentative writing should emphasize on hearing and responding rather than making claims. Based on the suggestions given by students, the revised 2nd edition of the book includes more chapters and features to give students a better understanding of academic writing.…

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    She comes to understand that it is with our daily lives that we begin to find ourselves and realize that our words not only the text matter. One has to give their own authority and their own standpoint to make their point argumentative. Through personal life, methods of teaching and college experience does Sommers truly notice the change between her own authority and textual information. It is within us that truly makes a paper what it is. Our own authority should be our judgment. Between the drafts makes one comprehend what really happens between 2 papers. Drafts not only have to be papers but they can pertain to our own lives as well. Arguments begin with our own voices. Either the risk one takes or the risk they do not. It is with much evidence and disdain that Sommers truly presents her argument. One is lost between the words of the paper to make it seem less effective. Sommers uses effective writing techniques’ and much revision to make her thesis…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cited: Lazere, Donald. "Chapter 13 Thinking Critically About Political Rhetoric." Reading and Writing for Civic Literacy: The Critical Citizen 's Guide to Argumentative Rhetoric. Boulder: Paradigm, 2009. 267-301. Print.…

    • 1204 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rhetorical Summary

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In your annotation of the article, what are a few of the predominant pieces of rhetoric that the author chooses to use to achieve his/her purpose? Also, add your…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Within the chapters five and six of, They Say/I Say, by Gerald Graff and Cathy Birkenstein, they believe that while writing an essay, one may use many tools to help them strengthen their arguments. For example. Instead of rambling on about why a writer’s argument is credible, a writer may address criticism that others might say, and can use counter arguments to lengthen and strengthen their argument. When a writer does not implement counter arguments within their text, they may seem close minded. However, when using a counter, or what Birkenstein and Graff call a “Naysayer,” a writer must accurately represent that individuals view. When a person is addressing a nay-sayer, they can either keep them anonymous, or give them proper labels. Although,…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dr. Tannen is a professor of linguistics at Georgetown University. Her study of language and how it is utilized has led her to have many books on the “Best-Selling” List. In her book, “The Argument Culture”, Deborah Tannen takes a closer look at how we as a society have come to view arguing/debating as a normal form of communication. Our inability to look at more than two views at a time, has led us to limit the potential conversations that could easily take place. In this essay, Professor Tannen takes a shot at making us believe that being in an “Argument-culture” is not the best thing for us as a whole. She wants us to see that it is truly a problem but that it can be fixed by following her advice. Tannen feels that everything…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The Argument Culture” is a persuasive essay written by Professor Deborah Tannen. As a professor of linguistics at Georgetown University, Tannen experience in language leads her to write many books in this field. Tannen uses “The Argument Culture” essay to persuade her audience that this society’s way of looking at debate encourages an “adversarial frame of mind” (Tannen, 305). Three of Tannen’s main points include; polarized views in the news, the use of “war metaphors’ by media to catch the readers eye, and even in the language mankind uses in everyday life. Tannen’s essay also includes different ways to look at these each of these situations that may help reduce the debate language that this society uses every day.…

    • 892 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Analysis of Rush Limbaugh

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Since the time of the woman 's suffrage movement, many articles and essays have reached newspapers and magazines across the country. Several of these essays were written to inform people, but others were created to strictly entertain the audience. Rush Limbaugh 's essay, "The Latest from the Feminist Front," is an essay created to entertain and voice only his opinion. The elements of writing used to create a credible and valid argument can be taken out of context. Rush Limbaugh uses style, form, and claims to make his argument but is not effective in making his argument valid.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Study Questions 1

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages

    2) The book explains how when we learned to write a basic five paragraph argumentative essay, we only learned how to put down points from our side, and fail to properly address the points made by those arguing against. So to be effective writers we must as they say “enter a conversation” meaning that we must argue on paper how we would in the real world. Addressing what others have to say, and counting with a point of your own. One example from the book was “I can’t see why you like the Lakers so much”. In this case they addressed the topic at hand and they would proceed to make an argument from there, like a real world conversation.…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The author of this book is Howard Fineman, one of the most trusted political journalists that discusses the American debate of the 13 arguments. One question Howard proposes to the reader would be, who is a person? Still till this day, us Americans are still trying to determine the answer to that. Every generation is evolving into something greater than it was before. According to the Declaration of Independence, it believes that a person is ‘everyone’, but that it took some time to figure this all out through many Civil Right Acts and other movements. The purpose for Howard to write this story was to ‘cut through’ the chaos during each day. The themes within this book go along with the everyday debates; whether through the various types of newspaper arguments such as the Daily Kos of even the Drudge Report. The position that Howard is trying to portray to his audience is that as a journalist, he is displaying the inside scoop of the behind the scenes government. Informing all the people that debate and argument is actually okay. If no one was able to debate or argue, then the world would be boring. It keeps the people on their toes and interested with what is about to be said next. From earlier, debating gives freedom of speech for all, and will continue to give freedom of speech for the years to come. With this, I agree…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The author, Stuart Green, makes a few interesting points in the text, Argument as Conversation: The Role of Inquiry in Writing a Researched Argument. Stuart Green described arguments as conversations. They contain an issue and many viewpoints on the specified situation of the issue. He mentioned the conversations we have are never new; they’ve been discussed before and they will be discussed after you leave the conversation. Also, you, as a reader, need to find out about the ideas said about your specific conversation in the past in order for you to branch out your own idea about the conversation. Stuart Green discussed about framing. He defined framing as “a metaphor for describing the lens, or perspective, from which writers present their…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mike Rose Essay

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Mike Rose’s essay, “Entering the Conversation,” questions the prevailing methods of teaching college level literacy to under-prepared students. The core courses for incoming freshmen “have traditionally served to exclude working-class people from the classroom. It doesn’t, of necessity have to be that way” (12). Rose is trying to prove that an education in the humanities does not have to be exclusive or elitist. Just because remedial students lack literacy skills, it is not through a shortage of intelligence; rather, it is due to poor education and a lack of overall support.…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    This is the “reoccurring ways of speaking that challenge societies taken for granted assumptions and offer alternatives to prevailing discourse.”(Cox 68) Critical Discourse challenges socially dominant ideas or beliefs. The value comes from the timing in which I learned it. During election season, I was looking for someone to challenge many of the ideas that have become dominant over the past few decades. Unfortunately, neither candidate did much to appease that desire. For instance, sustainability was yet again a “boring” topic to our media and did not get the airtime and attention it warranted. However, it is encouraging that one can slowly start to see more of this Critical Discourse in other parts of the media. Conversely, Critical Discourse has caused massive division in the American community. People have used it to contest everything that does not agree with their dogmata, but the problem comes when one disagrees without knowing what they are fighting for. Discourse in America is more important now than…

    • 1311 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arguments Are Everywhere

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Now that I have finished reading the chapter, argument has a lot more meaning than just plain old disagreement. There are two types of argument, traditional and consensual arguments.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the world today, the word “argument” is used on a daily basis and usually carries a bad meaning. In fact, the word is used so much that people often mistaken it’s true meaning. According to the book Writing Arguments by John Ramage, John Bean and June Johnson, there is no universally accepted definition of “argument.” The meaning of the term is rather complex, and it has been remained a controversial issue of philosophers and rhetoricians over the centuries (2). Because of the complexity of the word, we need to examine three important points in order to understand what “argument” truly meant: the misconceptions about the meaning of argument, the features of argument, and the relationship of argument to the problem of truth.…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays