Theology of Atonement and Salvation
The view and understanding of atonement is one of the widest in Christian theology. Unlike the dogmas that define the theology of trinity and incarnation and bring unity to Christian understanding, the theology of atonement has many different views that are widely held. The theology of atonement is one of the most important for Christians to understand, as it shapes our images of God, our understanding of salvation and how we are saved.
In this essay, I will be looking at different theories of atonement and how they make a difference to our theology of salvation. I will argue that different understandings and theories of atonement affect our theology of salvation by highlighting different aspects of salvation and answering the theological question that is found in the theology of salvation, ‘how are we saved?’. I will first define atonement and its origins. I will then proceed into looking at the extent of atonement and the objective and subjective nature of atonement. I will then look into more detail of five theories of atonement that have been derived from the objective and subjective views over the ages; ransom theory, satisfaction theory, moral influence, Christus Victor and penal substitution, and their implication of our understanding of salvation, by what they highlight in the theology of salvation and how they answer the question raised above.
The theology of atonement is about the restoration of the broken relationship between God and man that was accomplished in the life and death of Jesus Christ. Atonement is derived from at-one-ment and can be defined as reconciliation. Sin has put up a barrier between God and humanity and Jesus’ life death and resurrection break down that barrier and atones us, so that we can once again have a right relationship with God. However, we must make sure to distinguish between atonement from reconciliation, which as an act is restoring a right relationship with God, is understood to be the purpose of atonement. All
In this essay, I will be looking at different theories of atonement and how they make a difference to our theology of salvation. I will argue that different understandings and theories of atonement affect our theology of salvation by highlighting different aspects of salvation and answering the theological question that is found in the theology of salvation, ‘how are we saved?’. I will first define atonement and its origins. I will then proceed into looking at the extent of atonement and the objective and subjective nature of atonement. I will then look into more detail of five theories of atonement that have been derived from the objective and subjective views over the ages; ransom theory, satisfaction theory, moral influence, Christus Victor and penal substitution, and their implication of our understanding of salvation, by what they highlight in the theology of salvation and how they answer the question raised above.
The theology of atonement is about the restoration of the broken relationship between God and man that was accomplished in the life and death of Jesus Christ. Atonement is derived from at-one-ment and can be defined as reconciliation. Sin has put up a barrier between God and humanity and Jesus’ life death and resurrection break down that barrier and atones us, so that we can once again have a right relationship with God. However, we must make sure to distinguish between atonement from reconciliation, which as an act is restoring a right relationship with God, is understood to be the purpose of atonement. All
Bibliography: Beilby, James, and Paul R. Eddy, eds. The Nature of the Atonement: Four Views. Downers Grove, Ill.: IVP Academic, 2006. Elwell, Walter A., ed. Evangelical Dictionary of Theology. 2nd ed. Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker Academic, 2001. Fahlbusch, Erwin, Jan Milic Lochman, John Mbiti, Jaroslav Jan Pelikan, and Lukas Vischer, eds. The Encyclopedia of Christianity. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans Pub Co, 1999. Finlan, Stephen. Options On Atonement in Christian Thought. Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Pr, 2007. Goldingay, John. Atonement Today (gospel and Cultures). London: Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge, 1995. Olson, Roger E. The Mosaic of Christian Belief: Twenty Centuries of Unity & Diversity. Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press, 2002 Wright, David F., Sinclair B. Ferguson, and J. I. Packer, eds. New Dictionary of Theology. Downers Grove, Ill.: IVP Academic, 1997. Winter, Michael. The Atonement (problems in Theology). New York: Continuum, 1994. [ 2 ]. Stephen Finlan, Options On Atonement in Christian Thought (Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Pr, 2007), 1. [ 3 ]. Erwin Fahlbusch et al., eds., The Encyclopedia of Christianity (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans Pub Co, 1999), 156. [ 4 ]. Walter A. Elwell, ed., Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, 2nd ed. (Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker Academic, 2001), 115. [ 7 ]. Roger E. Olson, The Mosaic of Christian Belief: Twenty Centuries of Unity & Diversity (USA: InterVarsity Press, 2002), 256. [ 8 ]. Walter A. Elwell, ed., Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, 2nd ed. (Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker Academic, 2001), 116. [ 9 ]. Roger E. Olson, The Mosaic of Christian Belief: Twenty Centuries of Unity & Diversity (USA: InterVarsity Press, 2002), 256. [ 10 ]. Walter A. Elwell, ed., Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, 2nd ed. (Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker Academic, 2001), 116. [ 11 ]. Roger E. Olson, The Mosaic of Christian Belief: Twenty Centuries of Unity & Diversity (USA: InterVarsity Press, 2002), 256. [ 12 ]. Peter Schmiechen, Saving Power: Theories of Atonement and Forms of the Church (Grand Rapids, Mich.: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 2005), 26. [ 13 ]. Roger E. Olson, The Mosaic of Christian Belief: Twenty Centuries of Unity & Diversity (USA: InterVarsity Press, 2002), 257. [ 15 ]. Michael Winter, The Atonement (problems in Theology) (New York: Continuum, 1994), 63. [ 16 ]. Roger E. Olson, The Mosaic of Christian Belief: Twenty Centuries of Unity & Diversity (USA: InterVarsity Press, 2002), 258. [ 19 ]. James Beilby and Paul R. Eddy, eds., The Nature of the Atonement: Four Views (Downers Grove, Ill.: IVP Academic, 2006), 12. [ 21 ]. Roger E. Olson, The Mosaic of Christian Belief: Twenty Centuries of Unity & Diversity (USA: InterVarsity Press, 2002), 259. [ 22 ]. Peter Schmiechen, Saving Power: Theories of Atonement and Forms of the Church (Grand Rapids, Mich.: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 2005), 104. [ 23 ]. Roger E. Olson, The Mosaic of Christian Belief: Twenty Centuries of Unity & Diversity (USA: InterVarsity Press, 2002), 259.