Preview

Themistocles Fight Against The Persians

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
379 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Themistocles Fight Against The Persians
Of all the notable figures of the ancient world, Themistocles stands paramount as the Athenian general, whose abilities as a tactician and strategist thwarted the Persian invasion force, effectively saving the entire Greek culture from the armies led by Xerxes. Described by ancient writer Thucydides as ‘a man who showed an unmistakable natural genius… and deserves our admiration’, Themistocles was the most influential leader of the Athenian war effort against the Persians. It was he who realized that the Persian threat was imminent and catastrophic, and it was his radical advancement of Athenian sea power which allowed the Greeks to achieve victory over the Persians.

After serving at the battle of Marathon, in 490BC during the first invasion,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The reasons for the Greek victory against the Persians in 490 to 480/479 BC was a mixture of exceptional leadership, skilful tactics and strategy, superior weapons and soldiers, and Greek unity. Strong leadership was the most important aspect of the Greek defence, as without the intelligence and bravery of the leaders, the Greeks would have been easily defeated. As a result of the excellent leadership; Greek tactics, strategy, and unity were greatly strengthened. Combined with their better weapons and soldiers, the Greeks held the advantage and seized opportunities at the perfect moment. Also, with each victory the Greeks grew more confident of success and defiant of the Persian attempts to invade. The poor organisation and disarray of their enemy led to an undermining of the Persian might and further improved Greece's chances of success.…

    • 2672 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Battle of Thermopylae started out in the late summer of 480 B.C, the Spartan King Leonidas 1 held out for three days with a mere 300 hoplites against thousands upon thousands of the best Great King’s troops. Under thirty-five Persian generals, were assembled for the invasion of Greece, five whom where sons of the royal house. On the arrival of Xerxes at Thermopylae, he saw the that place was defended by a large of number of Spartans, and about seven thousand hoplites from other states, commanded by the Spartan King Leonidas.…

    • 1358 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Battle of thermopylae was an important battle for both the persian and greek army, the leader of the persian fleet was Xerxes whose army was far more larger than King Leonidas, leader of the Greek army, but Leonidas was a far more tactical and smarter war general than Xerxes.…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    On thermopylea and platea

    • 1303 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Today I shall be arguing and elaborating upon the thesis that the battle at Thermopylae was instrumental in insuring the victory at Plataea against the Persian army as it allowed for Greece to build up its army’s in preparation for the upcoming battle. I shall attempt to prove this statement by discussing various aspects of the battle of Thermopylae and the battle of Plataea such as battle tactics, size of the Greek and Persian armies and the overall intent and outcome of both battles.…

    • 1303 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Herodotus, the Greek army did not have enough troops to maintain the Persians troops so they were heavily outnumbered this lead to the Persians surround the Greek Force. A major factor on the defeat of the defeat of the Greeks was of the disunity of the Greek states.…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Athenian army, led by the Athenian general Miltiades who decided to attack with a new tactic. Miltiades had his troops stretch out in a line as long as the Persian army. This tactic weakened his center but strengthened the wings.…

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Final Study Guide

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. The great Persian invasion under Xerxes was a crucial factor in cementing the ties of Greek ethnicity and a sense of separation from other peoples. It is no accident that the great playwright Aeschylus asked that his tombstone be engraved only with a mention of participation in the war and was content to omit his dramatic victories. What were the causes of this invasion? What was the Persian strategy? How did the Greeks respond to the threat? What were the crucial battles in the war and finally why did the Persians fail?…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    One of the greatest warriors in ancient Greek time was Leonidas the First. He ruled over the Spartans during the “Second Persian War.” He led in the battle between the Spartans and the Persians, which was called the Battle of Thermopylae. Leonidas’ contributions to Greek society helped many people continue fighting for what they believed in.…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Persia Argumentative Essay The Persian war was not caused by Persia. The Persian war was a result of the ignorance of Athens. Athens caused the war by helping the Ionians revolt against Persia.…

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Miltiades biggest contribution was to the battle at Marathon which was considered a significant impact on the Persian wars. It was in the battle at Marathon where he showed both witt and skill against the Persian army. He was considered valuable to the athenians because of his former close relations with the Persian army, which meant he knew there tactics and there ways to which they fought in battle. The Athenians made Miltiades 10th Commander to which each day starting from commander one every commander would be given a chance to be in charge of the army. It was Miltiades who saw the fact that the Persian cavalary wasnt their as an advantage and to which could result in victory if the Athenian army attacked early. So Miltiades convinced Calimuchus the Polemarh to confront the Persian army and give him command. Miltiades battle tactics were both thoughtful and strategic as he used what he had learnt about the Persians against them with both ingenious and thoughful ideas. He made use of the terrain by placing his army on the top of the hill so that they had the higher ground and the best spot for when they made there way down hill so they were less tired and exhausted. It was said to be Miltiades who convinced the generals not to use their customary tactics of which hoplites (soldiers of greek cities) normally marched in an evenly distributed phanlanx of shields and spears. Miltiades was the one who had this great idea of attacking while the cavalary was not around. He knew that the Persians had there flanks set out that the strongest soldiers where in the middle of th e flank and the weakest on the outer flanks, so Miltiades devised this cunning plan to swap it around for his army. He made the strongest soldiers as the outer flanks and the weakest in the middle, so when it came to the fight the strongest soldiers could encirle the persian flanks and cause them distress and penick. His other contribution in the battle at Marathon tactics was the fact that he knew…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alcibiades's Downfall

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In Nine Greek Lives: The Rise and Fall of Athens, Plutarch presents the life of Alcibiades as a contrast between inspired military excellence and disappointing moral failure. Although he was a brilliant and accomplished military strategist, Alcibiades’ lack of moral fortitude, and his provocation of the Athenians into reckless action led to his downfall, and that of Athens. Although Alcibiades was a man of prodigious gifts who could have led Athens to military dominance, he gave in to base self-interest and lack of self-control that caused him to alienate his friends, waste his military genius, and die alone in exile.…

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Spartan

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Xerxes was a Persian emperor who ruled many places such as Greece , he wanted to concur that land because the Athenian burned down the city of Sardis that was the major city in Persia. The Athenians were the people who lived in the Greek city of Athens. Xerxes was known to slaves and killing lots of innocent men and women. When xerxes tried to concur Greece, king Leonidas was very furious when a Persian messenger told him that to surrender or we will fight, the king was known to never surrender so he went to war with the Persians. They were prepared to fight to the death this was a suicide war for the Greeks but that didn’t stop them. The Spartans didn’t want Xerxes to take their people and slave them or kill them.…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Athenians treated Melos much like the Achaeans of Trojan Women treat Illium; the city was destroyed, all the men killed, and all the women taken as slaves. The parallel is obvious once history is imposed upon the play. Furthermore, the themes, characters, and very dialogue of the play are thus given new meaning. In presenting Odysseus, a great chief of the Achaeans and reputedly the most intelligent of them, as a coward and murder, Euripides is commenting on the leaders of Athens and on wartime leaders in general. In regards to another theme, Trojan Women (TW) and Iphegenia at Aulis (IA) together present an argument of the nature of war itself. In TW Helen is effectively put on trial by Hecuba and Menelaus. The dialogue there can be taken as indicting war and describing that war is a thing which feeds on itself. In IA, the same argument is presented in different way. The wavering opinion of the army, its supposed war lust and desire to go home, combined with the sudden reversal of mind that Iphegenia undergoes seem to say that war is madness, and that the madness is contagious and self renewing. A quick perusal of the timeline of the Peloponnesian war through which Euripides lived shows that his assertions are true. Euripides, taken in historical context, is not limited, but rather illuminated and by doing so we can make sense some of the affects of war just as he…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Aristagoras Mistakes

    • 4235 Words
    • 17 Pages

    This book provided background information on the Greeks and Persians and the clash that erupted. Tracing each civilization from its formation to eventual fall, it covered the highlights from which further areas of more in depth study were identified.…

    • 4235 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Greek Society

    • 3034 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Background history of Greece and it’s leaders, including Themistocles and his fight with the Persians.…

    • 3034 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Better Essays