Preview

The World of Doublespeak by William Lutz: Q&A

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
690 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The World of Doublespeak by William Lutz: Q&A
1. What principle does Lutz use for creating his four kinds of doublespeak-that is,what mainly distinguishes the groups? Lutz’s principle of classification is the intention of doublespeakers.Those who use euphemisms are trying to “mislead or deceive” with inoffensive words. Those who use jargon seek to give their words “an air of profundity, authority, and prestige” .Those who use gobbledygook or bureaucratese are bent on “overwhelming the audience with words” . And those who use inflated language seek “to make the ordinary seem extraordinary; . . . to make the simple seem complex”
2. How does Lutz develop the discussion of euphemism in paragraphs 5-8? In the essay, Lutz states that there are four kind of doublespeak and gives definitions and examples of each. The first is the euphemism. Euphemism is a mild word or phrase which is used to make the statement more soften to avoid the harsh or unpleasant reality. The purpose of the euphemism is to use words to disguise the true meaning of what is being said. A euphemism is often used to avoid hurting the feelings of another although it may also be used to cover up harsh facts or content. Then the author use a lot of example to explain his opinion.
3.Lutz quotes Alan Greenspan twice in paragraphs I3-I4. what is surprising about the comment in paragraph l4? Why does Lutz include this second quotation? The surprising is Greenspan's audience not really understand what he was saying. Perhaps there is some meaning beneath all those words, but it would take some time to search it out. This seems to be language which pretends to communicate but does not. The purpose is to make the sentenses sound so complicated. In the case it technically means to pile on words or to drown your audience with words; the bigger and more complicated the sentences and words become the better.
4. Lutz uses many quotations that were quite current when he first published this piece in

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ralph Waldo Emerson

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Example: He compares cannon balls to words: "Else if you would be a man, speak what you think today in words as hard as cannon balls, and tomorrow speak what tomorrow thinks in hard words again, though it contradict every thing you said today."…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gobbledygook is defined as when someone uses an extended amount of words in order to stretch their sentences out. According to Stuart Chase the author of “Gobbledygook” was founded by the Federal Security Agency and was said to help “Break out of the verbal squirrel cage”. Examples of Gobbledygook can be found in such places as academic and legal talk.…

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pseudo-profound bullshit is defined as something made with the intent to impress absent of any concern for the truth. The statement will have to contain no information, adequate meaning, and truth. This argues that the term “bullshit” defines a type of misrepresentation which is different from lying and for which there is no other real label. The article explores a specific subtype that the authors call “pseudo-profound bullshit” which is where the writers intention is to sound profound without really saying anything.…

    • 82 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    is the money?" The author uses this rhetorical device to show readers that most of the…

    • 443 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Final Exam Study Guide

    • 3514 Words
    • 15 Pages

    when words are used to have a different meaning from the actual meaning of the words.…

    • 3514 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Example: He compares cannon balls to words: "Else if you would be a man, speak what you think today in words as hard as cannon balls, and tomorrow speak what tomorrow thinks in hard words again, though it contradict every thing you said today."…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The organizing principle in “The World of Doublespeak” divides the paper according to the author's sentiments towards the various forms of double speak. As Lantz infers, doublespeak results in a variety of discrepancies among the words and the subject or topic (Lutz 390). For instance, the topics discussed in “The World of Doublespeak” includes, the indicators of doublespeak, euphemisms, jargon gobbledygook, inflated language, and the implication of doublespeak (Lutz 390-395). Furthermore, the organizing principle of utilized in “The World of Doublespeak” assists the reader in understanding the author’s sentiments towards doublespeak. Ultimately, providing examples for the various forms of doublespeak allowed the readers to fully grasp the…

    • 116 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. Doublespeak is the ability to use vague truths and positive deflecting language to redirect a person’s opinion or view on a potentially caustic issue. While not an actual act of lying, doublespeak is structured in such a way that it subconsciously nudges us to accept a more positive form of reality as truth, even if a clearly adverse topic is being presented or confirmed. The structure of doublespeak is enthusiastically circular; it never allows direct confirmation of an undesirable condition or event, yet proposes a more palatable outlook on the topic in question. Careful verbiage is used to discourage the ingesting of a topic in an undesirable interpretation, and to afford the audience more promising descriptions and thought processes to consume instead. Professor Lutz maintains that the doublespeak words actually manifest themselves as the perceived reality, thus softening the blow of a negative situation with optimistic language and careful inflection. A string of positive words is a lot easier to objectify and accept as truth than the actual act of a catastrophe or other harmful action. / For one to refer to their self as democratic, he or she has to believe in the fundamental ideology behind democracy. Government transparency and absolute power…

    • 724 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    James Paul Gee’s introduction to Literacy, Discourse, and Linguistics and his article, What is Literacy?, approach literacy studies from psychological and sociological viewpoints. He states that the focus of literacy is social practices (“it’s not just how you say it, but what you are and do when you say it).…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    No I feel there was no rhetorical devices used due to the fact he kept everything on the level and only gave to the point facts.…

    • 2051 Words
    • 59 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Questions on Meaning

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1. Lutz’s thesis might be stated briefly as follows: The four kinds of doublespeak all include language “that avoids or shifts responsibility, language that is at variance with its real or purported meaning” (the quotation is from par. 2). The thesis accumulates over paragraphs 2–3, with…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The political power of words lies not primarily in their form – that is, in speech – or even in the meanings of the words they are directly linked to, but in the totality of brain circuitry that activation can spread to: the frames, metaphors, prototypes, metonymies, and the entire system of concepts. Words matter. They shape our politics – and our lives.…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Language organizes perception by using symbols. Language is a persuasive tool but can also be misleading and confusing. The most powerful ability of language is to understand and effectively communicate. For example, a prototype of a friend affects how a person judges a particular friend. By placing a person in the friend category, the category will most likely influence us on how we interpret the person and his and/or her communication. If we say something that might sound a little insulting, a friend might see it as teasing but a random person might see it as insulting. Even though that the words don’t change the meaning could be different; depending on how the perception of the words and person speaking. The…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Catcher in the Rye

    • 2286 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Significant passage: “He wanted you to think that the only reason that he was lousy at writing compositions was because he stuck the commas in the wrong place” (28).…

    • 2286 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Emerson Self Reliance

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Example: He compares cannon balls to words: "Else if you would be a man, speak what you think today in words as hard as cannon balls, and tomorrow speak what tomorrow thinks in hard words again, though it contradict every thing you said today."…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays