The Underwriting Challenges Facing P.S.V. Insurers in Kenya
Rational Choice Theory: An Overview
by
Steven L. Green
Professor of Economics and Statistics
Chair, Department of Economics
Baylor University
Prepared for the
Baylor University Faculty Development Seminar on Rational Choice Theory
May 2002
© 2002, Steven L. Green
It has been said that democracy is the worst form of government except all the others that have been tried.
-Winston Churchill
It seems easy to accept that rationality involves many features that cannot be summarized in terms of some straightforward formula, such as binary consistency. But this recognition does not immediately lead to alternative characterizations that might be regarded as satisfactory, even though the inadequacies of the traditional assumptions of rational behaviour standardly used in economic theory have become hard to deny. It will not be an easy task to find replacements for the standard assumptions of rational behaviour ... that can be found in the traditional economic literature, both because the identified deficiencies have been seen as calling for rather divergent remedies, and also because there is little hope of finding an alternative assumption structure that will be as simple and usable as the traditional assumptions of self-interest maximization, or of consistency of choice.
- Amartya Sen (1990, p. 206)
1. Introduction
Rational Choice Theory is an approach used by social scientists to understand human behavior. The approach has long been the dominant paradigm in economics, but in recent decades it has become more widely used in other disciplines such as Sociology, Political Science, and Anthropology. This spread of the rational choice approach beyond conventional economic issues is discussed by Becker (1976), Radnitzky and Bernholz (1987), Hogarth and Reder (1987), Swedberg (1990), and Green and Shapiro (1996). The main purpose of this paper is to provide an
by
Steven L. Green
Professor of Economics and Statistics
Chair, Department of Economics
Baylor University
Prepared for the
Baylor University Faculty Development Seminar on Rational Choice Theory
May 2002
© 2002, Steven L. Green
It has been said that democracy is the worst form of government except all the others that have been tried.
-Winston Churchill
It seems easy to accept that rationality involves many features that cannot be summarized in terms of some straightforward formula, such as binary consistency. But this recognition does not immediately lead to alternative characterizations that might be regarded as satisfactory, even though the inadequacies of the traditional assumptions of rational behaviour standardly used in economic theory have become hard to deny. It will not be an easy task to find replacements for the standard assumptions of rational behaviour ... that can be found in the traditional economic literature, both because the identified deficiencies have been seen as calling for rather divergent remedies, and also because there is little hope of finding an alternative assumption structure that will be as simple and usable as the traditional assumptions of self-interest maximization, or of consistency of choice.
- Amartya Sen (1990, p. 206)
1. Introduction
Rational Choice Theory is an approach used by social scientists to understand human behavior. The approach has long been the dominant paradigm in economics, but in recent decades it has become more widely used in other disciplines such as Sociology, Political Science, and Anthropology. This spread of the rational choice approach beyond conventional economic issues is discussed by Becker (1976), Radnitzky and Bernholz (1987), Hogarth and Reder (1987), Swedberg (1990), and Green and Shapiro (1996). The main purpose of this paper is to provide an
References: Alchian, Armen A., and Demsetz, Harold. (1972, December). “Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization.” American Economic Review 62(5), 777-95. Akerlof, George A., and Kranton, Rachel E. (2000, August). “Economics and Identity.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 115(3), 715-53. Alkan, A., Demange, G., and Gale, D. (1991, July). “Fair Allocation of Indivisible Goods and Criteria of Justice.” Econometrica 59(4), 1023-39. Arrow, Kenneth J. (1994, May). “Methodological Individualism and Social Knowledge.” American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 84(2), 1-9. Azzi, Corry, and Ehrenberg, Ronald. (1975, February). “Household Allocation of Time and Church Attendance. Journal of Political Economy 83(1), 27-56. Becker, Gary. (1976). “The Economic Approach to Human Behavior,” in The Economic Approach to Human Behavior (Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press), pp. 3-14. Becker, Gary S., Grossman, Michael, and Murphy, Kevin M. (1994, June). “An Empirical Analysis of Cigarette Addiction. American Economic Review 84, 396-418. Becker, Gary S., and Murphy, Kevin M. (1988, August). “A Theory of Rational Addiction.” Journal of Political Economy (1988, August), 675-700. Bergstrom, Theodore C. (1999, January). “Systems of Benevolent Utility Functions.” Journal of Public Economic Theory 1(1), 71-100. Bowles, Samuel. (1974, May). “Economists as Servants of Power.” American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 64(2), 129-32. Campbell, Richmond, and Vinci, Thomas. (1983, December). “Novel Confirmation.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 34(4), 315-341/ Dickert-Conlin, Stacy, and Chandra, Amitabh Durkin, John T., Jr., and Greeley, Andrew M. (1991). “A Model of Religious Choice Under Uncertainty: On Responding Rationally to the Nonrational.” Rationality and Society 3(2), 178-96. Ehrlich, Isaac, and Chuma, Hiroyuki. (1987). “The Demand for Life: Theory and Applications.” In Radnitzky, Gerard, and Bernholz, Peter, eds., Economic Imperialism (New York: Paragon House Publishers), pp. 243-268. Elster, Jon. (1986). Ulysses and the Sirens: Studies in Rationality and Irrationality. (New York: Cambridge University Press). Flavin, Marjorie. (1981, October). “The Adjustment of Consumption to Changing Expectations about Future Income.” Journal of Political Economy 89(5), 974-1009. Frank, Robert H. (1987, September). “If Homo Economicus Could Choose His Own Utility Function, Would He Want One with a Conscience?” American Economic Review 77(4), 593-604. Frank, Robert H. (1990). “Rethinking Rational Choice.” In Friedland, Roger, and Robertson, A. F., eds., Beyond the Marketplace: Rethinking Economy and Society (New York: Aldine de Gruyter), pp. 53-87. Frank, Robert H. (1997). Microeconomics and Behavior (3rd ed.). (New York: McGraw-Hill). Friedman, David. (1987, October). “Cold Houses in Warm Climates and Vice Versa: A Paradox of Rational Heating.” Journal of Political Economy 95(5), 1089-97. Friedman, Milton. (1953). “The Methodology of Positive Economics,” in Essays in Positive Economics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), 3-43. Friedman, Milton. (1957). A Theory of the Consumption Function. (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press [for National Bureau of Economic Research]). Galbraith, J. K. (1984). The Affluent Society (4th edition). Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co. Glazer, Jacob, and Rubinstein, Ariel. (2001, August). “Debates and Decisions: On a Rationale of Argumentation Rules.” Games and Economic Behavior 36(2), 158-73. Guilday, J. E. (1967). “Differential Extinction during Late-Pleistocene and Recent Times,” in Martin, P. S., and Wright, H. E., Jr., eds., Pleistocene Extinctions (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press). Goff, Brian L., and Tollison, Robert D. (1987, October). “The Allocation of Death in the Vietnam War: A Public Choice Perspective.” Southern Economic Journal 54(2), 316-21. Green, Donald P., and Shapiro, Ian. (1996). Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory: A Critique of Applications in Political Science. (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press). Hall, Robert E. (1978, December). “Stochastic Implications of the Life Cycle-Permanent Income Hypothesis: Theory and Evidence.” Journal of Political Economy 86(6), 971-87. Hausman, Daniel M. (1984). “Introduction,” in Hausman, Daniel M., ed., The Philosophy of Economics: An Anthology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 1-50. Hausman, Daniel M. (1989, Spring). “Economic Methodology in a Nutshell.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 3(2), 115-28. Hausman, Daniel M., and McPherson, Michael S. (1996). Economic Analysis and Moral Philosophy. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). Hausman, Daniel M., and McPherson, Michael S. (1997, September). “Beware of Economists Bearing Advice.” Policy Options 18(7), 16-19. Quote is taken from the copy of the paper on Hausman’s web site: . Hamermesh, Daniel S., and Soss, Neal M. (1974, January-February). “An Economic Theory of Suicide.” Journal of Political Economy 82(1), 83-98. Hoftsadter, Douglas R. (1979). Godel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid. (New York: Vintage Books). Hogarth, Robin M., and Reder, Melvin W. (1987). Rational Choice: The Contrast Between Economics and Psychology (Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press). Jensen, Michael C., and Meckling, William H. (1976, October). “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure.” Journal of Financial Economics 3, 305-360. Lakatos, I. (1970). “Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes,” in I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave, eds., Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970), 91-196. Iannaccone, Laurence R. (1984). “Consumption Capital and Habit Formation with an Application to Religious Participation.” U. Chicago Ph.D. Dissertation. __________. (1990). “Religious Practice: A Human Capital Approach.” Journal of the Scientific Study of Religion 29(3), 297-314. __________. (1998, September). “Introduction to the Economics of Religion.” Journal of Economic Literature XXXVI, 1465-96. Kahn, James A., Landsburg, Steven E., and Stockman, Alan C. (1992). “On Novel Confirmation.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 43, 503-16. Keeler, Theodore E., Hu, The-Wei, Barnett, Paul G., and Manning, Willard G. (1993, April). “Taxation, Regulation, and Addiction: A Demand Function for Cigarettes Based on Time-Series Evidence.” Journal of Health Economics 12, 1-18. Kreps, David M. (1990). A Course in Microeconomic Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Lakatos, I., and Zahar, E. (1978). “Why did Copernicus’s Research Programme Supercede Ptolemy’s?” In Worrall, J., and Currie, G., eds., The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes/Imre Lakatos (New York: Cambridge University Press). Leontief, Wassily. (1971, March). “Theoretical Assumptions and Nonobserved Facts.” American Economic Review 61(1), 1-7. Marschak, J. (1965). “Economics of Language.” Behavioral Science 10, 135-140. Martin, Paul S. (1967). “Prehistoric Overkill,” in Martin, P. S., and Wright, H. E., Jr., eds., Pleistocene Extinctions (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press). Mas-Collel, Andreu, Whinston, Michael, and Green, Jerry R. (1995). Microeconomic Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.