Preview

The Two Nation Theory

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1788 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Two Nation Theory
Ideology --- Two Nation Theory Sir Syed --- Quaid --- Iqbal

Introduction: i) Sir Syed Ahmed Khan: The man who spoke first the Muslims as a “nation” in the modern times was none other than Sir Syed Ahmed Khan. In 1867, he said: “I am convinced that both these nations will not join whole heartedly in anything. At present there is no open hostility between the two nations. But on accounts of so called educated people it will increase in the future.” Analyzing on the demand of Indian National Congress for introduction of parliamentary elections he said: “The proposals of congress are exceeding expediently for a country which is inhabited by two different nations. Now suppose if the English leave India who would be the ruler of India? Is it possible under these circumstances that the two nations, the Indians and the Muslims would sit on the same throne? Most certainly not. It is necessary that one of them should surrender the other. To hope that both would remain equal is to desire the impossible.” ii) Allama Iqbal: He was a great philosopher and political thinker. He had studied Islam deeply and had profound likening for the Islamic principles. He compared the western culture with Islam and reached the conclusion that the welfare of mankind laid in the adoption of Islam as a way of life. He awakened the Muslims of the subcontinent and asked them to struggle for a separate homeland. This he did through his poetry. He said: “I am fully convinced that the Muslims of India will ultimately have to establish a separate homeland as they cannot live with Hindus in United India.” Allama Iqbal openly negated the concept of one nation and emphasize on the separate national identity of Muslims. He was against the separation of religion from politics: “India is a continent of human beings belonging to different languages and religions. To base a constitution on the conception of homogenous India is to prepare her for civil war. I, therefore demand a separate Muslim state in the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    2003 Apush Dbq Analysis

    • 1007 Words
    • 5 Pages

    One inevitable impact the division had on the people was perhaps one of the greatest refugee crises and migration in history. Over 10 million people moved between India and Pakistan. For the most part, the Hindus generally moved into the Indian subcontinent while the Muslims, who feared Hindu domination, migrated to East and West Pakistan. In Document 8 it shows that there were around 8.6 million Muslim refugees that migrated out of India into either East or West Pakistan. In addition to this extraordinary refugee crises, another effect the division of India had was border tensions. The tensions between the borders of India and Pakistan resulted in India being at the “receiving end of Pakistan’s heavy shelling” and “heavy bombing” (Document 9b). This shows that not only was there a large scale migration crises, there was also several attacks and possibly deaths and casualties from bombs. Also, in document 9a it that states that another effect of the division was that there were “two armed conflicts (in 1965 and 1999) and numerous clashes between Indian and Pakistani forces”. This highlights the various facets of the tensions and problems the division of India had on the Hindus and Muslims. It is inevitable that the division of the region greatly affected the people who lived there by causing the largest migration in human history, armed conflicts, and…

    • 1007 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This statement triggers the thought-provoking question of why making that point clear seemed to be such a priority of the chapter. The class discussion that followed this reading expanded upon Metcalf’s and Metcalf’s possible literary motives, and what they were trying to convey by describing the considerable change that occurred throughout these centuries. An interesting theory that was brought to my attention during the discussion was that the authors’ goal in deconstructing the perception of India as a “timeless” nation may have been a response to Hindu Nationalism. Certain rhetoric of Hindu Nationalists is centered around painting Muslims in a villainous light--focusing only on past violent occurrences, and not crediting them as the source of any positive change within India-- making the minority Muslim population of India the target of prejudice and discrimination. By Metcalf and Metcalf acknowledging the important role the Sultanate and Mughal empires played in developing India economically, politically, agriculturally and in regards to establishing infrastructure, perhaps people will be more informed when it comes to understanding the advancements that occurred in India due to Islamic…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nationlism

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages

    By reading this thoughtful essay, I learned that it is not easy to find an exact definition about who can be defined as an American.…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Since the partition of India, there were signs that Islamic movements were demanding creation of a nation. Allama Iqbal, a philosopher of Muslim India, is credited with articulating the idea that only creating an Islamic state the Islamic society could be preserved. Iqbal also viewed Islam as a binding force, which would integrate the Muslim community consisting of various ethnic and linguistic origins, thus making his view of nationalism both ideological as well as territorial. In 1940, Muhammad Ali Jinnah, passed the Lahore resolution, a political statement adopted by the Muslim League demanding the creation of independent states for Muslims. The majority of the congress were non-religious and opposed the division, however the idea was taken up by the Hindu and Muslim masses. In a short amount of time the Muslim League mobilized the Muslim population behind the slogan of “Pakistan- a nation for Muslims”. Religion was always described as the most important basis of Muslim nationhood, but it is noteworthy that in Pakistan’s case, Islam was used as a way to foster group identity with the intent of mobilizing the masses. The actual belief system of Islam did not play a significant role in the pre-independence days, since the Muslim League did not appeal to the ulama (Muslims legal scholars). Pakistan was created in 1947, and it hardly had any national unity: they did not speak the same language or have a homogenous culture,…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    According to orthodox historians, Jinnah was central to the partition of India.* He transformed the Muslim League from an elitist, marginally supported party to one of the most influential bodies at the all-India level. He mobilised the Muslims masses and according to Gilmartin, helped them to transcend their provincial divides and focus on a wider cause.* Jinnah accused the Indian National Congress of having a Hindu bias and feared their totalitarianism. He developed the 'Two Nations' theory, which asserted that Hindus and Muslims were two separate nations and should have parity in central and provincial governments. This led to the passing of the Lahore Resolution in March 1940, which orthodox historians highlight as the beginning of his campaign for Pakistan. Jinnah formally asserted that the Muslims were a nation and 'independent states'* should be formed. In June 1940, he published his 'Tentative Proposals,' which repeated his demands for the division of Hindus and Muslims and advocated…

    • 2129 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many scholars who have studied the India-Pakistan conflict have depicted historical evidence about India-Pakistan relations. In particular, some research studies have focused on the development of Indian and Pakistani’s identity (Veer, 1987, 1994, 2004; Sheth, 2013;Robb, 1991). The book Ethnic Conflict & Civic Life, edited by Ashutosh Varshney (2002), described the ethnic conflict between Hindus and Muslims through a perspective of social structure, highlighting the role of government. Furthermore, in the book Religious Nationalism: Hindus and Muslims in India, Peter Van Der Veer provides a constructivist perspective on the formation of Muslim and Hindus identity, and its changing along with the historical development, he admits the role of identities in the formation of religious, the vital part for hatred relationship between Hindus and Pakistani, but he didn’t go further to probe the significant of identity.…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This disintegration of Mughal Empire started after the demise of the emperor aourangzeb, to which several causes are ascribed which are at present out of out study. Form journalistic point of viuew , we should have a glance to the independence war of 1857and its effects. The struggle for the feerdom of the county began long before 1875. Including the infidelity of the Hindus and infidelity of other sections of the native inhabitants of the sub-continent. However it was fully realized that armed struggle would be futile and that the situation demanded a long political and constitutional struggle for the coveted independence. The muslime of the sub-continent also realized the facts of being a minority in the sub-continent and being left alone to their fate by the major sections of the natives, especially the Hindus. The Hindus betrayed the muslims in the independence war of 1857 outrageously, rather joined hands with the British ruling clique in order to gain illegitimate advantages over the muslims, with the ulterior motive to avenge their slavery to the muslim rule for wver one thousand years. Hthe clear visualization of these facts and realization of their lost political, social, educational, economic and cultural supremacy resulted in the origin of two-nation theory which proved the way to the creation of Pakistan.…

    • 2068 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sir Syed Ahmed Khan expressed a belief that the Muslims were a separate entity from Hindus. It was not acceptable by Muslims that Hindus and Muslims can be one nation. Muslims were different in history, religion, civilization and languages. It did become important for the Muslims of India to establish a political party of their own.…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Building upon Sir Sayyid Ahmed's two-nation theory, absorbing the teaching of Shibli, Ameer Ali, Hasrat Mohani and other great Indian Muslim thinkers and politicians, listening to Hindu and British voices, and watching the fermenting Indian scene closely for approximately 60 years, he knew and ultimately convinced his people and their leaders, particularly Quaid-i-Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah that:…

    • 375 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Meaning of Two Nation Theory The Two Nation theory in its simplest way, means the cultural, political, religious, economic and social dissimilarities between the two major communities, Hindus and Muslims of the Sub Continent. These differences of out look, in fact, were greatly instrumental in giving rise to two distinct political ideologies which were responsible for the partition of India into two independent states. Role of Sir Syed Ahmed Khan Sir Syed Ahmed Khan, the pioneer of two nation theory, used the word ‘two nation’ for Hindus and Muslims after being convinced of the Hindus and Congress hatred, hostility and prejudice for the Muslims. The entire freedom movement revolved around the two nation theory which was introduced by Sir Syed Ahmed Khan. He considered all those lived in India as one nation and was a great advocate of HinduMuslim unity. Speaking at the meeting of Indian Association he said: “I look to both Hindus and Muslims with the same eyes and consider them as my own eyes. By the word ‘Nation’ I mean only Hindus and Muslims and nothing else. We, Hindus and Muslims live together on the same soil under the same government. Our interests and problems are common, and therefore, I consider the two factions as one nation.” Sir Syed Ahmed Khan did his best to make the Muslims realize their differences with the Hindus with regard to religions, social and language, rational and international identity and for this purpose he diverted attention of the Indian Muslims towards a new idea of “Two Nation” or “Two entities.” After Hindi-Urdu controversy Sir Syed felt that it was not possible for Hindus and Muslims to progress as a single nation. He said: “I am convinced now that Hindus and Muslims could never become one nation as their religion and way of life was quite distinct from each other.”…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As all nations in Europe were Christians and there was no concept of a separate nation on the basis of religion. So they regarded India as a single country inhabited by Indians who were a nation collectively. But the Muslims and Hindus were conscious about their religious differences and of being two separate nations. In India, Hindus were in majority so Congress was in favour of combined elections. In a democratic government every bill or law is passed by a majority of 51% or more and in this situation the Hindus would get 100% legislative powers and Muslims would get no power to effect legislation in their own country. More in number than the population of any state in Europe, they would have no share in government. Thus they would become slaves and serfs having zero percent power in legislation, politics, and administration of their own country.…

    • 3572 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    jahnavi

    • 4699 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Following in the 1930s, the idea of separate nation-state and influential philosopher Sir Iqbal's vision of uniting the four provinces in North-West British India further support the rational of Two-nation theory. Constitutional struggle of Jinnah and political struggle of founding fathers, the Muslim League played a decisive role in the World War II in 1940s and as the driving force behind the division of India along religious lines and the creation of Pakistan as a Muslim state in 1947. The events leading the World War II, the Congress effective protest against the United Kingdom unilaterally involving India in the war without consulting with the Indian people; the Muslim League went on to support the British war efforts, which was allowed to actively propagandise against the Congress with the cry of. "Islam in Danger".…

    • 4699 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Allam Iqbal

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages

    “India is not a country, it is a Sub-continent of human beings belonging to different languages and practicing different religions. Muslim nation has its own religious and cultural identity.”…

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Two Nation Theory

    • 2058 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Secondly, a nation must have a political organization of passionate desire for such an organization. But a nationality is a political, cultural, spiritual and unified community of a people.…

    • 2058 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    23 rd March Pakistan day

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the words of Quaid-i-Azam: “Hindus and the Muslims belong to two different religions, philosophies, social customs and literature. They neither inter-marry nor inter-dine and, indeed, they belong to two different civilizations that are based mainly on conflicting ideas and conceptions. Their concepts on life and of life are different. It is quite clear that Hindus and Muslims derive their inspiration from different sources of history. They have different epics, different heroes and different episodes. Very often the hero of one is a foe of the other, and likewise, their victories and defeats overlap. To yoke together two such nations under a single state, one as a numerical minority and the other as a majority, must lead to growing discontent and final destruction of any fabric that may be so built up for the government of such a state”.…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays