Preview

The Truth Be Told: Socrates Examinations of Life

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
969 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Truth Be Told: Socrates Examinations of Life
The Truth Be Told: Socrates Examinations of Life

In this essay I am evaluating if Socrates death harmed the citizens of Athens more then it did Socrates himself. Socrates has two reasons why Athens will be more harmed then him by his death. When Socrates died he did just that, he left the earth and was no longer there, after this moment Socrates was no longer harmed by his own death, the people of Athens however went on to suffer the repercussions for years to come. It was Athens in the end that suffered, Socrates was at peace.

The first reason Socrates believed that his death would be more harmful on the Athenian people because the children would lose their teacher. The children looked up to Socrates as their role model, they enjoyed watching him examine people and proving them unwise when they think that they are wise. They learnt from his philosophizing. Socrates predicted that his execution would make the children of Athens rebel. During the trial, he used the analogy of horses and horse trainers in comparison to teaching the children. He stated that not just anyone can train a horse; only an expert could do so. Most people would have a negative effect on the horses if they tried to train them. Therefore, saying that the same goes for children, it would take someone with expertise to better the children’s minds. Without an appropriate mentor the children would never learn as they age into adulthood which would affect Athens for years to come.

The second reason Socrates believed that his death would be more harmful on the citizens of Athens is that during his trial he referred to them as a big slow horse, and referred to himself as a fly; and this fly is constantly biting the horse to make him move faster. The point of this analogy was to show the people that without him they will suffer. Socrates is always trying to improve the people of Athens. Without him, there will be no one there to find out the truth, to teach the truth. With Socrates gone the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    But on the other hand this choice has to be made "on attaining manhood". If the individual decides to stay and live there then he is automatically participating in the law making process and he engages in the "political association" (The Politics). In conclusion he must completely obey any decision the state makes concerning him even if this decision involves his death. He continues and states that if he would escape, the city and its laws could be destroyed. The judicial system would have no more power because the people will stop trusting the system. Chaos would be the imminent outcome. Therefore we get to another minor premise that states that destroying Athens laws will hurt its citizens. Committing an act that could harm other people is against Socrates premise of living well. By harming other people you destroy your own character and conscience. According to Socrates life is not worth living with a ruined conscience the same as it is not worth living "with a body which is worn out and ruined in health"…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In response from a Socrates’ being calm and cheerful, reason was that was just popular opinion, which I believe means that would be the best decision if Socrates’ wanted to escape death and be exiled from Athens all together. And then said “My escape would not help my children”, by which at that time period in human history, if Socrates’ was to escape from prison and was to never return to Athens. His children would go through life being called names, their father would be called names, they would go through town with everybody showing no love towards them like before their father escaped, and may even have rocks thrown at them as a punishment for their father’s cowardly mistake in eluding death.…

    • 1243 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    He believes that these laws has given him birth, have educated him, raised him and have shared the wealth of Athens with him. Socrates thinks that the people of Athens are free to leave if they find the laws unjust, but if they want to stay then they must abide by the laws of Athens. The only thing that he points out are the people in power. He thinks that the people who are in power have changed the original laws for their own benefit. “been wronged, not by the Laws, but by men” (p 54). Socrates accepts death penalty because he wants the laws should be remain in place. Given opportunities such as exile or apology, he argues that if he escape from the prison, it will destroy the laws of the city and, eventually, the city because according to Socrates no city can survive without its laws being enforced. Therefore, Socrates steadfast by his believes of not violating any…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates Quote Analysis

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This quote is significant because it exemplifies the way Socrates uses HIS method. Socrates uses metaphors in order to humbly enlighten his audience. At times Socrates structure of explanation is perceived to be complex and or difficult to interpret. To simplify what he is attempting to get across usually takes a thorough examination. Socrates is from ancient times and his methodology still suits fit to modern day. Analyzing the context of his circumstances before death alone goes to show the depth of understanding one needs to comprehend his ideology and beliefs. This quote also provides us with the notion of not being selfish and to avoid pretentious. When one thinks about death or the chance of dying when they’re in a predicament because…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Interlocutor Vs Meno

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In this dialogue, Socrates is attempting to defense himself at the trial and prove his innocence, while others are trying to put him to death for introducing strange gods and corrupting the youth. Socrates's first sentence sets the tone and direction for the whole dialogue. Socrates, in addressing the men of Athens, states that he almost forgets who he is because of…

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Plato’s Apology: A Defense of Socrates was assumed to serve as Socrates’ trial for his being a fink and shady practices with the youth. Socrates safeguarded himself in a way that he was solely operating assistance to the god that claimed that he was more knowledgeable than everyone else. This defiance didn’t function, and he didn’t win the trial. Socrates continued defending during the ruling allocation of the trial, which lead to him being condemned to death, and aforesaid he was compelled to display his state or condition of being subject to death. Socrates looked at death as not being a dreadful. The information in this paper will clarify how Socrates developed that theory and display why this development is not true.…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Socrates believed that his purpose, as a moral individual, was to achieve true wisdom of virtue and justice. With this considered, one may ask, "Then why did he accept punishment for crimes he didn't commit?" Socrates didn't care for fate, because he was only concerned for whether or not he and others were doing the right thing. This belief is shown to be evident when Socrates says, "You are sadly mistaken, fellow, if you suppose that a man with even a grain of self-respect should reckon up the risks of living or dying, rather than simply consider, whenever he does something, whether his actions are just or unjust, the deeds of a good man or a bad one." (Defence of Socrates, 28a).…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates lived during a time period where the transition from the height of the Athenian empire to its decline took place. Such a decline took place at the hands of Sparta where Athenians faced defeat in the Peloponnesian war (2006). Thus this was a time period where the Athenians were recovering from the humiliating defeat from Sparta. This was also a time in culture where Greeks believed and thought of gods and goddesses as being associated with protecting particular cities. They believed that Athens was protected by the Greek goddess Athena (2006). These aspects have great significance in shaping up the death of Socrates. Because most of the teachings and beliefs of Socrates went against the belief of Athena and her godly existence, the people of Athens became quite irritated and frustrated with Socrates. The last thing they desired was to have one man in the form of Socrates questioning Athena and subjecting all Athenians to yet another painful punishment at her hands. Thus the entire false accusations were built around this aspect and Socrates was brought to trial. (2006). Even though Socrates had strong valid arguments against the accusers it all fell in deaf ears and the unfortunate, wrong verdict was brought forward declaring that Socrates is guilty and that he was to be sentenced to death by drinking a cup of hemlock. The court stated that Socrates was…

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The question of Socrates’ criminality is not straightforward. The truth or falsity of the accusations is not certain. Also, the perspective from which the question is viewed changes its answer. The only certainty is that the philosopher, Socrates, was found guilty and sentenced to death by a jury of his peers for corrupting the youth and a disbelief in the Athenian’s Gods. If the Apology’s origins are to be believed, as in if Plato wrote a true description of events, then it can be said that Socrates does not believe himself to be guilty of these crimes.…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since Athenians were so close minded, they out casted anyone that didn't conform to their traditions. They should have been open to anything and not simply dislike a person or a situation because it didn’t follow their ideals. Socrates’ trial eventually led to his death and this illustrates that everyone has limitations. We can’t reject what we were taught or certain laws in society just because we don’t agree. Society functions because we work together and change together not because we do what we want. Furthermore, when Socrates was on trial he made a point to say that the democracy was poison to the people. Yet when his friend Crito offers him an escape from his death he denies the offer because he believes it is unjust to not face his execution. There are many theories behind why Socrates said no since he didn’t support the democracy; I believe it is because he had an open mind. (Crito,76-77). Yes, him being open-minded lead to his death; however, it indicates that he understood limitations of the law and respected societies perspectives.…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Socrate's Conviction

    • 1666 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Why, in a society relishing freedom and democracy, would a seventy-year-old philosopher be executed for what he was teaching? What could Socrates have done to prompt a jury of 500 Athenians send him to his death just a few years before he would have died naturally? He was charged with not believing in the gods worshipped by the city, introducing new divinities and for corrupting the youth. Socrates was a freethinker who went around Athens probing his fellow Athenians with questions and dialectal interrogations about religion and politics. He held contemporary views, that when he expressed them, provoked his listeners to anger. In 423 B.C., Socrates produced a play called Clouds, which at the time proved to be no threat to Athenian values and democracy. Characters in the play were taught how strengthen weak arguments by learning rhetorical skills and trickery and innovative divinities were introduced. However in 399 B.C., Socrates was charged with impiety. This was not the only charge brought against this philosopher; he was also accused for corrupting adolescences, Alcibiades and Critias. Should he have been condemned to death over such charges? Although religion and the state were central to ancient Athenian law, Socrates was executed unjustly.…

    • 1666 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The most intriguing people you will encounter in this life are the people who had insights about you, that you didn't know about yourself” (Alder). This quote can be used to show why the great Greek philosopher, Socrates is deemed as being so intriguing. During his time, Socrates was seen as a great threat because he tended to break free from the normal way of thinking and inevitably, people became afraid of him. Socrates was eventually put to death on account of “corrupting the youth” and being an “atheist,” which were false claims against him to cover up the fact that his accusers simply didn’t like him or his ways. When reading Plato’s Republic, Socrates is shown as being very intriguing because of: his humble ways, his Socratic method,…

    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Socrates Vs Crito

    • 2078 Words
    • 9 Pages

    What will they think if Socrates is not in charge of his kids? Socrates contends that the conclusion of a specialist is more essential than the sentiment of the dominant part. He gives the sample of somebody in preparing. Such a man does not pay consideration on the counsel of the overall population, however to his coach. In the event that he listened to popular assessment (take steroids, eat whatever you need, train 20 hours a day), he could hurt his body. Socrates extends the relationship to settling on what the right route is to act. On the off chance that we listen to the larger part instead of specialists we could hurt our souls, the some portion of us that is mangled by wrong activities and profited by right ones(Crito, 47a-48a). Socrates concedes that as a greater part, the overall population has the ability to kill individuals, yet he expresses that the most essential thing is not living, but rather carrying on with a decent life, so it is not worth after the assessment of the dominant part in the event that it means relinquishing something that is critical for living a decent life.(48b) . The above is one of Socrates' most key standards - that the truly critical thing is not to live but rather to live well. Thusly he considers whether it is ethically right to pay off the watchmen and escape. Socrates starts considering so as to tend to this issue the results for the city of Athens. He says that the laws and the city could be crushed on the off chance that he got away. Lawful judgments could lose their power in the event that they were invalidated by private nationals, and a city without laws would not stay in place for…

    • 2078 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    He mentions “no evil can happen to a good man either in this life or in death.”(Plato, apology Sec41) In other words he doesn’t resent anything he had done and knows he would have done it again. The “evil” refers to the idea of denial to learn new concepts and thoughts. Socrates will not let ignorance over power what he believed in. By being self-center and ignorant you’re only affecting yourself. As Socrates got wiser other people stayed the same. New ideas can cause fear to a society which can lead to violence. After all Socrates believed that his body would be gone but his soul would remain intact. If he feared his death that would have made him ignorant like the rest of the people. In reality I think he feared “evil” (ignorance) instead of death…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I was dismayed to find that Socrates was guilty after pleading his case. In his plea he explains that he does believe in the gods and that it is true that he believes in the underworld and the spiritual world but that is because he believes in the gods that he believes in both of these things. That if you believe in the spiritual world you have to believe in the gods and he is teaching his pupils about the spiritual world. In saying all of this Socrates is proving the point that he is not corrupting the young but he is trying to educate them more. It is very out of the ordinary that someone is to be found guilty and put to death just because he is speaking his mind. The main form of education was through tutors or sophists and Socrates had his own opinions which he was just educating other pupils on. That is also a huge difference in our time periods, in our years someone would never be put to death for speaking about his or her religion or way of thinking. In the Athenian court system they let the citizens’ vote. Which shows some similarities with our modern court system because we do have a jury but we mainly just let the jury and the judge decide. They may be put in prison for harassing others but never condemned to…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays