Preview

The Toulmin Model Of Argument 1

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1524 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Toulmin Model Of Argument 1
The Toulmin Model of Argument

(adapted from: http://schoolnet.org.za/twt/09/M9_argumentation.pdf)

In his work on logic and argument, The Uses of Argument, Stephen Toulmin indicates three major, necessary parts of an argument, along with three additional, optional parts. The three major parts are the claim, the support, and the warrants.

Claim: This is the disputable assertion for which a speaker argues. The claim may be directly stated or the claim may be implied. You can find the claim by asking the question, "What is the author trying to prove?"

Support: These are the reasons given in support of the claim; they are also known as evidence, proof, data, arguments, or grounds. The support of a claim can come in the form of facts and statistics, expert opinions, examples, explanations, and logical reasoning. You can find the support by asking, "What does the author say to persuade the reader of the claim?"

Warrants: These are the assumptions or presuppositions underlying the argument, explaining why or how the data supports the claim. Warrants are generally accepted beliefs and values, common ways our culture or society views things; because they are so commonplace, warrants are almost always unstated and implied. The author and audience may either share these beliefs, or the author’s warrants may be in conflict with audience’s generally held beliefs and cultural norms and values. Warrants are important because they are the "common ground" of author and audience; shared warrants invite the audience to participate by unconsciously supplying part of the argument. Warrants are also important because they provide the underlying reasons linking the claim and the support. You can infer the warrants by asking, "What’s causing the author to say the things s/he does?" or "Where’s the author coming from?"

Here’s a visual representation and an example:

In this example, the claim that universities should reinstate affirmative action polices is supported by

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Argument/Finding (What position did the author take? What were their main points? What are their claims/conclusions?) (75)…

    • 2260 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Calculus Project

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Follow-Up: Suppose you are the owner of Saucy Soup Company. You need to present an argument to your board of directors as to what shape soup can your company should sell. Some things to keep in mind:…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    4. What is the term designating a valid argument with true premises? A strong argument with true premises?…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Alternatively, to prove or justify a statement might be defined in terms of providing adequate evidence for…

    • 5131 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Argue Analysis Worksheet

    • 3144 Words
    • 13 Pages

    • A claim or conclusion is the statement whose truth an argument is meant to establish.…

    • 3144 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Structured designs or arguments can attract a greater range of attention by playing close attention to their intended topic. Throughout history many beautifully structured arguments such as a speech or a certain subject in democracy has brought about the nations patriotic proclamation to demonstrate a country of free speech and democracy. The Toulmin Argument was introduced by a man by the name of Stephen Toulmin a British philosopher who thought to research the idea and method that describes the way people make such convincing arguments. Toulims’ argument takes into account situations in which people have to deal with throughout their lives with words such as sometimes, often, and almost which deal with…

    • 377 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    T or F: A claim is what you use to state an opinion or a belief.…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    English 101

    • 1436 Words
    • 5 Pages

    o Supporting evidence, which means one to two phrases or facts that support the topic sentence of each body paragraph.…

    • 1436 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Toulmin Model

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Claims of fact, value and policy are an important input to supporting and warrant the three legs of the communication (triangle). Back on “1958” Stephen Toulmin proposed the six terms as a model of communication designed to analyze the court room rhetorician’s argument. These included the three legs of communication, which are writer, subject, and audience supporting the claims of fact, value and policy, in others words, claim is an author’s proposition in which he/she is trying to prove a statement. In addition, Wayne Brockriede and Douglas Ehninger brought to coaction the six key terms in Toulmin model connecting the three legs of the communication (triangle), which are: writer, subject, and audience and it included as a support warrant the claims of fact, value and policy (Rottenberg, Winchell, 2015) .…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What Is A Toulmin Model

    • 142 Words
    • 1 Page

    The information in the material shows of how a Toulmin model is used to analyze as well to create an argument outline. In this process the Toulmin model separates the components of an argument into pieces and analyze further more. It is composed of six points; the first point is the claim which is the main idea the essay. Secondly, we have the data where the writer use evidences to support its claim. Thirdly, is the warrant that connects the claim with the data. Fourthly, we have the backing which allows to support the warrant that becomes acceptable by the audience. Fifthly, we have the Rebuttals that states which is wrong or right of the argument from different points of view. Finally, we have the qualifiers which is a phrase that changes…

    • 142 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    To illustrate the Toulmin Model, there is a situation where two friends, Amy and Penny, are arguing about which one of them would buy a particular dress. Amy claims she would because it suits her. As a result, Penny tells her to prove it. Amy explains how the dress is in her size, the color goes well with her, and that Penny only has enough money to buy some pants. With this new information, the data, Penny makes a realization, the warrant, of how her friend has a point so she lets Amy buy the…

    • 96 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    5 Summarising the text  - Introduce the text – give an overview: The text and its authors The main content covered in the text The author’s main argument State the argument in your own words Gengatharan Das 2013 A IMST 6 Summarising the text  Summarise the supporting evidence:  i. Main argument  Ii. Evidence to support the main argument  Think about how the evidence is used to support the main argument Gengatharan Das 2013 A IMST…

    • 750 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A claim is a statement of opinion that the writer is asking of the audience to accept as the truth. In other words, this can be seen as the thesis. The grounds are the facts, data, and/or reasoning upon which the claim is developed from. Substantially, the grounds are the facts making the case for the claim. The warrant is the bridge between the claim and the grounds. This is what makes the audience understand how the grounds are connected to supporting the claim. Sometimes, the warrant is bluntly obvious or not directly stated. As a writer, one is making assumptions about what your audience already believes. This forces one to think about how clear the warrant is and whether or not, it needs to be directly stated for the audience. Also, one needs to contemplate if the warrant is actually an unproven claim. Therefore, this makes warrant the most significant part of the Toulmin method despite some elements not being discussed yet. Without the warrant, the audience would not understand the point of the argument, defeating the whole purpose of the argument. The backing is the additional support for the claim. It addresses different questions related to the claim. Due note: this is acknowledging that there are other sides than explicitly counterarguing. The qualifier is the limitations to the claim. Basically, it recognizes that the claim is not always true. This adds strength to claims because it helps the audience understand the writer does not expect one’s opinion to be true all of the time. The rebuttal is where the writer addresses the opposing views. One can use a rebuttal to pre-empt counter arguments, making the original argument…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A. An example, illustration, statistic, comparison, quote from an expert or other supportive material that supports or illustrates Main Point 3 (Parenthetical Citation, if this came from a source).…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Recognizing Arguments

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the first part of the assignment we were asked to identify components of arguments, premise and conclusion, for the passages. Where applicable we are to highlight key words or phrases that identify a claim as a premise or a conclusion. A premise is the support for the conclusion. (Missimer, 2005) The first example has several premises as follows if Sue’s baby is a boy it will be named Mark and if it is a girl it will be named Margaret. Another premise is that Sue will have a boy or girl. “So” is a keyword indicating the conclusion that Sue’s baby will be named Mark or Margaret. In the next example, “because” is a keyword in the premise and indicates that the conclusion has preceded and a reason will follow. This premise is that fantasy novels are fiction and works of fiction are on the second floor. The conclusion here is if the library has The Lord of Ring, you won’t find it on the first floor. In the last example, a keyword can be found in a premise.…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays