Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

The Theory of Universal Grammar ( by Anntina Fyvonnequehz)

Powerful Essays
2049 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Theory of Universal Grammar ( by Anntina Fyvonnequehz)
Title: The Theory of Universal Grammar
( By Anntina Fyvonnequehz)

Introduction

The Theory of Universal Grammar has been expounded in Lightbown and White (1987, White (1989), and Ellis (1994), among others. It derives from Chomsky 's conceptualization of the nature of the linguistic universals that comprise a child 's innate linguistic knowledge. According to Chomsky (1976), there is a 'system of principles, conditions, and rules that are elements or properties of all human languages '.

What constitutes knowledge of language?

According to Robert Matthews knowing a language is a matter of knowing the system of rules and principles that is the grammar for that language. To have such knowledge is to have an explicit internal representation of these rules and principles, which speakers use in the course of language production and understanding. Speakers might be said to know the principles and rules of what linguists call universal grammar. That is, they might be said to know “that all human languages have phrase structure and transformational rules, or that the grammar of every language contains the rule S → NP+VP.”

How is knowledge of language “acquired”?
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, it describes language acquisition as a process by which humans acquire the capacity to perceive, produce and use words to understand and communicate. This capacity involves the picking up of diverse capacities including syntax, phonetics, and an extensive vocabulary. This language might be vocal as with speech or manual as in sign. Language acquisition usually refers to first language acquisition, which studies infants ' acquisition of their native language, rather than second language acquisition, which deals with acquisition (in both children and adults) of additional languages.
The capacity to acquire and use language is a key aspect that distinguishes humans from other organisms. While many forms of animal communication exist, they have a limited range of nonsyntactically structured vocabulary tokens that lack cross cultural variation between groups.
Strengths and Weaknesses of Universal Grammar Theory

According to Chomsky, children learn language so efficiently and so fast because they know in advance what languages look like. They were born with a substantial amount of innate knowledge. Children seem to know that language is rule governed. They know that a finite number of principles govern the enormous number of utterance they hear going around them. Children also have an instinctive awareness that languages are hierarchically structured i.e the knowledge that several words can go in the same structural slot as one (Aitchison.1998). A child might say : I like Pippy Or I like My Pippy Or I like My Old Pippy

However, an innate knowledge that language is rule-governed, that it has a hierarchical structure, that it makes use of structure-dependent operations by no means explains the whole of language acquisition especially second language acquisition. Universal grammar does not attempt to lay out many blanket statements that hold true for every single language on Earth. If it did that, after all, we would expect most languages to be roughly the same. Instead, we find an incredible range of languages. Instead, what a universal grammar seeks to do is to lay out propositions of the form, “If X is true, then Y will be true.” These structures lay out how all languages develop when faced with certain basic principles. Using these structures, students of universal grammar can attempt to state what word order a language might choose, what phonemes will be present, and other foundational traits of the language.
Another argument commonly leveled against universal grammar is that the theory itself is not actually falsifiable. Although it claims to be able to predict what new languages will be like, the sample size is small enough that when new languages are discovered the rules laid out must sometimes adapt to fit the new data. This would seem to undermine its validity as a strong predictive theory, making it more a cohesive set of observations about what we already know to be true. Aitchison.1998 stated that many researcher disputed Chomsky’s theory as they believed that children are born with some sort of process mechanism which enables them to analyse linguistic data. These researchers ( Slobin 1971) in Aitchison 1998 suggest that:
The child’s mind is somehow ‘set’ in a predetermined way to process the sorts of structures which characterize human language...That is not to say that the gramma- tical system itself is given as innate knowledge, but that the child has innate means of processing information and forming internal structures, and that when these capacities are applied to the speech he hears he succeeds in constructing a grammar of his native language. (Slobin 1991c:56)

Children learn a language as social need as they need to interact to other children. According to the everyday needs approach (Aitchison 1998) , children are by nature sociable little animals who need to interact with other humans. Besides they also have other need such as food. They are therefore concerned primarily with interacting with other people and with getting what they want. So they acquire speech in order to meet this need. Therefore, it is not surprising that children develop language in parallel form, even though they have never met one another. Children are said to be to primarily concern with the external world—finding out and getting what they want. As children attempts to learn about and manipulate some aspect of their environment, they look for ways to talk about it. Therefore language is said reflect the preoccupation of the children at each stage. The child learning a language obviously attains very complex and rich knowledge in a very short time. Hearing some sentences and other utterances, the child becomes able to produce virtually an infinite number of others, many with structures that he or she has never heard before. There is a poverty of stimulus relative to the fantastically rich outcome. Language knowledge including universal grammar, the parameter settings, and the lexicon, becomes the child 's in a very short span despite the fact that linguists working in the field for decades have only just begun to enumerate what this knowledge consists of. How does this occur? UG Theory, therefore, assumes the autonomy of grammar. It claims that grammar constitutes an autonomous body of knowledge which is independent of other cognitive systems such as perception, memory, or problem-solving. This contrasts with holistic positions, which view language as part of communication. According to such positions, it is impossible to consider grammatical form independently of function because form is determined by function. Chomsky and his followers claim otherwise. Gregg (1989: 26) argues that 'one can understand form independent of function; however, function is not enough to explain form. ' He suggests that phenomena like grammatical gender, third-person singular -s, and vowel harmony have no identifiable function. Of course, there is more to language than grammar - this not disputed - but the point is that grammar exists as a significant and autonomous phenomenon which must be studied in its own right.
Universal Grammar and Second Language Acquisition
The application of UG Theory to SLA has centered on whether 'the logical problem of language acquisition ' is the same as for L1 acquisition or needs to be restated. According to some, such as Cook (1988), the goal of a theory of L2 acquisition is the same as that of L1 acquisition - to account for how acquisition is possible given the 'poverty of the stimulus ' (i.e. the inadequacies of input describe above). According to others, however, the problem is somewhat different. Bley-Vroman (1989) points out that whereas all children acquire the grammar of their mother tongue, there is considerable variation in L2 acquisition, with most learners failing to achieve full competence. He argues that the logical problem of foreign language acquisition is to explain 'the quite high level of competence that is clearly possible in some cases, while permitting the wide range of variation that is possible ' . In essence, this debate concerns whether UG is or is not available to the L2 learner. A number of positions have been advance -a complete access position (Flynn 1987) a no-access view (for example, Clahsen and Muysken 1986); a partial-access position (for example, Schachter (1988) suggests that learners may have access to principles but not to the full range of parameters, while White (1989) has suggested that learners have access to those universals and parameters evident in their L1); and a dual-access position ). Although the process of learning and acquisition is still under debate, a number of studies show that regardless of the learners ' first language background, a second language acquisition order is similar to a first language acquisition order.
Krashen’s acquisition-learning theory has much in common with both the communicative approach to language study and Noam Chomsky’s theory of generative grammar. The idea of “comprehensible input” is simply another way of saying that students learn languages best when they are learning about things that interest them. This idea is the essence of the communicative approach. Krashen’s Natural Order Hypothesis says that we acquire the rules of grammar in a logical order. This is similar to generative grammar’s hypothesis that the basic foundations of human grammar are deeply embedded in the human brain.
So as a teacher I need to know that Chomsky Universal Grammar theory is almost the same as Krashen’s Acquisition-Learning hypothesis which revolves around the concept of “comprehensible input,” a term which essentially means “messages that can be understood.” Comprehensible input is best received when the learner is hearing something that he or she wants or needs to know.According to Krashen language learning is different from language acquisition, emphasizing that while learning is a formalized process, such as that which occurs in a classroom, acquisition happens informally, when a person is relaxed. He identifies a “silent period” during language acquisition, a time during which the student listens but is not comfortable speaking. This hypothesis help me as a teacher so I can teach my student in learning their second language better. The Acquisition-Learning hypothesis acknowledges that students learn faster as they are given more comprehensible input. Inversely, a lack of comprehensible input delays language acquisition. I will give more understandable input in learning their grammar as this is also in accordance with the current syllabus use in our schools in our country
. I will try to give more materials about culture because according to theories mentioned as students are immersed in a culture in which they do not know the language, they have an intense need and desire to speak that language. Such students are not interested in grammar lessons from a book but, instead, want to hear “comprehensible input” about that culture that teaches them what they need to know to survive.
In a nut shell, Chomsky’s Universal Grammar help to explain some of the ways children learn language but the theory did have its own weakness as it did not cover how children can understand and expand the vocabularies learnt. Anyway other researcher like Krashen did help to enlighten me as a teacher on how I can help my students in learning and mastering their second language acquisition.

References

1. Matthews, Robert. “Does Linguistic Competence Require Knowledge of Language?” Epistemology of Language. Ed. Alex Barber. Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York, 2003

2. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Language_acquisition

3. Aitchison, J.(1998) The Articulate Mammal 4th edn, New York: Routledge 4. Rod Ellis. Appraising second language acquisition theory in relation to ... filebox.vt.edu/users/sojuprin/Portfolio/Resource/... 5. White, Lydia. 1990. "Second Language Acquisition and Universal Grammar". In Lydia White, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 6. Scahchter, Jacquelin and Virginia Yip. 1991. "Grammaticality Judgements: Why does . anyone object to subject extraction". In Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 7 . Krashen, Stephen D. 1987. Applications of Psycholinguistics Research in the Classroom". . In Michael H. Long and Jack C. Richard (eds) Methodology in TESOL: A Book of Reading. New York: Newbury House Publishers, Inc 8. Krashen, Stephen D. 1988. Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning. New York: Prentice-Hall International Inc. 9 . Krashen, Stephen D. and Tracy D. Terrell. 1988. The Natural Approach. New York:. Prentice-Hall International Inc. 10. Cook, V.J. 1988. Chomsky 's Universal Grammar: An Introduction. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

References: 1. Matthews, Robert. “Does Linguistic Competence Require Knowledge of Language?” Epistemology of Language. Ed. Alex Barber. Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York, 2003 2. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Language_acquisition 3. Aitchison, J.(1998) The Articulate Mammal 4th edn, New York: Routledge 4 8. Krashen, Stephen D. 1988. Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning 9 . Krashen, Stephen D. and Tracy D. Terrell. 1988. The Natural Approach. New York:. 10. Cook, V.J. 1988. Chomsky 's Universal Grammar: An Introduction. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    GRAMMAR: A system of rules in a language that enables us to communicate with and understand others.…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Chomsky based his theory on language being an innate capability of humans, something that humans were born to do by nature's design. This idea of language being an innate capability of humans has its foundations in that despite cultural differences, all humans develop some form of language skills and it is done with remarkable consistency in terms of the milestones of development. This implies that language development is not reliant on a particular way of teaching children to speak, which does vary from culture to culture.…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Chomsky, who supports the ideas of Nativism, has argued that a Universal Grammar exists, and that children are able to learn language so quickly because of an innate understanding of syntax rules (the rules for combining words in to sentences); he proposes that through the use an innate ‘language acquisition device’ language specific features of utterances (the surface structure of language) are translated into the innate deep structure of language with which children are born (Mitchell and Ziegler, 2012, p206).…

    • 1473 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Acquired Dyslexia

    • 1896 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The use of language is one of the most complex tasks the human brain must carry out. The way in which children acquire language is studied very carefully. This acquisition is enhanced by teaching from skilled language users, but in itself acquired by the child's own observation and learning. For this reason the acquisition of spoken language is perhaps more well documented then the taught acquisition of reading skills.…

    • 1896 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A child’s ability to acquire language is one of life’s most fascinating observations. The way they come into this world, and with time, can build upon their language comprehension and are able to go from cooing to structured sentences is a talented skill. There are many theories that argue the different elements that allow children to acquire language. One being the Syntactic Model of language development.…

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This article includes the different stages of language acquisition. The stages are the receptive stage, early production stage, speech emergence stage, intermediate…

    • 246 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both theories emphasize the importance of the environment which plays a crucial role when stimulating child’s language development. Hence, in order to pick up the language in a proper way the child must be exposed to the language given. However, contradictory to the behaviourist theory, Chomsky claims that the language is, to some degree, confusing and the provided information is not sufficient for a child to learn the language only by imitating particular words and phrases. That is to say, the environment fails to provide all necessary information which the child needs.…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Chomsky, N. (2000). Knowledge of language: Its mature, origin and use. In R. J. Stainton (Ed.), Perspectives in the philosophy of language: A concise anthology (pp. 3-44). Peterborough: Broadview Press.…

    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Language Development

    • 4227 Words
    • 17 Pages

    What is language? According to Bochner (1997) language is a form of communication. It involves a system of signs and symbols that are used by a group of people to communicate. The symbols include but are not limited to written symbols and sounds. The language may be diverse in different cultures in terms of how the symbols system is used, the formal properties of the language, and the way people use that language to communicate with others in the same culture. Every culture has its own language system. As a matter of fact all languages have four main components (Bochner, 1997):…

    • 4227 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Philosophy of language is the reasoned inquiry into the nature, origins, and usage of language. It is a philosophical topic that has a long history and has seen a great deal of interest since the beginning of the 20th century in particular. One of the lasting questions within the philosophy of language is the question of language acquisition. Is it acquired through innate ideas or through experience? There have been many notable discussions and ideas related to this question. A look into this debate will shed some light on what the idea of innate knowledge is and whether or not it is intelligible to believe that humans possess innate knowledge and use it to acquire language.…

    • 2385 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Language is dynamic in nature. It changes from one generation to the next. Each change brings forth new developments to the language’s grammatical structure. This is because grammar is an essential part of a language. In fact, language will not make sense without grammar (Backstrom, 2006). David Crystal wrote in the article, In Word and Deed, “Grammar is the structural foundation of our ability to express ourselves. The more we are aware of how it works, the more we can monitor the meaning and effectiveness of the way we and others use language” (Crystal, 2004). In other words, grammar is a collection of rules concerning what counts as socially acceptable and unacceptable language use.…

    • 1968 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Language, as a system of acquiring and using complex structures of communication, is distinguished between two components in theory of knowledge; language as a tool and language as reality.…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thesis Paragraph

    • 1025 Words
    • 5 Pages

    If a linguist identifies a sentence as "grammatical" this means that the sentence conforms to the hypothesized rules of the mental grammar…

    • 1025 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Noam Chomsky's Theories

    • 534 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Chomsky believed that it was more than a coincidence that the majority of human languages follow similar rules and patterns when it comes to grammar. Universal Grammar is considered to contain all the grammatical information needed to combine these categories, e.g. noun and verb, into phrases. The child’s task is just to learn the words of her language (Ambridge & Lieven). For example, according to the Universal Grammar account, children instinctively know how to combine a noun (e.g. a boy) and…

    • 534 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Universal Grammar is the brainchild of Noam Chomsky, adopting the cognitive approach. Human beings have implicit knowledge of grammar but may not be able to explain how they get this ability. This is because they have no conscious awareness of the processes involved.…

    • 4415 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays