Preview

The Study of Uniformitarianism

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1261 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Study of Uniformitarianism
The Study of Uniformitarianism
The origin of life on Earth is a fundamental scientific question, but we do not know as much as many biology textbooks would like you to believe. (Pigliucci)
Uniformitarianism is vital to the world of science. It is a geological doctrine. It states that the same natural laws and processes that operate in the universe now, have always operated in the universe in the past and apply everywhere in the universe. It assumes that geological processes have essentially not changed today from those from the past which are unobservable. As present processes are thought to explain all past events, the Uniformitarian slogan is "the present is the key to the past". Uniformitarianism is a key principle of geology. My research will explain the theory of uniformitarianism and the work of many geologists such as Charles Lyell and James Hutton.
To begin, one needs to understand that no serious scientific discussion of any topic should include supernatural explanations, since the basic assumption of science is that the world can be explained entirely in physical terms.
Uniformitarianism was formulated by Scottish naturalists in the late 18th century, beginning with the work of the geologist James Hutton, which was refined by John Playfair and popularized by Charles Lyell's Principles of Geology in 1830.
In 1785 James Hutton proposed an opposing, infinite cycle based on natural history and not on the Biblical record. The solid parts of the present land on earth appear to have been made up of the productions of the sea, and of other materials similar to those now found upon shores. Hence we find reason to conclude first, that the land we live on is not simple and original, but that it is a composition, and had been formed by the operation of second causes. Secondly, that before the present land was made, there had been a world composed of sea and land that had tides and currents, which still take place now at the bottom of the sea. And lastly, that

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    SCI 209 Entire Course

    • 661 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Describe at least one of the early research theories about the origins of life on Earth.…

    • 661 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In John/Hank Green’s video, “Life Begins: Crash Course Big History #4,” he discusses many different concepts encompassing the beginning of life on Earth. Life can adapt, metabolize and reproduce; but even these broad standards can make it difficult to classify certain things as ‘living.’ Regardless, the underlying principle is that life will actively try and increase its longevity, contrast to non-living things, which make no active attempt to exist longer. Another big idea is the transformation of scientific knowledge regarding life. For hundreds of centuries, even scientists believed that life could spontaneously appear – if food were to be left out in the open. This concept was shot down by scientist Louis Pasteur, who conducted an…

    • 332 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    the tunnel of samos

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There are, however, some convincing explana-tions, the oldest of which is based on a theoretical…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While Burnet primarily focused on the linear biblical history of Earth (‘time’s arrow’), it is clear that components of ‘time’s cycle’ are also prominent in his writings and the Bible (Burnet, 1691:13). Though Burnet’s narrative lacked clear empirical evidence—a key criticism that ultimately led to the demise of ‘time’s arrow’— he described "the great circle of time and fate,” where the biblical Paradise would be recovered once again in the future (1987: 27, 46). Despite religion’s role in ‘time’s arrow,’ this linear vision of time was also crucial to scientific progression (1987:11-12). While these metaphors deeply contradict, a clear division between them is lacking and both concepts are needed to thoroughly discuss the development of geological…

    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At first, it may appear as though there are many different explanations of how the earth came to be; however, with a closer look one can see that all explanations have the same message. Science and the Bible, often considered polar opposites, tell the same story just with different words. For instance, Genesis One and The World’s Biggest Membrane describe an ongoing process of creation. It is clear in Genesis One that God did not get it right the first time. After creating man God thinks, “It is not good for the man to be alone. I will make a helper suitable for him.” (2:18-19) Immediately following this thought God forms ‘wild animals’ and ‘all the birds in the sky’, unfortunately, this attempt is unsuccessful. God has no success until he eventually creates a woman from the man, to be his helper. He goes through a process of trial and error, rather than it happening all at once. Therefore, it is clearly evident that some form of evolution took place before the earth was completed for the time being. Lewis Thomas’ ideas parallel this when talking about the atmosphere. He talks about…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Huxley compares the uniformity within society by demonstrating the various forms it can take. Whether it’s a religious solidarity experience or their “physico-chemically” equality in death, Chapter 5 brings both forms together between its two parts. During the solidarity ritual, despite the intention of each individual losing their identities to become part of a larger being, Bernard focuses on Morgana’s eyebrow, differentiating her from the rest of the group. By isolating unique traits, he portrays his uniqueness from the others using their lack of interest in individual discrepancies. Likewise, when observing the smokestacks Henry could not help but wonder who each person was when they are alive. Henry’s interest prevailed. Regardless of…

    • 183 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    supernatural phenomena exist. From the time of the cavemen to the current day, there has always…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    For inspiration, Lyell turned to the fifty-year-old ideas of a Scottish farmer named James Hutton. In the 1790s, Hutton had argued that the Earth was transformed not by unimaginable catastrophes but by imperceptibly slow changes, many of which we can see around us today. Rain erodes mountains, while molten rock pushes up to create new ones. The eroded sediments form into layers of rock, which can later be lifted above sea level, tilted by the force of the uprising rock, and eroded away again. These changes are tiny, but with enough time they could produce vast changes. Hutton therefore argued that the Earth was vastly old — a sort of perpetual-motion machine passing through regular cycles of destruction and rebuilding that made the planet suitable for mankind. Lyell had an equally profound effect on our understanding of life's history. He influenced Darwin so deeply that Darwin envisioned evolution as a sort of biological uniformitarianism. Evolution took place from one generation to the next before our very eyes, he argued, but it worked too slowly for us to…

    • 1942 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Summary Of Wonderful Life

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Science has been around us since the beginning of times. In the book “Wonderful Life: The Burgess Shale and the Nature of History” written by Stephen Jay Gould, attempts to tackle one of the broadest issues that since can address, the nature of history itself. Gould’s main focus is on limestone quarry high in the Canadian Rockies known as the Burgess Shale. “Wonderful life” teaches the reader about animals and the evolution of our understanding of these animals' relationships to the organisms of today.…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Science, as a way of thinking, possesses many vital qualities for true understanding that common sense does not. Based on observations we make, science operates under theories, constantly revised and checked by experiment. Based on the required validity that we need to make judgments, science tests its own propositions, throwing out the theories which do not fit our world. Science also has controls, or ways of eliminating other explanations that may fit our preconceptions and intuitions but do not adequately explain phenomena. Causation, itself crucial to decision-making and judgment, can only reliably be determined through analytical methods that common sense pretends to involve but does not. Lastly, science rules out the metaphysical (so far). Common sense allows us to believe that ghosts, goblins, and angels run amok throughout our world, themselves causal agents of events in our lives. To suggest that angels cured your disease, and not modern medicine, for example, is exactly why common sense is such a poor master.…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Naturalism Research Paper

    • 4440 Words
    • 18 Pages

    You now have hypothetical knowledge, but that is not good enough, because you are still skeptical of the results. So you test your hypotheses, and when corroborated, you now possess reliable knowledge, which is as close as humans can get to the truth in a natural world, but it is close enough. Later in this paper, I will demonstrate that naturalism is a methodological necessity in the practice of science by scientists, and an ontological necessity for understanding and justifying science by scientists. But I can discuss the general justification for the essentiality of naturalism in science now. The alternative to naturalism is supernaturalism, and unless naturalism is true and supernaturalism false, empiricism--comprehending reality solely by sensory experience--is not sufficient to comprehend reality; rationalism--the use of logic in reasoning--is not sufficient to understand reality; and skepticism--the questioning and evaluation of one's knowledge system and beliefs--is not sufficient to arrive at reliable knowledge of reality. Simply put, empiricism, rationalism, and skepticism--the foundations of science--will not be epistemologically reliable unless naturalism is either true or assumed to be true, since by not doing so, part of reality…

    • 4440 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It's a perfect world, or is it? Sameness is conformity and uniformity within a community or a society. Sameness is a lack of variety. There are strengths and weaknesses of conformity. Some people argue that sameness is important for society because it can make people feel safe, as well as free from humiliation. With sameness you wouldn’t have to worry about people making fun of you because everyone will be the same. Others may argue that sameness is not important for a society because you can’t show your personality or have the freedom of speech. I believe that sameness is not important to have a functional society.…

    • 246 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Where and how did life come from? It’s very important actually to know where life started. We all have different beliefs, different opinions and different thinking on interpreting the information or facts that we get. For so many years, why is it still a question to us? Who can give confirmation to the truth behind all of these? Until now, none of the theories are approved and can be claimed as the origin of life. Up to this point, creationists and scientists are still debating whether life was created by God or life started in an evolution. Out of all the theories, people are mainly focused about the two of them. How about the others? Actually, it’s still a query for me where they came from. How scientists formulate such theories? And where did they get the facts and proofs about that?…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This I believe

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages

    What is life, how did it start and who created it? No one really knows how life was created and how it evolved. Scientist believe that life is the condition that distinguishes animals and plants from inorganic matter, including the capacity for growth, reproduction, functional activity, and continual change preceding death. Beyond our earth there are unknown billions of miles of space that includes galaxies, solar systems and planets. Earth is 4.5 billion years old however the universe is 14 billion years old. The earliest forms of humans were documented to be on earth 200,000 years ago. This time frame is microscopic compared to the time span of our universe. I believe that there is extraterrestrial life beyond our planet and that aliens have been to earth in the past.…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tok Natural Sciences

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages

    To begin with, there are various reasons to why we should not be entirely certain about the Natural Sciences, the main one being the fact that they are studied and brought to a conclusion by human beings. Humans tend to research deeply into various categories in these Natural Sciences, gain various knowledge that was aimed to be studied and hence conclude their findings as laws or facts. As humans study about the Natural Sciences, there are numerous limitations to their studies, which they eventually sum up as one major fact. For instance, the findings done by humans are limited by their senses in a way that if a particular thing is being measured, one’s sense of sight might interfere with the judgment of the issue.…

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays