The Role of Physical Attraction and Social Factors in Human Relationships.
Title
The Role of Physical Attraction and Social Factors in Human Relationships.
Gail Drew (2003)
Department of Human and Health Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield HD1 3DH.
Abstract
Objectives
The present study was partly based on previous research (Singh, 1993; 1994; Fallon and Rozin, 1985; Goodwin, 1990; Smith et al, 1990) to investigate the role of female body physical attractiveness and social factors between males and females in human relationships. The evolutionary theory and the social learning theory provide the basis of investigation. Four hypotheses were investigated, regarding female body shapes concerning their attractiveness. Three hypotheses were investigated in relation to personality factors, physical attributes and financial resources.
Design
The present study used a self-report questionnaire design. There were three independent variables. The first independent variable consisted of female body shapes in the form of line drawings with four levels varying from (very slim to heavy). The second variable consisted of line drawings varying in female body shapes (underweight to overweight) with twelve levels in the waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) varying from 0.7 WHR (underweight) to 0.10 WHR (overweight). The third independent variable consisted of eighteen social factors. A repeated measures design was employed for all conditions. A number of one-factor repeated measures ANOVA’s and a number of independent t-tests were employed for the results analysis.
Method
57 couples took part in the present study (57 males and 57 females). The length of relationships ranged from 2 weeks to 26 years. The sex and length of relationship was recorded. The participant’s age, background, profession, and religion were not recorded. Participants were gathered using a stratified sample. Their tasks were to rate female body
The Role of Physical Attraction and Social Factors in Human Relationships.
Gail Drew (2003)
Department of Human and Health Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield HD1 3DH.
Abstract
Objectives
The present study was partly based on previous research (Singh, 1993; 1994; Fallon and Rozin, 1985; Goodwin, 1990; Smith et al, 1990) to investigate the role of female body physical attractiveness and social factors between males and females in human relationships. The evolutionary theory and the social learning theory provide the basis of investigation. Four hypotheses were investigated, regarding female body shapes concerning their attractiveness. Three hypotheses were investigated in relation to personality factors, physical attributes and financial resources.
Design
The present study used a self-report questionnaire design. There were three independent variables. The first independent variable consisted of female body shapes in the form of line drawings with four levels varying from (very slim to heavy). The second variable consisted of line drawings varying in female body shapes (underweight to overweight) with twelve levels in the waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) varying from 0.7 WHR (underweight) to 0.10 WHR (overweight). The third independent variable consisted of eighteen social factors. A repeated measures design was employed for all conditions. A number of one-factor repeated measures ANOVA’s and a number of independent t-tests were employed for the results analysis.
Method
57 couples took part in the present study (57 males and 57 females). The length of relationships ranged from 2 weeks to 26 years. The sex and length of relationship was recorded. The participant’s age, background, profession, and religion were not recorded. Participants were gathered using a stratified sample. Their tasks were to rate female body
References: ψ Archer, J (1996) Sex differences in Social behaviour: Are the Social role theory and evolutionary explanations compatible? American Psychologist, 51, pp. 909-917. ψ Barber, N. (1998) Secular changes in standards of bodily attractiveness in American women: Different masculine and feminine ideals. The Journal of Psychology, 132, pp 87-94. ψ Baron, R. A., and Byrne (2000) Social Psychology (9th ed). Nova York. Allyn and Bacon. ψ Buss, D, M (1994) The evolution of desire strategies of human mating. New York. ψ Buss, D, M (1999) Evolutionary Psychology: The new science of the mind. Nova York. Allyn and Bacon. ψ Buss, D, M and Barnes, M., F (1986) Preferences in human mate selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, pp. 559-570. ψ Buss, D, M., & Schmitt. D. M (1993) sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating, Psychology review, 100, pp. 204-232. ψ Chodorow, N. (1978) The reproduction of mothering. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. ψ Cohn, L D. & Adler, N, E. (1992) Female and Male perceptions of ideal body shapes. Psychology of Women’s Quartley, 16, pp. 69-79. ψ Cunningham, M. R., Barbee, A. P., & Pike, C. L. (1990) What do women what? Facial metric assessment of multiple motives in the perception of male physical activeness. Journal of personality and social psychology, 59, pp 61-72. ψ Coolican, H. (1999) (3rd Eds) Research methods and statistics in psychology. London. Hodder and Stoughton. ψ Dawin, C (1871) The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. London. Murray. ψ Demarest, J., & Allen, R. (2000) Body image: Gender, ethnic, and age differences. Journal of Social Psychology, 140, pp 465-472. ψ Fallon and Rozin (1985) Sex differences in perception of desirable body shape. Journal of abnormal Psychology, 94, pp 102-105. ψ Eagly, A. (1987) Sex differences in Social behaviour: A Social role interpretation. Hillsdale, HJ: Erlbaum. ψ Feingold, A. (1990) Gender differences in effects of physical on romantic attraction, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, pp 981-993. ψ Furnham, A., Tan, T., & McManus, C. (1997) Waist to hip ratio and preferences for the body shape: a replication and extension. Personality and Individual Differences, 22, pp 539-549. ψ Fouts, G., & Burggraf, K (1999) Television situation comedies: Female body images and verbal reinforcements. Sex roles, 40, pp. 473-481. ψ Goodwin, R. (1990) Sex differences among partner preferences: Are the sexes really very similar? Sex Roles, 23, pp. 501-513. ψ Graziano, W. G (1993) Social influences, sex differences, and judgements of beauty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, pp 522-531. ψ Grogan, S (1998) Body Image, understanding body dissatisfaction in men. Women and children. London. Routledge. ψ Hamida, S. B., Mineka, S., & Bailey, J. M (1998) Sex differences in perceived controllability of mate value: an evolutionary perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, pp. 953-966. ψ Henss, R. (1995) Waist-to-hip ratio and attractiveness. Replication and extension. Personality and individual differences, 19, pp 479-488. ψ Henss, R. (2000) Waist-to-hip ratio and female attractiveness. Evidence from photographic stimuli and methodological considerations. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, pp. 501-513. ψ Herz, R. S., & Inzlicht, M (2000) Sex differences in response to physical and social factors involved in human mate selection. The importance of smell for women. Evolution and Human behaviour, 23, pp. 359-364. ψ Hyde, J. S. (1990) Meta-analysis and the psychology of gender differences. Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 16, pp. 55-73. ψ Kenrick, D. T., and Trost, M. R (1993) The evolutionary perspective. Cited in Beall A. E., and Sternberg. R.J (eds), The psychology of gender (pp. 148-172). New York & London: Guilford Press. ψ Margolin, L and White, L (1987) The Continuing Role of Physical Attractiveness in Marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49, pp. 21-27. ψ Marlowe, F., & Wetsman, A. (2001) Preferred waist-to-hip ratio and ecology. Personality and individual differences, 30, pp 481-489. ψ Muth, J.L., Cash, T.F. (1997). Body image attitudes: what difference does gender make? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, pp 1438-1452. ψ Pfeiffer, E., and Davis, G. C., (1972) Determinants of sexual behaviour in middle and old age. Cited in Margolin, L and White, L (1987) The Continuing Role of Physical Attractiveness in Marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49, pp. 21-27. ψ Pfeiffer, E., Verwoerdt, A., and Davis, G. C., (1972) Sexual Behaviour in Middle Life. Cited in Margolin, L and White, L (1987) The Continuing Role of Physical Attractiveness in Marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49, pp. 21-27. ψ Pfeiffer, E., Verwoerdt, A., and Wang, H. S (1968) Sexual Behaviour in Aged men and Women. Cited in Margolin, L and White, L (1987) The Continuing Role of Physical Attractiveness in Marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49, pp. 21-27. ψ Robson, C. (1991) Real world research. Oxford: Blackwell. ψ Rubin, L. B (1983). Intimate strangers: Men and women together. New York: Harper and Row. ψ Silberstein, L. R., Striegel-Moore, R. H., Timko, C. & Rodin, J. (1988). Behavioural and psychological implications of body dissatisfaction: Do men and women differ? Sex Roles, 19, pp. 219-232. ψ Singh, D. (1993) Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: Role of waist-to-hip ratio. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, pp 293-307. ψ Singh, D. (1994) Ideal female body shapes: Role of weight and waist-to-hip ratio. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 16, pp 285-288. ψ Singh, D., & Young, R. K (1995) Body weight, waist-to-hip ratio, breast and hips: role in judgements of female attractiveness and desirability. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, pp. 483-507. ψ Smith, J. B., Waldolf. V., & Trembath. D. L. (1990). “Single white male looking for thin, very attractive female…” Sex roles, 23, pp. 675-685. ψ Spence, J., Deaux, K., and Helmreich, R. L. (1985) Sex roles in contemporary American Society. Cited in Lindsay, G and Aronson E. (Eds), Handbook of Social Psychology (Vol.2) (pp. 149-178). New York. Random House. ψ Stice, E., Schupak-Neuberg, E., Shaw. H. E., & Stein, R. L (1994) Relation of Media exposure to eating disorder symptomatology: An examination of mediating mechanisms. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103 (3), pp. 836-840. ψ Townsend, J.M. (1990) Effects of potential partners’ costume and physical attractiveness on sexuality and partner selection. Journal of Psychology, 124, pp 371-389. ψ Townsend, J.M. (1993) Sexuality and partner selection: Sex differences among college students. Ethology and Sociobiology, 14, pp. 305 - 330. ψ Travis, C. (1992) The mismeasure of women. New York: Simon and Schuster. ψ Yu, D. W., & Shepard, G. H. Jr (1998). Is beauty in the eye of the beholder? Nature, 396, pp 321-322.