Preview

The Right to Bear Arms

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
757 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Right to Bear Arms
The Right to Bear Arms The second amendment clearly states “a well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” It definitely says that it is the right of the people to keep and bear arms, therefore doesn’t that make it an individual right. After all would people not feel safer if they are able to carry a handgun on them for self-defense? Just try and picture somebody walking down the sidewalk and having a thug pull a knife or a gun on them without any type of protection. What are they going to do now? Are perhaps picture a family living out in the country, which lives off of the land with no means to hunt for food to survive. That means it would be almost impossible for them to hunt for meat. In both cases if these people exercised their right to bear arms then they are able to have a form of protection and a means to shoot their food with. What should or should not be lawfully according to the second amendment? If the government can take an 18 year old person and put them in the army, train them, and give them a gun, should they not be able to purchase a gun if they are not in the army. The NRA, or National Rifle Association of America, sure thinks that they should. That’s right this same young person, who is treated as an adult for every other purpose under the law and putting his or her life on the line to protect our freedom, cannot buy a gun. Doesn’t this show how thankful our government is? The government will gladly send this person overseas to risk his or her life for our country, but they will not allow them to own a gun until they are 21 years of age. Now how messed up is that? Remember the family that lives off of the land with no means of shooting their meat. Without the second amendment this family would only have a small chance at survival, and with all of the taxes the government has placed on the food we buy , people are wanting to


Bibliography: "Action Center." NRAILA RSS. N.p., n.d. Web. 03 Dec. 2012. <http://www.nraila.org/legal/articles/2012/oral-arguments-heard-in-nra 's-appeal-for-second-amendment-rights-of-young-adults.aspx>. "The Second Amendment." About.com Civil Liberties. N.p., n.d. Web. 03 Dec. 2012. <http://civilliberty.about.com/od/guncontrol/p/2nd_amendment.htm>.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    John Kasich Pros And Cons

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed” (source 4). The second amendment is most important because it allows the people to intervene if the government is performing tyranny. If we the people were deprived of this right that means that we would be giving up our freedom to fight against…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The second amendment under the Bill of Rights of the United States Constitution has protected the right of the people to keep and bear arms since 1791 (Head). It protects an individual’s right…

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Overall this amendment is about self defense. Although, the second amendment has many different meanings. It also applies to hunting, target practice, and other forms gun sports. Although, there are some restrictions to these recreations. “You must also follow your state's gun control laws.” as stated…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In Wilson vs. Arkansas the decision was that, “To prohibit a citizen from wearing or carrying a war arm . . . is an unwarranted restriction upon the constitutional right to keep and bear arms. If cowardly and dishonorable men sometimes shoot unarmed men with army pistols or guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary and gallows, and not by a general deprivation of constitutional privilege” (Wang, Scott). This decision by the Arkansas Court system shows that any law that restrict firearms is unconstitutional. Another decision by the Texas court system concludes the same thing,…

    • 2498 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The provision of the English Bill of Rights that guaranteed the right to bear arms and required parliamentary consent to have a standing army was so important because it provided citizens with some form of defense, support, and protection. The right to bear arms was important because it allowed every citizen to protect themselves against harm legally, as opposed to only having a select few citizens that were guaranteed this right like it was before this provision. It was also important for consent from parliament in order to have a standing army because it would provide protection whenever a standing army was in place, but would still allow limitations on when the country would have one. This could ultimately help the country save money by…

    • 151 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Second Amendment has been one of the most controversial topics that America faces today. The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution reads: "A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed" (LII). Under the constitution, you are able to own guns but there has been many restrictions and Acts that control your rights to a minimum. Gun rights reforms are how the Acts and certain limitations are made. These reforms are made to help lower the dangers of these weapons and allow for higher protection. The Second Amendment and Gun Rights should be adapted to today’s society along with certain past events to allow citizens to bear arms publicly. In multiple scenarios, these past event may have been avoided if gun control was open to more eligible citizens.…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Second Amendment in the Bill of Rights states that the citizens of the United States have the right to bear arms, or keep weapons. This means that our forefathers made sure that legally we would be able to have the right to protect ourselves. According to the National Rifle Association’s Institute for Legislative Action, “Self-defense is a fundamental right.” (Pros). Almost half of Americans agree with this statement, and 67 percent of people who own guns claim that…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It has often been seen throughout history that when the United States government impedes on the rights of civilians, people tend to feel as though they are being stripped of their basic rights to life, liberty, and property. These basic rights are inalienable by law, according to the Declaration of Independence, and the government must tread lightly when making decisions in correspondence to them. In recent years laws and bills have been passed by legislation in regards to gun control with the intent of making the U.S. a safer place for all citizens who reside within its borders. However, the right to bear arms is protected by the second amendment and is highly favored by many American citizens making it a highly controversial topic. In the…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bill of Rights Essay

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages

    As far as the case that was stated about the citizens that were denied the right to bring legally owned firearms to storm shelters, Amendment 2 states that American’s have the right to bear arms. I believe that the right to bear arms is a very importantly stated amendment because of the fact that people need to be able to legally defend themselves if they are ever put into a situation that their lives are endangered.…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The nation's powerful gun lobby, the National Rifle Association, or NRA, says that the 2nd Amendment gives the right to keep and bear arms, which it most certainly says. This right is privileged and for those millions of people who choose to own guns either for safety or personal use. The NRA also believes that human behavior defects cannot be changed by a simple regulation of gun laws. They also state that gun laws would not have been able to stop most addicted killers from acting out. The goal of most members in the association is to educate people about guns. The association is willing to teach proper usage of guns to those thinking of getting or those that already have a gun. They think that this training could help reduce some of the tragedies involving guns including: hunting…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The second amendment, the right to bear arms, was adopted on December 15, 1791. In that day in age, guns were not as powerful as they have become, and many who created the Bill of Rights could not have predicted the future. If the constitution, or Bill of Rights, had been written with the knowledge of today’s weapons the Second Amendment would be different. Now in the 21st century there have been many cases where the Second Amendment has been brought into question. These cases have brought questions that deal with the amendment having been written for civilians, but also the worry of the advancements that have been made in weaponry since the time the Second Amendment was written.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Concealed Carry

    • 1431 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Since the beginning of our nation after the Declaration of Independence was signed, individuals have had the rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Inside these ‘rights’ is the right to bear arms. Is that wrong? Should all people have access to firearms? As stated in the second amendment, we as a nation and individuals have every right to own our own weapons. Therefore, it is your right to either own a weapon or not. There are some who buy a gun, put it in their gun cabinet, and never look at it again for years. Others shoot their guns regularly at ranges, take it to go on a hunting trip, or keep it close to their bed at night if they live in areas with a high crime rate, and these are all practices of using a gun that are considered to be proper uses. On the other hand, there are those who obtain them illegally and use them to harm, murder, rape, or put fear in other citizens. Most states offer a concealed handgun license that you can get when you turn twenty-one by going through the right course in order for you to carry a weapon around legally. The right to bear arms is an important symbol of an individual’s freedoms that our founding fathers established for those who understood the proper and improper uses when you bear arms, and anyone or anything trying to take that away is morally unjust and unconstitutional.…

    • 1431 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The second amendment is an exceedingly controversial amendment in the constitution. The amendments right to bear arms was “instituted within the Bill of Rights to suppress insurrection, participate and uphold the law, enable the citizens of the United States to organize a militia, and to facilitate the natural right to self-defense” (Logan). Some citizens suggest the analysis of the “right of people” shows that it protects the individual rights of citizens to own personal guns. From whatever some “citizens” may assume the second amendment to be, it establishes defense, protection, and safety among each citizen. The intents of the second amendment is to delineate upon the freedom of each individual. Moreover, this personal liberty prevents citizens from tyranny and oppressive governing. People have the right to make their own choices and whatever he or she decides to do with that right is up to them. However, one should not use the second amendment to put others in danger like Chris Mercer, the shooter at Umpqua Community College in Oregon. The second amendment justifies individual liberties for people to protect themselves in all cases. From the shooting that occurred at an Oregon community college, the nation’s second amendment has been the topic of debate.…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The United States is in a controversy of whether or not the Second Amendment is protecting our country or killing it. The United States owns approximately 250 million guns, nearly one for each citizen, and grows about 7 million each year. Experts believe that the Second Amendment in the Constitution is rational and legal, author of, Handgun Prohibition and the Original Meaning of the Second Amendment Don B. Kates states that the “Second Amendment protects an individual's right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that weapon for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home; however, they do not say that you can go around shooting people and claiming that you are protected by the Second Amendment. According to CNN news, the Second Amendment is loosely written, holding loop holes that others seem to find, such as Benjamin Ferguson, who bought a silencer which “falls into the same category of Tiltle II weapons as rockets and machine guns” (Bordeaux).Which provide some serious problems within the people and government of the United States.…

    • 1437 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Second Amendment

    • 260 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Second Amendment to the US Constitution states, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” The layman’s meaning of militia is citizen soldiers. The early American’s believed that a militia was a better security to their liberties than a permanent army. Today, the word militia can be associated with the National Guard. The Supreme Court ruled in 2010 that state and local governments were required to recognize an individual right to possess firearms. The court also recognized that laws to prohibit gun possession by felons and the mentally ill were acceptable and so were laws banning guns from schools, government buildings and laws regulating gun sales. This ruling in 2010 was brought to the Supreme Court because of a Chicago law that banned almost all handguns to individuals, which many believed denied them of their so-called Constitutional right to bear…

    • 260 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays