The Real Holes In Climate Change
The world is changing, temperatures are rising, and nature itself is changing due to the temperature. But what’s causing it? And how can we prevent this from happening? According to an article called, The Real Holes in Climate Science, created by a senior reporter, named, Quirin Schlermeter. Since 1999, Quirin has written for Nature about science and related policies in Germany, the European Union, Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union. The article was published in 2010 and it talks about scientist agreeing that the Earth’s climate is changing, includes some of IPCC and how policy makers are applying it. In results, I decided to analyzing this article, The Real Holes in Climate Science, along with my other sources supporting the idea of
…show more content…
It was said that “If your part of a social group, and you stand out, you will not belong to a group because you are different” (Why People Don’t Believe in Climate Science). People are afraid to stand out, because they are afraid of others judging them and not belonging to a group. So the thought of climate change, there will be no plan for it. Even though, about “97% of scientist are in agreement about climate change” (Why People Don’t Believe in Climate Science). This great amount of percentage, still doesn’t have the public full …show more content…
In the article called, “Real Holes in Climate Science” mentions about the IPCC in 2007, that there were uncertain measurements on past temperatures. Scientist and researchers are trying their best to understand the climate, but it is very hard to predict the outcomes, where there is so much going around the world, doing different things. To know more about the climate, one must understand the tools for understanding the processes. For example, “the water flow, in 2050, Colorado River will decrease, if researchers can improve how the climate will simulate with certain variables it be good to forecast for policy makers” (Schiermeier 285) With scientist collecting more data, it will be more reliable to not only policy makers, but to the public. Although, lots of experts are cautious on making future predictions, because the climate is always changing and data will change because of different results. Leonard Smith, a statistician and climate analyst at the London School of Economics and Political Science, says “Our current climate models are just not up to informed decision-making at the resolution of most countries” (Schiermeier 285). The climate models can’t always be accurate, into the decision making, but it doesn’t mean its useless information. It becomes very hard to predict new change because of human activity. One of the main weakness about climate
It was said that “If your part of a social group, and you stand out, you will not belong to a group because you are different” (Why People Don’t Believe in Climate Science). People are afraid to stand out, because they are afraid of others judging them and not belonging to a group. So the thought of climate change, there will be no plan for it. Even though, about “97% of scientist are in agreement about climate change” (Why People Don’t Believe in Climate Science). This great amount of percentage, still doesn’t have the public full …show more content…
In the article called, “Real Holes in Climate Science” mentions about the IPCC in 2007, that there were uncertain measurements on past temperatures. Scientist and researchers are trying their best to understand the climate, but it is very hard to predict the outcomes, where there is so much going around the world, doing different things. To know more about the climate, one must understand the tools for understanding the processes. For example, “the water flow, in 2050, Colorado River will decrease, if researchers can improve how the climate will simulate with certain variables it be good to forecast for policy makers” (Schiermeier 285) With scientist collecting more data, it will be more reliable to not only policy makers, but to the public. Although, lots of experts are cautious on making future predictions, because the climate is always changing and data will change because of different results. Leonard Smith, a statistician and climate analyst at the London School of Economics and Political Science, says “Our current climate models are just not up to informed decision-making at the resolution of most countries” (Schiermeier 285). The climate models can’t always be accurate, into the decision making, but it doesn’t mean its useless information. It becomes very hard to predict new change because of human activity. One of the main weakness about climate