Preview

The Purpose and Intent of The Wrongs Act 1958

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2838 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Purpose and Intent of The Wrongs Act 1958
1. The purpose and intent of The Wrongs Act 1958 (Vic) as it relates to torts

The Wrong Act 1958 is a law most closely related to people 's daily life, that means it is a legislation dedicated to set lawful regulation when someone in Victoria suffers from injuries of kind, he or she shall be lawfully compensated for his injury that may related to financial losses. After hundreds of years of development, Anglo-American tort law has formed a very sound legal system with negligent torts occupies a very important position in Anglo-American tort law. Negligence infringement is the core areas of The Wrong Act 1958 as well as the main forms of infringement. Negligence tort is a risky action causing unreasonable harm to other people. It is generally believed that causes of action of a negligence including four constituent elements: the existence of obligations, the breach action, causation and damages1. The last element means, in the absence of actual damages in a case, the plaintiff can not ask compensation for nominal damages to maintain its legal right against the risk of negligence of others. Negligence tort action requires a precondition of some kind of actual damage. In defining whether an act constitutes negligence, in addition to actual damage, there should have one more condition: the perpetrator has duty of care2. Only when a perpetrator has a duty of care, and the perpetrator 's behavior does not meet the required standards of conduct and breaching the obligation, negligence is constituted. The perpetrator will then be responsible for respective party. It is clear that duty of care research is necessary in negligence cases. Modern negligence tort law was originated in the early 19th century. However, common law has officially formed concept of negligence until 1932 in the United Kingdom after Donoghue V. Stevenson case. The duty of care principle was also proposed at that time. Judge Atkin used to say in Donoghue V .Stevenson case,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Shaw V Thomas

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages

    11.45 Section 48(3) of the Wrongs Act 1958 (Vic) attempts to give some guidance on the meaning of…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pa201 Unit 3 Assignment

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Negligence is defined as “the failure to exercise the standard of care that a reasonably prudent person would have exercised in a similar situation; any conduct that falls below the legal standard established to protect others against unreasonable risk of harm.” Black’s Law Dictionary 1133 (9th ed. 2009) …

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bugusa Case Summary

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The tort of negligence in this scenario includes the five essential elements of negligence, duty, breach of duty, the breach being the cause of injury, proximate, and the resulting damages (Lucas, 2008). In a case of negligence the individual or company may be held liable not only with negligence but sometimes with trespass, injury, and even mental or emotional harm (Lucas, 2008). However, the law requires these elements are proven in order to recover in a law suit against a torfeasor for negligence (Melvin,…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the case of Donoghue vs. Stevenson, the tort of negligence law was firstly observed in 1932. In the given case, it was held by the House of Lords that if some person has experienced loss or damage with the act of another person then the suffered person can file a suit against that person.…

    • 1727 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    2105

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Law: Section 23 (contributory negligence apply s9 and s11 to the plaintiff’s conduct) Ingram v Britten…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kelly V. Movie Theater

    • 1965 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Negligence requires a showing that a duty was owed, that the duty was breached, and that the breach was the actual and proximate cause of damages.…

    • 1965 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    * Negligence – conduct that falls below the standard established by law for the protection of others against unreasonably risk of harm; not intentional and usually by accident…

    • 5389 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hsa 515 Law and Health

    • 1411 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The first element that a plaintiff must prove is that the defendant owed him or her legal duty of care. Generally, this duty of care is a legal notion that states that people owe anyone around them or anyone who could be around them a duty to not place them in situations of undue risk of harm. Proving this element will largely depend on the facts of the situation. After the plaintiff has proved that a legal duty of care existed, he or she must then prove that this duty was breached. Generally, courts will use the standard of a ‘reasonable person’ when it comes to this question. Specifically, this means that the judge or jury must view the facts of the situation and decide what a reasonable person would have done in a similar situation. If this reasonable person would have acted differently than the defendant, it’s likely that it will be found that the duty was breached. Causation is the most complicated element of negligence. It means that the plaintiff must prove that the defendant either directly or indirectly caused the injuries and damages suffered by the plaintiff because of the breach of the duty of care. This element has confused even the most respected legal minds over time, and its proof should not be taken lightly. Last, a plaintiff in a negligence case must prove a legally recognized harm, usually in the form of physical injury to a person or to property. It is not enough that the defendant failed to exercise reasonable care. The failure to exercise reasonable care must result in actual damages to a person to whom the defendant owed a duty of care (FindLaw 2012). These damages can be actual costs such as medical expenses and lost income or intangible costs such as pain and suffering or loss of companionship.…

    • 1411 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There are two different types of torts intentional torts and negligence. An intentional tort is a harm that a person desires or intends to bring about; as opposed to harms that are a result of carelessness. Intentional torts are as follows: 1) assault, 2) battery, 3) false imprisonment, 4) intentional infliction of emotional distress, 5) trespass to land, 6) trespass to chattels, and 7) conversion.…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Elements Of Negligence

    • 94 Words
    • 1 Page

    Negligence is a failure to use reasonable care that results in harm to another party.…

    • 94 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Negligence is a particular type of tort action that involves something the law calls a "duty of care." The standard of care depends on the facts and circumstances of the case but, generally, the duty of care, in its broadest sense, means each of us should behave responsibly and sensibly, in the way a reasonable person would behave.…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Torts Notes

    • 3647 Words
    • 15 Pages

    * INTRODUCED Civil Law (Wrongs Act 2002). Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) Personal Injury (Liabilities and damages) NT.…

    • 3647 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Health Care Policy

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The final element needed to establish negligence requires that there be a close, reasonable, and casual relationship between the defendant’s negligent conduct and the resulting damages suffered by the plaintiff – in other words…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Legal Case Study

    • 2752 Words
    • 12 Pages

    As, for the first time, demonstrated in the case of Donoghue v Stevenson , negligence may exist despite there being no direct relationship between two parties. After the Shaddock’s Case , the duty of care was extended to include the giving of information. In general, defendant will owe the plaintiff a duty of care if, at the time of making the statement, the defendant knows that:…

    • 2752 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Tort Law of Negligence

    • 1570 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The negligence is breaches of civil Law distinguish as the Tort Law. There are three basics where plaintiff must establish ‘on the Balance of the Probability in organize to be successful in act in neglect. In another word, defendant owed the plaintiff a duty of care, defendant fail to meet the standard of care, and there must…

    • 1570 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays