Preview

The Pros And Cons Of Using Drones

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
626 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Pros And Cons Of Using Drones
There's an explosion, it kills some soldiers but it mostly just destroys some drones in the area. A drone is an unmanned ship controlled remotely. It's morally correct to use drones because it reduces the chance of harming our soldiers, it shows loyalty to our troops, and it's fair for us to use the resourceful technology available to us. If we're using drones rather than soldiers, it's putting fewer soldiers at risk to be harmed. It's not showing loyalty to our country when we're defending the opponent. It's also fair for us to use our technology to our advantage; it's not our problem if other countries lack supplies.

When we're using drones, we're putting a meaningless drone's life at risk rather than a soldier's. Drones are just helpful technology that have no psychology connections to the world. Meanwhile, soldiers are humans with bonds to friends and family. A soldier dying and losing his connection to the world would have much more of an impact than a technological tool. If a drone were to get shot while entering a country to spy, we would just find a new drone. But if a soldier were to do the same, there would be a massive impact to the people the soldier had interacted with. Meaning drones are irrelevant to the …show more content…
If we aren't throwing our soldiers out to get killed, it's being loyal by preserving their lives. Also, if we're worried about the opposing countries being unable to defend themselves, we're not being to our country. When we use drones rather than soldiers, it's safer for the soldier's life because they're not at risk to be shot at or blown up as often. But when we're upset over the unfairness over a rival country's supply deficiency, we're being disloyal to our country. We should be proud of our ability to access warfare technology and to protect our soldiers rather than worrying about the insufficiency of the other's. It's loyal to defend the soldiers in our country and to be
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Drone Usage in War-Time Tactics
    • 1885 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Drone Usage in War-Time Tactics

    Since the introduction of drones in war, the NY Times claims that the “CIA have not committed one civilian fatality, while allowing the troop death rate to decrease dramatically.” During the constant bettering of machinery throughout the world, the use of technology has come to a halt when it comes to an unmanned aerial vehicle. Slowly proving to be more reliable than the average pilot, in the years progressing new found respect has been shown by doubting militaries. In a HALE UAV article written by Carlos Reyes he states that “drones can fly up to 60,000 feet, being able to steadily winds at 15 mph compared to 50 mph winds at 40,000 feet.”(Reyes) and are able to outdo a pilot by almost 10,000 feet, due to the -75 degree weather. Portrayed by the US State Department as drones being useless, the use of drones has relentlessly grown to underestimated levels. A drone is classified as being “a UAV that is able to be controlled and sustain flight for numerous amounts of time, by a remote control”. The art of flying an attacking airplane remotely has made a strong peace appeal to not only the military but the citizens of the United States as well. By allowing the use of Drones in war time tactics, the innovation through this "technological leap" will help decrease in civilian deaths as well as increase in terrorist fatalities.…

    • 1885 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Drone Warfare: A Rhetorical Analysis
    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Drone Warfare: A Rhetorical Analysis

    Drone Warfare, enacted by George Bush and expanded on by President Obama to provide a haven for Americans against the terrorist group, al-Qaeda. The use of weaponized unmanned surveillance drones allowed for far better independent targeting decisions, rather than retrieving intelligence from sources within the real country where the warfare would take place. These strategic implications created a question among Americans, is the use of drones to target individuals right? This question has arisen due to a high number of civilian casualties, making it seem inhumane to do. However, Kenneth Anderson provides readers a strong argument as to why drone warfare is strategically effective in his article, “The Case for Drones” with his organization pattern,…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    A Drone War Is Still A War Summary
    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A Drone War Is Still A War Summary

    In the following “A Drone War Is Still a War” by Michael Kinsley speaks of the issue that using military drones causes civilian casualty and an unfair advantage. Kinsley addresses that we have already become used to the use of drones and that we treat the fact like a usual tactic of combat. The advantages of using drones is quite obvious. No American lives are put at risk, and the precision minimizes collateral damage, including the deaths of innocents who happen to be nearby. Kinsley states that the disadvantages are when a military option seems less painful, it is more likely to be resorted to. This makes it very easy for politicians such as President Barack Obama who are in favor of no troops on the ground to make a decision to use military drones.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Drone Killings
    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Drone Killings

    According to Kevin Zeese and Margaret Flowers, authors of “Anti-Drone Movement Grows: Ethics, Legality and Effectiveness of Drone Killings Doubted”, the use of drones by the U.S. military causes more trouble than what they are worth. Additionally, Zeese and Flowers reiterate their points by detailing attacks which “create situations in which violence begets violence”. However, as drones do collateral damage to objects around an established target, they are able to eliminate a large threat without endangering too many civilian and soldier lives. In fact, drones cause less damage to surrounding areas, use less resources, and are able to stay on for longer periods of times than soldiers. Hence this response paper challenges the viewpoints of Zeese…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Drones In Warfare Essay
    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Drones In Warfare Essay

    Should drones be used in warfare? It’s necessary to learn about drones—what they are, and how they are used—before determining the answer. The Air Force calls them Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, or simply UVAs. There are dozens of them flying over countries like Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Iraq, providing intelligence and surveillance. Since September 11, 2001, the US has been fighting the “War on Terror”, in which drones are used to kill suspected terrorists. Drones have changed the pattern of warfare and military outcomes.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Drone Age: How Drones Changed Modern War
    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Drone Age: How Drones Changed Modern War

    Content: the article The drone age is about the advancements and how far we’ve come with drones. Scope/Coverage/Limitations: Drones are here, they are the now, and they aren’t going anywhere war use to be different, before drones we had to risk the lives of thousands of soldiers just to kill or capture a target. In this article it really puts an emphasis on how much drones have saved many lives, and able to kill targets that were once imposable to get to. I wish the source had a statistic on and estimation of how many people have died due to drones. Purpose: The purpose of this writing is to inform the readers on how much drones for changed modern war and it’s not just the US, more than twenty other nations have lethal drones. Methods used…

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Preposterous: Does It Means To Be A Patriotic Hero
    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Preposterous: Does It Means To Be A Patriotic Hero

    Let’s say that the soldier did fire the drone and bombed the kids. Thousands of lives saved after sacrificing 1-5 bystanders. The soldier has worked very hard and has literally sweat blood and tears just for that moment of success. Yes, to kill innocent people is his success to save thousands upon thousands. Some will say that it is his duty to do what he has to do in order to protect his country, but it is not right to say there is good killing and bad killing.…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Drone Home Analysis
    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Drone Home Analysis

    Drones are capable of being used by terrorists and other criminals for their bad intentions. For example, in the article “Drone Home” on page 7, Lev Grossman points out the possible security concerns revolving the domestic use of drones.…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Police Targeting
    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Police Targeting

    Another way to look at it is simply if it would have been better to send in our military troops with a chance of losing quite a few good soldiers or taking out a single individual from thousands of miles away that is suspected of being the extremist that the military is targeting. Most logical people will agree that the latter option would be the best solution for the least amount of casualties. Many people that are around the attacked area are the ones that take most of the impact since they have to endure this constant fear of being monitored on a daily basis. To them our military would probably look at it as though they are the gods that govern their nation and that if our military sees them doing something wrong then they are going to be killed. A thought mentality of that would definitely bring about different discrepancies about the use of drone technology for military targeting. Either way, both sides of the drone usage has its own impact, one benefits our militaries moral while the other side of it could affect an entire…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Is Mary Shelley's Argument Of The Advancement Of Technology And Drone Warfare
    • 1870 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Is Mary Shelley's Argument Of The Advancement Of Technology And Drone Warfare

    These machines destroy many enemy camps that contain the Al-Qaeda in places such as Somalia and Afghanistan. Drones also “have done so at little financial cost, at no risk to U.S. forces, and with fewer civilian casualties than many alternative methods would have caused.” (Byman). In the face of the riots all around the nation, Obama has called the reduction in America’s reliance to these machines even though they will still remain the government’s main weapon of choice for international warfare. These machines have done the task of killing the main leaders of the terrorist organization that has haunted us for many years and have denied the life of many of their sanctuaries. Knowing that this information was spread around the world, the citizens of America became more accepting of keeping the production of this new technology alive and to make it as strong as ever. Although it has not been the most approved program the military could use, the biggest advantage is that it actually works and it is the most efficient program for terminating enemy troops that the military has ever invested billions of dollars for. Many politicians and regular civilians “think it fair to say that the targeted killing program has been the most precise and effective application of firepower in the history of armed conflict.” (Hayden). From this quote, the reality of war has brought upon the competition of seeing which country’s military can create the strongest weapon possible. Since Al-Qaeda has started the War on Terrorism with America, Obama and the government have worked for many months on created these drones to help reduce the risk of terrorists towards the civilians. According to Michael Lewis, Drones used for war is actually the most humane forms of warfare that could…

    • 1870 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Ethics of Drone Warfare
    • 1547 Words
    • 45 Pages

    The Ethics of Drone Warfare

    Eleven years ago, the United States Air Force launched a missile from a drone for the first time at a test range in the Nevada desert (Drone Test) . The use of armed drones has risen dramatically since 2009. Now drone strikes are almost a daily occurrence. In 2011 the use of drones continued to rise with strikes in (Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen, Libya, Somalia. Proponents of armed drones argue that their ability to watch and wait, with their highly accurate sensors and cameras gives increased control over when and where to strike its both increasing the chances of success and minimising the harm to civilians. Lt. Gen. David A. Deptula is the first Deputy Chief of Staff for Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance, Deptula contends that “the precision, the persistence, and the accuracy that remotely piloted aircraft bring to the equation actually enhance our ability to accomplish our objectives while minimizing loss of life”. There are good reasons for using more drones. Cruise missiles and jet fighters work against fixed targets, concentrations of forces or heavy weapons on open ground. They are not as useful, however, in today's “wars among the people” fought against insurgents and terrorists. Drones such as the Predator and the Reaper can loiter, maintaining what one former CIA director described as an “unblinking stare” over a chosen area for up to 18 hours. Edward Barrett is director of strategy and research at the US Naval Academy’s Stockdale Center for Ethical Leadership. He says “If you believe that a society has a duty to reduce unnecessary risk to its combatants, then these systems do that, so that would be actually one moral obligation, and then also the state has an obligation to effectively and efficiently defend its citizens, and these systems are effective and efficient. A soldier in the…

    • 1547 Words
    • 45 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Drone Strikes In The United States
    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Drone Strikes In The United States

    Since the attacks on the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001 and various other terrorist threats, the United States has used unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV), or drones, to eliminate terrorists or potential terrorists. The US should continue using and developing drones as combat weapons because they have less collateral damage than impractical alternatives, keep our own troops safe, and aide military generals with photography and mapping of foreign countries. Moreover, because UAV's cannot guarantee the safety of the innocent bystanders, drones obtain the reputation of creating more terrorists than they tend to eliminate and not only do drone strikes violate the sovereignty in other countries, they also violate the rights of basic human rights. Consequently, drones may be perceived differently in the eyes of Americans and Pakistanis.…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Congress Should Use Drones
    • 2180 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Why Congress Should Use Drones

    Do you think drones would help our men and women in blue? There are many differentiating opinions going around about drones. The Congress should pass a law that allows the police to use surveillance drones, they shouldn't allow armed drones. The police could use an eye in the sky every once in awhile. Drones can first help the police with surveillance. Then drones can help in police chases, patrol the wilderness and find them, lower the rate of crimes, watch over parades or demonstrations, and can make the policies jobs safer. Drones can have many benefits on our society. Police need help to prevent crimes before they happen, that is highest on their lists.…

    • 2180 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Summary Of The Political Economy Of Drones
    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Summary Of The Political Economy Of Drones

    In the article The Political Economy of Drones, written by Abigail Hall and Christopher Coyne discuss and analyze the relationship the government, private industry, and drones. Hall and Coyne bring to light that this relationship has existed for several decades. In the early 1900s, drones (or UAV Technology) were used by the NAVY, they relied on private industries (like Boeing and Northrop Gunman) to create things like unmanned aerial torpedoes. A lot of money was invested to companies to continue manufacturing these unmanned weapons. Later, all parts of the military was fully invested into private industry production of military weapons including drones. Especially during wartimes, when was an urgent demand for unmanned weapons that would…

    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Moral and Ethical Implications of Predator Drones
    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Moral and Ethical Implications of Predator Drones

    Drone Strikes are popular tools of all countries, especially the United States, seeking to neutralize suspected terrorists. Even though the American public is divided on the issue and the Pakistani public, where U.S. drones have been used the most, is sternly against the use of drones, they remain the weapon of choice for our military. This started with the Bush Administration in the early 2000s, the U.S. government has attacked hundreds of targets in northwestern Pakistan alone. Regardless of the moral or ethical questions, drone strikes…

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More

Related Topics