Preview

The Pros And Cons Of Student Athletes

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
411 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Pros And Cons Of Student Athletes
Though paying for other sports is a big setback to paying college football & basketball athletes another problem is posed when people bring up the beloved term "student-athletes." The kids that are heavily recruited are usually in bad situations and this is their way to get out of that but being a "student-athlete" or "amateur" bars them from any sort of economic advancement. Roughly twenty percent of the athletes graduate with degrees before their football careers are over, and all they are left with is the ability to say they played college football. Most of the kids are there for football anyways so the time needed to be successful as they'd like in school is scarce. "No, I don't think college athletes are given enough time to really take

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    “The college sports industry generates $11 billion in annual revenues. Fifty colleges report annual revenues that exceed $50 million. Meanwhile, five colleges report annual revenues that exceed $100 million,” (Mitchell & Edelman). The money collected by the NCAA, goes towards the sports and the programs, not the players themselves, however, the NCAA says that “Student-athletes are at the heart of the NCAA’s mission,” (NCAA). “Some athletes and their supporters believe that college athletes deserve some type of financial payment for their services and contributions to their institutions, an opinion that has lead to player-initiated lawsuits, court cases, and strikes,” (Garcia).…

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    If colleges were to pay athletes there would be no fair way to distribute the money. Athletes perform their sport at different levels of ability and for various lengths of time. In addition, not every player is able to compete in a game. Problems would arise about the athlete not playing which would not allow for him/her to receive the money they deserve. The first issue about this problem is that some people believe that athletes should be paid based on an open market system. This idea of an open market system would allow for supply and demand to come into play. In addition, a school would be able to pay their scouted athlete based on the money that comes in because of their ability. However, The payment would vary depending on the market along with the deals that each athlete has with the school. The second issue is about the colleges because not every college can afford the players they want to recruit. In 2013 the NCAA had an investigation on the economic stability of Division 1 sport programs. This study showed that out of 288 Division 1 schools only 23 were running their programs in a profitable way. This means that only those 23 schools had the money to pay a college athlete. In our society, any business not profiting from anything is likely not hiring, and there is no idea…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This logic is extremely flawed for many of the reasons discussed earlier. The athletes cannot get the same value out of the education because of the already intense time commitment to the sport that has given them the opportunity to be in school. The idea that a college education is payment would have to assume that a college degree always pays off in the long run. In reality, the glut of bachelor degrees entering the workforce is lessening their value. Without actually experiencing the class room and receiving the right networking and advising opportunities, it cannot be assumed that the degree is worth the athlete’s time. Especially considering that the time spent in college could be a player losing money available by playing in the professional leagues. The idea that an education is worth to a player what a professional salary would be seems to be a naïve view. While a cash payment may not solve the problems of a college athlete, and it may perpetuate some economic issues, payment is what these players are entitled to because they are the symbols that fill the stadiums across national campuses. Even with a full scholarship an athlete may have to pay between $8,000 to $12,000 more than the allotted amount due to travel and other needs. Assuming that the education itself, along with the opportunities and athletic department support, is payment enough, is assuming that those…

    • 1534 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some colleges make more money than others. This graph shows the schools with the most profit in their sports programs. Somebody could say that the athletes bring in an enormous amount of money. According to Jeff Dorfman, a professor of Economics at the University of Georgia, only a few collegiate sports actually bring in money. Therefore, an athlete in a sport that isn’t very profitable wouldn’t make nearly get as much as an athlete in a very profitable sport. Along with the sports being very profitable they also have to pay for an even larger variety of different things. Student athletes should not be paid because of the money that would be paid to them. The money that they would be paid could be used to advance other things in the university such as better libraries, science labs, fixing up the dorms, or even improving their athletic facilities. Although the athletes put a lot of time into their schooling and sports the benefits they are given is equal to what they are giving and being…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Being an athlete in college means you contribute about 40 hours to your sport. They have a full time college schedule with studying, mandatory classes, and let’s not forget practice. According to an article, “If the average NCAA college football player in division one spends over 40 hours a week on their game, then they are working the same amount as those in full time employment do”(Listland 1). Since 40 hours are dedicated to the game, that takes up a lot of time in schedules. The athletes also have to take mandatory classes and have time to study. So this raises the question, why spend so much time doing a sport and not get paid? According to Enno, “These athletes are practicing on half of the day and going to…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    The notion of paying college athletes has been an ongoing and controversial debate for student-athletes, coaches, schools, media and most certainly the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). Many would argue that playing major college sports is more like a job versus an extracurricular activity. As with the majority of many student athletes, some attend college with the aspiration of becoming professional players thereby college is seen as a means to end. Although student-athletes already receive compensation via full and partial scholarships to participate at the college level, passionate conversations will continue to be a topic of debate because of the enormous revenue generated by college sports.…

    • 3400 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why should kids be paid for doing a professionals job? The debate on whether or not to pay college athletes is a debate that has been argued for quite some time. Due to the lack of positive results, and a surplus of negatives, this should not take place. There is no way to muster up a fair system to pay the athletes while keeping everyone happy. Also, paying players will distract them from their academics due to them knowing that they can make money playing sports. Lastly, the athletes already have an opportunity for money with scholarships. Therefore, in order to keep college athletes happy and focused on school while still giving them an opportunity to receive scholarships, the students should not be paid for their athletic performances.…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    College athletes are so focused on gaining a paycheck that they don't realize all the materials that surround them are building them for their future -- facilities that can improve their in game abilities are in most colleges. College sports also set up them up for the real world, something they have never experienced -- they are being prepared with all practice dates that the have to attend and learn how to control the stress given to them, knowing that they have to deliver A+ material every game. If they fail, their careers don’t fall, it’s a learning environment. Also, if they get paid, it indicates that they have reached a level of maturity to handle money in their pockets, wrong, if they are mature then the right thing would be to drop the sport and pick up the books. They know that the sport is overwhelming their education and a possibility to leave without a diploma and a secured job. In a recent study shows the cost for the facilities in colleges, “USC's John McKay Center - $70 Million” (Zirm 1). An average tuition is around $30,000, nowhere need the amount for advanced facilities -- the amount of support college athletes receive to improve their skills is too much compared to their tuition, if they want to get paid the money should instead head towards maintaining the training facilities in check or improving…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Every student and alumni enjoy taking pride in their Alma Mater’s success. This has created a billion dollar industry in which colleges and the NCAA create a monopoly to exist above student athletes. Is this fair? Depending on the perspective, opinions will differ. Colleges will create more jobs and be able to give funding to for student programs. However, student athletes and their fans will feel injustice that money is being made on their behalf without receiving a cut. Another argument is that if student athletes were allowed to receive cash and revenue; a bidding war between top schools would evolve. “One of the N.C.A.A.’s primary arguments against paying players is that the concept of amateurism is what defines college sports and make it special — and that to abandon that amateurism would ruin the college “brand.”” (New York Times, 2011). The whole system might implode if college sports became too commercial. Whoever had the deepest pockets could purchase athletes and possibly “spoil” them at a critical stage of financial maturity development. We might see a former Heisman Trophy winner like Vince Young that upon receiving a huge payday, decides to stop performing and enjoy his monetary wealth…

    • 1332 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another counter argument is that paying these student-athletes would take away the title “college athlete” and makes them into a “professional athlete”. Although this does pose a great argument, the fact of the matter is that these student-athletes are not getting what they deserve as they devote the same amount of time a full-time worker applies to their job. In order to call them a “professional” is if they were making a full salary, these students do not need a full salary, they just need a little extra to help them get buy and to insure safety if they lose their scholarship. Ryan Riddle, former professional American Arena football defensive end who was drafted by the Oakland Raiders, discusses the difference between college and professional…

    • 144 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A problem with paying college athletes is the damage it would cause to the athletes themselves. We look at college athletes and we see big guys, but not a lot of people remember that they are STUDENT-ATHLETES!! There is no real reason why we…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essentially student athletes receive a full paid education and all they have to do is represent their college in their respective sport. College athletes do not have to worry about the cost of housing, textbooks, student loans, and meal plans. According to Institute For College Access & Success, “in the state of Pennsylvania 71 percent of students leave a public four-year institution or private non-profit four-year institution in debt. The average debt is $32,528.” A cost like that is a major burden on a student who may not get a job straight out of college. After looking at it from a different angle, plenty of college students would be psyched to play a sport for four years if it meant they would not be in debt (US…

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Also, with all the time practicing and working in the classroom, how many athletes have time to actually get a job? Another argument that supports paying college athletes is that…

    • 872 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    College athletes are the hardest working individuals in college. Balancing academics and sports is never a simple task and is especially challenging in college. The athletes are still required to achieve passing grades, although many of them will play professionally. Paying college athletes would benefit all athletes, providing a small stipend for all of the sacrifices they have made practicing, training, and traveling, in addition to school work.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this essay "Athletes and Education" by Neil H. Petrie, he shows how student athlete’s education can be neglected or even overlooked. Genre and writer would be related by Petrie being an English professor and how this inspired him to write the essay. By being a university professor he was able to see how the athletes were treated among the university. The ethos would be that he is an English professor of student athletes.…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays