The Pros And Cons Of Human Experimentation
In 1847, the American Medical Association founded the Code of Medical Ethics responsible for establishing the standards of physicians’ practices (source). However, this code did not include regulations involving human experimentation. Due to lack of regulation regarding consent and ethical research practices, Nazi doctors performed unethical and torturous experiments on concentration camp inmates. These practices ranged from immersing subjects into ice water for hours to record the effects of exposure to injecting the women prisoners with corrosive substances into their uterus to find new sterilization methods (source). Despite the widespread agreement of the unethical nature of these experiments, it is still in question whether the results
…show more content…
First, the subjects were not of proper health due to “suffering from weeks or months of inhumane treatment” (slate). This causes the results of the endurance experiments to be misconstrued because the subjects do not adequately represent the people intended to benefit from the study. Additionally, for experiment results to be accepted as fact in the scientific world, the procedure must be replicable. Because the experiments were not replicated before the introduction of the Nuremberg Code, the standard of ethical human experiments, the conclusions cannot be confirmed. Furthermore, the lack of scientific terminology and pressure from Reich leaders led to multiple reports of inconsistent data. Examples of measuring terms being manipulated include the following: “‘sample size’ meant truck load of Jews, ‘significance’ was an indication of misery, and ‘response rate’ was a measure of torment” (Jewish virtual library). The demand from Reich leaders caused the experimenters to adjust their findings in order to ensure their own safety. The combination of these various malpractices lead to invalid results that do not provide significant value to the scientific …show more content…
Some believe that publishing and acknowledging the data creates legitimization and acceptance (bioethics). Additionally, when addressing the Holocaust, “the Jewish community is unforgiving to those who find any redeeming merit from the Nazi horrors” (jewish virtual library). Attempting to find a positive outcome from the atrocious acts placed upon the Jews is seen as disgraceful in their community. Due to either a family member’s or their own personal experience with the experiments, the Jews do not view the results of the experiments as data. Susan Vigorito, a Holocaust survivor who was kept in a cage for an entire year at age 3 to be tested on, believes that “she is the real data, the living data” (jewish virtual
First, the subjects were not of proper health due to “suffering from weeks or months of inhumane treatment” (slate). This causes the results of the endurance experiments to be misconstrued because the subjects do not adequately represent the people intended to benefit from the study. Additionally, for experiment results to be accepted as fact in the scientific world, the procedure must be replicable. Because the experiments were not replicated before the introduction of the Nuremberg Code, the standard of ethical human experiments, the conclusions cannot be confirmed. Furthermore, the lack of scientific terminology and pressure from Reich leaders led to multiple reports of inconsistent data. Examples of measuring terms being manipulated include the following: “‘sample size’ meant truck load of Jews, ‘significance’ was an indication of misery, and ‘response rate’ was a measure of torment” (Jewish virtual library). The demand from Reich leaders caused the experimenters to adjust their findings in order to ensure their own safety. The combination of these various malpractices lead to invalid results that do not provide significant value to the scientific …show more content…
Some believe that publishing and acknowledging the data creates legitimization and acceptance (bioethics). Additionally, when addressing the Holocaust, “the Jewish community is unforgiving to those who find any redeeming merit from the Nazi horrors” (jewish virtual library). Attempting to find a positive outcome from the atrocious acts placed upon the Jews is seen as disgraceful in their community. Due to either a family member’s or their own personal experience with the experiments, the Jews do not view the results of the experiments as data. Susan Vigorito, a Holocaust survivor who was kept in a cage for an entire year at age 3 to be tested on, believes that “she is the real data, the living data” (jewish virtual