Preview

The Pros And Cons Of Bringing Back The Wooly Mammoth

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
142 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Pros And Cons Of Bringing Back The Wooly Mammoth
My opinion about bringing back the wooly mammoth would be have to be that we shouldn't. The food chain has changed over the last period of time and it is too late to bring back an animal that would soon die because of the new ecosystem. I think the huge dangers is one that the mammoth won't last long and 2 there is no point if the food chain and animal kingdom has evolved over time. It is too late for that and far too many extinctions to bring back a long gone specie. Scientists have come up with an idea to bringing back a species from a dead mammoth found frozen and well preserved. They are thinking of growing a cell inside the womb of a female elephant ( A close relative of the wooly mammoth) and bring back from extinction.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    On Friday, The California State Legislature approved a historic bill that banned the breeding of captive killer whales and orca performances in the state, the only exception would be for educational purposes and not entertainment, display, or performance purposes. The bill also prohibits the export or collect captive orcas coming from any place in California to another state or country, unless approved by federal law, and importing their semen or embryos of any orcas held in captivity for artificial insemination. The legislation passed 26-13 with Democrats in favor and Republicans opposing. The bill required that the killer whales be sent to sea sanctuaries for retirement in the United States or Canada. Sea World are actively lobbying against the bill, calling it unnecessary since they had already planned to do this and had announced…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Genetic engineering would be another ethical dilemma in bringing back the dinosaurs after they became extinct animals. There was a reason why natural selection took them off the face of the earth. The scientists took the DNA of dinosaurs from a mosquito that they found underground after it was fossilized in amber. With regard to what was said in the movie the scientists used frog DNA to fill the gaps between the dinosaurs DNA. It would have many scientists intrigued by this genetically engineered animal that was brought back to life but it would also have a lot of people scared if they somehow got their research stolen.…

    • 108 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Jurassic Park, a cult favorite, seems to be a scary work of fiction. What most do not realize is that there are efforts taking place right now to make the processes of reversing extinction a reality. This process, coined as ‘De-Extinction,’ is defined as using intact tissues of extinct animals to clone them and introduce them back into existing ecosystems. These efforts are taking place all over the world: the United States of America, Australia, Poland, and Russia. (Zimmer, 2013) This process includes taking fragmented DNA from preserved specimens, piecing the fragments together, placing the DNA in an emptied egg, and planting the egg in a female of similar lineage to the species being cloned. (Archer, 2013) The first attempt at this process was in 2003 when Spanish scientists attempted to clone the cells of the last Pyrenean ibex, Celia. The…

    • 1761 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Whale hunting, or whaling, has been a famed Japanese tradition for numerous years. The industrial whaling the country is known for nowadays was set up just after the Second World War. The Japanese economy ad collapsed and food and resources were scarce. It was no other than General Douglas MacArthur who came up with the idea of commercializing the wale hunt.…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If we brought back extinct animals, it would take a lot of funds and research, causing us to forget about other research projects. In Mrs. Zielinski’s article she told us that it could cost millions of dollars to resurrect a species. We could use the funds to do more research on things to benefit us, like cancer research, which is an actual problem in today's world, unlike this made-up problem. If we go on with this, we could forget about endangered animals, since we could revive them. Organizations could lost what little funding they already have, thanks to this huge waste of money and research.…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Seeing exotic animals behind cages or glass walls at the zoo, watching Shamu do flips for a fish at SeaWorld, and laughing as elephants perform tricks at the circus are all entertaining, but is our entertainment worth the suffering these animals endure behind the scenes? The answer is no. The billions of animals that are subjected to abuse outweigh any claimed benefits that can be made of these businesses. The debate of zoos and parks being ethical or unethical has two main arguments, these being the animal abuse involved and the supposed benefits.…

    • 1327 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Zoos

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Zoos are like internment camps and should be shut down. Animals deserve the right to live out their lives in their natural habitat, not be the source of human entertainment. Zoos are more detrimental to animals than they are good for them, even though there are conservation efforts and educational purposes for having animals in captivity. The negative aspects far outweigh any positive effects when it comes to having animals in captivity due to poor living conditions, failure to educate, and psychological trauma.…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “The issue should never be about the extinction of any animal, it should always be about the cruelty and exploitation which will lead to their extinction,” unknown. Each and every animal on earth has as much right to be here as you, me, and of all humanity. Scientists have found a way to clone extinct species. The thought of that sounds amazing and really exciting, but think about it another way. If we bring back no longer existing animals, us humans will do what we do best, which is changing nature and destroying it, basically killing them for money or being greedy for food. According to text “no,” there are already many living things becoming extinct many times faster than normal. Why would we worry about animals who are already long gone when there are many other things that are important to the environment that we need to care about? Another reason why we should not bring them back is because our Earth has changed significantly since they were alive. Having them back would change many things. Lastly, education costs lots of money.…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Personaly I don't think that there are many pros about this subject, but I've written down a few.…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    No to De Extinction

    • 2107 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Whether it is bringing people back from the dead or resurrecting an entire extinct species, for hundreds of years, scientists everywhere have had the desire and craving to try and reverse nature’s kiss of death. Modern scientists are exploring the possibility of resurrecting species, that we and our ancestors led to extinction, through the process of de-extinction or also known as “resurrection biology”. Scientists believe that this project would not only allow us to redeem our mistakes but also provide breakthroughs in the field of genetic engineering. This concept was first presented to the public in Steven Spielberg’s 1993 film, Jurassic Park that also shows how there are much greater repercussions of this experiment than there could be scientific gains. Even though these projects have purely good intentions, similarly to Frankenstein’s experiment, good intentions of a science experiment, which tampers with life and death, often have a greater chance of going south and causing more danger than benefit. Although astounding scientific breakthroughs may come to be as the result of a successful de-extinction project, there are many greater dangers that could develop for the human race through bringing back certain extinct species. While evolution may be cruel, it is never wrong therefore there was a reason for the species to have gone extinct in the first place and the natural cycle of life and death should not be tampered with artificially.…

    • 2107 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arguments Against Zoos

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The general topic of discussion among scholars is that the health of zoo animals in Britain needs specific attention as a way to counter the increasing push for the banning of zoos. Most scholars tend to specifically address the causes of low health of zoo animals. The most common causes addressed are visitor interactions, types of enclosures, and a lack of opportunities for wild behavior. There are scholars such as G.R. Hosey and Gareth Davey who both feel that zoo visitors have a strong impact on animals’ health. Davey argues that visitors inflict high stress on the animals, but that the measure of the stress depends on a multiplicity of variables including type of animal, person and surrounding environment (Hosey). Davey, in contrast, argues…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Would it also change the way we think about looking after the animals that we have, it might make us think that it doesn’t matter the way we treat animals because we could just bring them back if the species dies? If we were to bring some species back do we know what sort of viruses these animals carry, one of these viruses could be a mega-virus that could kill the entire human race? Depending on what animals we bring back some of these animals have been dead for millions of years and would be completely foreign to the environment we live in now. If we start bringing back animals it may also change our priorities and make us focus more on bringing back animals than trying to solve medical problems we have at the moment.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As you drive through connestee which has privately owned land it is a no hunting area you tend to see lots of deer that are very skinny and malnourished this is caused by overpopulation due to no hunting. Living in North Carolina we have a very big population that participates in wildlife-related recreation, this involves hunting, fishing, and wildlife watching. Hunting is not only good for the environment, it is also good for the animals. The money that is spent to buy weapons, equipment, expenses for travel, and license go through the government for taxes is used to enhance habitats, to manage, and keeps state parks clean. Without hunting animal population would be overpopulated and lead to issues like disease and lack of food.…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Have you ever wondered how people figured out if medicine works? Animal testing, or animal experimentation, has been going on for a long time. It is the process of using animals with similar DNA, such as chimpanzees, to test new cosmetic and medical products to try and figure out how they will work on humans. It is a very controversial subject . Some people argue animal testing provides valuable information for people and new products; Animal testing needs to be stopped because it is torture to animals and the information gathered is not always accurate.…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    So let’s say that you were an orca or a dolphin and you were held in captivity against your will by another human being, How would you feel about this situation? Well, in the case of many unfortunate aquatic mammals in marine parks and zoos around the world, most of these magnificent animals are held captive in tanks with no room to roam around, or have to deal with being alone, which can trigger stress and aggression. Over the years since the 1960s, the first marine mammals were put into display for entertainment shows in Marine Parks like Seaworld or any other marine parks that was on the globe; around the world, people wondered if captivity was a good or bad idea. By the time the 70s came and movies like “Free Willy” and “Blackfish” being…

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays