The Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing In The United States
On average, 26 million animals are tested every year for commercial and scientific testing in the United States. Animals are tested to develop cures and treatments, check safety of human designed products, and toxicity of medications. Research on living animals has been done since at least 500BC. Although animal testing is wrong - because it is cruel and humane - there is no need for testing on poor innocent creatures when there are alternative testing methods. 95% of animals used in experiments are not protected by the Animal Welfare Act. There are a few pros that are beneficial, but the cons outweigh the pros by a great deal. Animal testing is just plain out wicked and evil. Most animals that are experimented are forced to eat and inhale things, sometimes deprived of food and water, and inflict burns to see the healing process. The horrifying list goes on and on. Some cosmetics companies test rats to experiment irritation caused by shampoo and other products. They put clips to hold their eyelids open, and keep it that way for days, and without washing out the produce. Another petrifying experiment is the LD50, which finds out what dose of a chemical will butcher 50% of the animals used in the test. USDA reported in 2010, that around 97,000 animals suffered massive pain during trials while not given any anesthesia. Don’t get me
…show more content…
For an example, you can use vitro testing, which studies cells cultures in a lab dish. This method is possibly more valuable and relevant than animal testing, because human cells could be used. Or artificial human skin, where the cells are built in labs that eventually turn into sheets of human skin cells. This is also more favorable than testing animals. Last, you could additionally utilize computer models of a human molecular structure, which can predict many things, like the toxicity of a
For an example, you can use vitro testing, which studies cells cultures in a lab dish. This method is possibly more valuable and relevant than animal testing, because human cells could be used. Or artificial human skin, where the cells are built in labs that eventually turn into sheets of human skin cells. This is also more favorable than testing animals. Last, you could additionally utilize computer models of a human molecular structure, which can predict many things, like the toxicity of a