In this scholarly article, Kwok Pui Lan, a professor at the Chinese University of Hong Kong, explains how culture outside of the Bible view its beliefs. Being from China, she describes the thoughts of Asian views of the Bible. Kwok Pui Lan talks about how Asians believe the Bible is a part of “western domination and cultural imperialism,”(25). They feel as though if God has this great power, then why doesn’t He help the suffering of the world? She explains that “many Chinese Christians reject the assumption that the Bible contains all the truth,”(28), because of this. Coming from a Chinese background, Kwok Pui Lan gives her own opinions on the Bible and how it should be viewed.…
Sacred texts and writings go hand in hand with beliefs and believers. This is because beliefs determine what was originally written in the sacred texts and over time these writings determined what beliefs the later generations would have. It is accepted that the sacred texts and writings are revelations from god and therefore, god’s word or instruction. This is evidence that these two characteristics interact with each other to create a dynamic, living religion as sacred texts and writings by explains to people how to behave using instructional, historical and exemplary behaviour as an example.…
He points out how the modern-day scholars are now comparing the Bible to other religious documents and considering it as just another mythical belief. Oswalt credits this world-view change to a study of similarities between the Bible and like Near Eastern writings rather than before when perhaps more interest was placed on viewing the differences. These studies are explained in the first half of this publication and sub-titled The Bible and Myth.…
Before outlining the word, Oswalt revisits the idea that scholarship has wandered from the view that the Bible is exceptional from the other writings, religions, and cultures of the Ancient Near East. Since the 1960s, scholars have been stating that the characteristics of the Bible and its modern belief systems have more in common that are in opposition even though the data used to support these claims have remained the same.…
As part of the Christian faith during 18th century revivals, three practices evolved forming their own interpretation on the place and authority of Scripture in Christian faith. The first of these were the Liberals who "viewed themselves as the saviors of a defunct out of date Christianity," they wanted to connect with people and bring them into the faith, not scare them with a set of rules (Bingham 149). Their founder, Friedrich Schleiermacher an 18th century pastor, felt that the Scripture and other doctrines of the faith were not of the utmost importance in the Christian practice and were not needed in daily life (150). Instead of focusing on the holiness of The Trinity, Liberal's placed more emphasis on doctrines of sin and grace, and the emotional aspect of the faith (Kerr 213). Jesus was viewed as a historical figure that the church can learn from spiritually, and the Bible as a source of knowledge on Christian history (Bingham 152, 153). In this theological movement being a Christian is considered "nothing but feeling and experience," the hard facts taught in the Bible didn't matter so much as the believers feel that they are saved by the faith and are destined for Heaven (Lane 238).…
In our history, the Bible is a contribution to history that roots in Ancient Egypt and Mesopotamia. It focuses on Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. The Old Testament is the original Bible written by many different people with composite text. The Bible is a Monotheistic faith and is also impossible to date in time. This religion changed many people’s beliefs and traditions.…
The first section of the book is titled comparative studies. This section is comprised of the first two chapters. Chapter one is aptly named history and methods. Chapter two has been dubbed comparative studies, scholarship, and theology. This section covers the growing division between scholars of a secular nature and scholars of a religious nature. The purpose of this part of the book is to defend the Bible from the damage done by comparative studies which twisted evidence to work against the historicity, canonicity, and divine revelation of Gods’ Word, the Bible.…
External evidence in the Penateuch references Moses as the author and Jesus Himself says Moses was the author. (Mark12:26). The Jews and Palestines agreed in the Apocrypha and both Talmud’s. Internal evidence points to exact literary and historical and details that are way to accurate for someone to remember hundreds of years later. Moses was also trained in the Egyptian Royal court, so he had the skills to write Genesis.…
The Bible was the first book ever printed. God had written “The Ten Commandments” on tablets of stone, we can assume mankind must have had previous knowledge of writing. even today Archaeologists uncover ancient tablets with markings, Some of the first were unearthed at Lachish and Tel-el-Amarna. as Mankind moved forward they began writing on Animal skins and the inner bark of the Linden tree. Moses is credited with and was told by the Lord to write the first 5 books in our Holy Bible between 1491-1451 B.C. he wrote:-Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy and most scholar have accredited Moses as the author of the book of Job.…
what is the Bible? There are many other questions that are involved with what the Bible is. People have different views about the Bible. A major question that some people have about the Bible is how we got it. Within the question of how we got it is how was it produced and transmitted? Some people may also wonder when and why it was written. Others wonder how it was written at all since ancient Israel was predominantly non-literate before the 7th century (Schniedewing 2). We tend to think of the Bible as a single book but it actually is more than just a book. According to Harris, the Bible is a collection of many individual books written over a period of 1,100 years (Harris 2). Three main important questions about the Bible include, how we got the Bible, how it was produced and transmitted, why some books were included but not others, and why there are several different canons of the Old Testament even today.…
While the Sumerians wrote Gilgamesh as early as 3000 B.C., there is much controversy surrounding the time the Bible, mainly the Old Testament was written (Loery). Strangely, these two books have similar accounts of very meaningful events and symbols in today’s society, yet one is a myth and the other is the basis of many different religions. The similarities between parallel stories in Gilgamesh and The Bible make it hard to believe that one work did not influence the other.…
The process by which Scripture has been preserved and compiled is one whose history is worth noting. The early church had many opportunities to share the Good News of Christ via word of mouth, but from the time of Christ’s resurrection until the mid-second century, there had not been a single culmination of writings considered to be essential for the purposes of teaching and spreading the Gospel. Increasing heretical opposition in conjunction with the need for a standard of living to follow gave rise to the formation of the New Testament Canon; however, this would not come without multiple false teachers and many arguments over what would classify as “inspired by God”. To seek the answer to one of history’s most important questions, we must understand what the canon is, how it was inspired and to whom authority was given in determining what would be included in such Holy Scriptures.…
ix. Chapter Eight: Does It Matter Whether the Bible Is Historical? The Problem of History (2)…
the author and Old Testament scholar John W. Oswalt begins with an introduction in which he presents the argument for the book. In this book, it is divided into two main sections: The Bible and Myth and The Bible and History. However, Oswalt puts emphases on myth and history. Oswalt addresses the Bible and myth, the Bible and history, the Old Testament, and the Ancient Near Eastern (ANE) myth all in ten chapters. However, revelation, myth, and history are the main topics of this book. Oswalt further discusses the differences between Scripture and myth; as well as the issues involved in the Bible’s relationship to history and historiography. Oswalt argues that while there are undoubtedly many surface comparisons among the Old Testament and…
The chapter ‘The Bible as Book and as Library’ gives an understanding of the Bible, where it originated from and the many different forms it takes under the various religions. The chapter answers all the various questions one may ask when studying the Bible by looking at the Bible at an academic perspective but also a faith perspective. Many religions Many Religions have sacred texts but only Judaism and Christianity refer to theirs as ‘The Bible’.…