The Normative Claims of Brazil’s Democratic Ethos
The normative claims of Brazil’s democratic ethos:
Bourdieu’s habitus, critical theory, and social philosophy
As exigências normativas do ethos democrático brasileiro:
O habitus em Bourdieu, teoria crítica e filosofia social Nythamar de Oliveira*
Abstract: This paper argues for an interdisciplinary interlocution between social theory and social philosophy in order to recast the problem of normativity in social practices, especially within Brazil’s democratic ethos. By resorting to insights from critical theory and social epistemology, the essay proposes to reexamine Bourdieu’s conception of habitus so as to contribute to a moderate social constructionism that cannot be reduced to a postmodernist discourse or to a variant of relativism.
Keywords: critical theory; democratic ethos; habitus; normativity; social philosophy
Resumo: O artigo defende uma interlocução interdisciplinar entre teoria social e filosofia social, com o fito de reformular o problema da normatividade nas práticas sociais, especialmente no contexto de um ethos democrático brasileiro. Recorrendo a aportes de teoria crítica e de epistemologia social, o texto propõe-se a reexaminar a concepção de habitus de Bourdieu, de forma a contribuir para um construcionismo social mitigado que não pode ser reduzido a um discurso pós-moderno ou a uma versão de relativismo.
Palavras-chave: ethos democrático; filosofia social; habitus; normatividade; teoria crítica
1. One of the best approaches to make sense of ongoing social, political problems in Brazil is by means of an interdisciplinary research program that takes into account both the complex historical and cultural makeup of the Brazilian people, including its modern quest for a national identity, and the
* Ph.D. in Phylosophy at State University of New York, Associate Professor at Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil. .
Civitas Porto Alegre v. 12 n. 1 p. 70-87 jan.-abr. 2012
N. Oliveira – The
Bourdieu’s habitus, critical theory, and social philosophy
As exigências normativas do ethos democrático brasileiro:
O habitus em Bourdieu, teoria crítica e filosofia social Nythamar de Oliveira*
Abstract: This paper argues for an interdisciplinary interlocution between social theory and social philosophy in order to recast the problem of normativity in social practices, especially within Brazil’s democratic ethos. By resorting to insights from critical theory and social epistemology, the essay proposes to reexamine Bourdieu’s conception of habitus so as to contribute to a moderate social constructionism that cannot be reduced to a postmodernist discourse or to a variant of relativism.
Keywords: critical theory; democratic ethos; habitus; normativity; social philosophy
Resumo: O artigo defende uma interlocução interdisciplinar entre teoria social e filosofia social, com o fito de reformular o problema da normatividade nas práticas sociais, especialmente no contexto de um ethos democrático brasileiro. Recorrendo a aportes de teoria crítica e de epistemologia social, o texto propõe-se a reexaminar a concepção de habitus de Bourdieu, de forma a contribuir para um construcionismo social mitigado que não pode ser reduzido a um discurso pós-moderno ou a uma versão de relativismo.
Palavras-chave: ethos democrático; filosofia social; habitus; normatividade; teoria crítica
1. One of the best approaches to make sense of ongoing social, political problems in Brazil is by means of an interdisciplinary research program that takes into account both the complex historical and cultural makeup of the Brazilian people, including its modern quest for a national identity, and the
* Ph.D. in Phylosophy at State University of New York, Associate Professor at Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil. .
Civitas Porto Alegre v. 12 n. 1 p. 70-87 jan.-abr. 2012
N. Oliveira – The
References: BECK, Ulrich; GIDDENS, Anthony; LASH, Scott. Reflexive modernization: politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order. Cambridge: Polity, 1994. BERGER, Peter L.; LUCKMANN, Thomas. The social construction of reality: a treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books, 1966. BOURDIEU, Pierre. Le sens pratique. Paris: Éditions de Minuit, 1980a. _____. Questions de sociologie. Paris: Minuit, 1980b. _____. Distinction: a social critique of the judgement of taste. Trans. R. Nice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1984. _____. Choses dites. Paris: Minuit, 1987. CHARTIER, Roger. Cultural history: between practices and interpretations. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1988. DE OLIVEIRA, Nythamar. Globalization and democratization in Brazil: an interpretation of Rawls’s political liberalism. Civitas, Porto Alegre, v. 4, n. 1, p. 39-55, jan.-jun. 2004. N. Oliveira – The normative claims of Brazil’s democratic ethos 87 _____. Affirmative action, recognition, self-Respect: Axel Honneth and the phenomenological deficit of critical theory. Civitas, Porto Alegre, v. 9, n. 3, p. 369385, Sept.-Dec. 2009. ELSTER, Jon. Sour grapes: studies in the subversion of rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983. GOLDMAN, Alvin; WHITCOMB, Dennis (orgs.). Social epistemology: essential readings. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010. HABERMAS, Jürgen. The theory of communicative action. 2 v. Trans. Thomas McCarthy. Boston: Beacon Press, 1984 and 1989. _____. Between facts and norms. Trans. William Rehg. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1998. HACKING, Ian. The social construction of what? Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1999. HEIDEGGER, Martin. Being and time. Trans. John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson. New York: Harper & Row, 1962. HONNETH, Axel. The struggle for recognition: the moral grammar of social conflict. Trans. Joel Anderson. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1996. _____. Democracy as reflexive cooperation: John Dewey and the theory of democracy today. Political Theory, v. 26, n. 6, p. 763-783, Dec. 1998. _____. Das Recht der Freiheit. Grundriß einer demokratischen Sittlichkeit. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 2011. HONNETH, Axel; JOAS, Hans (orgs.). Social action and human nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988. MEDINA, Vicente. The possibility of an indigenous philosophy: a Latin American perspective. American Philosophical Quarterly, v. 29, n. 4, p. 373-380, Oct. 1992. NUCCETELLI, Susana; SCHUTTE, Ofelia; BUENO, Otávio (orgs.). A companion to Latin American philosophy. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010. OLSON, Kevin. Reflexive democracy: political equality and the welfare state. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2006. SEARLE, John. The construction of social reality. New York: Free Press, 1995. SORJ, Bernardo. A nova sociedade brasileira. Rio de Janeiro: Jorge Zahar, 2000. STEPAN, Alfred (org.). Democratizing Brazil: problems of transition and consolidation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989. Recebido em: 09.11.2011 Aprovado em: 29.12.2011