Preview

Discontent in Britain in 1815-1820

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
963 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Discontent in Britain in 1815-1820
Explain why there was popular discontent in Britain in the years 1815 – 1820
Lord Liverpool‘s government took office in 1812. At this time Industrialisation had already started to take effect which in term meant that workers were slowly becoming replaced because of the new machinery that was coming forward. At this point luddites came forward who were against machines taking over people because they saw the machines as a threat to their living. A reason of discontent here was that the workers who were left over had hard times when they experienced a decline in the conditions that they worked in and also a much lower pay by the hands of their merciless employers who wished to make as much money as they possibly could.
There was also a population increase which was out of government control which meant that as the population was growing there soon became problems for people who lived in poor conditions. Malthus suggested that the population increase meant that the amount of food would not be enough for the population and therefore the amount of food produced agriculturally would not be able to feed the amount of people. This was another reason for discontent as this resulted in poor health conditions, over-crowded places and a foul and uncomfortable place for the poor to live in.
The government’s economic policies had also caused discontent. First of all the Corn Law was introduced in 1815 which was to block all foreign corn from being imported into the country, this was done to protect the price of wheat in Britain, as in the time of war farmers did very well and they had lot of demand but not enough supplies to give out. The government simply wanted the landowner to have the same profits as they had during war. There was discontent because of the Corn Laws as there were riots and petitions against it. Another policy introduced was that Income Tax (pay tax on how much you earn) was abolished which did not affect the poor but the rich instead however and the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The first key point to look at is the nature of British society at the time. The economy and living conditions can always be catalysts for a revolution- an example is the sorry state of the French economy, one of the major causes of revolution breaking out there, just before they went into revolution. Now, had the economy of Britain in the 1790’s been as crippled as France’s was, then it would have been likely that people in Great Britain would have been feeling desperate for change, and a revolutionary would have been looking likely. However, this was not the case. Although the years 1795 and 1797 were very difficult in terms of high bread prices and unemployment, the situation was simply not severe enough to make revolution a necessity for people in Great Britain. Hunger and famine were very sparse, in comparison to France. In fact, the standard of living of most people in the 1790’s had actually improved due to the industrial revolution taking place at the time. Pitt, thanks to his numerous reforms and changes to the government, such as increasing taxes and the introduction of the sinking fund, meant that the threat of revolution was significantly decreased.…

    • 2322 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Luddites Dbq

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Between 1811-1812, the Yorkshire Luddites had sent a threatening letter to a factory owner who had purchased some Shearing Frames. In nineteenth century England, the Luddites began to threaten factory owners who would purchase machines for their mills. At the time, changes were occurring rapidly due to the Industrial Revolution. While the changes had a positive effect on innovations, it had a negative effect on employment for some people like the Luddites. The Luddites were opposed to any form of new technology and were willing to do anything to get rid of it.…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reactionaries are people in a group that opposes or asks for reforms that threatened or may change the way they are living. More likely, these reactionaries are with an ideological perspective focusing on classical conservatism or individual’s rights and freedom. Luddites, Chartists and the Sadler Committee were among those groups and have been fighting for their right as an individual or as a human. Luddites was an ideology that was created in response to classical liberalism during the 1800s in Europe wherein the working class started a movement asking for reforms as they suffers from poverty and dangerously poor conditions; thus, gave birth to the Army of Redresser who broke into textile factories and destroyed the machines. Besides the Luddites there were the Chartists who were those working class men who formed a movement in Britain to addresses political and social issues and to have reforms such as universal suffrage since they believe that a way must be created to modify the undesirable effect of classical liberalism. The Sadler Committee on the otherhand, is a parliamentary investigation of conditions that was due on Michael Sadler’s report and revealed the worst things of workers’ life in the textile factory during the Industrial Revolution. TheLuddites reactionaries responded to classical liberalism’s principles through their actions that where often radically expressed (smashing of machines)forcing the government to act as soon as possible but cannot or do not want to act due to their commitment to their laissez-faire principles. Chartists asked for electoral system reform through their initiatives and efforts believing that being granted the right to vote is the key to all the improvements in the society.The Sadler Committee investigate all these uproar during the 19th Century from the citizens, intently to bring out the…

    • 1355 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The political discontent seen in France was one of the causes of the Revolution. In the 17th and 18th centuries, France was ruled by an absolute government. The king had all the political powers. Anyone who criticized the government could be arrested and put in prison without trial. Louis XVI was king at the time of the French Revolution. He was more interested in hunting than governing France. He and his queen lived an extravagant life at the Palace of Versailles. They did not really care about the state of their country. The third was largely ignored when it came to political elections. The first two estates worked together to outvote the large third estate to keep them from becoming a threat to the power. American Independence sparks this French Revolution. The American Revolution also originated from political discontent. However, the America 's discontent stemmed largely from misrepresentation and not over taxation. The Stamp Act was merely a way for the colonist 's to pay for their own defense. Colonists simply felt that they had no voice in Parliament, which was no different from the rest of Britain 's colonies.…

    • 976 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    England: 1815-1914

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The period of time from 1815 through 1914 is commonly referred to as the Hundred Years Peace. Begining at the end of the Napoleonic Wars at Waterloo in 1815, and until the outbreak of war in 1914, the contries in Europe were mostly at peace with one another. Wellington 's land victory at Waterloo in 1815, marked the end of wars for almost a century in Europe. Britain was the dominant power, and the defeat of Napoleon broke the French 's will to rule the world as they had done once before. This time period become the age of poets with remarkable people, such as Keats, Shelly, and Byron. It also was named a great time period of science with electrical engineers such as Davy and Faraday. It was with this cultures background that Queen Victoria rose to the throne in 1837, when she was only 18 years of age, and started a magnificient reign that spanned for almost 65 years.…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    One of Malthus’ basic premises was that food production levels and population levels expand at different rates. His basic premise was that Britain’s population would continue to expand while its food production capacity would stagnate, or at best, lag far behind. This would result in less supply for more demand and the result would be stagnant or deteriorating standards of living in Britain. Malthus’ predictions proved wrong or inaccurate at the time because: 1) he did not account for technology’s ability to keep food production apace with population…

    • 1474 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There were significant political views between the king and parliament. Charles wanted to do whatever he wanted because he thought that was what the king could do. He brought in unnecessary taxes into England, such as ship tax which wasn’t needed because the country was not in a war with another country. The sailors did not like ship tax because it meant they had to pay money that didn’t need to be paid that would be spent on the king’s lavish luxurious lifestyle. Parliament on the other hand wanted to have as much power as possible and wanted to overthrow Charles. Parliament introduced the Grand Remonstrance which was a document that said all of the misdeeds that Charles had done. They also introduced the 19 propositions. They took power away from Charles, so Charles ruled without parliament for a period of time. This made parliament and Charles angry at each other causing the country to split into two groups. Parliament and the king were each building up their own armies. They both knew that the only way to solve the problem was to have a civil war. This is because without each other the country would not be right.…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Industrial working class was peasant based initially and was looking for a better standard of life. All that they saw however was poor living and working conditions, bad pay and much unemployment as they were totally at the disposal of the factory…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The greatest social transformation in Britain can be traced back in early 19th century. It was primarily due to the reform in life style or modernity (the introduction of machines industrialisation)which have caused a radical change on the location of work, which also became a driven force for vast number of people to move towards cities (urbanization).In contrary caused a drastic change on population size (over population )in city areas .The overall state political frame work was based on lassie fair, conservative(non-interventionist )approach where there are no or limited state intervention in redistributing resources .The economy was market wise economy system(free market).There were no social welfare amendments or services provided by the state , it was commonly considered as commodity and they were mainly provided by private sectors or volunteers (philanthropy’s ). The newly life style and overpopulation have caused massive social, political and economic problems which mandated the state to intervention in overcoming the situate (the need appeoch). The overpopulation have triggered various social disorders like shortage in housing , outbreak of new diseases, sanitation problem, poor health condition increase rate of unemployment and poverty..Etc. In the 19th century Britain was the uppermost in industry and trades (the first country to go through industrialized) and accounted as one of the richest country in the world while 30 % of the population were under poverty line (ref) the free market had aggravated great social conflict among haves and the have–not due to opposing interest and created excessive gap between social classes. However this stimulated the emergence of strong labour unions .There are two approaches on the evolution of welfare state. The need approach states diversion in life style (modernity) have caused the state to intervene and the conflict approach argues on class conflict and the growth of strong labour union as…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Luddites. The Luddites were machine-breakers, so called after a mythical leader, General Ludd. In 1811-16 textile workers in the east midlands, south Lancashire, and west Yorkshire met secretly in public houses or on the moors, took oaths. They smashed the machinery of mill-owners who refused what they demanded. When trade unions were illegal, Luddism may be recognised as bargaining by riot: frame-breaking in the east midlands was an attempt to bully factory employees. Eventually the Luddite bands were tracked down and the presumed leaders were executed or transported.…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Luddite

    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Factor that affected the labor demand and labor supply in the Luddite revolt was the attacks of the Luddites and the Nottingham. The fact that they did such damage to the machines, that industry was set back. The labor demand could have possibly been greater had there not been a thousand machines at the cost of between 6,000 and 10,000 affected.…

    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Malthus first essay on population was written in 1798. The purpose of Malthus’s essay is to explore the correlations between both human population and the subsistence needed by the population. Malthus argues that “population cannot increase without the means of subsistence”. The purpose of this essay is to analyze Malthus argument and ideas to determine if there is indeed a correlation between both population and needed subsistence. Ultimately this essay will be in support of Malthus’s argument in regards to the world’s population and what is need to sustain it. Malthus explored the correlation between population and means of subsistence to directly argue against William Godwin, who was in support of a more “egalitarian society and…

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Legacy of Malthus

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Malthus further claimed that the strain that the increased numbers place on a country's resources also makes life more difficult for members of the middle class and the upper classes and threatens to drag them into the pool of suffering that rightly belongs to the lot of the poor.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Thomas Malthus

    • 4238 Words
    • 17 Pages

    Thomas Malthus, in the early 19th century published an essay on the principle of population as it affects the future improvement of the society with remarks on the Speculations of Mr. Godwin, M. Condorcet, and Other Writers. He criticized the views of the Utopians who believed that life could and would definitely improve for humans on earth. Populations are growing most rapidly where such growth can be afforded the least — where pollution, resource shortages, and environmental damage create additional stresses on the ability of governments to meet the basic food, clothing, and shelter needs of their populations. The relationship between human population growth and the availability of natural resources has…

    • 4238 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first outbreak of Luddism started in the 1811 and got to a point where machines were damaged almost every night1. Most Luddites were led by someone named, Ned Ludd1. He is believed to be fictional, but no one really knows if he was real or not1. He was the symbol for the Luddites, the threatening letters were signed in his name and he was their General1. The Luddites were fighting for something that was very important; they were fighting for their livelihoods3. Why should it be fair that hard working men that had done no wrong be released from their jobs and replaced by an immobile object? “It is, I think, fair to claim that 'collective bargaining by riot’ was …probably more effective than any other means available” (Hobsbawm, 1952). They had no alternative, so they turned to the only effective choice they had, which was violence4. The Luddites had no other intentions besides trying to get their jobs back; there was no evidence of them trying to cause a revolution, trying to change their status, nor were there…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays