The Necklace Foreshadowing
The development of the statement, appearances can be deceiving, is a use of foreshadowing. When Mme. Loisel sees the black satin box, it appears to be the most expensive item in the box. This is an key case of foreshadowing by Maupassant. When looking through for a piece of jewelry to wear, Mme. Loisel dislikes the bracelets, a Venetian cross, gold, and gems. She finally sees something that she likes, a necklace in a black satin box which implies the necklace is an very expensive one. Mme. Loisel “hands trembled as she took it up. Clasping it around her throat, outside her her high-necked dress, she stood in ecstasy looking at her reflection”(30). This case of foreshadowing considering the box makes the necklace seem expensive at first glance. Mme.
…show more content…
The moment when Mme. Loisel and M. Loisel “took the case to the jeweler whose name they found inside. He consulted his records.’I didn’t sell the necklace, madame,’ he said. ‘I only supplied the case.’”(32). Mme. Loisel and her husband are both convinced the necklace is real due to the looks of the costume jewel and the case. We, after all know the necklace does not belong to the case which implies the necklace is not that expensive. The most distinct foreshadowing the necklace is inexpensive is Mme. Forestier’s reaction. As Mme. Loisel lost Mme. Forestier’s necklace, her husband tells “her you have broken the catch and are having it repaired. That will give us a little time to turn around’”(32). Just as, Mme. Loisel returned the decoy necklace to Mme. Forestier, her reaction is, “‘You should have brought it back sooner; I might have needed it.’”(33). Mme. Forestier reaction to it all, foreshadows that if the necklace was valuable, she would have been more worried and paranoid. Regardless of their mistake, they were hinted multiple times, yet they failed to think it is not real because they were outplayed by the
The moment when Mme. Loisel and M. Loisel “took the case to the jeweler whose name they found inside. He consulted his records.’I didn’t sell the necklace, madame,’ he said. ‘I only supplied the case.’”(32). Mme. Loisel and her husband are both convinced the necklace is real due to the looks of the costume jewel and the case. We, after all know the necklace does not belong to the case which implies the necklace is not that expensive. The most distinct foreshadowing the necklace is inexpensive is Mme. Forestier’s reaction. As Mme. Loisel lost Mme. Forestier’s necklace, her husband tells “her you have broken the catch and are having it repaired. That will give us a little time to turn around’”(32). Just as, Mme. Loisel returned the decoy necklace to Mme. Forestier, her reaction is, “‘You should have brought it back sooner; I might have needed it.’”(33). Mme. Forestier reaction to it all, foreshadows that if the necklace was valuable, she would have been more worried and paranoid. Regardless of their mistake, they were hinted multiple times, yet they failed to think it is not real because they were outplayed by the