Preview

The nature of State can be understood through both Liberal and Marxist Perspectives”. Elucidate

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
412 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The nature of State can be understood through both Liberal and Marxist Perspectives”. Elucidate
ANS. 1
The liberal conception of the state is of a limited organization that represents popular will. The state plays a minimal role in the directing of society and economic affairs, but can play a significant supporting role in modern liberal (social liberal) theories. Classical Liberals favor a minimal state that only provides for basic services such as defense, enforcing contracts and protecting property rights. Social liberals accept more roles for the state, primarily in the economic sphere, such as regulation of capitalism in order to protect consumers and workers, welfare programs to help the poor and disadvantaged in society and public services that benefit everyone. To liberals, the state plays a supporting role in society, and is usually left to operate in the political and social spheres.

Marxists conceive of the state as an institution of capitalism that can be transformed to benefit the working class, as the state is the only institution that is capable of organizing and managing the economy on a large scale. The state would be radicalized in that the workers and people would control it through direct democracy or council democracy. The state becomes an integral part of the economy in that it owns the means of production in the phase of socialism. Marxists see the state as becoming unnecessary when the productive forces develop and authority on the state level is no longer required, leading to the disappearance of the state and social class. This society is called communism, where the means of production is owned communally but operated and managed by cooperatives.

Socialism is an economic system whereby either the state or worker cooperatives own and control the means of production, strategic resources and major industry. The principle of socialism is to organize the economy in a rational manner that avoids the pitfalls of capitalism and the free market through planned or state directed economic systems. Socialism can also utilize the market

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    5.05 Jack London

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Socialism is a type of government that is in between the time of capitalism and communism. London used it because it has to do with the problem of social welfare and individualism.…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Whereas Socialism, according to the Marxists Theory, is something in-between Capitalism and Communism; A political and economic ideology where the government has almost complete control over trade, capital, land, and the production and distribution of goods. Thus encouraging the formation of a welfare state. In countries such as Cuba and other countries who employ Socialistic practices land is completely owned by the government, unlike America, where the majority of land is privately owned by the individuals of America. While some people will argue that capitalism is all about greed and has caused the inequality that is so frequently spoke of by politicians, protesters, and news and media outlets. Many think the solution to this inequality is to employ more Socialistic ideals, what some refer to as Marxism 2.0; however, as Socialism is European countries is proving, that is not the…

    • 1365 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    For a better understanding, I will start by defining a socialistic system because I will be using it often in this paper work. Socialism is a way of organizing a society in which majority of properties, industries, and…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are two types of Liberals; Classical, who want to minimise the state’s role, and Modern liberals who want a more involved state. Classical liberals want a limited state because they support negative freedom, as they believe it has; created a dependency culture, a potential nanny state, and cause damage to the economy. However, modern liberals want a more involved state because it increases the level of positive freedom, equality of opportunity, social justice, and believe it boosts the economy.…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The basic components and goals of a socialist government are based on how citizens are best served by policies focused on meeting the basic needs of the entire society rather than meeting only the basic needs of individuals as individuals. It's a system within society of where production is owned and controlled by the state and is consistent with democracy. Private property and the distribution of income are under social control.…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Poli 330 Week 3

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Socialism is when the state controls the means of production by manipulating prices of goods and wages of workers. Socialism also requires people to submit to the rule of law. In return for their compliance, citizens are provided with resources rationed by the government. In a socialist government you get pros like, free health care and other services provided. But with good comes bad, cons are high taxes, not as much incentive to work hard as in other systems. Excessive government regulation makes business slow and not very efficient. Let take Cuba for example, as an island Cuba needed to trade to live. As long as there was a community of socialist nations with whom it could enjoy favorable terms of trade, it was able to develop economically and raise its standard of living to a level that made it the envy of the rest of the Third World, a level that in areas such as health care and public education rivals industrialized countries like the United States. While its place in the international division of labor within the emerging socialist world system continued its role as an exporter of agricultural goods and minerals, the prices of these exports were indexed to those of imported industrial goods so that the labor value content of each were more nearly equal than you usually find. It was this unique equivalent exchange that has made economic development possible in Cuba since the revolution.…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Socialism is the idea of a social organization that supports production, distribution, and trade that should be controlled within the community itself. There are many aspects of socialism that are unique, setting it apart from other social systems in the world. The ‘social’ aspect of socialism gives evidence to the fact that in the system, everyone in society is expected to contribute to the economic production of the state. In socialized health care, everyone pays the government and those who need care, get it without paying extra. Citizens all have to pay the same amount and have access to the same benefits. The problem this system runs into, however, is that there often is not enough money to go around. People tend to become greedy when they see that some things are free and then start to abuse the system. According to Einstein the real purpose is “…precisely…

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Liberalism as an ideology revolves around the idea of freedom for the individual. The reason for this is due to the liberal’s view of human nature; they see the human being as unique and rational; able to make decisions in their best interest. Although all liberals agree on individual freedom, when it comes to the role of the state they are split down the middle. On one side there are the classic liberals who believe in as little state intervention as possible, and on the other side there is the modern liberals who believe state intervention is necessary as it can develop people and create equal opportunity. When looking at a liberal view of the state it is necessary to focus on both modern and classic liberals and compare their ideas. Classic liberalism can clearly be defined by the desire to minimise the role of the state, this is also known as negative freedom. Whereas modern liberalism believes the state is necessary to develop individuals and create opportunity, this is known as positive freedom.…

    • 1514 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Classical liberals believe in negative freedom. This is the simple belief in an absence of external constraints on the individual and that they should be left alone to make their own choices. In this way classical liberals were heavily influenced by the natural rights theories of John Locke and Thomas Jefferson. Jefferson claimed that we were born with certain “inalienable” rights and therefore no individual or government had the right to constrict them or take them away. Freedom from constraints is therefor an essential condition for exercising these rights. In practice this has meant that classical liberals have advocated a minimal state, what John Locke referred to as the ‘night watchman state’. The states activities should, in his eyes, be limited to the enforcement of contracts, maintaining order and protection from foreign threats to prevent the state from infringing on individual liberties as much as possible. On the other hand, modern liberals have advocated a more positive interpretation of freedom. Positive freedom can be defined as the ability to achieve true self-mastery and self-realisation in order to fulfil our individual potential. Modern liberals such as TH Green criticised negative freedom on the grounds that it failed to address the social and economic factors that can prevent individuals from achieving their full potential. Negative freedom was inadequate because it failed to remove these barriers to true self-mastery such as social disadvantage and inequality. Modern liberals have therefore proposed an enabling state. Rather than a ‘necessary evil’ as classical liberals believe, the state can be a force for good by protecting individuals against social and…

    • 1082 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Socialism is the means of all aspects of the economy and owned and is regulated by the community. The founder of this theory, Karl Marx, is usually associated with Communism. While Socialism is considered a lower stage of communism, it is actually the middle of the economic systems (Capitalism, Communism, and Socialism). Communism has more of an underlying political effect, whereas Socialism and Communism do not. By Socialism controlling the means of production, this diminishes the idea or private businesses.…

    • 168 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Any form of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods.…

    • 1439 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Socialism is the economic system based on cooperation rather than competition of businesses which utilizes centralized planning and redistribution of wealth. Industry is state owned and therefore companies have government monopolies on them which results in no competition. Industries are redistributed though the state to achieve a fairer society.…

    • 511 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Webster dictionary defines socialism as “ way of organizing a society in which major industries are owned…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Within the framework of democratic capitalism, the American Constitution and government structure have a fundamentally liberal backbone. Viewed as a social contract, the relationship between the state and the individual is expressed in the Constitution which dictates the liberal values intrinsically woven into American history. Combined with the Bill of Rights, the Constitution holds the representative government accountable for its actions and sets finite limits on the power it wields over the individual. A capitalist society such as that of the United States uses taxation and wealth distribution as a tool for controlling social equality, an unavoidable hypocrisy of liberal values in a democratic welfare state. Classical liberal values that hold the individual 's rights as paramount have been modernised to accommodate a mildly paternalistic social welfare system.…

    • 1545 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Liberals don’t believe that a balanced and tolerant society will develop naturally out of the free actions of individuals. Liberals fear that free individuals may want to exploit others if it is in their interest to do so. Therefore our liberty requires that they are restrained from encroaching on our freedom and vice versa. Such protection can only be provided by a sovereign state capable of restraining all individuals and groups within society. While liberals are convinced of the need for government they are also aware of the dangers.…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays