Preview

The movie

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
791 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The movie
"The movie, “Thank You for Smoking” is a comedy-drama about a tobacco industry lobbyist, Nick Naylor. The movie brings up serious issue of the addicting substance tobacco and its various effects on human’s health. In the opening scene of “Thank You for Smoking”, Nick has committed three fallacies: 1. “Joan, how on earth would Big Tobacco profit off of the loss of this young man... It's in our best interest to keep Robin alive and smoking.” There is an element of False Analogy. He draws a weak comparison between things that are alike in some respects, however the comparison does not hold up to his statement. 2. “The Ron Goodes of this world... want the Robin Willigers to die.” In this argument, he uses Ad Hominem and Red Herring to shy away from his first argument, by attacking personal name and arguing off point by bringing an issue that “ Ron goodes of this world want the Robin Willigers to die,” “so that their budget will go up.” Its intention is to deflect attention from the main point of the issue. 3. And finally, he uses Ad Populum to appeal to the audience, a group-approved belief that is “there is nothing more important than America's children.” Nick is trying to get the audience to agree with him by appealing to their belief on American children’s education.
His fallacies are useful in invading, shy away from the main topic and focus on something else that is irrelevant to the debate. He knows that tobacco or nicotine is dangerous and that it is to his advantage to avert the question and placing the blame on “Ron Goodes ” and appeal to the audience."
The Appeal to Popularity: This type of logical argument suggests that people should be doing something because it is popular. An example of this is when Nick Naylor is pitching an advertisement. He feels that if cigarettes are put back into movies, they will be more appealing to a young audience.
The False Analogy: This type of argument incorrectly rationalizes that if someone can do one thing,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    examples does he give to support his argument? Are they effective? Do they withstand the test of time? Can you…

    • 273 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Another appeak that Forbes used was ethical appeal. he uses esthical appeal by first bringing to his readers' attention that he has a degree in Native American Studies which immediately supports his argument by persuading the readers to believe that he's accurate in reference to why all birth certificates should record the actual ancestry of a child's four grandparents.…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thank You for Smoking is a both fierce and sophisticated satire written by Jason Reitman. The moral of the film is on the matter of cigarettes and cancer and how it is associated with the responsibility of choice. Nick Naylor (Aaron Eckhart) leads as a lobbyist for Big Tobacco who will fight to protect America’s right to smoke -although it may kill him and others. Nick does not take sides in the matter, but rather spins the situation around in which makes all others wrong. Although the realistic acting and satirical style make the movie intriguing to watch, the plot of the movie is irrational.…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Thank You for Smoking is a criticism of today's "culture of spin". The hero of the film is Nick Naylor (Eckhart), the Chief Spokesman for Big Tobacco whose task was to defend the rights of smokers and cigarette makers while health advertisements and programmes call for stopping smoking which has a relationship with cancer. He knows very well the bad and damaging effects of cigarettes which may lead to death, but he wanted to win against other people’s arguments, as that was his job & duties. That was clearly shown in the scene when he told his young son Joey, "The beauty of an argument is that if you argue correctly, you're never wrong."…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thank You for Smoking

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The book/article Thank You For Not Smoking is a 1994 satirical novel written by Christopher Buckley, and written as an e-article by Peter Brimelow. It was also made into a dark comedy film in 2005, written and directed by Jason Reitman and starring Aaron Eckhart, In the article, the story follows a tobacco industry lobbyist named Nick Naylor. Like most lobbyist, Naylor is a cunning, level headed support of the tobacco industry, with many arguments he provides throughout the article on why smoking is good. His claims are not always so simple and straight forward, but instead he uses many different tactics to convince people to agree with him and take his side. There are many good examples of rhetoric in the article, one of them being his argument against the skull crossbones death symbol on every pack, a symbol that causes each pack to not only have a warning label, but a potentially scary visual image to go along with it. This is done in front of a Congressional committee and an audience which includes his young son, during a hearing in Vermont. He defends a highly debatable idea with arguable evidence and support, whether it affects him positively or not. Pretty much all of the main points of rhetoric are in Naylor’s arguments. His argument has a relatively decent ethos, logos, and pathos.…

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the movie "Thank You for Smoking" the smoking industry is coming under the attack from Senator Finistirre over putting a skull and crossbones on all the packs of cigarettes. The smoking industry has created the "The Academy for Tobacco Studies" with researchers to prove that there are no problems with smoking. The main character Nick Nalor's job, the chief Spokesperson for Big Tobacco, is to discredit all the problems associated with smoking to the public. He had a relationship with a reporter, Heather, thinking that she would not write anything bad about him or anyone associated with the smoking industry. She backstabbed him. He forced an invitation from the senator to appear at a congressional hearing. Nick Nalor convinced enough people to not put the skull and crossbones on the cigarettes. Then he quit his job right before the smoking industry paid out millions to judgments against it and forced many out of their jobs.…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Thank You for smoking is about a lobbyist name Nick Naylor who is the vice-president of Academy of Tobacco studies. The movie revolves around how Nick smooth-talks everyone into believing that Tobacco is not very harmful. Nick Naylor's main job was to make people aware of the research his academy does and answer questions on television regarding health claims against tobacco. Nick believed everyone has some sort of talent and he has the talent to talk people in or out of an argument. He always knew what to say and when he needs to say it. In the movie Thank You For Smoking the main character Nick Naylor shows the power of how argument when it is done in a correct manner, which can make everything seem right.…

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    An example of appealing to authority can be found in many television commercials. This fallacy is used on television by many companies trying to sell, or gain profit, by using athletes, or well-known figures to advertise their product for them. They do this in order to persuade consumers to buy their goods, due to their idols using them; even though, many of the famous people aren’t qualified to give expert opinions about the product. A commercial that uses this type of fallacy is Bacardi, who advertises tennis player Novak Djokovic saying, “Champions Drink Responsibly.”…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Thank You for Smoking

    • 1523 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In the movie Thank You for Smoking, Nick Naylor is a handsome man, smooth talking tobacco lobbyist and the vice-president of a tobacco lobby called the “Academy of Tobacco Studies”. Naylor’s job consists mainly of reporting the questionable research of the company to the public and defending Big Tobacco on television programs by questioning health claims and advocating their personal choice about cigarette. While Nick Naylor’s morals maybe questionable, he has the talent for whipping up an argument in his favor as he believes and tells his young son in his own words “if you argue correctly, you’re never wrong.” Nick Naylor throughout the movie is trying to demolish the senator’s idea of having images of skulls and crossbones on every pack of cigarettes and the poison sign. Nick Naylor’s duty is to fight for his company in the worst and most hazardous times. His son Joey Naylor accompanies his father on every business trip. The reason why Naylor does that is so he can understand the intricacies of his job better and also trains his son to follow in his footsteps to learn about the art of molding the truth in personal favor. The big question is whether Nick Naylor has evolved morally at the end of the movie. From this question, there arises a set of central issues in the movie: does Nick Naylor’s ’s ability to spin control spin his moral compass in the right direction, and do his professional skills effect the evolution of his relationship with his son?…

    • 1523 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thank You for Smoking

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There’s something exhilarating about watching a clever liar in full, resplendent flight. Nick Naylor (Aaron Eckhardt) has what he cheerfully describes as a "challenging" job: he represents the interests of the tobacco industry in a world that generally considers the product reprehensible. At the beginning of "Thank You For Smoking," Nick is getting ready to defend himself on the Joan Lunden talk show, in the company of anti-smoking do-gooders and a cancer-stricken, bald teenaged boy.…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Based on the novel by Christopher Buckley, Thank You For Smoking’s distinct title contains everything you would want in a movie and more. Nick Naylor is the lobbyist of one of the biggest tobacco companies, Big Tobacco. Nick plays the perfect defense, a strong, very strong offence. His job is to promote cigarettes and tobacco to the masses. Luckily he has some of the most flexible morals shown in a man and the argument skills of a lawyer. One of the quotes by Eckhart that I enjoyed the most was “The beauty of an argument is that if you argue correctly, you’re never wrong.”…

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thank You for Smoking was a film about a tobacco lobbyist named Nick Naylor. Throughout the movie Nick explains to his son, Joey, that his job is to be right. He also explains that, when you argue properly, you’ll never be wrong. Near the beginning of the movie he pitches an idea to have movie stars boost tobacco sales by smoking cigarettes in movies. When he meets with a big time Hollywood producer, they formulate a plan to simultaneously release a new cigarette with a new movie involving super hot smoking space sex. About midway through the movie, Nick enters a wild sexual relationship with a reporter, played by Katie Holmes, and confides in her, but is later betrayed when she reveals damaging information about his corporation and the corporations of his two lobbyist friends. After being fired from his job, he still testifies on behalf of the cigarette companies and combats a Vermont Senator who is greatly opposed to smoking. After he successfully argues in court, he denies an offer to return to his former occupation, and he gets a new job.…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Today, I have a question for all of you “Would you mix rat poison, tar, lighter fuel, some radioactive gas some pesticide and drink all of that stuff at once?”, Your answer would probably be no because it’s obvious that all of this stuff is toxic and would result in sudden death. This is all of the stuff that cigarette smoke contains, so just wonder how harmful would cigarettes actually be. I’ll be telling you about the harmful effects of tobacco & the great harm caused by the second-hand smoke that is emitted from smoking it. I know you all must have seen it in the movies and would’ve at least thought once that smoking makes you look so cool, but believe me after you hear all about it, it’s something that you don’t even want to think about trying .…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Should tobacco products be banned? I believe they should because they kill about 400,000 prematurely every year. Tobacco products kill more people than illegal drugs do such as cocaine, heroin, and methamphetamine. People get arrested for having marijuana in their possession and they don’t have to be smoking it but studies show that cigarettes are more harmful to a person’s health. I say they should make tobacco illegal as well because in my opinion tobacco is also one of the worst drugs out there. In states like California to New York there are many restrictions on when and where people can smoke cigarettes. Bars, restaurants, and some universities have banned smoking. Now someone can be fired from their job because they cannot quit, now in some cities it’s nearly impossible to smoke anywhere besides someone’s home, so doesn’t it make sense that tobacco should be illegal also? The only reason why it is not is because even if it becomes banned it’s not going to stop people from doing it, it’s the same as people who smoke marijuana they still do it even though it’s illegal. There would be people hiding in alleys afraid of being caught smoking cigarettes because they cannot quit, the overcrowding of prisons would increase with people who are addicted to cigarettes. If tobacco becomes illegal people would be doing the exact same thing as people who smoke weed do to get their fix, they would go through drug dealers. We have tried to ban tobacco products in state prisons, like in California, but tobacco users still continued to smoke. Thank God that there’s no one trying to outlaw tobacco products because it would be horrific.…

    • 575 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The study of logic

    • 2914 Words
    • 12 Pages

    This book is intended as a practical guide for those who wish to win arguments. It also teaches how to perpetrate fallacies with mischief at heart and malice aforethought. I have described each X How to Win Every Argument fallacy, iven examples of it, and shown why it is fallacious. After any points of general interest concerning the history or occurrence of the fallacy, I have given the reader recommendations on how and where the fallacy may be used to deceive with maximum effect.…

    • 2914 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays