Preview

The Missouri Compromise's Role In The Civil War

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1227 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Missouri Compromise's Role In The Civil War
The Missouri Compromise Sectional tension between the slave south and free north arose over the control of the vast western lands, in 1819. During that year, Missouri, the first state entirely west of the Mississippi River and carved from the Louisiana Purchase, wanted admission from the Congress to be recognized as a slave state. The territory contained a sufficient population to become a state, yet the House of Representatives withheld passing Missouri as a state. At the moment, the Tallmadge amendment was passed, declaring that no more slaves could be brought into Missouri. Slaveholding southerners argued aggressively that the sectional balance between states was being threatened. In 1788, the Constitution granted the northern and southern …show more content…
While the southern states were in favor of slavery, the northern states vehemently opposed the idea. An expansion of slavery would have meant an increase in the territorial space and population. This in turn would give the Southern states increased power in the House. Although the Civil War had some time to initiate, the Compromise played a major role in the laying the groundwork for the war that was to come. It contributed to the division and disagreement between north and south, surrounding the topic of slavery. The issue built severe tension between the two sides of the …show more content…
The United States wanted to be isolated from other countries and not be in the middle of a war between two other nations. George Washington’s Neutrality Proclamation was designed to keep America from future wars, and keep Americans from dividing their loyalties. Involving the United States in outer wars would inflict severe damage on the new nation; therefore, Washington also in his Farewell Address advised to stay away from permanent alliances with foreign countries. The doctrine was to signify between the Americas from the European lifestyle, non-intervention, and non-colonization. Through this doctrine, President James Monroe wanted to refrain Europe from thinking about seeking new territories in America since at the time, Americans took up the majority along the eastern border. All unclaimed land would directly belong to the United States, and could be made so no Europeans could enter. Americans wanted to be able to increase the United States influence on trading and industries throughout the region of the south. Without having the restrictions from Britain, Americans could trade with whoever they felt
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Missouri Compromise
    • 263 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Missouri Compromise

    Give two ordered pairs that are solutions and two ordered pairs that are not solutions.…

    • 263 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Missouri Compromise Dbq
    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Missouri Compromise Dbq

    The Missouri Compromise is commonly thought of as the beginning of American sectionalism, although the signs were visible long before 1819. The crisis solved by the compromise certainly alerted the South for the need for political unity in order to maintain its way of life in the face of a more populous North. Likewise, it alerted both regions to the political problems inherent in westward expansion. The Missouri Compromise did not create sectionalism, but it is important as the first possible signs of sectionalist differences in the US.…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Fugitive Slave Act And Harriet Beecher Stoowe
    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Fugitive Slave Act And Harriet Beecher Stoowe

    Civil war in America was inevitable from the beginning. A country can not partake in slavery without an uproar. Tensions were high between the north and the south already because of their different ways of life. The north focused on mass production whereas the south’s biggest trade was agriculture. Slavery allowed the south to prosper, their whole economy was based off of it. Though change was inevitable two documents that sped up the war process were the Fugitive Slave Act and Harriet Beecher Stowe’s Uncle Tom’s Cabin.…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    In the Early Nineteenth Century, Americans Sought to Resolve Their Political Disputes Through Compromise, Yet by 1860 This No Longer Seemed Possible. Analyze the Reasons for This Change. Use the Documents and Your
    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the Early Nineteenth Century, Americans Sought to Resolve Their Political Disputes Through Compromise, Yet by 1860 This No Longer Seemed Possible. Analyze the Reasons for This Change. Use the Documents and Your

    The issue of slavery became an even greater concern when the Louisiana Purchase territories were to enter the Union as states. The question was, would new territories enter the Union as slave or free states? The South wanted a balance of power. They knew that if the North were to have more free states, then slavery in the south could be facing extinction through congress. In an attempt to conciliate with the South, the North agreed upon the Missouri Compromise of 1820. Through this, slavery was banned above the 36 degrees 30 minute line and Missouri entered as a slave state, Maine a free state. For a while, it retained the balance of power. However, tempers in the south rose again later in the 1820s over high tariffs. The tariffs benefitted the north but threatened southern cotton exports. In 1828, the tariff was around 50%. President Jackson modified it to around 33% in 1832 only to have South Carolina nullify it in the state. It raised the question of whether or not the federal government could legally impose protective tariffs and whether it was constitutional for a state to nullify a federal law. "South…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Analysis Of The Missouri Compromise
    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Analysis Of The Missouri Compromise

    In 1818, Missouri requested to join the Union as a slave state. Louisiana had already been admitted as a slave state. Congress was concerned that adding another slave state would upset the balance between the number of free and slave states. James Tallmadge of New York proposed an amendment that would require Missouri to abolish slavery as a requirement for admission as a state. A significant debate resulted. The South felt that the government had no right to limit slavery which was protected under the Constitution. The North felt that slavery…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Missouri Compromise Dbq
    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Missouri Compromise Dbq

    The collection of documents about the Missouri Compromise in 1820 offer a rare insight into the significance of the changes to American society in the first part of the 19th century.…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Pros And Cons Of The Articles Of Confederation
    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of The Articles Of Confederation

    The Northerners opposed slavery, whereas the agriculture dependent Southerners supported it. It was on this issue that the most acerbic debates took place. For the unity and efficiency of the whole country, both sides gave in and made the most famous of the compromises, the Three-Fifth Clause, which won unanimous approval. Not wanting to loose the valuable revenues from the South, the Northerners compromised again in the Constitution by prohibiting Congress from outlawing the slave trade for at least twenty years in order to appeal to the masses. Was this necessarily the right and just decision? No. But it undeniably guaranteed the South as a part of the…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of The Louisiana Purchase
    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of The Louisiana Purchase

    While there had already been tension building between the North and the South, the addition of new territory added new fuel to the fire. If the new states that emerged from the Louisiana Territory were all free, then the balance of power in the U.S. Senate would tilt decisively against slavery or vice versa . From the moment that the expansion of the United States emerged, there was conflict. Eventually after many years of debate the Missouri Compromise came to be in 1820. The Missouri Compromise was devised by Henry Clay . It was an attempt to defuse the tension causes by the addition of the Louisiana Purchase. It gave the pre-slavers the decisive state they needed to hold their position in congress. After much debate was had about which states would be free or slave states with the addition of the Louisiana Purchase, a compromise was worked out. To appease both sides Missouri would be admitted as a slave state and Maine (which used to be apart Massachusetts) would have the status of a free state, and minus Missouri, slavery was to be excluded at a certain latitude . With the Missouri Compromise; all states south of Missouri would be slave states and all states north of it would be free. The addition of Missouri as a slave state just ignited the already hot debate about the legitimacy of slavery. While the Louisiana Purchase would eventually help to…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What Was The Missouri Compromise
    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages

    What Was The Missouri Compromise

    The Missouri Compromise, in many ways made political conditions worse between the North and South. For a long time the North and South had been fighting about political issues such as slavery. The North believed that it was wrong to capture, enslave and ship Africans to America to work in harsh conditions for free for White owners. The South, on the other hand believed slavery was right and should be used for helping the economy and producing cash crops so the North could use the supplies to make products. But the addition of new states, especially an uneven number made the tension grow between the two sides on the decision of slavery.…

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Missouri Compromise
    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Missouri Compromise

    The Missouri Compromise was passed in 1820 between the pro-slavery and anti-slavery factions in the United States Congress, involving primarily the regulation of slavery in the western territories. It prohibited slavery in the former Louisiana Territory north of the parallel 36°30′ north except within the boundaries of the proposed state of Missouri. The 1820 passage of Missouri Compromise took place during the presidency of James Monroe.…

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Dbq Civil War
    • 1673 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Dbq Civil War

    The United States as a whole was divided before the Civil War, over the dispute of whether slavery should be allowed or not after the Mexican American war ended in 1848. After the Mexican American war citizens of the North and the South began to dispute the issue of slavery and tensions started to rise. There were many things proposed that were proposed to help the dispute over slavery such as the Wilmot Provisio which would close off California, Utah and New Mexico off from slavery. However it was not approved by the Senate as well, the South did not agree with the provisio as they feared that it would shift the balance of the power in the north. The Civil war was an inevitable fate that not only the North and the South had to face but the…

    • 1673 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Was The Civil War Inevitable
    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Why Was The Civil War Inevitable

    They depended greatly on the North for their industries and factories, because they had very few. They also opposed federal spending on internal improvements and they wanted no tariffs. Even despite having a somewhat weak economy, the South wanted to gain their independence to become their own country, and to have their own way of life, which included slavery as legal. When Abraham Lincoln was elected in 1860, the South thought that they would have no voice in the government, considering that Abraham Lincoln was against slavery. In hopes of being their own country, the South had no intention of fighting a war. However, before the war started, the South was unwilling to compromise. They thought that slavery should be allowed in all of the territories. They disagreed to the Missouri Compromise and to parts of the Compromise of 1850. Many felt that these compromises were unfair and biased. The South felt that their way of life and views on slavery were right and just. They turned to what they thought was their only choice: seceding from the Union. This enrage the North, which was one of the main causes of the Civil War.…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Age of the Common Man
    • 6184 Words
    • 25 Pages

    Age of the Common Man

    The Tallmadge Amendment was submitted by James Tallmadge, Jr. in the United States House of Representatives on February 13, 1819, during the debate regarding the admission of Missouri as a state. Tallmadge, an opponent of slavery, sought to impose conditions on Missouri that would extinguish slavery within a generation.…

    • 6184 Words
    • 25 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Role Of Slavery In The United States
    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Role Of Slavery In The United States

    The United States was divided on slavery and the Norther States abolished slavery while the southern states embraced it. The northern states above the Missouri Compromise of 1820 did not allow slavery. The United States economy played an important role in slavery were it either strengthened or weakened it. The northern states did not have a strong agricultural business due to the type of hard and rocky soil that proved…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Best Essays

    For What Purposes Do Us Presidents Construct Doctrines and Do They Have a Defining Impact on Us Foreign Policy or Are They Merely Rhetoric?
    • 4124 Words
    • 17 Pages

    For What Purposes Do Us Presidents Construct Doctrines and Do They Have a Defining Impact on Us Foreign Policy or Are They Merely Rhetoric?

    The Monroe Doctrine came about for two main reasons. Firstly, a clash with Russia over the north-western coast of North America led Secretary of State John Adams to suggest the principle that the Western hemisphere was no longer an option for colonisation by the European powers. Also, more importantly, the US was afraid that reactionary European powers would seek to recolonise the newly independent Latin American countries. Unveiled by President James Monroe in his State of the Union Address in December 1823, the doctrine contained two main points. Firstly, the United States would commit to a policy of non-colonisation, with Monroe saying that ‘the American continents…are henceforth not to be considered as subjects to future colonisation by any European powers’ (Avalon Project, 1996). Hart (1916) suggests that this part of the doctrine came…

    • 4124 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Best Essays
    Read More

Related Topics