Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

The Milgram experiment

Powerful Essays
1345 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Milgram experiment
The Milgram experiment The Milgram experiment came about by a Yale University psychologist by the name of Stanley Milgram. The experiment was to test how well the study participants were and the willingness of study participants to obey an authority figure who instructed them to perform acts that conflicted with what they thought was right. He concluded people obey either out of fear or out of a desire to appear cooperative even when acting against their own better judgment and desires. Stanley Milgram raised a question of why so many people obey when they feel coerced, which brought on his shockingly incredible experiment. Stanley Milgram’s experiment was probably one of the most famous studies of obedience. The experiment was started in july of 1961 it was simple to say the less. The first step of Stanley’s experiment was to put a ad out in the local paper, that read “ We will pay you $4.00 for one hour or your time
Persons needed for a study of Memory * we will pay five hundred New haven men to us complete a scientific study of memory and learning. The study is being done at Yale University. * each person who participates will be paid $4.00 ( plus 50c carfare) for approximately 1 hours time. We need you for an hour: there are no further obligations. You may choose the time you would like to come. All person must be between the ages of 20 and 50. High school and college students cannot be used. * If you meet these qualifications, fill out the coupon below and mail it now to Professor Stanley Milgram, Department of Psychology, Yale University New Haven” as stated from http://www.age-of-the-sage.org/psychology/milgram_obedience_experiment.html
In Milgram’s study he selected 40 male volunteers who had responded to his ad the 40 volunteers who were selected were of different age groups as shown from the chart below it was broken down in to age groups from 20 to 29 year olds in occupation as skilled and unskilled workers to business and white-collar and the finale professional occupation. This was also broken down in to two other age groups such as 30 to 39 and 40 to 50 year olds. “this chart can also be seen on http://www.age-of-the-sage.org/psychology/milgram_obedience_experiment.html” . After the volunteers have shown up Stanley came out wearing a white coat with a friendly co-subject which the volunteers assumed was there because of the same ad, Then Stanley went on to explained that one subject would be assigned the role of "teacher" and the other would be assigned the role of "learner." He then stated that he would hand each of them a piece of paper to assign them a role, ether the teacher or the learner. Little to the volunteers knowledge both pieces of paper had the role of teacher written on it. The co-subject pretended that his paper said learner on it so that in the volunteer mind it was inevitably random that they got the position as the teacher. Now for the surprising part, the co-subject was really an actor. Who was paid to act like he was getting shocked, which was to lead on the volunteer that he was really in pain to put the effect of physically hurting another person in the subjects mind who was the teacher. To see if the teacher would stop the experiment and the painful shock that really was not happening. Now the so called shock was only supposed to be giving for each wrong answer. Now the learner gave mainly wrong answers (on purpose) and for each of these the teacher gave him an electric shock. When the teacher refused to administer a shock and turned to Stanley for some guidance, he was given the standard instruction and or order to continue with four simple commands. First of which was please continue. Second the experiment requires you to continue. Third it is absolutely essential that you continue. The fourth and final one was you have no other choice but to continue. As the experiment went on and the results were coming in two-thirds of participants as in the teachers continued to the highest level of 450 volts. Now in one of Stanley’s article he had thought before the experiment took place that only one in a thousand would administer the highest shock he later found out it was wrong.

“In an article entitled "The Perils of Obedience" (1974) Stanley Milgram wrote:-
"Before the experiments, I sought predictions about the outcome from various kinds of people -- psychiatrists, college sophomores, middle-class adults, graduate students and faculty in the behavioral sciences. With remarkable similarity, they predicted that virtually all the subjects would refuse to obey the experimenter. The psychiatrist, specifically, predicted that most subjects would not go beyond 150 volts, when the victim makes his first explicit demand to be freed. They expected that only 4 percent would reach 300 volts, and that only a pathological fringe of about one in a thousand would administer the highest shock on the board". All though all the participants did continue to 300 volts after Stanley gave them some guidance. Milgram came to the conclusion that Ordinary people are more than likely to follow orders given by an authority figure, even more so to the extent of possibility of serious injury and or death of an innocent human being. Having Obedience to authority is ingrained in all of us from the way we are brought up. As in Obey parents, teachers, anyone in authority position, as some as the testers went on some demonstrated a range of negative emotions about continuing and would plead with the learner about stopping the experiment. Some of which started to laugh nervously and act strangely because they did not know what to do so the nerves laugh was them trying to hide it. As they sat there in front of a control panel as shown to the right. Which had 30 switches in 15 volt increments, each switch was labeled with a voltage ranging from 15 and up to 450 volts. Each switch also had a rating, which was ranging from slight shock to danger and then even more to severe shock just when one would think it was done it still had two final switches which were labeled by XXX. In other words a hell of a lot of pain one would think. Which the volunteer did not know that it was not hooked up they just heard the co-subject or actor in the other room pretending to yell in pain.
Now in conclusion the experiment showed how people would react to an authority figure giving those orders and if they would rebel if they thought the outcome was bad or not. Now at the end all the volunteers were debriefed showing that they did not bring any harm to the student, which a lot were relieved and in one case one person even cried seeing the person alive because they thought they had killed him. Now after all that was said and done, the volunteer were broken down in to three groups once again the first group was Obeyed but justified themselves. Some obedient participants gave up responsibility for their actions, blaming the experimenter. The second group was obeyed but blamed themselves. Others felt badly about what they had done and were quite harsh on themselves. The last group and the group that had the lowest amount of people was Rebelled. Finally, rebellious subjects questioned the authority of the experimenter and argued there was a greater ethical imperative calling for the protection of the learner over the needs of the experimenter. “To see the experiment there are two youtube videos links are below” http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vLR100oGSSY&NR=1&feature=fvwp http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GHuI2JIPylk&feature=player_embedded#! Works Citied
007IceWeasel. "Obedience." YouTube. YouTube, 29 Jan. 2010. Web. 19 Apr. 2012. .
MichaelRobertRees. "The Milgram Experiment." YouTube. YouTube, 30 Nov. 2010. Web. 19 Apr. 2012. .
"Milgram's Experiment on Obedience to Authority." Web. 19 Apr. 2012. .
"Milgram Experiment." Simply Psychology. Web. 19 Apr. 2012. .
"Obedience to AuthorityThe Experiments by Stanley Milgram." Stanley Milgram Obedience Experiments Authority Study 1974 Psychology. Web. 19 Apr. 2012. .

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In The Perils of Obedience, Stanley Milgram expresses his findings of an experiment he conducted trying to prove the lengths people will go to be obedient to authority.…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Milgram (1963) himself, however, recognises a plethora of caveats – demonstrating a scientific awareness of his experiment’s scientific limitations such the location of the experiment was cited as a possible influence as Yale University is and was considered to be prestigious, thus reinforcing the reliability and plausibility of the experimenter himself. This was demonstrated by a follow up study which replicated the procedure in a rundown location, in which the obedience rate dropped to 47.5% (McLeod,…

    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In 1963, Stanley Milgram, a psychologist at Yale University, conducted a series of social psychology experiments to study the conditions under which the people are obedient to authorities and personal conscience. The purpose of his experiment was to determine whether or not people were particularly obedient to the higher authority who instructed them to perform various acts even if they violate their own morals and ethics. It was one of the most famous studies of obedience in psychology as it has inspired other researchers to explore what makes people question authority and more importantly, what leads them to follow orders. There were several replications of his experiment and the results were identical to those reported by Milgram about how…

    • 1558 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over the past century, the field of Psychology has prospered, giving way to a more in depth knowledge and understanding of people’s social interactions with one another and what drives those connections. 20th century psychologist, Stanley Milgram, executed a series of Obedience to Authority test on random participants. As seen in the YouTube videos online and in class, Milgram’s study found that over 65% of the participants carried out the experiment, despite potentially hurting someone, due to the authority figure urging them to continue.…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yale University psychologist, Stanley Milgram, conducted an experiment in 1961 focusing on the conflict between obedience to authority and personal conscience. He examined justifications for acts of genocide offered by those accused at the World War II Nuremberg War Criminal trials. Their defense often was based on "obedience" - that they were just following orders from their superiors. Milgram's experiment, which he told his participants was about learning, was to have participants (teacher) question another participant (learner), and when the learner got a question wrong the teacher would shock the learner. For every question wrong, the teacher would increase the amount of volts used in the shock. Of course the experiment was actually about obedience, the learner was an experimenter, and the shock was faked (McLeod). Milgram's was one of the first psychology experiments to use…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Assessing Obedience

    • 1769 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Obedience is a characteristic ingrained in every person. No matter who a person is, there is always a more authoritative figure that they must obey to. Stanley Milgram, a psychologist at Yale University, conducted experiments that tested obedience towards authority. These experiments were conducted in 1963 at Yale University. The experiments Milgram performed gained many different reactions from people. Two authors that wrote their thoughts on the experiments done by Milgram are Diana Baumrind and Richard Herrnstein. Diana Baumrind, who wrote the “Review of Stanley Milgram’s Experiments on Obedience”, believes that the experiments Milgram conducted were not necessary and should not have been conducted unless the subject knew the harms that could occur after the experiment was done. Baumrind is a psychologist, who was employed at the Institute of Human Development at the University of California, Berkley at the time that Milgram’s experiment was performed. Richard Herrnstein has a different belief. Herrnstein, the author of the article “Review of Stanley Milgram’s Experiments on Obedience”, believes Milgram’s experiments were well done and show great potential of what we are able to do in the future. Milgram’s experiment is valid because it was conducted in an appropriate setting, there was minimal psychological harm done, and it contained valuable results.…

    • 1769 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Stanley Milgram experiment takes normal everyday people and gives them orders to do horrible…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Before actually conducting these experiments, Milgram asked for predictions from various groups of people. It was predicted that almost all the subjects would deny to obey the experimenter, but these predictions were proved wrong. In the first group of subjects, only 25 of the 40 who participated in the experiment obeyed all the orders from the experimenter. In another scenario where Yale undergraduates were used as subjects, 60 percent of them were obedient to the experimenter.…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    One of the most famous studies of obedience in psychology was carried out by Stanley Milgram (1963). Stanley Milgram, a psychologist at Yale University, conducted an experiment focusing on the conflict between obedience to authority and personal conscience. He examined justifications for acts of genocide offered by those accused at the World War II, Nuremberg War Criminal trials. Their defense often was based on "obedience" - that they were just following orders of their superiors. The experiments began in July 1961, a year after the trial of Adolf Eichmann in Jerusalem. Milgram (1963) wanted to investigate whether Germans were particularly obedient to authority figures as this was a common explanation for the Nazi killings in World War II. Milgram selected participants for his experiment by advertising for male participants to take part in a study of learning at Yale University. The procedure was that the participant was paired with another person and they drew lots to find out who would be the ‘learner’ and who would be the ‘teacher’. The draw was fixed so that the participant was always the teacher, and the learner was one of Milgram’s confederates (pretending to be a real participant).…

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Evaluate Milgram's Study

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Milgram did a lab experiment, varying different situational pressures to see which had the greatest effect on obedience. He told 40 male volunteers that it was a study of how punishment affects learning. After drawing lots, the real participant was assigned the role of 'teacher'. The learner was a confederate. The teachers job was to administrate a learning task and deliver 'electric shocks' to the learner (in another room) if he got a question wrong. The shocks began at 15 volts and increased in increment of 15 volts to a maximum of 450 volts.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Milgram and Zimbardo

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The study of obedience, conducted by Milgram, was to test how the subject would obey when ordered by the experimenter to adminater a shock to another human. Two experiments were conducted. The first used Yale undergraduates as subjects. The other used "ordinary" people as subjects. The results were shocking, both showed that around 60 percect of the subjects obeyed the experimenter completely. The subjects showed signs of distress throughtout the experiment, but continued because they were instructed to. These signs of distress indicate that the subjects knew what they were doing was wrong, but did the experiment anyways because they were ordered to so.…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Milgram Experiment

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Milgram experiment was conducted by Stanley Milgram a assistant professor of psychology at Yale. The experiment wanted to show the obedience in people to the authority in others by creating a fake “shocking machine“. Lauren Slater quotes in the book Opening Skinners Box “In Milgrams view, any especially persuasive…

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Milgram Experiment Essay

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In May, 1962 an experiment was done at Yale University. The experiment was called Milgram’s Obedience to Authority. The participants of the experiment was forty males. The male’s ages were between twenty and fifty years old. Along, with the age differences they all had different occupations.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stanley Milgrams experiments are some of the most recognized behavior experiments in psychology today. Milgrams most known experiment was ‘shocking’ to people and has also been controversial ethically. As Ian Parker stated it would “make his name and destroy his reputation.” Parkers Obedience essay talks much of Milgrams life before the experiment and how the psychology community thought about his ethics.…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stanley Milgram is a 20th century social psychologist who conducted research into social influence and persuasion. His experiments on obedience remain some of the most frequently cited and controversial in the history of the field. Brown, R. (1986), “Social psychologist Stanley Milgram researched the effect of authority on obedience. He concluded people obey either out of fear or out of a desire to appear cooperative--even when acting against their own better judgment and desires.”…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays