Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

The Legal Process of Discrimmination

Better Essays
1087 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Legal Process of Discrimmination
The Legal Process of Discrimination

Sylvia Goldstein

Employment Law/MGT434

July 30, 2012
Deborah Wilder

The Legal Process of Discrimination

According to a 2002 Rutgers University study, “forty-six percent of African American workers believe they have been treated unfairly by their employers, compared with 10 percent of whites and 28 percent of African Americans and 22 percent of Hispanics/Latinos have experienced workplace discrimination, compared with 6 percent of whites” (Massie for www.monster.com) For John a worker in the private sector these statistics are important if he should fall into one of these categories and is considering filing a discrimination charge based on race. Race is a protected class under Title VII for employers with 14 or more employees. Still John will need to consider all the factors related to pursuing a complaint or do nothing and subject himself to further stress. Discrimination in the workplace can take a toll, physically, mentally and emotionally. “The feelings of hopelessness, mistrust, despair and alienation are common among people facing bias, and they don 't stop at the end of the workday. Stress and depression don 't just affect employees at work but also at home among family, friends and loved ones” (Massie:www.monster.com). For John and all those who file complaints the burden of having to prove discrimination can be an agonizing toll. Still statistics from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) reveal,” the highest number of employment discrimination charges in its 45 year history was filed in the fiscal year ending on September 30, 2010” ( www.eeoc.gov). If John should consider pursuing, he will have to first file a charge with the EEOC, “By law, the EEOC must in some way handle every claim it receives” (Bennett-Alexander and Hartman, 2007). The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) is responsible for enforcing federal laws that make it illegal to discriminate against a job applicant or an employee because race, color, religion, sex ,national origin, age, disability and genetic information. A charge of employment discrimination can be done in person by appointment, by phone, or by mail. The EEOC office will send a notice to John’s employer within 10 days of the filing. This process can take several directions. The first can be remedied through mediation. A mediator can help both parties reach a voluntary settlement. There is also the possibility of a dismissal if the EEOC should deem that there is not enough evidence. A good outcome is that the EEOC agrees to conduct an investigation to the charge. This involves gathering information by ways of visiting John’s employer, holding interviews of key staff members including human resources and obtaining work records. In the event the employer is not cooperative a Subpoena can be administered to obtain documents, testimony or enter the facilities. An investigation can take an average of 6months. If the EEOC determines no law was broken, they can still than grant a letter of “right to sue”. This notice would give John the right to take his employer to court. If the EEOC determines there is a valid charge, they will make every effort to try to reach a settlement or be referred to their legal staff. Either way, John would be wise to seek legal counsel and if he should consider filing a law suit, it would have to be done within 90 days. “Upon going to court, the case is handled entirely new, as if there had not already been a finding by the EEOC” (Bennett-Alexander and Hartman, 2007). In other words the discrimination charge would have to be proved again at civil litigation. A challenging factor is the odds against winning discrimination cases are few and many lawyers are reluctant to try. From an article in the Wall Street Journal, “A battery of recent studies shows that employees who sue over discrimination lose at a higher rate in federal court than other types of plaintiffs. They also get less time in court with judges quicker to throw out their cases”(2009). It is more likely that when companies are faced with going to court, they choose the option of settling outside of court. In the same article by Nathan Koppel(2009), “A report last year by the Federal Judicial Center, the research arm of the federal courts, found that judges nationwide terminated 12.5% of employment-discrimination cases through summary judgments, before the suits reached trial”(2009). The chances for John winning if his case should even go to trial are dismal but the opportunity to reach a monetary settlement is much more plausible. For John’s employer escaping court is also not a winning battle. From an article in legal match.com by John Richards, Shanti Atkins, Esq., President and CEO of ELT, Inc., a company that specializes in ethics and compliance training, states “ settlement costs to resolve an EEOC claim fade in the face of additional, often unrecorded, costs to the employer’s organization” (2010).These can be non-monetary costs such as; distraction and loss of time invested by staff,low employee morale while under the constant pressure of a lawsuit, and the potential loss of an employer’s business from a negative reputation. There are many factors for John to consider if he should pursue a discrimination charge against his employer. His job and means of supporting himself are at stake as well as his reputation and fear of retribution. Most importantly John’s mental and physical health during this stressful process are at risk. In the meantime, according to the article, The Stress of Workplace Discrimination, What Can Employers and Employees Do? By Michelle K. Massie; John can do the following” • Develop informal social support networks made up of people who can offer insight into workplace issues • Consider therapy or counseling like community-based employee assistance programs • Keep a detailed log of events in case he decides to file a complaint with his supervisors, human resources department, union, or lawyer” (www.monster.com).

References

U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission@www.eeoc.gov

Bennett-Alexander, D. D., & Hartman, L. P. (2007). Employment Law for Business (5th ed.). New York, N.Y.: McGraw- Hill Companies.

Job-Discrimination Cases Tend To Fare Poorly in Federal Court From The Wall Street Journal Online by NATHAN KOPPEL, February 19,2009

Most Employment Discrimination Lawsuits Don’t Net Much Money; www.legalmatch.com by John Richards, June 18, 2010

The Stress of Workplace Discrimination,What Can Employers and Employees Do? By Michelle K. Massie, Monster Contributing Writer for www.monster.com

References: U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission@www.eeoc.gov Bennett-Alexander, D. D., & Hartman, L. P. (2007). Employment Law for Business (5th ed.). New York, N.Y.: McGraw- Hill Companies. Job-Discrimination Cases Tend To Fare Poorly in Federal Court From The Wall Street Journal Online by NATHAN KOPPEL, February 19,2009 Most Employment Discrimination Lawsuits Don’t Net Much Money; www.legalmatch.com by John Richards, June 18, 2010 The Stress of Workplace Discrimination,What Can Employers and Employees Do? By Michelle K. Massie, Monster Contributing Writer for www.monster.com

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The disparate impact theory requires a plaintiff to demonstrate that an apparently neutral employment practice affects one group more harshly than another and that the practice is not justified by business necessity. A prima face case is established when the plaintiff identifies a specific employment practice to be challenged; and through relevant statistical analysis proves that the challenged practice has an adverse impact on a protected group. When it comes to the case, discrimination was seen, but never affects more than one…

    • 1228 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ‘ makes it an unlawful employment practice for an employer.. To discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual’s race, color, religion, sex or national origin” (204). The language of the law makes it clear that discrimination is considered unlawful, regardless if a firm’s stance on the issue or whether it states it does not want its employees to be harassed since under Title VII, firms are accountable for workplace behavior. Furthermore, firms under Title VII have a legal responsibility to monitor their employees’ behavior to ensure discrimination is not occurring in the workplace. Therefore, an employee cannot be “ acting on their own,” because he is a representative of the firm he / she works at and as a result his actions make the firm legally…

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The legal issue in this case is about David Dunlap the plaintiff who has been faced with discrimination on the basis of race in the interview at Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) during the employment process of this company. Mr. Dunlap is an African American man whom has worked for many years as foreman through contract for the union. He has worked as a contractor with the union at Tennessee Authority as a boiler man for over twenty years including fifteen years as a foreman. He has applied for employment at TVA numerous times since 1970 and was not once offered an interview. Mr. Dunlap has established that regardless of experience and during the hiring development, the company has allowed racial favoritism. The court has to recognize if the business is legally responsible under title VII of the civil rights act of 1964 for racial bias with intent. Mr. Dunlap has claimed the case under disparate impact and disparate treatment investigation. (Walsh, 2010)…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title VII, forbids “an employer to … discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual’s … sex.” Civil Rights Act, 1964. In Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson, the court held that “a plaintiff may establish a violation of Title VII by proving that discrimination based on sex has created a hostile or abusive work environment.” Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson (US 1986). A hostile work environment is created when the environment at work creates anxiety so severe as to result in an alteration of the terms and conditions of employment. Hailey Course Pack, p. 140. The burden to prove such an environment was created rests on the plaintiff. The plaintiff must prove that they belong to a protected class; were subject to unwelcomed harassment; the harassment is based on sex, meaning it is not happening to members of the opposite sex; and the harassment alters the conditions of employment. Hailey Course Pack, p. 140. In this case, the court will evaluate whether Black has sufficient evidence to prove her claim of a hostile work environment.…

    • 1852 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Manner Case Summary

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Plaintiff worked for the Defendant in several positions. The Plaintiff alleges twelve different incidents occurred where she was treated differently than her white co-workers. These includes incidents such as dress code violations that white employees did not receive. Another involved her supervisor advising the Plaintiff not to steal anything. There were other race-based comments such as a supervisor referring to the Plaintiff’s hair as “nappy.”…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Based on Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 employers are not allowed to discriminate against a potential employee based on race, color, sex, religion, or national origin. In the Dunlap v. Tennessee Valley Authority case this title of the civil rights act was violated. An African American man named David Dunlap who gave almost the exact same answers as white candidates who got the job and who had 20 years of experience in boiler making was not chosen for any of the 10 positions available with the TVA. The issue is not only that he wasn’t hired but based on the score sheet he was highly discriminated against. When asked how many days he missed Dunlap told the employers that he never missed days unless sick or having a family emergency, two other candidates who just so happened to be white gave almost the exact same answer. On the score sheet for this question Dunlap was given a score of 3.7 while the other two potential employees were given scores of 4.2 and 5.5. Also when he was asked about how many accidents he had in the field he replied none and was given a low score but another candidate whom had at least two accidents was given a higher score than Dunlap. The issue at hand was that, his score sheet was heavily manipulated putting him in number 14 out of the 21 candidates that had applied. The top ten got hired.…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Employers must understand that the persons who evaluate and decide the outcome of employment discrimination cases (the EEOC investigator, federal or state judge, and/or jury) have keen senses of fairness and expect that employees will be treated in a fair manner. As a result, employers are exposed to substantial liability for any acts, including perceived acts, of discrimination in the workplace. Employers should take any charge of discrimination seriously and the employer must keep in mind that, at a minimum, it needs to have a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for taking the action in question. In addition, an employer's response will be evaluated by persons who have a different perspective than the employer. What…

    • 964 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Eeoc Pros And Cons

    • 251 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Since the EEOC was created, they’re aware of all of these discriminations and many more, and have been working hard to dissipate all of them by creating multiple laws and acts throughout the years. Since 1963. The EEOC have created around 25 laws, acts, and orders all together. We should be grateful that there’s a group of people out there that is taking care of this dire situation and making sure that everyone gets an equal opportunity at finding a…

    • 251 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bennett-Alexander, D. D., & Hartman, P. L. (2007). Employment law for business (5th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.…

    • 1462 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Eeoc Paper

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The purpose of this paper is to go over a lawsuit that was filled by the United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. The paper will cover who the EEOC (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission) is and their role in the lawsuit. It will go over whether or not the lawsuit promotes social change. The paper will also go over how the EEOC as well as other news groups released information about the case to the public. I will then give my take on how I would implement new strategies to make sure the problem does not come up in the workplace again.…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Employment at Will

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Cited: Bennett-Alexander, D. D. & Hartman, P. L. (2007). Employment law for business (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Flagrant Violations

    • 230 Words
    • 1 Page

    Stephanie your discussion response outlines the activity that an employer would do treating a protected class in disparate treatment treating them differently. Based on this explanation it is evident that the protected classes of people should be protected when employers follow different practices that violate their rights. In light, of these facts many of these protected classes are overlooked by companies and the intent of these violations are never identified. The only way for these types of violations to be identified is for better education to permeate the national workforce. Once this is accomplished the areas of concern, the protected classes will be able to bring suit for flagrant violations. In the article, “Race, Employment, and Crime:…

    • 230 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    References: Bennett-Alexander, D., & Hartman, L. (2009). Employment law for business. (6 ed., pp. 247-249). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    2012). As described in the article, this experiment can provide multiple findings about discrimination: (1) it produces estimate rates of discrimination; (2) it yields evidence about the interactions that deals with discrimination; (3) it provides a vehicle for both research on and enforces antidiscrimination. A report by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission states that 99,412 workplace discrimination claims were filed in 2012. Race discrimination was cited in 33.7 percent of the cases, while 23 percent of claims were for age discrimination. These findings demonstrate that workplace discrimination is a reality for thousands of workers every year (Finn, L.…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lilly Ledbetter was one of the very few female supervisors at the Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. plant in Gadsden, Alabama, and she worked at that plant for nineteen years, from 1979 till her retirement in 1998. Initially, when she started working for the company, her pay was equal to that of the other male supervisors. However, as time passed the pay discrepancy between Ledbetter and her 15 male counterparts was stark: the lowest she received was $3,727 per month, while the lowest paid male received $4,286. Thus, after realizing this Mrs. Ledbetter filed an official complaint before the EEOC in March 1998, stating that Goodyear violated the Title VII as they paid her a discriminatory low salary due to her sex. After she filed an official complaint, her case went to trial, and the jury concluded that the pay disparity was due to intentional discrimination. However, the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit reversed the jury verdict, as it claimed Mrs. Ledbetter’s’ case was not filed in time, as the original discriminatory pay decision occurred before the statutory limitations of 180 days.…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays