Preview

The Legal Future of Human Cloning

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1691 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Legal Future of Human Cloning
The Future of Human Cloning in America: A Legal Perspective

On July 6, 1996, a historical bookmark in modern science was placed as scientists successfully cloned Dolly the Sheep. Dolly was the first mammal to ever be cloned, and from her existence grew several very real concerns, most notably the possibility of humans also being cloned in a laboratory. This new possibility brought up the ethical implications of cloning a human being and President Bill Clinton quickly passed an executive memorandum forbidding the use of federal funds for cloning projects and experiments. To this day, cloning is still not a federally funded science and only privately funded organizations such as private universities and private companies can afford to engage in this kind of costly research. However, there is no blanket ban on cloning imposed by the federal government and therefore much of the regulation of cloning is carried out by the states individually. The result is that states will have different rules and regulations on cloning, which will lead to incongruities of interstate policies. The first thing that needs to be understood when discussing human cloning is that there are two fundamental types of human cloning: reproductive cloning and therapeutic cloning. Reproductive cloning is the cloning of a whole human being from the cells of another human being. Therapeutic cloning, or “research cloning” is the production of embryo cells that are used in stem cell research. Reproductive cloning, the more obvious extreme of the two, is generally agreed upon by both proponents and opponents of human cloning as too controversial because of the safety and ethical risks involved in producing an entire human being from a laboratory. Therapeutic cloning is where a finer line exists. Using embryo cells for stem cell research in essential in researching new treatments and cures for terminal and potentially fatal diseases such as Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s, but opponents argue that



Cited: Page "Cloning Laws and Public Policy." Cloning Laws and Public Policy. Web. Efforts to Ban Human Cloning The American Journal of International Law , Vol. 99, No. 1 (Jan., 2005), p. 266 Research Cloning, Ethics, and Public Policy LeRoy Walters Science , New Series, Vol. 299, No. 5613 (Mar. 14, 2003), p. 1661 Human Cloning Laws." Human Cloning Laws. N.p., n.d. Web. Andrews, Lori B. Cloning Human Beings: The Current and Future Legal Status of Cloning. Georgetown.edu. Georgetown University, n.d. Web.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Firstly, cloning a human body has a low success rate. Human cloning is far more complicated, with greater risks and potentials for error. As a result, scientists fear that applying this technique to human might lead to malformations or diseases. Moreover, of the cloning that has been clone, about a third of cloned calves born alive died young, and many of them were abnormally large. Japanese researchers examined that coned mice live in poor health and die early. More than 90% of cloning attempts fail. Thus, cloning poses serious risks, potentially producing children who are still-born, unhealthy, severely malformed or disabled.…

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Ever since the birth of the first cloned sheep, named Dolly, the dream of human cloning has existed (Van Dijck, 1999). Cloning a mammal is described as the manipulation of an animal or human cell in order to create an identical copy of that animal’s or human’s nucleic DNA (Andrews, 1997). Though the dream of a human clone also comes with a lot of controversy regarding ethics and morals. Embryotic stem cell research, which could lead to a renewable source of human tissue, cells and eventually entire organs (Bowring, 2004), is highly controversial due to the necessity of placing a cloned embryo into a woman’s body in order to achieve that research. Politicians differentiate between therapeutic cloning and reproductive cloning as they refer to the second as “implanting a cloned embryo in a woman's womb” (Bowring, 2004), as for the embryo itself the research is not very therapeutic. Furthermore cloning by transfer of nuclei is not very effective yet as only 1% of manipulated sheep eggs reach adulthood and the number is even lower for other animals (Solter, 2000). The question whether human cloning will ever be possible and ethical remains to be answered but it seems certain that extra research in embryotic stem cells will improve techniques and success rates, which eventually brings the realization of a human clone closer one step at a time.…

    • 1944 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cloning is a procedure conceived to notion in the late 1960s, but it is only recently that it was fully understood and that scientists have started to figure out how to successfully copy the genetic composition of one organism to another. Since science already knows how to do this, the only problems and obstacles that remains is efficiency and the success ratio of each operation. The cloning process consists of taking the nucleus of an organism, and placing it, along with the DNA that contains all the genetic material, in place of the nucleus of the host egg. The egg then forms an embryo and matures into the same exact "copy", at least genetically, as the original organism. Already done on mammals, cloning is something that can be extended to utilize humans as subjects. In the future it will be wholly possible to create human clones to serve whatever purpose they were conceived for. However, presently there are numerous ethical issues surrounding cloning and there are problems about the implications of the use of cloning for the purpose of medicine. This issue plagues us so much that the constant objections of bioethicists and political and religious leaders have caused the US Government to propose a ban on all research concerning human cloning until a conclusion is reached on the moral and ethical aspects of the process. (Macer, 2)…

    • 1585 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cloning Persuasive Essay

    • 1534 Words
    • 7 Pages

    What was once thought to be the content of fiction novels and comic books is now being fully explored and realized in the cutting edge world of modern science. Scientists now possess the necessary capabilities and technology to make the process of human cloning a reality. While this is a controversial and rather sensitive topic, cloning is an innovative practice that has the potential to vastly improve the lives of unlimited amounts of people. Although cloning may prove to be a useful remedy for many of today’s issues, there are those in the scientific and medical fields who remain vehemently opposed to its practice. It is for this reason that lawmakers, scientists, and doctors around the world are currently locked in a fierce standoff that will determine what if any, impact that cloning will have upon our ever-changing society. Each side has compiled substantial evidence against the other as to why cloning should or should not be legalized and practiced. It is my strong belief that the curative effects that could be reaped by practicing cloning far outweigh the arguments of anti-cloning advocates; the practice of human cloning should be legalized and practiced. Countless individuals could benefit from its various applications and the future of medicine would be drastically enhanced.…

    • 1534 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Human Cloning

    • 1857 Words
    • 8 Pages

    John A. Robertson, "Human Cloning and the Challenge of Regulation," The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 339, no. 2 (July 9, 1998), pp. 119-122.…

    • 1857 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The question shakes us all to our very souls. For humans to consider the cloning of one another forces them all to question the very concepts of right and wrong that make them all human. The cloning of any species, whether they be human or non-human, is ethically and morally wrong. Scientists and ethicists alike have debated the implications of human and non-human cloning extensively since 1997 when scientists at the Roslin Institute in Scotland produced Dolly. No direct conclusions have been drawn, but compelling arguments state that cloning of both human and non-human species results in harmful physical and psychological effects on both groups. The following issues dealing with cloning and its ethical and moral implications will be addressed: cloning of human beings would result in severe psychological effects in the cloned child, and that the cloning of non-human species subjects them to unethical or moral treatment for human needs.…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Starting with an explanation of what cloning is and the two main types of the technology: reproductive cloning and therapeutic cloning, this paper goes on to explore the ramifications these technologies may have in different areas of our society with respect to government, funding issues for research, religious views, education for our children on cloning issues and lastly the publics response to cloned animal produce.…

    • 1913 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    One major issue in regards to the cloning debate is the conjoining of the two separate types of cloning. The public sees cloning as the creation of a belated twin, which actually only describes reproductive cloning. When most people think about cloning they picture a mad scientist creating faux people in some dank, secret laboratory. In reality, this is about as far from the truth as one can get. Medical science is very far from creating actual people. However, we are much closer to discovering the necessary technology for producing cells and tissue samples essential for the treating, and possibly curing, of many debilitating diseases.…

    • 1391 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Satire On Cloning

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages

    However, scientists still have still a lot to learn in the field of cloning. The first mammal to be cloned was Dolly the sheep in the year of 1996 on July 5th. Geneticists have already learned how to clone an animal and different cross-breeds of two organisms like the human-pig. They can also remove DNA strands and clone them to study the genetic makeup of the organism. The use of stem cells is that they can use the stem cells in experimenting different diseases to produce a new medication or more effective medication. Over the years, geneticists have accomplished composing stem cells and generating the duplicate of the same animal for…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The process of cloning has remained one of the most controversial topics as debates continue about the pros and cons of Cloning. Cloning which is the process of duplicating DNA or living stem cells can be dated back to over 200 years ago. The two most common types of cloning are Therapeutic Cloning and Reproductive Cloning. Therapeutic cloning is a process that specifies the use of cloning stem cells for the treatment of an illness or disability (Ham, 2007). Reproductive Cloning involves inserting a cell into a host but uses donated embryos to harvest stem cells that can be converted into almost any type of cell needed (Ham, 2007). Many arguments are being posed by scientists, pro-life representatives, medical researchers and religious followers about why the practice of cloning should be allowed or banned with all parties making strong points on either side. Today there is a great amount of experimenting and cloning tests being conducted on animals. The United States government has suppressed support for human cloning practices (Bush, 2002). This report will elaborate on the different views from the pro and con side of cloning and provide a realistic synthesis and a conclusive resolution for the practices surrounding the cloning process.…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In this two-part viewpoint, David A. Prentice and William Saunders discuss the science and the ethics of therapeutic cloning. In the first part, Prentice argues that creating clones for the purpose of embryonic stem cell research, called "therapeutic cloning," is no different from reproductive cloning, which creates a living human child. Also, he points out, therapeutic cloning is not therapeutic for the embryo. In the second part of the viewpoint, Saunders builds on Prentice's argument and goes even…

    • 3138 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    This question shakes us all to our very souls. For humans to consider the cloning of one another, forces everyone of us to question the very concepts of right and wrong that makes us all human. The cloning of any species, whether they be human or non-human, is ethically and morally wrong. Scientists and ethicists alike have debated the dangerous implications of human and non-human cloning extensively since 1997 when scientists at the Roslin Institute in Scotland produced a cloned sheep, named Dolly. No direct conclusions have been drawn, but compelling arguments state that cloning of both human and non-human species results in harmful physical and psychological effects on both groups. The following issues dealing with cloning and its ethical and moral implications will be addressed: cloning of human beings would result in severe psychological effects in the cloned child, and that the cloning of non-human species such as animals subjects them to unethical or moral treatment for human needs.…

    • 1371 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    In his work from 2002 “Religion and Human Cloning: An Exploratory Analysis of the First Available Opinion Data”, John Evans proudly states a few possible benefits, or advantages, of human ‘therapeutic’ cloning. While talking about embryonic stem cells, he states “these cells can eventually be used to treat diseases such as Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, and kidney failure, to name but a few…”(748). These possibilities have mostly been confirmed since the publishing of Evans’ piece and other more incredible possibilities have come about. The benefits of both reproductive and therapeutic cloning are endless, yet many still disagree. They say that cloning is dangerous and that it would end human evolution and bring disaster to society as we know it (Mautner, 68). Do most people really think this is true? Or is modern society simply scared of the unknown and not ready for change? Many scientists and authors constantly debate the ethics and possibilities of human cloning, both for reproductive use and therapeutic use. A couple of possible risks would accompany the beginning of human cloning, however the benefits are legitimate, and we as a species should reconsider.…

    • 1336 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Harris, J. “Goodbye Dolly? The Ethics of Human Cloning.” Journal of Medical Ethics (1997): n.…

    • 86 Words
    • 1 Page
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Most of the American society sees human cloning as only science fiction, but what they don’t know is how close to reality it actually is. With the technology that is available today, it does not seem crazy that human cloning could happen within my own lifetime. Cloning could have a very beneficial effect to our world, possibly one that we can’t even fathom because the idea of human cloning is so complicated. After completing my research, I have concluded that human cloning should not continue to be researched given the current conditions of our society. Cloning should not be allowed because society would not be able to handle…

    • 1697 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays