Preview

The Leadership Quarterly

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
12140 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Leadership Quarterly
The Leadership Quarterly 17 (2006) 559 – 576 www.elsevier.com/locate/leaqua

Leadership and the organizational context: Like the weather? ☆
Lyman W. Porter ⁎, Grace B. McLaughlin 1
The Paul Merage School of Business, University of California–Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697-3125, USA

Abstract This article reviews the leadership literature from 1990–2005 in twenty-one major journals in order to determine the nature and extent of attention to the organizational context as a factor affecting leaders' behavior and their effectiveness. Both conceptual and empirical articles were rated as having “moderate/strong,” “slight,” or “no” emphasis on the organizational context. Those articles classified in the moderate/strong category were analyzed under seven organizational context components. Suggestions are included for improving the breadth and depth of empirical knowledge about the interaction of leadership and the organizational context. © 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Leadership; Organizational context

1. Introduction In the past 15 years or so, there have been increasing calls in the literature for the necessity to give more attention to the role of the organizational context as a major factor affecting leadership behavior and outcomes. Consistent with those calls, the basic premise of this article is: Leadership in organizations does not take place in a vacuum. It takes place in organizational contexts. The key issue, therefore, is whether, and to what extent, the organizational context has been front and center in recent leadership literature. That is, does a relative void still exist in the research literature on the impact of the organizational context on leadership? If it does, the situation would seem to be like the weather: many talking about it, but very few doing much about it insofar as empirical research is concerned. Progress in filling this void, to the extent that it exists, would seem to be essential for a better understanding of



References: Antonakis, J., & Atwater, L. (2002). Leader distance: A review and a proposed theory. The Leadership Quarterly, 13, 673−704. Antonakis, J., Schriesheim, C. A., Donovan, J. A., Gopalakrishna-Pillai, K., Pellegrini, E. K., & Rossomme, J. L. (2004). Methods for studying leadership. In J. Antonakis, A. R. Cianciolo, & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The nature of leadership (pp. 48−70). Thousand Oaks: Sage. Avolio, B. J., & Bass, B. M. (1995). Individual consideration viewed at multiple levels of analysis: A multi-level framework for examining the diffusion of transformational leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 6, 199−218. Avolio, B. J., Kahai, S., & Dodge, G. E. (2000). E-leadership: Implications for theory, research, and practice. The Leadership Quarterly, 11, 615−668. Balkundi, P., & Kilduff, M. (2005). The ties that lead: A social network approach to leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 941−961. Bess, J. L., & Goldman, P. (2001). Leadership ambiguity in universities and K-12 schools and the limits of contemporary leadership theory. The Leadership Quarterly, 12, 419−450. Boal, K. B., & Hooijberg, R. (2000). Strategic leadership research: Moving on. The Leadership Quarterly, 11, 515−549. Brown, M. E., & Gioia, D. A. (2002). Making things click: Distributive leadership in an online division of an offline organization. The Leadership Quarterly, 13, 397−419. Choi, Y., & Mai-Dalton, R. R. (1998). On the leadership function of self-sacrifice. The Leadership Quarterly, 9, 475−501. Cliff, J. E., Langton, N., & Aldrich, H. E. (2005). Walking the talk? Gendered rhetoric vs. action in small firms. Organization studies, Vol. 26. (pp. 63−91): Sage Publications Inc. Davis, W. D., & Gardner, W. L. (2004). Perceptions of politics and organizational cynicism: An attributional and leader–member exchange perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 439−465. de Hoogh, A. H. B., den Hartog, D. N., Koopman, P. L., Thierry, H., van den Berg, P. T., van der Weide, J. G., et al. (2005). Leader motives, charismatic leadership, and subordinates ' work attitude in the profit and voluntary sector. Leadership Quarterly, 16, 17−38. Denis, J. -L., Lamothe, L., & Langley, A. (2001). The dynamics of collective leadership and strategic change in pluralistic organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 809−837. Denis, J. -L., Langley, A., & Cazale, L. (1996). Leadership and strategic change under ambiguity. Organization studies, Vol. 17. (pp. 673): Walter de Gruyter GmbH and Co. KG. Denison, D. R. (1996). What is the difference between organizational culture and organizational climate? A native 's point of view on a decade of paradigm wars. Academy of Management Review, 21, 619−654. Eggleston, K. K., & Bhagat, R. S. (1993). Organizational contexts and contingent leadership roles: A theoretical exploration. Human Relations, 46, 1177−1192. Egri, C. P., & Frost, P. J. (1994). Leadership for environmental and social change. The Leadership Quarterly, 5, 195−200. Ehrhart, M. G. (2004). Leadership and procedural justice climate as antecedents of unit-level organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel Psychology, 57, 61−94. Elron, E. (1997). Top management teams within multinational corporations: Effects of cultural heterogeneity. The Leadership Quarterly, 8, 393−412. Gargiulo, M. (1993). Two-step leverage: Managing constraint in organizational politics. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 1−19. Glick, W. H. (1985). Conceptualizing and measuring organizational and psychological climate: Pitfalls in multilevel research. Academy of Management Review, 10, 601−616. Green, S. G., Anderson, S. E., & Shivers, S. L. (1996). Demographic and organizational influences on leader–member exchange and related work attitudes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 66, 203−214. Groves, K. S. (2005). Linking leader skills, follower attitudes, and contextual variables via an integrated model of charismatic leadership. Journal of Management, 31, 255−277. L.W. Porter, G.B. McLaughlin / The Leadership Quarterly 17 (2006) 559–576 575 Hackman, J. R., & Wageman, R. (2005). A theory of team coaching. Academy of Management Review, 30, 269−287. Hambrick, D. C., Finkelstein, S., & Mooney, A. C. (2005). Executive job demands: New insights for explaining strategic decisions and leader behaviors. Academy of Management Review, 30, 472−491. Hooijberg, R., & DiTomaso, N. (1996). Leadership in and of demographically diverse organizations. The Leadership Quarterly, 7, 1−19. Howell, J. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1993). Transformational leadership, transactional leadership, locus of control, and support for innovation: Key predictors of consolidated-business-unit performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 891−902. Howell, J. M., & Hall-Merenda, K. E. (1999). The ties that bind: The impact of leader–member exchange, transformational and transactional leadership, and distance on predicting follower performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 680−694. Howell, J. M., Neufeld, D. J., & Avolio, B. J. (2005). Examining the relationship of leadership and physical distance with business unit performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 273−285. Hunt, J. G., Boal, K. B., & Dodge, G. E. (1999). The effects of visionary and crisis-responsive charisma on followers: An experimental examination of two kinds of charismatic leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 10, 423−448. Hunt, J. G., Boal, K. B., & Sorenson, R. L. (1990). Top management leadership: Inside the black box. The Leadership Quarterly, 1, 41−65. Hunt, J. G., & Ropo, A. (1995). Multi-level leadership: Grounded theory and mainstream theory applied to the case of General Motors. The Leadership Quarterly, 6, 379−412. Jeffrey, A. A., Mary, L. F., & Michael, T. H. (1993). Leadership instability in hospitals: The influence of Board–CEO relations and organizational growth and decline. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 74−99. Johns, G. (2006). The essential impact of context on organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review, 31, 386−408. Jung, D. I., Chow, C., & Wu, A. (2003). The role of transformational leadership in enhancing organizational innovation: Hypotheses and some preliminary findings. The Leadership Quarterly, 14, 525−544. Karakowsky, L., & Siegel, J. P. (1999). The effects of proportional representation and gender orientation of the task on emergent leadership behavior in mixed-gender work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 620−631. Keller, R. T. (1992). Transformational leadership and the performance of research and development project groups. Journal of Management, 18, 489. Klein, K. J., & House, R. J. (1995). On fire: Charismatic leadership and levels of analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 6, 183−198. Lucas, J. W. (2003). Status processes and the institutionalization of women as leaders. American Sociological Review, 68, 464−480. Maitlis, S. (2005). The social processes of organizational sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 21−49. Marta, S., Leritz, L. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2005). Leadership skills and the group performance: Situational demands, behavioral requirements, and planning. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 97−120. Mayo, M., Pastor, J. C., & Meindl, J. R. (1996). The effects of group heterogeneity on the self-perceived efficacy of group leaders. The Leadership Quarterly, 7, 265−284. Morrison, E. W., & Phelps, C. C. (1999). Taking charge at work: Extrarole efforts to initiate workplace change. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 403−419. Mowday, R. T., & Sutton, R. I. (1993). Organizational behavior: Linking individuals and groups to organizational contexts. Annual Review of Psychology, 44(1), 195. Mumford, M. D., Marks, M. A., Connelly, M. S., Zaccaro, S. J., & Reiter-Palmon, R. (2000). Development of leadership skills: Experience and timing. The Leadership Quarterly, 11, 87−114. Mumford, M. D., Scott, G. M., Gaddis, B., & Strange, J. M. (2002). Leading creative people: Orchestrating expertise and relationships. The Leadership Quarterly, 13, 705−750. Osborn, R. N., Hunt, J. G., & Jauch, L. R. (2002). Toward a contextual theory of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 13, 797−837. Pastor, J. -C., Meindl, J. R., & Mayo, M. C. (2002). A network effects model of charisma attributions. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 410−420. Pawar, B. S., & Eastman, K. K. (1997). The nature and implications of contextual influences on transformational leadership: A conceptual examination. Academy of Management Review, 22, 80−109. Porter, L. W. (1996). Forty years of organization studies: Reflections from a micro perspective. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 262−269. Rousseau, D. M., & Fried, Y. (2001). Location, location, location: Contextualizing organizational research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 1−13. Scandura, T. A., & Lankau, M. J. (1996). Developing diverse leaders: A leader–member exchange approach. The Leadership Quarterly, 7, 243−263. Schneider, B., Brief, A. P., & Guzzo, R. A. (1996). Creating a climate and culture for sustainable organizational change. Organizational Dynamics, 24(4), 6−19. Scully, J. A., Sims, J. H. P., Olian, J. D., Schnell, E. R., & Smith, K. A. (1994). Tough times make tough bosses: A meso analysis of CEO leader behavior. The Leadership Quarterly, 5, 59−83. Shamir, B., & Howell, J. M. (1999). Organizational and contextual influences on the emergence and effectiveness of charismatic leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 10, 257−283. Smith, P. B., Wang, Z. M., & Leung, K. (1997). Leadership, decision-making and cultural context: Event management within Chinese joint ventures. The Leadership Quarterly, 8, 413−431. Tosi, H. L. (1991). The organization as a context for leadership theory: A multilevel approach. The Leadership Quarterly, 2, 205−228. Trice, H. M., & Beyer, J. M. (1991). Cultural leadership in organizations. Organization Science, 2, 149. Tyler, T. R., & De Cremer, D. (2005). Process-based leadership: Fair procedures and reactions to organizational change. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 529−545. Waldman, D. A. (1993). A theoretical consideration of leadership and total quality management. The Leadership Quarterly, 4, 65−79. Waldman, D. A., Lituchy, T., Gopalakrishnan, M., Laframboise, K., Galperin, B., & Kaltsounakis, Z. (1998). A qualitative analysis of leadership and quality improvement. The Leadership Quarterly, 9, 177−201. 576 L.W. Porter, G.B. McLaughlin / The Leadership Quarterly 17 (2006) 559–576 Whittington, J. L., Goodwin, V. L., & Murray, B. (2004). Transformational leadership, goal difficulty, and job design: Independent and interactive effects on employee outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 593−606. Yagil, D. (1998). Charismatic leadership and organizational hierarchy: Attribution of charisma to close and distant leaders. The Leadership Quarterly, 9, 161−176. Zhu, W., Chew, I. K. H., & Spangler, W. D. (2005). CEO transformational leadership and organizational outcomes: The mediating role of humancapital-enhancing human resource management. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 39−52.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Bass, B.M. and Avolio, B.J. (1994).Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA.: Sage.…

    • 2307 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Transformational leadership’s influence on job performance, job satisfaction, employee attitudes, and employee engagement has been studied and compared to the influence of transactional leadership on the same. This paper compares three studies by three different researchers. Wright and Pandey (2010), Emery and Barker (2007), and Hechanova and Cementina-Olpoc (2013) conducted empirical research to determine the degree of influence transformational leadership played in each of their sample populations. This comparison will examine the purpose of the study, the research questions, the literature review, the sample population, any limitations, and the findings.…

    • 1814 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The three articles used for this comparison matrix looked at transformational leadership and how it affects those in relation to each study. The three articles were all written with a different purpose in mind, with all three correlating to the same hypothesis, “How does transformational leadership affect employees/individuals in different settings?” With similarities found in topic, it was also evident that there were several contrasting variables within each article. The three empirical articles that were utilized for this comparison were as follows: Transformational Leadership in the Public Sector: Does Structure Matter, written by: Bradley Wright and Sanjay Pandey, The Effect Of Transactional and Transformational Leadership Styles on the Organizational Commitment and Job Satisfaction of Customer Contact Personnel, written by: Charles Emery and Katherine Barker, and Principal Leadership and Student Achievement: What is the Effect of Transformational Leadership in Conjunction with Instructional Leadership on Student Achievement, written by: William Greb.…

    • 1544 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Nielsen K, Randall R, Yarker J, Brenner S (2008). The effects of transformational leadership on…

    • 1726 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Luggers vs Butcher

    • 5333 Words
    • 22 Pages

    References: Block, L. (2003). The leadership-culture connection: An exploratory investigation. Leadership & Organisation Development Journal, 24(6), 318–334.…

    • 5333 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Piccolo, R. F & Colquitt, J. A. (2006). Academy of management journal: Transformational Leadership and Job Behaviors: The Mediating Role of Core Job Characteristics. vol. 49 no. 2 327-340. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.454.7623&rep=rep1&type=pdf…

    • 4717 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Warrick, D.D. (2011). The Urgent Need for Skilled Transformational leaders: Integrating Transformational Leadership and Organization Development. Journal of Leadership Accountability & Ethics, (8)5, 11-26.…

    • 1548 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    A Longitudinal Analysis

    • 4321 Words
    • 18 Pages

    Two studies were conducted including one involving a longitudinal research design to understand better the influential role…

    • 4321 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Bass (1985), followers led by transformational leaders tend to perform beyond expected levels due to the influence of the leaders. This may be due to the extra effort they put in as a result of their commitment to the leader, the sense of purpose or mission that drives them or their high levels of intrinsic motivation. In a research carried out by Carless (2000), it was found that followers of transformational leaders tend to be more productive and satisfied workers than followers of transactional…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Final Paper

    • 1938 Words
    • 7 Pages

    10. NOVAC, C., & BRATANOV, C. I. (2014). The Impact of the Leadership Style on the Organizational Climate in a Public Entity. Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, 155-179.…

    • 1938 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The purpose of this paper is to present and defend my ideas about the various leadership theories that have been addressed in the doctoral program. With this purpose in mind, I will focus predominantly on Situational Leadership, first described by Hersey and Blanchard in 1969. This approach has been revised over time by the following researchers since its inception: Blanchard, Zigarmi, & Nelson, 1993; Blanchard, Zigarmi, & Zigarmi, 1985; Hersey & Blanchard, 1977 and 1988. Through synthesizing the readings from class, I will illustrate the special character of this approach relative to other leadership styles and its impact on organizations. Furthermore, I will identify the implications of using this approach as a conceptual lens as opposed to the other styles. I will close with insights derived from the synthesis and reflect upon the implications for my professional growth as a leader.…

    • 2694 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Foster Care Study

    • 12899 Words
    • 52 Pages

    A Dissertation Proposal Submitted in Partial Satisfaction of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Education in Organizational Leadership…

    • 12899 Words
    • 52 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    References: Bass B M & Riggio R E (2006). Transformational Leadership (Second ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.…

    • 4107 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Effect of Ceos

    • 6600 Words
    • 27 Pages

    References: Ancona DG. 1990. Top management teams: preparing for the revolution. In Applied social psychology and organizational settings, Carroll J (ed). Erlbaum: Hillsdale, NJ; 99-128. Barnard C. 1938. The functions of the executive. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA. Bass BM. 1991. Bass & Stogdill 's handbook of leadership: theory, research, and managerial applications (3rd ed). Free Press: New York. Bertrand M, Schoar A. 2003. Managing with style: the effects of managers on firm policies. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 118(4): 1169-1208. Bowman EH, Helfat CE. 2001. Does corporate strategy matter? Strategic Management Journal 22: 1-23. Brown MC. 1982. Administrative succession and organizational performance: the succession effect. Administrative Science Quarterly 27:1-16. Brush TH, Bromiley P. 1997. What does a small corporate effect mean? A variance components simulation of corporate and business effects. Strategic Management Journal 18: 825-835. Calder BJ. 1977. An attribution theory of leadership. In New direction in organizational behavior, Staw BM, Salancik GR (eds). St. Clair: Chicago, IL; 179-204. Carpenter MA, Geletkanycz MA, Sanders WG. 2004. Upper echelons research revisited: antecedents, elements, and consequences of top management team composition. Journal of Management 30: 749-778. Collins JC. 2001. Good to great: why some companies make the leap…and others don’t. HarperCollins Publishers: New York. DiMaggio PJ, Powell W. 1983. The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review 48:147-60. Drucker P. 1954. The principles of management. Harper-Collins Publishers: New York. Finkelstein S, Hambrick DC. 1996. Strategic leadership: top executives and their effects on organizations. West’s Strategic Management Series: Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN. Hage J, Dewar R. 1973. Elite values versus organizational structure in predicting innovations. Administrative Science Quarterly 18: 279-290. Haleblian J, Finkelstein S. 1993. Top management size, CEO dominance, and firm performance: The moderating roles of environmental turbulence and discretion. Academy of Management Journal 36:844-863. Hambrick DC, Mason P. 1984. Upper echelons: the organization as a reflection of its top 20…

    • 6600 Words
    • 27 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    norms, values, and beliefs of the people being led. In other words, to be seen as effective,…

    • 2145 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics