Preview

The Injustice In Matthew James Nance's A Mockery Of Justice

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
389 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Injustice In Matthew James Nance's A Mockery Of Justice
In an article by Matthew James Nance titled “A Mockery of Justice” he writes about an inmate’s tale of what happen to David Martin Long in the late 80’s. While David Long was still incarcerated there was a reporter that was interested in writing about his story her name was Laura Miller and in 1994 she came to the prison to interview him. She wrote about his injustice in which he wanted to be executed but because Texas law had an automatic appeal process his execution could not be carried out and therefore no matter how many times that he wanted to oppose this the state of Texas denied him his execution. He tells her about his trial and how short the deliberation was. He goes into great, detail in telling her of his wrong doing and how he knows

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    This case takes place in a meeting between employees of the Florida Project for Human Justice at the Florida State Prison. Diane Epps a fifty-five-year-old Caucasian woman, Executive director, Joe Moran, the other lead attorney (only African American staff), Cynthia Sanders a petite 28-year-old Caucasian woman, the mitigation investigator, and an accountant, Jose Arnada, a thirty-four Mexican American man; the client, was sentenced the death penalty for a crime that he did not commit. Cynthia, the protagonist, is meeting with Diane and Joe to discuss ways to show Jose is competent to write his own appeal.…

    • 879 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    If nothing else, young George Stinney, accused and convicted of killing two young girls and executed at age 14 by the state of South Carolina in 1944, is the poster child for why now an appeal is automatic in a Capital Murder case where execution is a possible sentence. Secondly, Stinney’s death makes a case for why the Supreme Court has ruled that children and the mentally deficient should not be subjected to the death penalty – they cannot adequately stand-up for themselves against law enforcement and the criminal justice system. Thirdly, Stinney’s 3 hour trial (and guilty verdict handed-down in only 10 minutes by an all-white jury) is an illustration of why juries should be made-up of a group of the defendant’s peers – and fourthly, the…

    • 175 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ring Vs Arizona Case Study

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages

    This case set forth the precedent that juries, not the judge, will have the ability to exercise their discretion when deciding aggravating factors which could lead to the enforcement of the death…

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Sheppard Case

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The petitioner filed for habeas corpus relief in the federal courts. The question was whether Sheppard was deprived of a fair trail and his right to due process according to the Sixth Amendment. Was the petitioner denied a fair trail for the second-degree murder of his wife, of which he was convicted, because of the trail judge’s failure to protect Sheppard sufficiently from the massive, pervasive, and prejudicial publicity that attended his prosecution?…

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    I am writing to bring to your attention the unfair trial of Tom Robinson. I think we all knew that the jury would say that he was guilty of the crime, but was he really? I don’t think he was, and I hope you and the readers of The Maycomb Tribune will help me fight this injustice. Good people like Atticus Finch, tried to prove the innocence of Tom Robinson. The real criminals here are Mayella Ewell and Bob Ewell for taking a man’s life simply because he was colored. Remember it’s a sin to kill a mockingbird.…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To Kill a Mockingbird’s themes of justice, morality, and ethics are represented through the actions and beliefs of the characters Atticus, Bob Ewell, and the town of Maycomb, represented through the Missionary Society, which is controlled by the sociable white women. Justice, as in justice by law, is inherent in the novel as is justice through karma. Morality is also central to the novel; a strong sense of morality, or rather a lack of, guides the characters as the story progresses. Ethics and unethical conduct form the basis for the plotline. Harper Lee uses characters to control the events that bring conflict in To Kill a Mockingbird.…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Robert E. Worden's Unfair

    • 1881 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Police officers are vital in our everyday lives because they’re known and serve as reliable forces that aid in protecting our rights and ultimately, our lives. Law enforcement, and police officers in particular, have secured a lot of media coverage recently because there have been multiple cases where through excessive force, police have fatally shot and killed civilians. While it may be known for police to do this if it is necessary and for their own safety, some specific stories have been globally exerted because of the unlawful reason behind the killing and verdict of the police officers at fault. In a book assessing criminal justice, Robert E. Worden believes that on a theoretical standpoint, there are situational factors that are the cues…

    • 1881 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In her novel, To Kill a Mockingbird, Harper Lee tells the story of Scout and her father…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chapter four in Sandel’s book “Justice” talks about markets and morals. In this chapter we consider the morality of paying people to perform different types of work such as fighting wars and bearing children. The question that stands is whether there should be a market, when money is involved, to the aspect of morality. One good example that Sandel portrays in this chapter is “Pregnancy for Pay.” Thinking through the rights and wrongs in this example helps clarify the differences among leading theories of justice.…

    • 377 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mark George indicates in his article The Relevance of The Eight Amendment to the US Death Penalty in the 21st Century, that people with mental retardation faced high risks of wrongful convictions because they might make wrongful of false confessions. The case of Atkins v. Virginia is a clear example of cruel and unusual punishment. In 1996, the American Association of Mental Retardation declared Atkins mentally incapable. However, the court sentenced him to capital punishment. It wasn’t until 2001 that Atkins was exonerated of capital punishment due to his mental condition.…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wolff V. Mcdonnell

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The criminal justice system realizes that inmates do have some rights, however it is also recognized that those inmates do have less rights than free citizens. Taking away some rights of the inmates is a valid punishment and by restricting these rights it helps in maintaining security in prisons. The title of the case that I chose was Wolff v. McDonnell. This case was very important because it uniformed certain rights and freedoms within correctional facilities. “Although inmates received some procedural safe-guards to protect them against the notorious abuses of disciplinary meetings, they did not receive all the due- process rights of a criminal trial” (Clemens, 2002). Nor did the Court question the right of correctional officials to revoke the good time of inmates. In this case, “Robert O. McDonnell, a prisoner, had filed a class- action suit against the state of Nebraska, claiming that its disciplinary procedures, especially those pertaining to the loss of good time were unconstitutional” (Clemens, 2002). McDonnell also complained, along with other inmates, about the limitations on their access to the law library, legal services, and visitation with the inmate legal assistant and that the regulations regarding prisoners ' mail violated the attorney-client privilege” (Keenan, 2005). This case was argued on Argued April 22, 1974 and a decision was made on decided June 26, 1974.…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “Gentleman of the jury, be merciful. For God’s sake, be merciful. He is innocent of all charges brought against him. But let us say he was not. Let us say for a moment he was not. What justice would there be to take this life? Justice gentleman? Why I would just as soon put a hog in the electric chair as this”. (Chap. 1, pg. 8) My analysis of this story weighs on multiple dynamics:…

    • 1514 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Life and the End

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This case is an appeal by Andrew Mugnano, who is incarcerated in a State Penitentiary for first degree murder and for malicious wounding, from a decision of the Circuit Court of Greenbrier County denying him habeas corpus relief. The appellant was indicted for murdering his wife, Theresa Mugnano, and for maliciously wounding her companion. In denying Mugnano habeas corpus relief, the circuit court did not appoint counsel as requested, concluded that Mugnano failed to show adequate grounds for relief. In the present proceeding, Mugnano claims that the circuit court erred in failing to appoint counsel to assist him in the preparation and presentation of his habeas corpus claims and that the court erred in denying him a meaningful hearing on the question of whether the plea agreement was breached and whether his trial attorney 's performance was deficient. In his pro se habeas corpus petition, Mugnano claimed that the State of West Virginia had breached the plea agreement which had resulted in his conviction and that his counsel at that time had failed to afford him effective assistance of counsel by failing to object to the State 's failure to comply with the agreement. Mugnano also requested that the court appoint counsel to assist in the presentation of his case.…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Although there have been many changes in our society concerning discrimination against one's gender, there is still one area that has yet to change. If we take a man and a woman convicted of the same crime, it is very likely that the man will receive a more callous sentence. Since the beginning of the colonial era, 20,000 people have been lawfully executed in America, but only 400 of them have been women, including 27 who were found guilty of witchcraft. In the 23 years since the Supreme Court reinstated capital punishment, 5,569 total death sentences have been given out by courts, 112 to women. Of these 112, only one has been executed, compared with 301 men. Leigh Beinen, a Northwestern University law professor who studies the gender bias in capital cases nationwide, thinks the reason so few women face execution has to do with the symbolism that's central to the death penalty. She said, "Capital punishment is about portraying people as devils, but women are usually seen as less threatening." In 1977, Guinevere Garcia murdered her daughter, and later received a 10-year sentence for the killing. Four months after her release, she killed her husband during a robbery attempt. This time, the court imposed the death penalty. Garcia had refused to appeal her sentence, and opposed efforts to save her. Death penalty opponents turned to Illinois Gov. Jim Edgar who as a state legislator, voted to restore the death penalty. The facts of the case swayed his opinion and just hours before the scheduled execution, Edgar commuted Garcia's sentence to life without parole, his first such act in more than five years in office.…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    David Dow is an attorney that defends death row inmates in Texas. His job is to fight for his client to get life sentence rather than to be executed. He talks about how most of the cases he gets his client are guilty. He discusses how there are times when by the time his clients get send to death row are completely changed. That after so much time they have been rehabilitated and probably don’t deserve to be executed. He also discusses how there have been a few times where he gets a client that he truly thinks there is no way he could change. That the client is certainly “evil”, but he fights for them because he believes that they should still has the justice system run its course. He stands for the notion that people are still people no matter what they’ve done.…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics