Key Point: "Presidential power is the power to persuade." (11) Presidents are expected to do much more than their authority allows them to do. Persuasion and bargaining are the means that presidents use to influence policy. Not only do presidents need to bargain to influence other branches of government (particularly Congress), but presidents also must bargain to influence the executive branch itself; cabinet secretaries, agency heads, and individual bureaucrats all have leverage that they can use against the president, requiring presidents to persuade even the executive branch, not merely command it.…
Yes, because it would eliminate congress the ability to put in riders in bills that the president supports and want to pass.…
There's doubtlessly about it: being the U.S. president is a hard and frequently difficult employment. Richard Nixon broadly said, "Scouring floors and exhausting bedpans has as much respect as the Presidency."…
In my opinion is I agree that the president has usurped the constitiutional power of the Congress. I agree this statement because he is wielding the most pontent legislative power. The Constitution does quote that “All legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in the Congress of the United States.” Most people agree that he has usurped the Constitiutional Power of Congress. It also seems that the president seems to wield the legislative power. In Article 2, Section 3 of the Constitiution states that the president “shall take Care that the laws be faithfully executed.” Congress wields the legislative power and it seems the president is wielding that power.…
The first idea was to have Congress choose the President. This idea was rejected because many felt that it would disturb the balance of power that existed between the Executive and Legislative branches. It was also rejected due to the possible divisive fallout that would disable the branches to legislate effectively in the aftermath of a heated Presidential contest. Lastly, this idea was rejected as it could possibly give way to foreign intervention, corruption, and bribes. The next idea was to have state legislatures elect the President, but this was rejected on the idea that it would disregard federal authority which essentially was the glue that would keep the states together. The third idea was to elect the President by a direct popular…
I am going to use Thomas Jefferson's as a example for this question because he has done alot, Thomas Jefferson attempted solution, an embargo upon American shipping, worked badly and was unpopular, the Embargo Act of 1807 was pretty much, an act laying an Embargo on all ships and vessels in the ports and harbors of the United States, so it general embargo enacted by the United States Congress against Great Britain and France during the Napoleonic Wars.The effects on the American shipping and marke was that the Agricultural prices and earnings fell down because of this. Every president had different motives and method but I decied to share one of them which was Thomas…
The President of the United States is a very important and strong leader that does not have the right to officially go to war without the approval of Congress. This law is dubbed the War Powers Act since it states that the President has to notify Congress when sending troops to hostilities and if in a state of emergency, 42 hours after (SAS Institute Inc). Presidents in the past, like President Richard Nixon and George W. Bush, have argued that by enforcing the War Powers Act, Congress is taking away constitutional authorities that have been exercised for many years. On the other hand, people, such as George Mason, claim that giving the power to declare war to one singular person is a very untrustworthy situation (SAS Institute Inc). This argument…
There are two perspectives on presidential power. The two perspectives are presidential power by persuasion and presidential without persuasion or unilateral. The first perspective where presidential power is persuasive means that the president needs help in order to achieve an outcome. The president tries to convince other branches of government or other high-ranking officials to implement an idea of his. This all depends on the president’s ability to bargain with other branches or even his own branch to influence policy. The Unilateral perspective means that the president can act alone when making policy decisions. The unilateral perspective forces the judiciary to react.…
The two perspectives on Presidential power are power as persuasion and unilateral power. Since Presidents’ power is to persuade, they have far less formal power than the necessary to meet the large expectations over them. Presidents take to office their goals and expectations for public policy, but to accomplish these, they must work with the Congress. Congress and the presidency were created to avoid one single institution from having control over policymaking. Presidents’ power involves the bargaining that derives from their position, reputation, prestige and reputation (Howell). They make their personal impact on the choices of what should be said or done, how and when.…
5. The authors of our American Government textbook highlight that legislative power is one of President Obama’s expressed powers. For instance, the authors indicate on page 311 that “Article I, Section 7, and Article II, Section 3, give the president the…
These last eight years, a lot has happened, from the H1N1 outbreak, the Sandy Hook shootings, Hurricane Sandy, the capture of Osama Bin Laden, the withdrawal of troops from the Middle East, and many other events. President Barack Obama came in during one of the worst economic recessions since the Great Depression, and somehow he managed to control the situation. Obama came in when the country needed to count on the president the most, and he did his job as best as he could, he did it well enough that he served as president for eight years. Although he didn’t do something extraordinary to be one of the top ten presidents ever, Obama sure does deserve to be placed at least in the top twenty of best presidents of all time.…
One of the subjects in political psychology is Presidential character. Author James D. Barber in his book The Presidential Character (1972) uses psychobiography to explain the personalities, style, and “character” of the modern presidents while attempting to avoid the Freudian psychoanalytical focus on the concepts of ego and superego (Cottam p25). The typology used by Barber to distinguish presidential character is one of the most well-known and widely used in political psychology. Presidential character was later given an additional perspective in the article written by Michael Lyons titled “Presidential Character Revisited”. The article written by Lyons concluded with an all-embracing Myers-Briggs Type Indicator…
The presidency is both an exciting and a challenging job. One need not ask a past president about his experience and thoughts on running for and winning the presidency- there are always inherent struggles, challenges and threats to the presidency. For a start, presidents need to face his critics that always make the case that he is unfit for the presidency. There are other stakeholders and interest groups that will also try to contest the presidency and raise some issues. Also, the challenges to the presidency come in the form of public outcry for certain issues and poliy directions. But there are some cases wherein the challenges and threats are extreme- like an assasination attempt. Threats to life of the presidents are common in modern history and around the world. One of the earliest (and luckiest) cases of an assasination attempt was experienced by former…
Executive orders enable the President of the United States of America to enact a pseudo-law without the need of approval from Congress. Some presidents make more use of them than others. For example, President Franklin D. Roosevelt, in the early 30's, took the most advantage of them due to the Great Depression. Similar to FDR, President Trump is making the most of his privilege in the White House, but in contrast to FDR's helping initiative, one of President Trump's executive orders were instituted on a discriminatory basis that benefits his many business ties.…
The purpose of my survey is to research Canadian’s and their trust in government following the 2015 Federal Election. During the election, The Liberal Party of Canada used Canadian's diminishing trust in the Harper Government to develop a campaign based on change and an open and inclusive government. Canadians responded well to this approach, and this was demonstrated through an increase in voter turnout and a majority government for the Liberals. I developed this survey out of interest specifically in trust in government following this election. Do Canadians trust their new government? If they don’t, what could the government do better?…