Preview

The Importance of Power and Politics in Organisation Decision-Making

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2536 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Importance of Power and Politics in Organisation Decision-Making
The importance of power and politics in organisation decision-making

Report submitted by:

Report received by:

Date of submission:

Paper title and number: Organisational Management 152-700

Contents 1. Introduction 3 2. Discussion 3 2.1. Power and politics in decision-making 3 2.2. The distribution of power within organisation 4 2.3. Politics in an organisational setting 5 2.4. The challenges of politics in an organisation 6 2.5. Ethical concerns 7 2.6. Overcoming the dangers of politics 7 3. Conclusions 8 4. Recommendations 9 References 11

1. Introduction 2.1.1. The purpose of this report is to provide the theoretical framework that will underpin training workshops for managers. The report will also outline the organisational objectives of these workshops and identify key texts for the continued development of managers. 2.1.2. Accordingly, this report examines a broad range of literature and outlines key concepts about the relationship between power, politics and decision-making in an organisational setting. This analysis suggests that power is a essential aspect the decision making. In turn, politics is shown to be a necessary process for the management of power in organisations, albeit one that gives rise to ethical concerns. 2. Discussion 3.1. Power and politics in decision-making 3.2.3. Finkelstein (1992), Hickson et al (1971), and Pfeffer (1981) define power as the capacity of individual actors to exert their will. The advantage of this concept is that it recognises that power exists in many contexts, and can be exercised in various settings. As noted by Cavanagh et al (1981) ‘Power is a vital and ubiquitous reality in organizational life’. 3.2.4. Mintzberg et al (1976) builds on this concept by defining power, within the context of organisational decision-making, as the ability to influence ambiguous situations. Essentially, all situations that require a decision to be



References: Brass, D. J. (1984). Being in the right place: A structural analysis of individual influence in an organization. Administrative Science Quarterly , 29, 518-539. Cavanagh, G. F., Moberg, D. J., & Velaquez, M. (1981). The Ethics of Organizational Politics. The Academy of Management Review , 6 (3), 363-374. Clegg, S., Kornberger, M., & Pitsis, T. (2011). Managing & Organizations . London: Sage Publications Ltd. Eisenhardt, K. M., Kahwajy, J. L., & Bourgeois III, L. J. (1997). How Management Teams Can Have a Good Fight . Harvard Business Review , 77-85. Finkelstein, S. (1992). Power in Top Management Teams: Dimensions , Measurement, and Validations. Academy of Management Journal , 35 (3), 505-538. Hannan, M., & Freeman, J. F. (1977). the population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology , 82, 929-964. Hickson, D. J., Lee, C. A., Schneck, R., & Pennings, J. M. (1971). A strategic contingencies theory of intraorganization power. Administrative Science Quarterly , 16, 216-229. Julio, B., & Yook, Y. (2012). Political Uncertainty and Corporate Investment Cycles. The Journal of Finance , 67 (1), 45-83. Miles, R. H. (1980). Macro Organizational Behavior . Santa Monica: Calif. Mintzberg, H., Raisinghani, D., & Theoret, A. (1976). The structure of unstructured decision processes. Adminstrative Science Quaterly , 21, 246-275. Oxford University Press. (2013, January 1). Definitions: Politics. Retrieved April 1, 2013, from Oxford Dictionaries: the world 's most trusted dictionaries: oxforddictionaries.com Pfeffer, J Robock, S. H. (1971). Political Risk: Identification and Assessment. Columbia Journal of World Business , 6 (4), 6-20. Tushman, M. L. (1977). Approaches to organizations: A review and rationale. Academy of Management , 2, 206-216.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Bateman, T. S., & Snell, S. A. (2011). Management: Leading & collaborating in a competitive world (9th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Irwin.…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bolman and Deal

    • 1834 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Power in organizations is basically the capacity to get things done. Pfeffer (1992, p.30) defines power as the “potential ability to influence behavior, to change the course of events, to overcome resistance, and to get people to do things they would not otherwise do.”…

    • 1834 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In this chapter, the author examined and enumerated the different types of power conceptualized during that eight decade gap. Paul Hirst started off with the most dominant concept of power using Bertrand Russell’s “Power: A new social Analysis”(1938) as a direct reference. He explained three main aspects of power in the social sciences; Power as a factor in the relations between actors, power as a simple quantitative capacity thus making it as a competition, and lastly, power as a zero-sum game.…

    • 1957 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    R. M. Belbin, Management Teams: Why They Succeed or Fail, Butterworth Heinemann, 2003. Accessed on web page https://moodle1.carnegiecollege.ac.uk/ 15/1/13…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    power and status. In J. P. Walsh, & A. P. Brief (Eds.), Academy of Management Annals,…

    • 4791 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A number of approaches are offered for organizational science to solve the problem regarding organizational gap between theory and practice. The rational model can be considered as a dominant model on organizational science among the others with the purpose of defining organization as instruments for attaining goals instead of dealing with problems .Furthermore, objectives are defined in favour of organization progress regardless of employees’ ideas in such a model. It is mainly assumed that involved individuals in the organisation’s activities agree reasonably with its major purposes. The main task of managers are described as of replacing irrationality with technically rational actions. Therefore, an incomplete picture organizational reality is shown. As a result, political model as one of the derivations of rational model could be used to widen the scope of social and political criteria and also overcome the rational model’s restricted normative focus . Model proposes a concept called power within the intention to basic centralised system decrease with organisation development. At the present time, the large size ones that differentiated by complexity and also decentralisation control the land scape. In some organization that the form of multiple hierarchies are taken as a results of a number of reasons, the political activities of interest groups and bargaining coalitions can be more clear than the normal one. The same purposes and also forming by individuals are the main features of interest group. As an important part, they should be considered is political reactions to different limitations established by organizational structures. The high competition among interest groups within the organization can be seen that cause low productivity.…

    • 2141 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A manager needs to understand the interdependency of departments, internal partnerships, and the influence of power and politics to effectively manage across the organization. Effective managers use various political tactics to increase their power within the organization to coordinate and support the work of their peers and subordinates to meet company objectives. Managers regularly acquire and use power. Power-oriented behavior has an impact on managerial career progress, on job performance, on organizational effectiveness, and on the personal lives of employees (Obholzer, 1995). It involves the combined topics of power, influence, authority, and organizational politics. When running an organization, all these factors should be taken into consideration.…

    • 767 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The five bases of power are divided into two groups; formal power and personal power, and further subdivided into five specific categories under each group. Categories of formal power are coercive power, reward power, and legitimate power, and they come from the authority of one person over another. Categories of personal power are expert power and referent power, and they come from one’s characteristics rather than one’s authority. “Coercive power base depends on fear of the negative results from failing to comply.” (Judge and Robbins, 2012) It is the most conspicuous form of power from the people’s perspective. Fear of negative results can lead to dissatisfaction and resentment, and it is usually the least effective power. People will acquiesce to coercive power to avoid the stated negative results, but its excessive use can ultimately undermine the leader’s ability to lead. Reward power is said to be the opposite of coercive power, and is, “Compliance achieved based on the ability to distribute rewards that others view as valuable.” (Judge and Robbins, 2012) These rewards are based on compliance, and the benefits can be either financial or nonfinancial such as promotions, raises, bonuses, preferred work schedules, or time off. Legitimate power is, “the formal authority to control and use organizational resources based on structural position in the organization.” (Judge and Robbins, 2012) This power is greater than the power to reward or coerce, because it relies on the peoples acknowledgement of the authority of a leaders position. It can be unstable on a personal level, if the leader is seen as not having the authority in a certain area, the power is lost. “Expert power is influence wielded as a result of expertise, special skill, or knowledge.” (Judge and Robbins, 2012) This category shifts the balance of power from authority to personal. When you can exhibit expertise in a field, people are more apt to trust and respect what you have to say, and they will…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Clegg, S., Hardy, C. & Nord, W. (1999). “Managing Organizations: Current Issues”. London: Sage Publications…

    • 2474 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Chapter 2, I found James Hunter’s definition of power very enlightening. At any time when I thought of employees in executive positions, I thought that they were in a position of power. However, Hunter defines power as the ability to force others to do your will. As I recall the executive team and the way they implement changes in the organization, by no means were they forcing us. I just knew that I had a job to do and I respected the changes that were forthcoming. Although Hunter mentions that power does work, it damages relationships. Using power to get people to do what you want, will work for some time but the end result is a very unhealthy relationship. This will yield bad symptoms as Hunter calls it. The symptoms in an organization…

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    dada

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Max Weber, the ‘founding voice’ on power in organisations saw power as a pervasive aspect of organisational life (Clegg, Kornberger and Pitsis, 2011, p 252).…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    The forms of power are not mutually exclusive and are often used in various forms to influence others to achieve organisational goals. Three distinct outcomes that may result from the use of power are: Compliance, Resistance, and Commitment. Therefore, it is important for leaders to understand the power they hold and the effects of wielding it, as power can be used for both positive and negative influences.…

    • 2397 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Gibson, J. L., Ivancevich, J. M., & Donnelly, J. H., Jr. (1997). Organizations: Behavior, structure, and processes. New York: Irwin.…

    • 2247 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    What is Power? Power means different things to different people, but it’s most known meaning can be defined as corruption, or having authority over a persons actions. In any strategy or belief, power has its advantages and disadvantages. Some known advantages of power are it allows leaders to be more assertive and confident. The decisions made allows them to choose powerful courses of action and a “ get the job done” approach to all efforts put forth. A disadvantage in power is that it allows people to focus on their own desires and about other perspectives. Power allows leaders to become infatuated that the have the authority to make decisions over people that they forget that it may be malicious or unethical. The amount of power given speaks volume on how people respect you based upon the decisions you make. People often are intimidated by people with power because of the title they hold, not knowing that most have a heart and will listen to your thoughts or beliefs when making decisions that can affect an organization. (Abudi,2011)…

    • 2227 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Choosing Your Battles

    • 1330 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Eisenhardt, K. M., (1997). How management teams can have a good fight. Harvard business review, 75(4), 77­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­–­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­85.…

    • 1330 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics