Preview

The Importance Of Ad Populum-Appeal To The People

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2059 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Importance Of Ad Populum-Appeal To The People
Ladies and gentlemen, today the lines of battle have been drawn. When the din of clashing armor has finally died way, the Republican party will emerge victorious! We are the true party of the American people! We embody the values that all real Americans Ad Populum - Appeal to the People

Fallacy of Relevance
As a businessperson you certainly want to subscribe to Forbes magazine. Virtually all the successful business executives in the country subscribe to it. Ad Populum - Appeal to the People

Fallacy of Relevance
Of course you should eat Wheaties. Wheaties is the breakfast of champions, you know. Ad Populum - Appeal to the People

Fallacy of Relevance
The position open in the accounting department should be given to Frank Thompson. Frank has 6 hungry children to feed, and his wife desperately needs an operation to save her eyesight. Ad
…show more content…
Nietzsche was an immoral reprobate who went completely insave from syphillis before he died. Ad Hominem (Abusive)

Fallacy of Relevance
Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle argues that ethanol should be added to gasoline to reduce air pollution. But of course Daschle arges this way. He represents South Dakota, which is loaded with grain growers, and ethanol is manufactured from grain. Thus Ad Hominem (Circumstantial)

Fallacy of Relevance
Paula Anderson, spokesperson for State Farm Insurance, has argued that jury awards for pain and suffering should be severly limited. But his is exactly what you would expect her to say. After all, attorney fees come out of these awards, and if the awards Ad Hominem (Circumstantial)

Fallacy of Relevance
President George W. Bush argues that we should open up the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge for oil drilling. But Bush just wants to reward his rich cronies in the oil industry who got him elected. Thus, we can hardly take Bush's argument seriously. Ad Hominem (Circumstantial)

Fallacy of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Cited: Wood, N. V. (2012). Perspectives on argument. 7th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.…

    • 536 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Friedrich Nietzsche is a German Philosopher, who studied and written several critical texts. The type of texts he wrote were along the lines of philosophy, religion, contemporary culture, and science. Nietzsche is known for a lot of his work, but master-slave morality is highly valued. Master-slave morality was the first subject in Nietzsche’s book, On the Genealogy of Morality. In this book Nietzsche defines the difference between Slave morality and Master morality. When Nietzsche compares between the two types of morality he distinguish strength versus weakness, the difference is primarily one of power and also love independence. The master knows he has power and abilities to aspire to excellence, also he…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The basic principles of the Republican Party are: all people are entitled to equal rights, individuals, not government, and decisions are best make close to home. The elephant is the symbol of the Republican Party. It was by a cartoonist for Harper's Weekly named Thomas Nast.…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kennedy uses the evidence oriented rational argument in the form of authoritative evidence when he mentions a quote from Dr. Falwell and builds his argument off of it. He brings up the quote from Dr. Falwell to gain the attention of the audience by citing from a familiar person recognized by the audience. The authoritative evidence is the dominant strategy that adds to Kennedy’s credibility as a knowledgeable rhetor on the subject of policy.…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fallacy: A Misconception

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Fallacy is a misconception resulting from incorrect reasoning. Even though we pay careful attention to our arguments and supports; we tend sometimes to commit mistakes. However, through critical thinking we could diminish faulty arguments. There are numerous significant topics to critical thinking. One aspect of these particular topics is the ‘fallacy’. In order to be a critical thinker, one should be able to recognize and avoid logical fallacies whenever possible. Discussed throughout this essay are three fallacious statements from the TV Patrol. The fallacies to be cited and explained are Ad Hominem, Red Herring and Hasty Generalization.…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fussell dismisses those who disagree with him with the logical fallacy of Ad hominem in many examples, such as:…

    • 329 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Malpractice Awards

    • 2301 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Twenty-four States have laws that limit damage payments in malpractice cases. Most of these laws limit the amounts paid for noneconomic damages (e.g., pain and suffering) but a few limit both economic (e.g., medical expenses and lost wages) and noneconomic damages. Supporters of legislation to cap damages in malpractice cases maintain that it reduces malpractice premiums and helps insure an adequate supply of physicians. They also assert that escalating, multi-million-dollar jury awards are driving malpractice premium increases and that capping damage awards for pain and suffering helps restrain the rate of increase. Without such a law, it is asserted that the loss of affordable medical malpractice insurance for physicians could eventually lead to the loss of affordable, accessible health care. Opponents of this legislation maintain that insurance companies are trying to compensate for poor business decisions and fading investment income. Although there is some evidence demonstrating that physicians in States with tort reform laws capping malpractice awards enjoy lower malpractice premiums, there is no evidence about the impact of malpractice cap legislation on decisions by physicians regarding geographic location.…

    • 2301 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Begging the Question is a type of fallacy that is used quite a bit. It is considered to be a fallacy of assuming when trying to prove something. One of the main things to remember with the use of this fallacy is that the term "Begging the Question" has a very specific meaning. This means that if someone was trying to prove something to us but they are not being specific and leave room for there to be more questions asked then there is a good chance this is an example of a begging the question fallacy. According to Whitman, "The fact that we believe pornography should be legal means that it is a valid form of free expression. And since it 's free expression, it shouldn 't be banned (Whitman, 2001)" is an example of begging the question.…

    • 1357 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The late Stephen Toulmin the creator of the Toulmin Model has constructed and contributed immensely to the analytical study of arguments. The Toulmin Model, a dynamic foundation of structured analysis commonly used to analyze any text in which an argumentative statement develops through the essential elements which goes to define the Toulmin process. In a textbook titled, Elements of Argument written by Annette Rottenberg and Donna Haisty Winchell summarizes the Toulmin Model as a “systematic manner.” (Rottenberg and Winchell, page 22) Stephen Toulmin pointed out three main key terms crucial to the process of rhetoric when analyzing argumentative text. These key terms Toulmin highlights as vital to the process of rethoric when applying the theory of his model. The claim, the support, and the warrant are what Toulmin emphasizes as essential. When applying these critical elements of rhetoric theory to a speech, such as one recently given by presidential candidate Mitt Romney. One should be able to isolate the claim, the support, and the warrant found within his speech. Mitt Romney, a presidential candidate for the upcoming 2012 general election delivered a speech to the Latino Coalition on the 23rd day of May 2012 in Washington D.C on the topic of American education. Romney’s speech vis-à-vis the decline of the American education system supplies magnificent examples and illustrations used to harness the core developments and applications of the Toulmin Model. Rhetoric implications generated by Stephen Toulmin renders one’s ability to become familiar with the evaluative process.…

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    There is a surplus in litigation congesting the court systems in which people along with ATRA wish to reduce. “According to a 2003 ATRA survey, 85 percent of Americans believe too many frivolous lawsuits clog our courts; therefore, ATRA successfully translates the frustrations into action and reforms.” (A Track Record of Success| ATRA) Also, the protestors against tort reform argue that the money available to victims is drastically being reduces, for many disagree with the caps on awards for damages. However, this may not apply to everyone because every case is unique and because lawsuits vary the amount of information that the plaintiff is able to supply. Lawsuits vary case by case and if there is not physical harm or injury the amount of money may be reduced because courts cannot correctly compensated when there is a lack of evidences or information. According to ATRA, “Award must be specific to each defendant, and each defendant is liable only for the amount made against him or her.” (Punitive Damages Reform: H. 3775 (2011) |ATRA) On the other hand, people argue that “the lack of money is the result of malpractice and insurance lawsuits”. Causing high damage awards in malpractice is the result of an increase in costs for everyone. According to ATRA,” Limits noneconomic damages in medical liability cases to $350,000 per provider, with an overall aggregate limit of $1.05…

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Republican Party has over 55 million registered voters, comprising of over thirty percent of the United States population. Of course, it is impossible to form a party so that everyone fits, I think that the Republican Party does a fairly well job in creating a mold that includes thirty percent of the United States and I am a part and support and agree, to an extent, their ideas and platform. Some of the Republican Party’s stances on popular debates that I support are as follows: opposes gun control, opposes government regulated healthcare, and supports lower taxes.…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Oil Drilling in Alaska

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages

    George W. Bush was a strong supporter for the drilling in Alaska. His argument for being pro drilling is that it will help our economy. Many new jobs would be created and that America would be less dependent on foreign sources of energy. This will improve America's economy which has took a plunge over the last few years. He also said that with all the studies that ANWR ( Arctic National Wildlife Refuge) has done that scientists have created was of drilling for the oil with having barely any effect on the earth. If this is true that means that most of the people who were opposed to it, because it would destroy wildlife, would be happy. The area that the drilling would be done in makes up only 8 percent of the whole refuge.…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Emtala

    • 3841 Words
    • 16 Pages

    References: Bitterman, R. A. (2011, July). Jury awards woman $200,000 after hospital ED sends her…

    • 3841 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Tort Law

    • 5205 Words
    • 21 Pages

    Over the past several years the body of laws governing compensation in tort law has substantially transformed from its common law origins. In the course of what many have advocated in the name of "tort reform," more than half of the United States have revised, or attempted to revise, one or more aspects of tort liability and damage principles to a greater or lesser degree. Tort law is, of course, constantly evolving; everyday in courts across the country, judges, attorneys and jurors are making and reshaping the law. Despite efforts for reform, one still cannot overlook the nature of modern torts and fail to see a convoluted system of rules and laws that has seized the efficiency, fairness and original purpose of tort law.…

    • 5205 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    law presentation

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages

    thinks the amount is too large much greater than the actual injury incurred by the innocent party,…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics