Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

The Hunger Games and Roman Gladiators

Better Essays
1086 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Hunger Games and Roman Gladiators
For as long as historians can tell, humans have enjoyed watching other people hurt each other. One of the most well-known instances of this was the ancient Roman Empire and the gladiators. Today, the blood and carnage is only depicted in books and movies. One book that has a similar event to the Gladiatorial games is The Hunger Games. The Roman Empire was the post-Republican period of the ancient Roman civilization, characterized by large territorial holdings in Europe and around the Mediterranean. At its height, the Roman Empire controlled approximately 6.5 million km of land. The Roman Empire had a lasting impact on Europe and the world. The first Roman gladiatorial games were held in 246 BCE by Marcus and Decimus Brutus in honor of their father, Junius Brutus, as a munus or funeral gift for the dead (AbleMedia, 2005). The munus served the purpose of keeping alive the memory of an important individual after death. Munera were held sometime after the funeral and were often repeated at annual or five-year intervals (Dunkle, 2002). In 216 BCE, Marcus Ameilius Lepidus, late consul and augur, was honored by his sons with three days of gladiatora munera in the Forum Romanum, using twenty-two pairs of gladiators. Ten years later, Scipio Africanus gave a commemorative munus in Iberia for his father and uncle, casualties in the Punic Wars. High status non-Romans, and possibly Romans too, volunteered as his gladiators. The next recorded munus, held for the funeral of Publius Liciniusin in 183 BCE, was more extravagant. It involved three days of funeral games, 120 gladiators, and public distribution of meat. By 174 BC, "small" Roman munera (private or public), provided by an editor of relatively low importance, may have been so commonplace and unremarkable they were not considered worth recording. In 105 BCE, the ruling consuls offered Rome its first taste of state-sponsored "barbarian combat" demonstrated by gladiators from Capua, as part of a training program for the military. It was immensely popular. The ludi (state games), sponsored by the ruling elite and dedicated to a deity such as Jupiter, a divine or heroic ancestor, could now compete with privately funded munera for popular support (Wikipedia, 2012). In 65 BCE, Julius Caesar had taken it one step further by pitting three hundred and twenty pairs of gladiators against one another in a wooden amphitheater constructed specifically for the event. The gladiators themselves came from all walks of life from slaves to emperors. Gladiators were usually recruited from criminals, slaves, and prisoners of war. Criminals, having lost their citizen rights and slaves and prisoners of war having none, had no choice about becoming a gladiator, if they had the physical and emotional make-up necessary to be a gladiator. Some free-born men, however, although they had not lost their citizen rights, voluntarily chose the profession and bound themselves body and soul to the owner of a gladiatorial school by swearing an oath "to endure branding, chains, flogging or death by the sword" and to do whatever the master ordered (Dunkle, 2002). Woman also participated in gladiatorial game, although rarely. Seven emperors were said to have participated in the arena (private or public). They are: Caligula, Titus, Hadrian, Lucius Verus, Caracalla, Geta and Didius Julianus. Despite the deadliness of the arena the risks to each were minimal (Wikipedia, 2012). Each gladiator was allowed to fight in the armor and with the weapons that best suited him. Gladiators wore the armor and used the weaponry of non-Roman people, playing the role of Rome's enemies. They did so because depicting roman armor would “send the wrong political sign” to the viewers (AbleMedia, 2005). There were many different classes of gladiator. Two of which were the retiarius and the secutor who were often pitted against each other. The retiarius was a “fisherman” style class who wore a loin cloth or tunic and a shoulder guard for armor. For weaponry they had a weighted net, a trident, and a dagger. The secutor was a more heavily armored style who carried a large oval or rectangular shield, a leg guard on the left leg, a round or high-visored helmet, and an arm guard on the elbow and wrists. Their weapons of choice were the sword or dagger. The Retiarius used their speed and agility to dodge the attacks of the larger and heavier Secutor while waiting for an opportunity to strike (Gill, 2012). In The Hunger Games, the country of Panem is controlled by “the capitol” that governs its twelve districts and makes each one send one boy and girl ages twelve to eighteen to participate in the hunger games. The hunger games is an annual even in which twenty four tributes fight to the death in an arena over several weeks. The gladiatorial games of ancient Rome and the hunger games have several similarities. One similarity is that both were “played” with in a defined area called the arena. Another is that the contestants of both receive weeks of training to prepare them for the rigors of the arena. Yet another similarity between them is that the contestants were forced to fight whether they want to or not. An additional similarity is that the contestants were allowed to choose which style of combat they prefer. A large similarity between both games is that they were a form of entertainment for large crowds of people. Despite their many similarities, there are many more differences between the hunger games and the gladiatorial games of ancient Rome. One difference between them is that the contestants of the gladiatorial games could be spared if the crowd felt they had earned their life. In the hunger games, the games didn’t end until one contestant was left standing. Another difference between them is that people of any age could fight in the gladiatorial games unlike the limited ages of the contestants of the hunger games. Yet another difference is that the gladiators were given weapons and armor to fight with instead of having to fight for them, whereas in the hunger games there were only a few that each contestant could fight for. An additional difference is that the gladiatorial games didn’t last for weeks like the hunger games did. There is no doubt that the hunger games in the book The Hunger Games is reminiscent of the gladiatorial gamers of the Roman Empire. This is a great example of how we all continue to draw inspiration from the past.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The roman empire was a very important time in history .According to Chua she states that the achaemenid empire was better than the roman. the achaemenid empire was all about wars but the roman were smart about everything they were idealist. The empire started in 753 BC by Romulus. The ruler Trajan was from the origin of Spain his mother was Spanish father was roman. Mostly many rulers were not roman anybody with a education could be a emperor. He established…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    AP World Rome Notes

    • 1766 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Rome is one of the longest lasting and most influential empires. It was the center of comm. and trade for the entire Italian peninsula. At its greatest extent in second century C.E., the Roman Empire ruled between 70 and 100 million diverse people. Spread 2700 miles east and 2500 north to south. At its most powerful (27 BCE - 180 CE) the Pax Romana, the Roman peace, was enforced.…

    • 1766 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Roman Gladiators were a unique example of competition in Roman Empire. During the period of the Roman Republic the newly recruited Gladiators were at first conscripted to the gladiator schools from slaves, criminals and prisoners of war. They had no choice, they were forced to take the role as a gladiator. The life a gladiator was strict and harsh.…

    • 60 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    From 100-600 AD, the Roman Empire was the centerpiece of Western Civilization, although it experienced many changes along the way, including change of religion, customs, and political power, while keeping some continuity at the same time.…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Coordinating these games on such a large scale was no easy task. Likewise, is important to note the different resources that it took to pull off these games. Perhaps the most important resource that was required to pull off the games was money. Without funding, the Romans would have never been able to quench their thirst for bloodshed. While Commodus’s games themselves only cost 12,000 denarii, the emperor Symmachus spent as much as 20,000,000 denarii to put on his games. Two other resources that were crucial to the games development were animals and arenas. In many emperor’s games, thousands upon thousands of animals were killed. The animals that were showcased in the gladiator aspect of the games, the chariot races and the theatrical aspect of the games included: lions, tigers, leopards, ostriches, elephants, rhinoceros, and giraffes. All of these animals were used at the Roman’s expense. Without them, the games could not have taken place. Lastly, another resource that was important to the development of the Roman’s violent games, were the arenas. Arenas had to be built for the gladiator games, the chariot races, and even the theatrical performances. Arenas that were used for the games began to be built as permanent structures as the games became a more important part of the Roman society. On page 50, Toner writes “Amphitheaters had originally been made of wood but now huge permanent…

    • 1517 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A gladiator was a trained warrior who fought bloody battles to entertain the ancient romans. According to tradition, gladiators were introduced to Rome in 264 B.C., when Decimus Junius Brutus had three pairs of gladiators fight during his father's funeral. The games soon became very popular soon after. The gladiatorial games could be compared to that of a present day circus. Gladiators were usually prisoners of wars, prisoners who committed serious crimes, or slaves. The Romans built many structures and amphitheaters such as the Colosseum. The Colosseum could seat up to fifty thousand to eighty thousand, but usually had an average audience of approximately fifty thousand. The amphitheater had the most updated technology of the time. For…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I think Rome was an Empire under the Republic. Differences were the forms of government. In the Republic the people had voting rights and would elect the officials, the Republic was a system based on the rule of law, and a cleverly balanced constitution that was not a written document, but consisted of an accord between the 3 elements, democracy, monarchy, and oligarchy. On the other hand the Empire or Principate, a system based on an emperor. One man had total, absolute power. In the republic there was a collective form of government; in the Principate it was a one man rule (Emperor). Both the Roman Republic and Roman Empire had periods of instability which ultimately caused their demise. Interestingly, each lasted for almost the same amount of time, so it would be difficult to ascertain one as more "successful" than the other. The Roman Republic controlled most of the Italian Peninsula and soon spread into the Mediterranean, they came in conflicts and things started getting hard. Although the dying republic was ruled for a short time by the famous triumvirate; it soon collapsed with the death of Crassus and Julius Caesar became the first Roman Emperor. The Empire itself lasted no longer than the Republic, but its territorial gains were considerably more extensive. The Empire extended to Britain in the West, and to the banks of the Rhine and Danube Rivers in the East. It encompassed vast numbers of people and thereby spread Roman culture throughout Western Europe. The empire was brought about largely by Caesar who was a man of the people and rose on a popularist platform of protecting the citizens rights against the greed of the senate and redistributing wealth.…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gladiator Movie Analysis

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages

    By currently taking this History & Philosophy of Sports class, this film “Gladiator” establishes the whole scenery during the time period of ancient Rome. In the film, it introduced Gladiator battles. These Gladiator battles reflected as entertainment to society, as well as, being a survival setting between life and death. Not only they would compete for survival, but they would compete to become the best. By this time, Commodus, is the new Roman emperor and he fears that Maximus could use his heroic ability to dethrone him and become emperor himself. Maximus would use his fame and popularity as a gladiator to invoke further damage to Commodus' insecure dominance of the devoted Roman people, hoping to influence them to restore their lost values and overcome the corruption that…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The practice of armed men fighting to the death originated in Etruria, in central Italy, probably as a funeral sacrifice. The first gladiatorial exhibition in Rome was in 264BC, when three pairs of gladiators fought as part of a funeral celebration. By 174BC, at a 3-day spectacle, 37 pairs participated. Julius Caesar's large-scale exhibitions (300 pairs on one occasion) prompted the Roman Senate to limit the number of contestants. The largest contest of gladiators was given by the emperor Trajan as part of a victory celebration in AD107 and included 5000 pairs of fighters. The emperor Domitian in AD90 presented combats between women and between dwarfs. Mostly males, gladiators were slaves, condemned criminals, prisoners of war, and sometimes Christians. Forced to become swordsmen, they were trained in schools called ludi, and special measures were taken to discipline them and prevent them from committing suicide. One gladiator, Spartacus, avenged his captivity by escaping and leading an insurrection that terrorized southern Italy from 73 to 71BC. A successful gladiator received great acclaim; he was praised by poets, his portrait appeared on gems and vases, and patrician ladies pampered him. A gladiator who survived many combats might be relieved from further obligation. Occasionally, freedmen and Roman citizens entered the arena, as did the insane Emperor…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    11). For the Roman populous, blood offerings were an intrinsic aspect of funeral gatherings, a fact acknowledged by sociologist Keith Hopkins, who states that they acted as a, “reconciliation for the deceased with the living.” Expanding on from this idea the text ‘Gladiator – Rome’s Bloody Spectacle’ explores the concept that, in the hope to placate the deceased with human blood, the Romans sacrificed prisoners of war and slaves, and decided to, “add pleasure through Gladiatorial fighting” (Nossov 2009, p. 12). Oft Cited historian, Konstantin Nossov suggests that, by the end of the Third Century B.C, Rome controlled the “entire Mediterranean along…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gladiators were not always popular, but weren’t always the ones already marked for death either. The gladiators were given prizes for pleasuring the audience with a remarkable show because they were everything in the Games. Similarly, the tributes of The Hunger Games came from various districts with different standings—the smaller the number the smaller the standing—in the country. Their presence leads to fear. Their death brought agony. Their victory brought suffering. Their defiance brought…

    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Hunger Games, directed by Gary Ross, is linked to the Roman gladiator combats. This is shown through the use of Panem audience experience being alluded to the audience experience of Roman upper and lower class at the gladiatorial games, comparing the Hunger Games arena to the Roman Colosseum and contrasting the tributes to the Roman gladiators.…

    • 1198 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Roman Empire came after the era of The Roman Republic. At its peak, it controlled territories from Britain and Germany to the Persian Gulf and North Africa. The great Empire was then separated into the Byzantine Empire and the Western Roman Empire and attacked by Barbarian invaders.…

    • 1926 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    rome

    • 675 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Rome, an empire whose influence and power shaped Europe and the world to what we know. For 400 years the Roman Empire stood as a symbol of hope and oppression. In the year 329A.D. the emperor of Rome Theodius died and his two sons split the empire into east and west. The empires had many areas that they needed to work on in their new nations, military divided new and old politicians hammering at the young emperors and gold being the driving force of everything within the government.…

    • 675 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Gladiators

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Gladiators were put up against each other to fights to the death. The winning gladiator waited for a sign from the crowd on whether to kill or not to kill the other gladiator; if the gladiator put up a good fight then his life just might be spared (“Gladiators, Chariots, and the Roman Games”.) All Gladiators swore a solemn oath, “I will endure to be burned, to be bound, to be beaten, and to be killed by the sword” (McManus, “Gladiator Games”.)…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays