Preview

THE HISTORY OF HABEAS CORPUS

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1056 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
THE HISTORY OF HABEAS CORPUS
Civil Liberties, Habeas Corpus, and the war on Terror

Jean M. Tamayo

POL201

Professor Dovie Dawson

08/26/2013

This paper will explain civil liberties, habeas corpus, and the war on terror. It will show how

each is intertwined with the other two. It will give examples to help you better understand the

processes and purposes of each of them.

Here I will explain the difference between "civil rights" and "civil liberties." The area known as

"civil rights" is the basic right to be free from unequal treatment based on certain characteristics like

race, gender, disability, etc. in employment and housing. "Civil liberties" are about basic rights and

freedoms that are guaranteed. These include freedom of speech, right to privacy, the right to be free of

unreasonable searches of your home, right to a fair trial, right to marry, and the right to vote. A lot of

people get these two terms mixed up.

The right of writs of habeas corpus are granted in Article I, Section 9, clause 2 of the

Constitution, which states, "The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless

when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it." Longely, R. (2006).

Basically, it is the right to be brought before a judge who will determine whether or not you are being

held legally.

Habeas corpus is Latin for “that you have the body”. It 's origin seems to have preceded the

English Magna Carta in 1215. “It is thought to have been common law by the time of Magna Carta,

which says in Article 39: "No freeman shall be taken or imprisoned or disseised or exiled or in any way

destroyed, nor will we go upon him nor will we send upon him except upon the lawful judgment of his

peers or the law of the land." (Blackstone, Sir William; 18th Century). Habeas corpus is part of our civil

liberties which of



References: http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/12/01/maddow-time-to-end-the-war-on-terror/ Blackstone, Sir William (18th Century); Retrieved from http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/4329839.stm Fergusun, D. (2012) Maddow: Time to end the 'War on Terror '. Gharib, A. (2008) Supreme Court Reinstates Habeas Corpus. Retrieved from;http://www.monitor.net/monitor/0806a/copyright/supremegitmohabeas2.html Levin-Waldman, O. M. (2012). American government. San Diego, CA: Bridgepoint Education, Inc. Longley, R. (2006). Bush and Lincoln both suspended Habeas Corpus; Retrieved from http://usgovinfo.about.com/od/rightsandfreedoms/a/habeuscorpus.htm New York Times (2007); Retrieved from: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/17/opinion/17mon1.html?_r=0

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Edward Gough Whitlam was born on 11th July 1916. He is well known as Gough Whitlam, Australian politician and 21st Prime Minister of Australia. He was Australia 's Prime Minister elected in 1972, Whitlam 's term as prime minister ended in 1975 when he was dismissed by the Governor-General. It ended three years of extensive social and cultural reform.…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The framers of the Constitution sought that the writ shall be included in the body of the Constitution in Article I, Section 9, stating that, “The privilege of the writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in case of Rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it.” (site) Abraham Lincoln believed and respected the Constitution and the traditional separation of powers, however he did not feel that the framers of the Constitution intended to wait for Congress to come together to make a decision in a time of crisis. President Lincoln did not want to get rid of the writ of Habeas Corpus because prior to becoming the president he had served in congress and was a lawyer himself and therefore he understood it’s meaning and importance. (site) Suspending the writ of Habeas Corpus was not an easy decision made by Lincoln, yet as the commander in Chief of the United States it was his duty to protect the country in these extreme circumstances of protests and…

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Define Civil Rights: The rights of people to be treated without unreasonable or unconstitutional differences…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Law Quiz Chapter 1

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The first ten amendments of the U.S. Constitution embody a series of protections for individuals against various types of interference by the federal government. Page 106…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The freedom to live where we want, to own property, to take part in the government, to give a better future for our kids and most importantly, the freedom to be treated like a human being (K 2009).…

    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The word “Habeas Corpus” is a Latin word that means “you have the body”, also known as the “Great Writ” and was established by English’s Parliament in 1679 when King Charles II deputies…

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Habeas Corpus Research Paper

    • 2303 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The general meaning of the right of habeas corpus in the U.S. Constitution and its relationship to the protection of other civil liberties. The historical evolution of habeas corpus, including its English…

    • 2303 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In reality, though they lead to confusion, Civil Rights and Civil Liberties are different. Indeed, most of the Civil Liberties derived from the Bill of Rights while the Fourteenth Amendment is the location where the Equal Rights are found. Furthermore, Civil Liberties are specifically applied on an individual (right for a fair trial) whereas Civil Rights concern whether an individual or a group (right for the young of eighteen-year age to vote). Finally, Civil Liberties are individual rights that the government cannot infringe by using the law. In opposition, Civil Rights are rights that the government must ensure under the…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Office of The United Nations High Commissioner For Human Rights. (2006). Frequently Asked Questions on a Human Rights-Based Approach to Development Cooperation. United Nations, New York and Geneva.…

    • 10044 Words
    • 41 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil Rights are in place to protect citizen from being treated unfairly. When Supreme Court created the “Separate But Equal Doctrine,” it allowed whites to be superior to any other race. A case in Topeka, Kansas known as, Brown vs Board of Education, helped end this segregation. Soon after African Americans became equal to whites by law, women began to fight for equality. Women wanted to have a job, own land, and be her own person. The 19th amendment allowed that to happen.…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil liberties, unlike civil rights are protected in character and refer to the actual freedoms that an individual has under a Constitution and the rights that individuals have against the government. In the past, citizens of the United States denied to ratify the Constitution until a Bill of Rights was added, defending citizens and their inalienable rights against undesirable infringement from the government. Civil rights apply to the concept of how an individual is treated by others and our rights that are guaranteed by our government either through acts, executive orders or judicial…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Human Rights and Employer

    • 1320 Words
    • 6 Pages

    UNIT 201- UNDERSTAND EMPLOYMENT RESPONSIBILITIES AND RIGHTS IN HEALTH, SOCIAL CARE OR CHILDREN AND YOUNG PEOPLE’S SETTINGS…

    • 1320 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Habeas Corpus

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Habeas corpus can be suspended only when there are cases of rebellion of invasion of the…

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The terms, civil liberties and civil rights, might be closely related to one another, but have often been inadvertently misused. Civil rights are actions within the law that the United States government uses (meaning that they have the right to intervene/enforce) to establish conditions that are equal for all human beings. For instance, citizens of the United States, with the proper qualifications, have the right to vote, meaning that right can be enforced through government intervention. Another common example would include freedom from employment discrimination founded on differences of disability, race, age, or gender (Civil Rights vs. Civil Liberties). Two famous events that heavily tested our civil rights would include Hernandez v. Texas,…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Freedom. What an indescribable term. Is it merely a feeling or is it something more tangible? False Imprisonment. Now that is something more noticeable. The Great Writ of Habeas Corpus has been part of the judicial system since the Magna Carta! It is this writer 's intent to show the reader how Habeas Corpus has been incorporated into the United States of America 's Constitution and how it has changed since being written into law by the implementation of the Habeas Corpus Act of 1679; Interesting usage of Habeas Corpus will be explored throughout the reader 's journey down the rabbit hole.…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays