The health and safety impact of construction project features
The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available at www.emeraldinsight.com/0969-9988.htm The health and safety impact of construction project features
H&S impact of CPFs
Patrick Manu
School of Engineering and Mathematical Sciences,
City University London, London, UK
65
Nii Ankrah
School of Technology, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, UK
David Proverbs
Faculty of Environment and Technology, University of the West of England,
Bristol, UK, and
Subashini Suresh
School of Technology, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, UK
Abstract
Purpose – Despite the established significance of underlying accident causes to health and safety
(H&S), and the persistent reporting of the underlying accident causal influence of construction project features (CPFs) which emanate from pre-construction decisions, no empirical research has focused on CPFs in terms of assessing their degree of potential to influence accident occurrence. The purpose of this paper is to, therefore, investigate this facet of the accident causal influence of CPFs.
Design/methodology/approach – A mixed method design was used involving semi-structured interviews, and a questionnaire survey of UK construction professionals.
Findings – CPFs generally have a moderate or a high potential to influence accident occurrence, implying a fair or severe potential to cause harm in terms of the H&S of workers. The degree of potential of CPFs to influence accident occurrence is influenced by: the extent to which certain proximate causes of accidents are common/prevalent within CPFs;and the degree of potential of those proximate causes to influence accident occurrence.
Originality/value – These findings provide insight into the H&S consequences of CPFs, awareness of which is essential if pre-construction project participants are to implement appropriate risk control measures especially in the early phases of projects to mitigate the accident causal
H&S impact of CPFs
Patrick Manu
School of Engineering and Mathematical Sciences,
City University London, London, UK
65
Nii Ankrah
School of Technology, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, UK
David Proverbs
Faculty of Environment and Technology, University of the West of England,
Bristol, UK, and
Subashini Suresh
School of Technology, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, UK
Abstract
Purpose – Despite the established significance of underlying accident causes to health and safety
(H&S), and the persistent reporting of the underlying accident causal influence of construction project features (CPFs) which emanate from pre-construction decisions, no empirical research has focused on CPFs in terms of assessing their degree of potential to influence accident occurrence. The purpose of this paper is to, therefore, investigate this facet of the accident causal influence of CPFs.
Design/methodology/approach – A mixed method design was used involving semi-structured interviews, and a questionnaire survey of UK construction professionals.
Findings – CPFs generally have a moderate or a high potential to influence accident occurrence, implying a fair or severe potential to cause harm in terms of the H&S of workers. The degree of potential of CPFs to influence accident occurrence is influenced by: the extent to which certain proximate causes of accidents are common/prevalent within CPFs;and the degree of potential of those proximate causes to influence accident occurrence.
Originality/value – These findings provide insight into the H&S consequences of CPFs, awareness of which is essential if pre-construction project participants are to implement appropriate risk control measures especially in the early phases of projects to mitigate the accident causal
References: Abdelhamid and Everett (2000), “Identifying root causes of construction accidents”, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol Ankrah, N.A. (2007), “An investigation into the impact of culture on construction project performance”, PhD thesis, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton. Anumba, C., Egbu, C. and Kashyap, M. (2006), Avoiding Structural Collapses in Refurbishment – A Decision Support System, HSE Books, Suffolk. Anumba, C., Marino, B., Gottfried, A. and Egbu, C. (2004), Health and Safety in Refurbishment Involving Demolition and Structural Instability, HSE Books, Suffolk. Arboleda, C.A. and Abraham, D.M. (2004), “Fatalities in trenching operations-analysis using models of accident causation”, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Baiden, B., Price, A. and Dainty, A. (2006), “The extent of team integration within construction projects”, International Journal of Project Management, Vol Baron, R.M. and Kenny, D.A. (1986), “The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 51 No. 6, pp. 1173-1182. Behm, M. (2005), “Linking construction fatalities to the design for construction safety concept”, Safety Science, Vol Behm, M. and Schneller, A. (2012), “Application of the Loughborough construction accident causation model: a framework for organizational learning”, Construction Management and Bomel Limited, Glasgow Caledonian University and The Institute for Employment Research (2006), An Analysis of the Significant Causes of Fatal and Major Injuries in Construction in Brabazon, P., Tipping, A. and Jones, J. (2000), Construction Health and Safety for the New Millennium, HSE Books, Suffolk. Brace, C., Gibb, A., Pendlebury, M. and Bust, P. (2009), Phase 2 Report: Health and Safety in the Construction Industry: Underlying Causes of Construction Fatal Accidents – External Bresnen, M. and Marshall, N. (2000), “Partnering in construction: a critical review of issues, problems and dilemmas”, Construction Management and Economics, Vol Chi, C.F., Chang, T.C. and Ting, H.I. (2005), “Accident patterns and prevention measures for fatal occupational falls in the construction industry”, Applied Ergonomics, Vol Choudhry, R.M. and Fang, D. (2008), “Why operatives engage in unsafe work behavior: investigating factors on construction sites”, Safety Science, Vol Chua, D.K.H. and Goh, Y.M. (2005), “Poisson model of construction incident occurrence”, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol Cohen, A., Doveh, E. and Eick, U. (2001), “Statistical properties of the rwg(j) index of agreement”, Psychological Methods, Vol Cohen, A., Doveh, E. and Nahum-Shani, I. (2009), “Testing agreement for multi-item scales with the indices rwg(j) and ADm( j)”, Organizational Research Methods, Vol Cooke, T. and Lingard, H. (2011), “A retrospective analysis of work-related deaths in the Australian construction industry”, in Egbu, C Creswell, J.W. (2009), Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method Approaches, 3rd ed., Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA. Dewlaney, K.S. and Hallowell, M. (2012), “Prevention through design and construction safety management strategies for high performance sustainable building construction”, Duffus, J. and Worth, H. (2001), The Science of Chemical Safety Essential Toxicology – An Educational Resource, International Union of Pure and Applied chemistry, New York, NY. Egawa, Y. and Nakamura, T. (2000), Analysis and Experimental Study on Labor Accidents Related to Communication in Construction Work, Research Institute for Industrial Safety, Tokyo. Egbu, C.O. (1999), “Skills, knowledge and competencies for managing construction refurbishment works”, Construction Management and Economics, Vol Eriksson, P.E. (2010), “Partnering: what is it, when should it be used, and how should it be implemented?”, Construction Management and Economics, Vol Fellows, R. and Liu, A. (2008), Research Methods for Construction, Blackwell Pubishing, West Sussex. Fellows, R., Langford, D., Newcombe, R. and Urry, S. (2002), Construction Management in Practice, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford. Field, A. (2005), Discovering Statistics Using SPSS, 2nd ed., Sage Publications Ltd, London. Frontline Consultants (2011), Evaluation of Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2007 – Pilot Study, HSE Books, Suffolk. Gherardi, S., Nicolini, D. and Odella, F. (1998), “What do you mean by safety? Conflicting perspectives on accident causation and safety management in a construction firm”, Gibb, A.G.F. (1999), Principles in Off-Site Fabrication, Whittles, Caithness. Gibb, A.G.F. (2001), “Standardization and pre-assembly-distinguishing myth from reality using case study research”, Construction Management and Economics, Vol Greenwood, D. and Wu, S. (2012), “Establishing the association between collaborative working and construction project performance based on client and contractor perceptions”, Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E. and Tatham, R.L. (2010), Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings, 7th ed., Pearson/Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. Hallowell, M.R. and Gambatese, J.A. (2009), “Construction safety risk mitigation”, Journal of