Preview

The Gm Bailout

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3153 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Gm Bailout
Table of Contents

1. Introduction 3 2. The Phenomenon 3 3. The theories / the literature 6 3.1 Different economic theories 6 3.2 How would Locke, Smith and Marx evaluate the various events in this case? 7 4. The Reality 8 5. Conclusions/Decisions 9

1. Introduction

The moon is an orbital albino, and it gets tons of sunlight, so I propose Operation Sunscreen, where astronauts coat the surface of the moon with a protective layer of sunscreen. If you care about albinos and the environment, you’ll see this is a good idea. And hey, it’s a better use of taxpayer funds than bailing out private banks.

― Jarod Kintz

Bailing out people who made ill-advised mortgages makes no more sense that bailing out people who lost their life savings in Las Vegas casinos.”
― Thomas Sowell
Those two, rather cynical, quotes on bail outs reflect how most American economists think of those. It’s not a bail out from prison they mean, it is the consciously directed spending of tax money to save a company that is about to go bankrupt because of reasons as bad governance or economic-misplaning.
It is easy to judge, it always was, but how ethical is the judgment? How ethical is the action itself? What moral right and justification does a company have to ask for money from the Government? And how should the Government reply?
We would like to discuss this issue in the following case – at the Example of the Bail out of General Motors by the US Government.

2. The Phenomenon

A bailout is a colloquial pejorative term for giving a loan to a company or country which faces serious financial difficulty or bankruptcy. It may also be used to allow a failing entity to fail gracefully without spreading contagion. A bailout could be done for mere profit, as when a predatory investor resurrects a floundering company by buying its shares at fire-sale prices, for social improvement, as when, a wealthy philanthropist reinvents an unprofitable fast food company into a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Inside the Meltdown

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The stock of a global investment company, Bear Stearns, began to drop drastically on March 10th, 2008. A share of Bear Stearns was as high as $171 and by the afternoon dropped to $57. Former CEO of the company, Ace Greenberg, tells CNBC that all of these rumors are “ridiculous.” As time goes on, Bear Stearns’ cash reserves were disappearing and people invested in the company were immediately withdrawing. Bear Stearns was basically racing to find a company to buy them out or they would go under. Current CEO of Bear Stearns, Alan Schwartz, got ahold of JP Morgan’s CEO, Jamie Dimon, to buy out Bear. A ton of government officials come to Bear to look over their records and it is not a pretty sight. Bear was deep in toxic assets. The Federal Reserve was prohibited from lending any money to Bear so they used JP Morgan to bail out Bear Stearns. Unfortunately the company could not be saved and Bear Stearns was gone after being sold to JP Morgan at $2 per share.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The government bailout of General Motors (GM) and Chrysler between 2008 and 2009 coasted taxpayers approximately $23 billion. President Barack Obama emphatically defends his decision to subsidize the automakers, arguing it was necessary to prevent massive job losses. Even if one accepts this premise, the government should and could have executed the bailout more efficiently, with no cost to taxpayers, had the Administration required the United Auto Workers (UAW) to accept standard bankruptcy concessions. Instead, the Obama Administration gave special treatment to the UAW above and beyond what other creditors and unions received:…

    • 1094 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eco 316 Week 1 Essay

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages

    What are the implications of a U.S. policy to “bail out” firms and heavily subsidize the economy? How could such a policy create inflation and higher interest rates? If you have cash available should you wait until interest rates rise?…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Using taxpayer’s money, the bailouts of hundreds of banks and other companies took place in order to save the US economy. In order to prevent the occurrence of these events, in 2010 Congress passed the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. This act, intended to reduce the risks in the United States financial system, will be further discussed in this paper, as well as what caused the collapse of the economy, how the bailout was implemented, how it affects the accounting profession, and the pros and cons.…

    • 1644 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bank Bailout 2008

    • 2686 Words
    • 11 Pages

    “Let’s hope we are all wealthy and retired by this house of cards falters” (Bloomberg, 2007). The credit crisis is known as the “House of Cards”, for years the banking industry has transformed many American lives, which has resulted in a troublesome economy. Many factors led to the credit crisis, such as the rise and fall of the housing market, and inaccurate credit ratings helped to create the sub-prime mortgage crisis (Issues & Controversies, 2010). Low interest rates developed easy credit, in which people could get a mortgage and credit cards based on inaccurate credit ratings with the creation of sub-prime mortgages. People have the ability to own a home, with no down payment or fixed income. In August of 2007, the United States began a loss of confidence in securitized mortgages, which resulted in the Federal Reserve injecting $20 trillion dollars into the financial markets to ease the situation (“Obama Sends Warning to Big Banks, 2010). The most important question to be answered in the decade is “How a loss of $500 billion dollars from the sub-prime mortgage resulted in a $20…

    • 2686 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the fall of 2008, General Motors, Ford and Chrysler-known for decades as the Big Three encountered a very serious automotive industry crisis that they haven’t met before. This unprecedented crisis made these three leading companies in automotive industry step at the edge of bankruptcy. Facing this critical problem, automotive companies can not deal with this severe difficult situation all by themselves then they turn to the United States Federal Government for help not only once but several times. According to a report published by Center for Automotive Research in the United States, the United States Federal Government successfully avoids a lose of 28.6 billion dollars by offering assistance to automotive manufacturers in this crisis. Even though this amount of money can not be comparable with the tremendous amount of money the United States Federal Government loaned to the automotive industries, it does demonstrate that the government has done something really helpful and successful in term of the outcome of this action and the federal government’s functions in some extent. Therefore, as far as I am concerned, the United States Federal Government should have assisted the automotive manufacturers from going bankrupt. Then I will illustrate my reasons to support my opinion in the following statement.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Leverage is borrowing money to amplify the outcome of a deal. The financial crisis includes sub-prime mortgages, collateralized debt obligations, frozen credit markets, and credit default swaps. The way that leverage works in a normal deal is that someone can buy merchandise for 20,000 and sell it to someone else for 11,000 and they gain 1,000 in profit. However, using leverage if the same person with 10,000 goes to borrow 990,000 it will give him 1,000,000. He will then go buy 100 boxes with his 1,000,000 and sell them to someone for 1,100,00, pays back the 990,000 and 10% interest. This will give them a profit of 90,000. Leverage makes every deal better.…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    pineda

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Politics have a role in bailing out and propping up shaky financial firms during the economic crisis.…

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Government Bailout Benefits

    • 2934 Words
    • 12 Pages

    The United States has been debating what to do concerning the foreclosure and banking crisis, with the answer being the consideration of a 700 billion dollar bailout. This bailout would benefit the middle class who have enough money and credit to buy a house, but give little benefit to the rich who may already own several houses, nor the lower classes, who are not typically able to afford a house. The current focus seems to be on helping only those middle-class people who made financially foolish decisions. Our nation 's working poor most likely cannot get access to bank loans, and must resolve on check cashing stores that loan money at over 14 percent interest. These working class and poor most likely do not have enough credit to qualify for a loan, so the bailout to the middle class will give little or no benefit to this specific group. The bailout is for the moderately rich who were careless with the use of their strong credit and ability to borrow cheaply on an almost continuous basis. According to the U.S. Dept of labor, the number of workers in June 2008, among working class, as defined as construction and manufacturing non-farm employment was 21,565 thousand workers; retail trade…

    • 2934 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Three and a half years later, smaller financial institutions have been mostly unsuccessful in their efforts to exit TARP because they are having trouble procuring new capital to repay TARP funds, as the big banks are able to. The Wall Street Journal reported an estimate by Stonecastle partners, LLC, a New York firm that has invested in 800 community banks, that it will take $90 billion in fresh capital to clean up their balance sheets and acquire other institutions.7 In a quarterly report to congress, Christy Romero, Special Inspector General for the Troubled Asset Relief Program, reported this figure as well as a figure of only $23 billion in fresh capital for community banks to repay TARP or SBLF funds:…

    • 2807 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    According to Thomas Billitteri, a journalist with 30 years in business, before the actual bailout happened, a number of huge events caused the monumental bailout to happen. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were seized by the federal government, which promised to inject up to $100 billion into each firm as there were concerns about the cash reserves for each firm. The second issue was the biggest bankruptcy in U.S. history with the investment bank of Lehman Brothers collapsing. Merrill Lynch was another issue by being bought out…

    • 3602 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Dodd-Frank Act

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Its an oftenly stated human cliché to never feel “Too Big for ones own boots.” However cliches only seem to gain there momentum in the wake of a crisis. A company at its prime which could not have dared to be looked at with disdaining eyes had finally crumbled. The Lehman brothers resilience has to credited towards the strive that was taken to open operations on a daily basis in the mast of a world financial criss in 2008, however whether that can be attributed towards a wholehearted desire to keep the company afloat or the sheer power of human greed is a debate left for another occasion.…

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since the economic recession struck the United Sates, whenever the hard working taxpayers of this country see and hear the reports about the billions of dollars of our taxes being used in bailout relief for several of these powerhouse banks, and companies, it often tends to have a negative thought and impact in our minds. With thousands of Americans out of work, and thousands of people struggling to make ends meet, the mere thought of these huge finical corporations receiving a “pardon” on my dime infuriates me. But I then attempt to analyze the reasoning of why our government would even allow these Mongol companies to make the rich, richer, by taking taxpayer funds from the hard working class men and women. In order to find an answer to this analysis, I would first have to identify the normative ethics that deals with the utilitarian and deontological implications as to why should the top executives of the major banks that received bail-out money are allowed to receive large bonuses?…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Expansive auto organizations and banks were enduring and were on the very edge of chapter 11. Bailout cash was sent to several vast organizations, for the most part car organizations and banks. Around $70 billion was given to the bank AIG and almost $50 billion was given to General Motors. The explanation behind these bailouts were so the years worth of ventures from American subjects could be remained careful and the occupations of a couple of million natives could be remained careful. This bailout cash would invigorate and keep these enterprises running for a fitting time span that they could reexamine their…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Karl Marx and Adam Smith

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Adam Smith and Karl Marx have very different theoretical contributions. Adam Smith proposed that the free market, where producers are free to produce as much as they want and charge customers the prices they want, would result in the most efficient economic outcome for consumers and producers alike due to the. The rationale for his proposal was that each individual would try to maximize his own benefit. In doing so, consumers would only pay as much as or less than they would value the benefit that a good could provide, and producers would only sell for as much as or higher than they would have spent on producing a good. In his optimistic economy, there would be no surplus or demand; markets would always be in equilibrium, and the benefits to consumers and producers alike would be maximized. There would be a limited role for the government in such an economic system.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays