Preview

The Forms teach us nothing about the physical world

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
454 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Forms teach us nothing about the physical world
“The Forms teach us nothing about the physical world”

It can be argued that the Forms don’t teach us anything about the physical world because Plato said that the Realm of the Forms is a world which no human has ever been to or can get to; they can only strive to be as close as they can to the Realm of the Forms, therefore humans cannot be taught anything about the real world from a Realm which doesn’t physically exist.
Furthermore, contained within the Realm of the Forms is the perfect version or copy of everything in the world, and everything in the world is just a copy of the perfect version in the Realm of the Forms, hence the Realm cannot teach us about any physical objects in the world if the object in the Realm is different to all the others on Earth. For example, in the Realm of the Forms will be the perfect version of a chair so, according to Plato, all the chairs in the physical world are copies of the perfect version so the perfect chair cannot teach us anything about a physical chair in the world that we know.
The physical world moves in time and space, so it is transitory, whereas the Realm of the Forms is outside time and space, so it is transcendental. This means that everything in the world is changing all the time as the years go by but the Forms never change. Therefore, the Forms may not be relevant to the world that we know today, only to the world of the time in which it was created. Consequently our world may be edging further and further away from the Forms all the time, due to the world in which we live constantly developing and changing.
The Realm of the Forms is beyond the senses so what is in the Realm does not rely on the senses, it is absolute, whereas everything in the physical world is determined and identified by our senses but people could argue that if we can see or touch something then it is physical and part of our world whereas if the Forms is beyond the senses then it is not physical because you cannot physically hear,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Plato developed the theory that behind every concept or object in the visible world there is an unseen reality which he calls its ‘Form’. These Forms exist in the world of the Forms separate from our world of sensory perception. Within the world of the Forms the pattern or the objects and concepts for the material world exist in a state of unchanging perfection. Plato suggested the idea of forms in his book “De Republica”, which is a dialogue between Socrates and Glaucon, and the idea of dualism. Plato suggested that there are two worlds (dualism) we live in one of sensory perception and the true forms live in one of rational knowledge.…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    When Plato and other prominent philosophers such as Plutarch and Heraclitus were observing the world, they came to the conclusion that it was in a state of flux; they came to the conclusion that it was constantly changing. Plato wrote a number of texts including Phaedo and Republic; this worked with his dualistic approach concluding that our realm of appearances – or our world; and all within is changeable and will eventually cease to exist. He says that this world is nothing but a mere copy of forms, and the forms are described as the eternal and perfect idea of what a thing is. The world of the forms, to Plato is the only realm where true knowledge lies, Plato defined this as the realm of reality; this could in fact be trusted unlike our own world. There are a few reasons to Plato as to why The Forms exist, and these reasons are present through his work for example through The Theory of Recollection, and The Imperfection Argument. But several philosophers have critiqued Plato’s notion and they argued Plato’s arguments are actually just reasons for why forms should exist; rather than actual proof of the existence. Furthermore, The Third Man Argument in Plato’s ‘Parmenides’ brings a prominent problem for the theory of The Forms. For example, Russell called it ‘One…

    • 2371 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Nothing in this realm changes. Its contents are accessible only to “the eye of the soul.” If this “eye of the soul” dismisses auditory and visual aids, through which of the senses does it perceive what truly is? How can a seeing, hearing human being blatantly disregard the very senses that characterize his entire conscious existence? Something can be entirely unchanging only if it is hypothetical. This implies that the specific realm of objects in their purest forms is conceptual; it is the perfection of these concepts rather than the actual itselves that is or should be “the highest object of the philosopher 's contemplation,” yet even this is fundamentally unachievable.…

    • 2216 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the beginning of the allegory, the “theory of forms” is also introduced. This theory states that the “existence of a level of reality inhabited by ideal “forms” of all things and concepts”(Plato pg1) indicating that there is a form to any object, Adding as well that all forms will be eternal and unchanging but they tend to inhabit changeable matter in the temporal world. Plato considers the realm of forms to be always eternal and unchanging however; the world we inhabit is a constantly changing, and thus not real because nothing last forever. Similar to the allegory, our perception of this world could also be like the shadows projected by the fire, although they are constantly changing, they all come from a particular object. Therefore,…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hup 102 Short Paper #2

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In this paper I will be discussing the view on the forms, of both Plato and Aristotle. For starts, Plato’s views on the Forms are basically describing the true meaning about material objects in the world. Like for example viewing a desk in a class room, should be looked at as more than just what we see, but thousands of atoms put together to make it look like a desk or something like that. His idea of an object was defined by what we might think something is it’s basically a form of something else. He said that we could be sitting on a chair but its quality is of an object which form is that of a chair. This idea of the form by Plato exists in a heavenly realm that could be understood by the mind. Plato’s views on the forms were aspects of everyday life, anything from a table to a bench As well as ideas and emotions. The essence of Plato's theory of Ideas Forms lay in the conscious recognition of the fact that there is a class of entities, in which the best name is probably universal, that are entirely different from sensible things, which is interesting. Plato's theory of Forms assumed that Forms are universal and exist as substances. On the other hand, Aristotle firmly disagrees with the idea of Forms being universal.…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato thought that there were two worlds: the everyday changing world in which we exist, the world of becoming, and the unchanging world of eternal truths, the world of being. In this world of being Plato illustrates that the eidos, or forms, define what a substance truly is and that each and every thing has a Form on which it falls under. For example, we know the Form of a human so any human we come into contact with, regardless of size, shape, or color; we know to put them in the category of human because they fit the eternal Form. Depicted in his allegory of the cave, Plato comes to the belief that our everyday world is thought not to be an illusion but more like a “set…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Forms give us knowledge and allow us to have some understanding of the truth. Although, we know that we do not know them fully as we can form our own opinions on things, e.g. what is beautiful and what is not. Forms are in the Realm of the Forms, we can recognise them as this is where our soul originates from, however because they come from there and not from…

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Comparing Socrates To Meno

    • 1777 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The theory of the forms is this idea that everything we see in the world is an aspect of some perfect form. These perfect forms do not exist in the world, but our immortal souls that have all knowledge know these perfect forms, and we perceive everything in the world as aspects of these forms. When we see beautiful objects we are seeing things that exhibit aspects of the form of beauty, and when we see ugly things we see things exhibiting aspects of the form of the ugly and so on. Again these perfect forms do not exist in reality, but within our immortal souls we have them, and therefore when we see these beautiful things or ugly things we recollect this form. In the argument in the republic we create three categories. There is ignorance which is what is not, knowledge comprises what is, and belief comprises the middle ground in both what is and what is not. In this argument knowledge would be the forms, the forms are perfect they are what actually is unchanging and infallible. Ignorance is simply falsehoods things that don’t exist. Beliefs is the tricky part in this argument. Everything we can observe would be in the belief category. While we can see things that exhibit aspects of the forms they aren’t totally the form. For example the same woman one man sees as beautiful could be seen as ugly by another. Therefore this woman would exhibiting two forms, and not totally either one she…

    • 1777 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In this analogy, Plato implies that only by investigating, using our priori can philosophers gain the knowledge of the world of the forms.…

    • 260 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Anolgy of the cave

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Yet others might disagree with this saying that most people still live in the shadow copy of reality and therefore we can have no clear idea of what reality really is. Even though Plato is theoretically mentioning and discussing the concept of reality in his analogy we can’t prove that the spiritual world is real and if the world of forms is not visible by humans then Plato has no evidence to back his teachings so it is arguably not valid and therefore as Plato has no proper understanding about what reality is and what it isn’t there is no way his analogy can tell us anything about the concept of it.…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    One thing I can say that is of complex to me somewhat is the idea of the philosophical term form, in which something is just that and not subjected to change. I get the meaning of it by how it is something that is the exact reality of something, but what I don’t get is the understanding. I have questions like is that something we are to look forward to when we die; the exact form of something? Would we be actually satisfied with this result? I can’t help but wonder what how these forms are going to affect us when we are in another world where our true form is shown.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Furthermore, Plato would argue that everything we see and touch is only partially real; they are replicas of the true actuality. On the other hand, justice, courage, moderation, wisdom, and beauty are true realities for Plato. He calls these the Forms. They are not visible to the senses, but by overcoming bodily desires, the mind can straightforwardly perceive these real truths. Plato nearly teaches…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The vast formless things are the ideas that we have. Ideas like the things that…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Allegory Of The Cave

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages

    They think the shadows are the true forms because that is the only truth they have seen. Then, one of the prisoners escapes, and discovers that the shadow is not the true form. That the shadows coming from the statues are only copies of the “more real” form and lastly, without the sun, there are no objects. With these discoveries, Plato conveys his idea of the different levels of knowledge.…

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    statement of intent

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages

    I intend to make a series of paintings and drawings to show the process of the development of human’s journey from the visible realm to the intelligible realm. I will create this through ideas such Plato’s similes; the sun, the divided line and the cave analysed in the republic. For instant Plato defines the realm of appearance as our everyday experiences, analogous to the physical or external world in many philosophies. However the intelligible realm is a more exclusive world, only accessible via contemplative powers of reason. The objects in this world are those of knowledge and are what Plato labels ‘the forms’. As we discover, he thinks that only these intelligible object that possess genuine…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics